诺基亚 Lumia 630 智能手机简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 350 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 355 cd/m²
Contrast: 486:1 (Black: 0.73 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.97
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Nokia Lumia 620 | |
| Acer Liquid Z4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| HP Slate 6 6000en VoiceTab | |
| Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Motorola Moto E 1. Gen 2014 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Motorola Moto E 1. Gen 2014 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| HP Slate 6 6000en VoiceTab | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Motorola Moto E 1. Gen 2014 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| HP Slate 6 6000en VoiceTab | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
| WebXPRT 2013 | |
| Overall (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Nokia Lumia 620 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
| Photo Effects (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Nokia Lumia 620 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
| Face Detection (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Nokia Lumia 620 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
| Stocks Dashboard (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Nokia Lumia 620 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
| Offline Notes (sort by value) | |
| Nokia Lumia 630 | |
| Nokia Lumia 620 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 GT-S7582 | |
| Kazam Thunder Q4.5 | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle |  0.4 / 1.1 / 1.4 Watt |
| Load |
1.8 / 3.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
当然，诺基亚的Lumia 630有相对Lumia 620几年前上市时更低的建议零售价。因为现在和那时不同，入门级手机的价格已经越来越低了。所以，诺基亚在很多功能上做了缩减。前置摄像头，LED闪光灯，相机键，触控按钮，高亮度的屏幕，micro-USB线，NFC的支持，和杜比音频技术都成为了价格压力下的牺牲品。
这些缩水成为了这款手机整体表现的限制，比前作而言更低的价格，仅仅略高的性能（鉴于两者性能均是受到内存大小的限制），和一些附属功能的缩水，像是屏幕，相机，配件，和散热性能。最新的Windows Phone 8.1也很难成为一个卖点，因为旧版的手机也可也升级到更新的系统。
那么诺基亚Lumia 630的优势究竟在哪里呢？ 四核的整合芯片确实提供了更多应对未来需求的能力，且相对Lumia 620的芯片组有更低的能耗。搭配更大的电池，超长的续航时间成为了现实。另外，更大的屏幕也很有吸引力，不过屏幕上的按键栏占据了一些空间，且屏幕分辨率并未上升。
需要一款实惠的Windows Phone系统手机的用户，目前Lumia 620似乎仍是更好的选择，鉴于它现在和Lumia 630价格几乎相同。稍贵一点的Lumia 625提供了对LTE的支持；或者处于中端定位的三星 ATIV SWindows手机也是不错的选择，它提供了更大的内存，使得绝大部分软件可以流畅的运行。
Lumia 630并不是一个低质的廉价品。不过，如果把同生产商的其他产品放入参考范围的话，这款手机我们恐怕只能够推荐给那些首先需要更长的电池续航时间的用户了。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里
