迈腾 MTN-FP750 迷你 PC 评测:AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 因拙劣的配置而迟滞不前
Maxtang 是一家中国系统制造商,主要销售嵌入式系统形式的特殊工业解决方案以及专为办公用途设计的微型 PC。在本次评测中,我们将重点介绍售价 440 美元的 Maxtang MTN-FP750。该系统由 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS和 16 GB DDR5 内存以及 512 GB SSD。另外,还配备了 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H处理器。除此之外,该迷你电脑还可以订购额外的内存和更大的固态硬盘。Maxtang 还提供了一个裸机选项,但只配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS。
在本次评测中,Maxtang MTN-FP750 与当前的迷你 PC 进行了对比。下表汇总了本次评测中发现的对比设备的更详细列表。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 601 g | 52 mm | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 66 mm | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 753 g | 58 mm | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 572 g | 45.6 mm | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 555 g | 49.2 mm | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 i7-12650H, UHD Graphics 64EUs | 616 g | 55 mm | |
78.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | NiPoGi AD08 i7-12650H, UHD Graphics 64EUs | 878 g | 188.5 mm |
迈腾 MTN-FP750 详细信息
外壳 - 钢琴黑金属和塑料
Maxtang MTN-FP750 采用坚固的金属外壳,顶部和底部采用黑色亮面塑料。很快,指纹就会变得清晰可见,划痕迟早也是不可避免的。从稳定性来看,该机似乎并没有受到塑料盖的影响。微型电脑的顶部印有 Maxtang 品牌标志。
该设备的尺寸约为 13 x 13 厘米,占用的桌面空间略大于同类产品,而 Maxtang MTN-FP750 的重量仅为 600 克,相对较轻。PSU 的重量仅为 290 克。Maxtang MTN-FP750 还可以连接到显示器上,包装盒中还附带了一个 VESA 支架。
特点
说到端口,Maxtang MTN-FP750 提供了基本的端口。所有这些端口都位于正面和背面。共有五个 USB 端口,其中一个(USB Type C)还可用作显示器接口。加上后部的两个 HDMI 输出,这意味着总共可以同时操作三个显示器。此外,设备后部还配有 2.5G LAN 端口。
交流
Maxtang MTN-FP750 配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6 AX200 无线模块,可处理 2.4 和 5 GHz 频率。在测试中,我们的评测样品并没有给我们留下深刻印象。在测试中,我们使用了华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000。您也可以通过以太网端口将 Maxtang mini PC 连接到网络。传输速度可达 2.5 Gbit/s。
配件
Maxtang MTN-FP750 随附了设备启动和运行所需的所有重要组件。除机器本身外,包装盒内还包括一个 90 瓦的 PSU(19 V;4.74 A)以及一个用于 VESA 安装的安装板。同样,HDMI 电缆和快速安装指南也是包装的一部分。
维护
Maxtang mini PC 可以比较容易地打开。底座由四颗螺钉固定,螺钉被胶粘的橡胶脚垫遮住。在底板下面,很容易就能找到内存或 M.2 固态硬盘。在我们的案例中,还有空间安装额外的内存模块和第二个大容量存储设备(2.5 英寸格式)。要接触风扇,必须进一步拆卸设备,因此无法进行快速清洁。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS,8 核 16 线程
我们的 Maxtang MTN-FP750 评测设备配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS.在 AMD Radeon 680MSoC 还配备了强大的 iGPU。不过,在内存方面,制造商选择给迷你 PC 配备一个 16 GB DDR5-5600 模块,尽管实际上只能使用 DDR5-4800。
测试条件
我们使用 "最高性能 "能耗配置文件进行了所有性能测试。在 BIOS 中没有更改 SoC 的性能,设备保留了出厂设置。
处理器
餈 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS是伦勃朗系列中一款相对现代的 8 核处理器。不过,AMD 的 Zen3 SoC 已经不能再被视为新生力量之一。尽管如此,该处理器仍可并行处理 16 个线程,具有良好的多线程性能。在性能对比中,我们的 Maxtang MTN-FP750 只能排在倒数第二位。原因是 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 的功耗限制为 35 瓦。
其他处理器基准测试见 这里.
出厂设置下的 Cinebench 结果(PL1 和 PL2 = 35 瓦)
更高功率目标(PL1 = 54 瓦,PL2 = 65 瓦)下的 Cinebench 结果
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom A5 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom A5 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 与 Cinebench R15 多回路对比
Cinebench R15 多环测试向我们展示了散热系统在负载情况下的工作性能。由于最大 TDP 较低,仅为 35 瓦,因此冷却装置并未达到极限,这也是该设备能够实现持续稳定的 CPU 性能的原因。在比较中,我们的评测样品甚至能排在第二位,仅次于 Geekom AS 6.
系统性能
在系统性能综合测试中,我们的评测设备再次落后。在测试期间的日常任务中,从主观角度来看,只要系统不同时处理过多的任务,傲腾 MTN-FP750 就能提供良好的系统性能。内存似乎是瓶颈所在,因为一旦减去显存,16 GB 内存中只有 12 GB 可用。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Geekom A5 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在使用 Edge 浏览器打开多个标签页时,我们已经记录到延迟略有增加。不过,随着测试的继续,延迟并没有增加。在播放 4K 测试视频时,iGPU 的压力约为其容量的 24%。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
铭瑄为我们的 MTN-FP750 评测样品配备了 Foresee 512 GB 固态硬盘。这块 PCIe 3.0 固态硬盘最大限度地利用了 M.2 接口的带宽,并没有因为接口速度过慢而被人为拖后腿。尽管如此,我们的评测设备只能获得中游水平。可安装额外的 2.5 英寸存储设备。请参阅我们的 对比表进一步比较和基准测试。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Geekom A5 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
图形输出由 AMD Radeon 680MiGPU 在大多数情况下都能提供良好的性能。 不过,Maxtang MTN-FP750 的情况有些不同,原因在于安装的内存。制造商只为我们的评测设备配备了一个内存模块。在这种配置下 AMD Radeon 680M几乎没有比配备 96 个 EU 的英特尔 Iris Xe Graphics G7 更快。即使是 Geekom A5在我们的评测样品面前也只能望其项背,因为它使用的是较老的 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8。
为了弄清性能不佳的原因,我们从耗材中取出了另一个内存模块,并进行了一些基准测试。结果与 Geekom AS 6因此,Maxtang MTN-FP750 绝不逊色于其竞争对手。
更多 AMD Radeon 680M 的基准测试结果请参见 这里.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
Maxtang MTN-FP750, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735HS | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX, AMD Radeon 680M R9 6900HX | Geekom Mini IT12, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1260P | Geekom A5, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) R7 5800H | Minisforum Venus Series NAB6, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) i7-12650H | NiPoGi AD08, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) i7-12650H | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | -26% | 58% | -31% | 2% | -37% | -34% | 43% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 46.9 | 40.9 -13% | 75.3 61% | 38.7 -17% | 51.7 10% | 36.2 -23% | 34.4 -27% | 75.4 ? 61% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 51.5 | 41.2 -20% | 70.3 37% | 38.5 -25% | 44.2 -14% | 34.5 -33% | 30.3 -41% | 64.2 ? 25% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 33.2 | 9.64 -71% | 45.2 36% | 7.52 -77% | 36.3 9% | 6.44 -81% | 21.1 -36% | 37 ? 11% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.41 | 76.1 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 13.3 ? | ||
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 45.2 | 39.9 -12% | 58.3 29% | 36.5 -19% | 40.3 -11% | 33.4 -26% | 32.5 -28% | 64 ? 42% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 17.9 | 12.3 -31% | 44 146% | 11.2 -37% | 18.2 2% | 9.12 -49% | 8.41 -53% | 28.5 ? 59% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 17.5 | 17.9 2% | 30.1 72% | 16.7 -5% | 21.7 24% | 15.9 -9% | 15.2 -13% | 35.3 ? 102% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 72.1 | 47.2 -35% | 88.8 23% | 43.7 -39% | 68.3 -5% | 44.5 -38% | 43.4 -40% | 72.4 ? 0% |
SPECviewperf 13 | -27% | 51% | -30% | 2% | -37% | -40% | 48% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 48.3 | 40.5 -16% | 76.7 59% | 37.9 -22% | 51.6 7% | 36 -25% | 34.1 -29% | 74.8 ? 55% |
Catia (catia-05) | 73.9 | 59.4 -20% | 105 42% | 56.3 -24% | 62.1 -16% | 49.6 -33% | 43.2 -42% | 91.4 ? 24% |
Creo (creo-02) | 44.9 | 38.8 -14% | 78.4 75% | 36.8 -18% | 50.6 13% | 33 -27% | 33.1 -26% | 73 ? 63% |
Energy (energy-02) | 11.4 | 4.27 -63% | 13.9 22% | 4.29 -62% | 10.6 -7% | 2.82 -75% | 2.62 -77% | 17.7 ? 55% |
Maya (maya-05) | 58.3 | 44.2 -24% | 99 70% | 42.9 -26% | 56.5 -3% | 38.2 -34% | 41.3 -29% | 97.5 ? 67% |
Medical (medical-02) | 32.8 | 14.5 -56% | 44.9 37% | 14 -57% | 31 -5% | 10.9 -67% | 8.63 -74% | 37.6 ? 15% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 17.4 | 17.9 3% | 30.4 75% | 16.8 -3% | 21.5 24% | 15.7 -10% | 15.1 -13% | 35 ? 101% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 72.9 | 55.8 -23% | 95 30% | 54.1 -26% | 72.4 -1% | 53.9 -26% | 51.9 -29% | 76.6 ? 5% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | -35% | 84% | -24% | 2% | -43% | 73% | ||
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 4.72 | 2.57 -46% | 8.59 82% | 3.37 -29% | 4.82 2% | 2.54 -46% | 7.85 ? 66% | |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 6.6 | 3.02 -54% | 16.9 156% | 7.39 12% | 5.33 -19% | 1.9 -71% | 11.3 ? 71% | |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 17.5 | 15.3 -13% | 28.9 65% | 15.1 -14% | 19.1 9% | 12.7 -27% | 30.7 ? 75% | |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 13.1 | 8.2 -37% | 20.4 56% | 8.23 -37% | 13.1 0% | 7.63 -42% | 18.6 ? 42% | |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 9.26 | 9.67 4% | 17.5 89% | 9.65 4% | 11.3 22% | 8.65 -7% | 22.5 ? 143% | |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 33 | 6.69 -80% | 58.5 77% | 6.23 -81% | 38 15% | 6.61 -80% | 37.2 ? 13% | |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 29.5 | 24 -19% | 47.4 61% | 23.7 -20% | 25.8 -13% | 21.2 -28% | 58.9 ? 100% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-29% | 64% /
64% | -28% /
-28% | 2% /
2% | -39% /
-39% | -37% /
-37% | 55% /
54% |
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768 | 25274 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 24874 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6723 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 127954 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21960 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4002 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2090 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1591 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
我们的评测规格 Maxtang MTN-FP750 在游戏方面的适用性有限。性能相对较强的 AMD Radeon 680M 并不能充分发挥其威力。因此,我们建议安装两个内存模块以获得最佳性能。有关游戏性能的粗略指南可参见 Geekom AS 6.
如需进一步比较和基准测试,请查看我们的 GPU 游戏列表.
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
NiPoGi AD08 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom A5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 | |
NiPoGi AD08 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 95.5 | 85.7 | 28.2 | 12.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73 | 46.7 | 23.7 | 14.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115.8 | 87.4 | 60.5 | 53.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39.2 | 20.5 | 14.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.8 | 39.8 | 33.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 46 | 25 | 22 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 78.4 | 31.4 | 26.7 | 23.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 53.3 | 21.8 | 19.8 | 16.4 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 40 | 23 | 21 | 20 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 43.1 | 17.6 | 13.8 | 11.7 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 58.2 | 24.8 | 15.7 | 12.5 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 96.9 | 49.8 | 39.1 | 27.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 97 | 49.8 | 36.4 | 16.7 |
God of War (2022) | 19.5 | 15.9 | 11.7 | |
GRID Legends (2022) | 58.2 | 45 | 34.2 | 26.6 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 37.7 | 28.2 | 20.2 | 16.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 45.6 | 40.6 | 32.1 | 9.25 |
F1 23 (2023) | 45.3 | 40.1 | 29.1 | |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 43.3 | 33.3 | 21.6 | 16.9 |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 89.3 | 58.8 | 58.4 |
排放 - 经济但不刺耳
噪音排放
在没有压力的情况下,Maxtang MTN-FP750 大部分时间都是静音的。不过,在负载情况下,我们的噪音很快就达到了 45 dB(A),而且我们只能分辨出中等负载和满载时的微小差异。不过,我们可以将其归结为在测量误差范围之内。遗憾的是,似乎只有两种风扇级别。从表中可以看出 Geekom A5和 NiPoGi AD08在相同情况下噪音更大。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.3 / 25.3 / 25.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.1 / 45.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 i7-12650H, UHD Graphics 64EUs | NiPoGi AD08 i7-12650H, UHD Graphics 64EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | -14% | -3% | -7% | -4% | -14% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 30.2 -21% | 30 -20% | 29.8 -19% | 25 -0% | 29.4 -18% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.3 | 30.5 -21% | 33.2 -31% | 29.9 -18% | 28.2 -11% | 29.4 -16% | 31.1 -23% |
Idle Average * | 25.3 | 30.5 -21% | 33.6 -33% | 30.1 -19% | 28.2 -11% | 29.5 -17% | 31.2 -23% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.4 | 30.5 -20% | 33.6 -32% | 30.2 -19% | 28.2 -11% | 29.7 -17% | 31.3 -23% |
Load Average * | 45.1 | 30.5 32% | 36.8 18% | 32.1 29% | 47.8 -6% | 34.6 23% | 51.7 -15% |
Load Maximum * | 45.3 | 30.5 33% | 39.8 12% | 32.5 28% | 47.4 -5% | 36.1 20% | 45.8 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Maxtang MTN-FP750 的外壳在空闲或负载运行时的发热量都很小。我们在设备顶部观察到一个热点,温度仅略低于 40 °C,而设备底部甚至没有达到 35 °C。不过,SoC 的温度会明显升高,虽然温度接近 80 °C,但我们仍处于绿色区域。此外,制造商在 BIOS 中设置的最高温度为 90 °C。在预设的 35 瓦功率限制下,我们仍然无法达到这一温度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
在我们的比较中,Maxtang MTN-FP750 属于最经济的设备。空闲运行时,我们已经记录到了非常低的功耗,仅为 7 至 8.4 瓦。只有 Geekom A5 和 Geekom Mini IT12 能达到类似的低耗电水平。在负载情况下,我们的评测样本继续保持相对经济的状态,我们的测量设备记录到的峰值功耗仅为 61.4 瓦。考虑到处理器的功耗限制,负载情况下的能耗要求并不特别令人惊讶。
这意味着 90 瓦的 PSU 在为迷你 PC 可靠地提供足够的能量方面从未遇到过任何问题。PSU 甚至可以轻松应对手动功耗调节。
Off / Standby | 0.95 / 0.75 Watt |
Idle | 7 / 8.1 / 8.4 Watt |
Load |
54.2 / 61.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 i7-12650H, UHD Graphics 64EUs | NiPoGi AD08 i7-12650H, UHD Graphics 64EUs | Average AMD Radeon 680M | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -73% | -23% | -2% | -12% | -50% | -107% | -10% | -48% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 12.1 -73% | 6.8 3% | 5 29% | 6.9 1% | 10.4 -49% | 14.2 -103% | 6.94 ? 1% | 9.68 ? -38% |
Idle Average * | 8.1 | 13 -60% | 9.4 -16% | 7 14% | 7.9 2% | 12.3 -52% | 15.1 -86% | 8.92 ? -10% | 11.8 ? -46% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 18.2 -117% | 13.7 -63% | 10.7 -27% | 8.9 -6% | 12.4 -48% | 28.7 -242% | 10.5 ? -25% | 15.2 ? -81% |
Load Average * | 54.2 | 70.6 -30% | 45.3 16% | 50.3 7% | 60.8 -12% | 72.9 -35% | 76.9 -42% | 53.9 ? 1% | 59.2 ? -9% |
Load Maximum * | 61.4 | 113 -84% | 94.8 -54% | 82 -34% | 89.7 -46% | 101.2 -65% | 100.2 -63% | 70.8 ? -15% | 100.9 ? -64% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with an external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论:性能更佳,但需经过优化
Maxtang MTN-FP750 是一款相对简单的迷你 PC,适合家庭或工作场所办公使用。AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 提供充足的动力,能够处理大多数任务。它的 8 个内核和 16 个线程使这款迷你电脑适用于对性能要求较高的应用。安装的内存为 16 GB,暂时不会造成任何问题。不过,尽管傲腾 MTN-FP750 允许安装 SO-DIMM 模块,但使用单个内存模块还是得到了回报。这意味着,在测试中,傲腾 MTN-FP750 并没有达到我们预期的性能。最明显的性能差异出现在 3D 基准测试中。这个问题可以通过安装额外的内存模块来避免,毫无疑问,这是客户应该注意的问题。
根据数据表,Maxtang MTN-FP750 性能卓越。然而,在测试中,这款迷你电脑未能达到其承诺的功率。
Maxtang MTN-FP750 的最大优势是价格低廉,与我们比较的其他竞争产品相比,它的性能略逊一筹。除非你亲自动手,否则性能会稍差一些,而且无法调整 SoC 的功率限制。我们认为,规定的 35 瓦功率限制有点过于保守。如果是 45 瓦,制造商本可以达成一个很好的折衷方案。内存也是如此,它可以通过第二个模块进行扩展。如果考虑到这两点,从性能上看,Maxtang MTN-FP750 与我们测试过的那台完全不同。
在端口选择方面,这款产品可以说是稳扎稳打。所有重要的端口都有,但仅此而已。没有 Thunderbolt 或 USB4,这略微限制了使用案例的数量。CPU 性能受限的一个积极副作用是 Maxtang MTN-FP750 的能耗要求。在测试中,这款设备的能耗明显低于竞争对手。遗憾的是,这并没有对相对较大的风扇噪音产生积极影响。如果散热概念稍好一些,这方面的成绩会更好。
价格和供应情况
在我们的评测配置中,Maxtang MTN-FP750 可直接从制造商处购买,价格为 440 美元。.
Maxtang MTN-FP750
- 02/27/2024 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.