Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar金阶 ME Pro 智能手机简短评测
Gigaset ME Pro (ME Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 430
Memory
3 GB
, LPDDR4
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 22.02 GB free
Weight
202 g, Power Supply: 87 g
Price
549 EUR
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 424 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 409.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.15 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 2019:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.76
| Gigaset ME Pro 1920x1080 px 5.5'' (IPS) | OnePlus 2 1920x1080 px 5.5'' (IPS) | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3840x2160 px 5.5'' (IPS) | LG G4 2560x1440 px 5.5'' (IPS) | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 2560x1440 px 5.5'' (AMOLED) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 2560x1440 px 5.7'' (AMOLED) | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 1920x1080 px 5.5'' (IPS) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 3% | -34% | -14% | 48% | 19% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 424 | 451 6% | 560 32% | 566 33% | 554 31% | 297 -30% | 583 38% |
| Brightness | 409 | 446 9% | 541 32% | 536 31% | 552 35% | 297 -27% | 560 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 85 -7% | 90 -1% | 96 5% | 93 2% | 91 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.3 -43% | 0.45 -114% | 0.47 -124% | 0.46 -119% | ||
| Contrast | 2019 | 1503 -26% | 1244 -38% | 1204 -40% | 1267 -37% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.32 | 3.84 39% | 9.19 -45% | 6.17 2% | 1.59 75% | 2.67 58% | 3.55 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.98 | 15.01 -67% | 2.56 71% | 3.98 56% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.35 | 3.97 37% | 10.58 -67% | 6.26 1% | 2.01 68% | 2.81 56% | 3.88 39% |
| Gamma | 2.76 80% | 2.46 89% | 2.7 81% | 2.48 89% | 2.01 109% | 2.08 106% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7664 85% | 7283 89% | 9760 67% | 8171 80% | 6321 103% | 6379 102% | 7280 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.07 | 73.19 | 65.48 | 82.12 | 66.31 | 59.05 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.14 | 98.63 | 99.98 | 99.79 | 92.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
PCMark for Android | AnTuTu v6 | BaseMark OS II | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | 3DMark
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset ME Pro | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| LG G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 25 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.16 / 0.27 Watt |
| Idle |  0.94 / 1.61 / 1.75 Watt |
| Load |
6.45 / 12.05 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigaset ME Pro Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | -12% | 1% | 26% | -78% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.94 | 0.6 36% | 0.83 12% | 1.1 -17% | 0.63 33% | 2.85 -203% | 0.5 47% |
| Idle Average * | 1.61 | 1.7 -6% | 2.36 -47% | 1.5 7% | 1.1 32% | 2.95 -83% | 1.9 -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.75 | 1.8 -3% | 2.42 -38% | 1.9 -9% | 1.56 11% | 3.26 -86% | 2.2 -26% |
| Load Average * | 6.45 | 5.7 12% | 7.27 -13% | 6.6 -2% | 5.95 8% | 8.92 -38% | 3.2 50% |
| Load Maximum * | 12.05 | 6 50% | 9.18 24% | 8.8 27% | 6.7 44% | 9.39 22% | 6.4 47% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigaset ME Pro Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -22% | -24% | 42% | -21% | 3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1487 | 1393 -6% | 1277 -14% | 1654 11% | 1663 12% | 1078 -28% | 1655 11% |
| H.264 | 671 | 580 -14% | 411 -39% | 501 -25% | 914 36% | 611 -9% | 714 6% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 430 | 356 -17% | 372 -13% | 326 -24% | 732 70% | 369 -14% | 513 19% |
| Load | 265 | 229 -14% | 210 -21% | 114 -57% | 392 48% | 179 -32% | 197 -26% |
Pros
+ 非常坚固的机身
+ 第二SIM卡或microSD卡槽
+ USB C型接口
+ 提供多种传感器
+ 应用授权管理器
+ 支持无线AC标准MIMO技术
+ 支持Miracast
+ 不错的拍照品质
+ 高品质入耳式耳机
+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 出色的电池续航时间
Cons
- 后盖较滑
- 卡槽盖不稳固
- 相对较重
- 主相机摄像效果较弱
- 一般的无线连接速度
- 通话效果不理想
- 运行不够流畅
- 测试机的触控屏幕有缺陷
- 不支持USB-OTG
- 不支持NFC
- 不可更换电池
你可以立刻察觉到金阶ME Pro是以成功产品为目标的强力挑战者：玻璃和金属的材质带来了坚固（除了卡槽盖以外）的高品质机身。它搭载了“火热”的Snapdragon 810处理器，不过金阶很好的控制了发热量。它搭配了丰富的传感器，包括紫外线传感器，心率计和指纹识别器。你还可以通过红外传输来控制你的家庭影院。遗憾的是它的最新USB-C接口不支持OTG，同时生产商没有为它搭配NFC模组。如果你需要超过32GB的存储空间的话，可能会需要使用microSD卡，那么你将无法使用它的第二SIM卡功能了。
金阶的用户界面设计浑然一体，提供了应用授权管理器，但是它还有一些小问题。尽管处理器很强大，它偶尔还会卡顿——这应可以通过软件更新解决。它的触控屏幕在手机充电时的问题应该就比较难修复了。根据生产商的答复，这应该是我们测试机的个别问题，用户不需为此担心。
尽管它的两个相机都能拍摄不错的照片，但视频拍摄的效果只能算一般，特别是录制的音频让我们很难满意。生产商也需要进一步改进通话质量：不寻常的听筒设计所带来的使用体验让我们不敢恭维，麦克风收录声音的效果也不是很好。作为旗舰机型它搭配了可视角度宽广的IPS屏幕，由于黑值较低，它也提供了很高的对比度。超长的电池续航时间让它十分全面实用。
金阶的高端智能手机ME Pro凭借高品质屏幕，超长续航和优雅设计给我们带来了惊喜。感兴趣的消费者需要接受它的一些小问题如缺少对NFC的支持和一般的通话音质。
售价约550欧元（约4053人民币）的金阶ME Pro相比竞争对手可以说是十分实惠。如果你不需要microSD卡槽，红外传输和玻璃后盖的话，OnePlus 2也是不错的选择，至少从技术的层面上——而你可以节省接近200欧元（约1474人民币）的预
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Gigaset ME Pro
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
