Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar微软 Lumia 950 智能手机简短评测
Microsoft Lumia 950 (Lumia Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 418
Memory
3 GB
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, AMOLED, 564 PPI, WQHD, ClearBlack, TrueColor (24 bit/16 M), 改进的日光下可读性, 易于清洁, 高亮度模式, Lumia色彩预设, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 24.65 GB free
Weight
150 g, Power Supply: 70 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 312 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 298 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 292 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.06
| Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Nokia Lumia 930 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -136% | 4% | -89% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 292 | 275 -6% | 552 89% | 669 129% | 335 15% |
| Brightness | 298 | 278 -7% | 549 84% | 624 109% | 345 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 87 -5% | 85 -8% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.68 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.48 | 10.99 -343% | 3.4 -37% | 7.96 -221% | 2.51 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.97 | 8.29 -321% | 4.16 -111% | 10.95 -456% | 2.59 -31% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.16 102% | 2.21 100% | 2.61 84% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6640 98% | 6731 97% | 7288 89% | 7402 88% | 6424 101% |
| Contrast | 1415 | 984 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.18 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.93 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark X 1.1 | Linpack Android / IOS
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| HTC One M9 | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.29 Watt |
| Idle |  1.97 / 2.42 / 2.96 Watt |
| Load |
5.94 / 7.79 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | Nokia Lumia 930 | Sony Xperia Z5 | Samsung Galaxy S6 | Apple iPhone 6S | HTC One M9 | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | Google Nexus 6P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 36% | 25% | 49% | 48% | 13% | 22% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.97 | 1.1 44% | 0.7 64% | 0.4 80% | 0.5 75% | 1.1 44% | 1.1 44% | 0.83 58% |
| Idle Average * | 2.42 | 1.4 42% | 1.7 30% | 0.6 75% | 1.6 34% | 2 17% | 2.2 9% | 1.09 55% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.96 | 1.8 39% | 1.8 39% | 1.2 59% | 1.9 36% | 2.4 19% | 2.4 19% | 1.17 60% |
| Load Average * | 5.94 | 3.8 36% | 5.6 6% | 5 16% | 2.5 58% | 7.2 -21% | 4.2 29% | 7.49 -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.79 | 6.5 17% | 8.7 -12% | 6.8 13% | 4.8 38% | 7.5 4% | 7.2 8% | 9.51 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Nokia Lumia 930 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | HTC One M9 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 26% | 24% | 42% | -2% | 68% | 23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1500 | 1387 -8% | 1669 11% | 1510 1% | 1300 -13% | 805 -46% | 1447 -4% | |
| H.264 | 570 | 600 5% | 699 23% | 421 -26% | 533 -6% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 250 | 438 75% | 492 97% | 475 90% | 348 39% | 420 68% | 375 50% | |
| Load | 187 | 175 -6% | 213 14% | 137 -27% | 278 49% | 236 26% | 280 50% | |
| WiFi | 1002 | 575 | 573 |
Pros
+ 高性能处理器
+ 首款在负载下性能不会下降的Snapdragon 808处理器机型
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 可更换电池
+ USB 3.1
+ 无线信号接收距离远
+ 支持Continuum
+ 支持Windows Hello
+ 优秀的定位性能
+ 不错的相机模组
+ 明亮，高对比度的屏幕，响应速度快同时色彩还原优秀
+ 不错的通话质量
Cons
- 作为旗舰机型设计平淡
- 电池续航时间不理想
- 商店中应用数量较少
微软的Lumia 950是一款不错的智能手机，搭载艺术品级的硬件，没有严重缺点。它的处理器足以应对各种应用，而且是我们测试过的第一台搭载高通Snapdragon 808而没有在负载下遇到降频问题的智能手机。它的充裕存储空间仍然可以通过microSD卡方便地扩展。它的相机模组也十分优秀，可以拍摄效果不错的照片，特别是在暗光下的表现让人惊喜。支持USB 3.1的C型接口是目前最前沿的接口之一。竞争对手在这方面仍然普遍落后。名为“Continuum”的优秀功能让它在搭配可选的屏幕底座时变得非常实用，特别是对商务用户而言。微软用Windows Hello功能替代了它缺少的指纹识别器。不过，视网膜识别有时可能更加可靠。
微软Lumia 950是一台优秀的Windows 10智能手机，搭配了不错的组件并提供了有趣的功能。
遗憾的是，这个最新的操作系统还不能流畅地运行。但是，微软正在通过软件更新不断改进。Windows 10 Mobile整体上十分易于上手使用，清晰简洁。它最大的问题大概是应用商店有限的软件。可以接受这些问题而不会对它的售价望而却步的用户，应该会十分享受这台没有旗舰架子的Windows系统智能手机。相比之下，微软 Lumia 950XL应该是目前更好的选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Microsoft Lumia 950
- 03/03/2016 v5 (old)
Michael Moser
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
