微软 Lumia 950 XL 智能手机简短评测
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Lumia Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 430
Memory
3 GB
Display
5.70 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, 电容式触控屏幕, AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 25.2 GB free
Weight
165 g, Power Supply: 70 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 296.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.19 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 297 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.79% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | -13% | 13% | 29% | 23% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 297 | 343 15% | 566 91% | 583 96% | 538 81% | 363 22% | 352 19% |
| Brightness | 297 | 338 14% | 536 80% | 560 89% | 528 78% | 365 23% | 350 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 90 -3% | 91 -2% | 92 -1% | 90 -3% | 87 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.66 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.67 | 2.2 18% | 6.17 -131% | 3.55 -33% | 2.63 1% | 2.34 12% | 4.95 -85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.98 | ||||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.81 | 2.37 16% | 6.26 -123% | 3.88 -38% | 3.24 -15% | 1.03 63% | 6.54 -133% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.41 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6379 102% | 6425 101% | 8171 80% | 7280 89% | 6906 94% | 6429 101% | 6943 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.31 | 87.77 32% | 65.48 -1% | 59.05 -11% | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.79 | 98.63 -1% | 92.8 -7% | ||||
| Contrast | 1204 | 1267 | 815 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.42 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.52 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.72 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.68 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | BaseMark OS II | Linpack Android / IOS | Basemark X 1.1 | JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.14 Watt |
| Idle |  2.85 / 2.95 / 3.26 Watt |
| Load |
8.92 / 9.39 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 49% | 43% | 43% | 41% | 53% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.85 | 0.5 82% | 0.83 71% | 0.7 75% | 0.7 75% | 0.6 79% |
| Idle Average * | 2.95 | 1.9 36% | 1.09 63% | 2.2 25% | 1.7 42% | 1.2 59% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.26 | 2.2 33% | 1.17 64% | 2.3 29% | 1.8 45% | 1.6 51% |
| Load Average * | 8.92 | 3.2 64% | 7.49 16% | 3.9 56% | 5.6 37% | 4.1 54% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.39 | 6.4 32% | 9.51 -1% | 6.8 28% | 8.7 7% | 7.4 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | -0% | 20% | 28% | 30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1078 | 1459 35% | 1141 6% | 1447 34% | 1124 4% | 1655 54% |
| H.264 | 611 | 383 -37% | 533 -13% | 569 -7% | 714 17% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 369 | 501 36% | 400 8% | 375 2% | 575 56% | 513 39% |
| Load | 179 | 223 25% | 219 22% | 280 56% | 282 58% | 197 10% |
Pros
+ 高速处理器
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ USB 3.1
+ 无线范围远
+ Continuum
+ Windows Hello
+ 优秀的GPS性能
+ 出色的相机
+ 优秀的可连接性
+ 出色的屏幕，色彩准确，响应迅速...
Cons
- ... 使用了闪烁亮度控制
- 在通话音质上略显不足
- 显得有些过于简单
- 续航时间有提升空间
- 商店中应用较少
- Windows 10移动版仍存在一些小问题
为微软新旗舰智能手机付出的等待是值得的。Lumia 950 XL是一款出色的高端产品，它在所有的技术方面都无可挑剔。出了高速的处理器，你还可以得到充足的存储空间，它还支持扩展。它的相机也十分优秀，可以拍摄高质量的照片以及影片。微软为它搭配了全新的USB C型插口，它甚至支持USB 3.1标准，这仍然十分少见。
这个接口是Continuum的关键所在，它可以帮助用户享受一些新功能和可能性。微软也将会赠送现在购买的用户一年的Office 365和Display Dock订阅。Windows Hello是一个简单可靠的验证方式，它得到了很好地集成在了系统之中。
Lumia 950 XL是一款有优秀技术参数和出色功能的智能手机，这让它可以通过Continuum技术作为个人电脑替代。
这台来自软件巨头的智能手机的最大问题反而是系统软件。Windows 10移动版的理念和用户界面十分优秀，不过这个操作系统似乎还没有完全准备好。它的商店缺少很多应用，这是移动版Windows一直以来的问题。它的通话音质也略逊于其它的高端设备。
如果你在寻找一台出色的Windows 10智能手机的话，Lumia 950 XL肯定是最好的选择之一，它并没有什么有威胁的竞争者。第一款Windows平台的竞争设备会是Acer Liquid Jade Primo，它将于二月上市。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
- 04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
