MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS笔记本电脑评测:看起来低调,声音不低调
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2019 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2019 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 316 cd/m²
Contrast: 1505:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -5% | -6% | -8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.5 | 64.6 -7% | 65.3 -6% | 66.2 -5% | 64 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 92.6 -7% | 95.5 -4% | 92.3 -7% | 90.3 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 66 -7% | 66.5 -6% | 67.2 -5% | 65.4 -8% |
Response Times | 23% | -13% | -11% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 5.2 ? 63% | 15.2 ? -9% | 15.2 ? -9% | 9.6 ? 31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 11.2 ? -17% | 11.2 ? -17% | 10.8 ? -13% | 12 ? -25% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | ||||
Screen | -7% | -8% | -34% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 316 | 288 -9% | 266 -16% | 324.8 3% | 313 -1% |
Brightness | 311 | 265 -15% | 248 -20% | 316 2% | 295 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 89 -3% | 84 -9% | 89 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.22 -5% | 0.31 -48% | 0.26 -24% | 0.3 -43% |
Contrast | 1505 | 1309 -13% | 858 -43% | 1249 -17% | 1043 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.03 | 3.22 -6% | 2.78 8% | 4.96 -64% | 3.33 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.32 | 6.26 14% | 5.96 19% | 8.95 -22% | 6.25 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.5 -36% | 0.91 17% | 3.23 -194% | 1.77 -61% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 3.43 12% | 3.58 8% | 5 -28% | 3.1 21% |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 7439 87% | 7290 89% | 7186 90% | 7742 84% | 6930 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 60 -8% | 62 -5% | 59.8 -8% | 59 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 93 -7% | 96 -4% | 91.8 -8% | 90 -10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-4% | -9% /
-8% | -17% /
-26% | -6% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 7.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -4% | -4% | 2% | -12% | |
Write 4K | 131.3 | 108.8 -17% | 115.5 -12% | 137.4 5% | 108.7 -17% |
Read 4K | 45.84 | 40.31 -12% | 58 27% | 41.37 -10% | 41.4 -10% |
Write Seq | 2370 | 2488 5% | 1555 -34% | 2500 5% | 1083 -54% |
Read Seq | 1509 | 1916 27% | 2590 72% | 1576 4% | 917 -39% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 481.5 | 382.4 -21% | 369.3 -23% | 446.7 -7% | 468.5 -3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 560 | 421.8 -25% | 441.7 -21% | 522 -7% | 530 -5% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2392 | 2542 6% | 1547 -35% | 2796 17% | 3057 28% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3232 | 3320 3% | 2969 -8% | 3415 6% | 3422 6% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 21934 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45202 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17312 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7272 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 182 | 174 | 153 | 83.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 131 | 70.5 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 153 | 138 | 128 | 120 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 113 | 97.4 | 82.3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 102 | 91 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 121 | 113 | ||
Apex Legends (2019) | 140 | 139 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 76.3 | 58.9 | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 196 | 190 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 88.2 | 80.7 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 95 | 88.8 | ||
Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 121 | 119 | ||
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 91.6 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 141 | 137 | ||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 116 | 90.6 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32 / 34 / 39 dB(A) |
Load |
| 53 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 0% | 8% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 31 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 31 3% | 30.5 5% | 31 3% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 34 -0% | 31.5 7% | 34 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 39 | 39 -0% | 39 -0% | 31.5 19% | 37 5% |
Load Average * | 53 | 45 15% | 46 13% | 40.6 23% | 47 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 49 -2% | 53 -10% | 49.5 -3% | 50 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 51 4% | 55 -4% | 53.4 -1% | 54 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 0% | -10% | -24% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 49 8% | 58 -9% | 48.8 8% | 60 -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 59 -7% | 64 -16% | 55 -0% | 66 -20% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 28 -0% | 30 -7% | 41 -46% | 30 -7% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 29 -0% | 31 -7% | 45.6 -57% | 32 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 1.4 / 1.8 Watt |
Idle | 13 / 16 / 27 Watt |
Load |
109 / 236 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -17% | -109% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 7 46% | 21 -62% | 46 -254% | 11 15% |
Idle Average * | 16 | 12 25% | 23 -44% | 59 -269% | 15 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 22 19% | 32 -19% | 65.5 -143% | 21 22% |
Load Average * | 109 | 86 21% | 97 11% | 99.8 8% | 94 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 155 | 144 7% | 148 5% | 154.1 1% | 143 8% |
Load Maximum * | 236 | 177 25% | 213 10% | 222.7 6% | 173 27% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | 34% | -48% | -14% | 1% | |
Reader / Idle | 505 | 666 32% | 545 8% | 221 -56% | 439 -13% | 574 ? 14% |
WiFi v1.3 | 364 | 478 31% | 421 16% | 129 -65% | 340 -7% | 378 ? 4% |
Load | 102 | 96 -6% | 181 77% | 80 -22% | 79 -23% | 85.8 ? -16% |
H.264 | 408 | 413 ? |
Pros
Cons
与GS65相比,GS66有着明显的进步。
MSI处理了最重要的不满,并为紧凑机身提供了更多的稳定性和维护选项。它也应该因最新的连接设备(Thunderbolt 3),快速且对比度高的300-Hz面板以及巨大的电池而受到称赞,即使电池潜能还未完全被发掘。
我们发现处理器的选择有些难以理解。虽然从市场营销角度和收益方面来说,酷睿i9-10980HK当然是非常有吸引力的,但是如果客户要面对的弊端(高温和噪音增加)要比优势(更高的性能潜能)更多 并且笔记本通常是为移动而设计的,我们一开始就不会建议此选项。
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
- 05/17/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser