华为 Mate 8 智能手机简短评测
Huawei Mate 8 (Mate Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB
Display
6.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 电容式, IPS-NEO, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 24.7 GB free
Weight
185 g, Power Supply: 70 g
Price
599 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 527 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.43 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 514 cd/m²
Contrast: 1469:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
79.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
90.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 15% | 0% | 6% | -27% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 514 | 335.7 -35% | 363 -29% | 583 13% | 297 -42% | 425 -17% | 538 5% |
| Brightness | 513 | 332 -35% | 365 -29% | 560 9% | 297 -42% | 395 -23% | 528 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 90 -4% | 91 -3% | 93 -1% | 88 -6% | 92 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.46 -31% | 0.5 -43% | 0.66 -89% | |||
| Contrast | 1469 | 1267 -14% | 850 -42% | 815 -45% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.08 | 2.33 54% | 2.34 54% | 3.55 30% | 2.67 47% | 7.05 -39% | 2.63 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.28 | 3.98 52% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.49 | 2.15 61% | 1.03 81% | 3.88 29% | 2.81 49% | 6.38 -16% | 3.24 41% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.08 106% | 1.63 135% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7254 90% | 6184 105% | 6429 101% | 7280 89% | 6379 102% | 6776 96% | 6906 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 79.95 | 59.05 -26% | 66.31 -17% | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.84 | 92.8 -7% | 99.79 0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | Smartbench 2012 | BaseMark OS II | Linpack Android / IOS | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | Basemark X 1.1 | Lightmark | Epic Citadel
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Epic Citadel | |
| Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| High Performance (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
Sunspider | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Google V8 Ver. 7 | Browsermark
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.07 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  0.85 / 2.07 / 2.28 Watt |
| Load |
3.91 / 4.69 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | 7% | -110% | -20% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.83 2% | 0.5 41% | 2.85 -235% | 1.1 -29% | 0.7 18% |
| Idle Average * | 2.07 | 1.09 47% | 1.9 8% | 2.95 -43% | 2.2 -6% | 2.2 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.28 | 1.17 49% | 2.2 4% | 3.26 -43% | 2.4 -5% | 2.3 -1% |
| Load Average * | 3.91 | 7.49 -92% | 3.2 18% | 8.92 -128% | 4.2 -7% | 3.9 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.69 | 9.51 -103% | 6.4 -36% | 9.39 -100% | 7.2 -54% | 6.8 -45% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | -29% | -26% | -42% | -51% | -42% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1872 | 1459 -22% | 1447 -23% | 1655 -12% | 1078 -42% | 1141 -39% | |
| H.264 | 963 | 533 -45% | 714 -26% | 611 -37% | 383 -60% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 865 | 501 -42% | 375 -57% | 513 -41% | 369 -57% | 420 -51% | 400 -54% |
| Load | 256 | 223 -13% | 280 9% | 197 -23% | 179 -30% | 219 -14% |
Pros
+ 出色的机身
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 出色的性能
+ 非常优秀的电池续航
+ 双SIM卡
+ 可通过microSD卡扩展
+ 指纹识别
+ 无垃圾软件
Cons
- 屏幕色差
- 前置相机效果差
- 售价高
- 一般的GPS
- 在持续负载下略有降频
- 扬声器
华为Mate 8在测试中凭借高品质机身和高性能给我们留下了很好的印象。它的6寸屏幕尺寸不小，不过由于边框较窄在使用中仍然十分顺手。出了高性能，我们也对Kirin 950处理器的能效十分满意，它搭配4000毫安时电池带来的续航时间十分惊人。一次充电应该可以坚持两天的使用时间。安卓6.0搭配华为的EMUI 4.0界面在使用中十分流畅，而生产商也没有为它安装任何不必要的软件。
那么Mate 8可以和其他高端设备同台竞技吗？恐怕有点悬，因为它在一些方面还有待提高。全高清的屏幕面板的色彩还原不够准确，相机无法拍摄4K视频，GPS模组准确度也不够高，而双SIM卡的支持也需要改进，因为只有一个卡槽支持移动数据连接。这些功能中的一部分可能会在即将发布的旗舰机型Huawei P9中得到实现，它预计将在三月份发布。Mate 8仍然是一台出色的设备。如果你在寻找一台设计典雅，拥有超长续航的大屏幕手机的话，那么它没有任何理由不值得选择。
机身、性能和耐力都是华为Mate 8的出色之处，不过一些竞争对手表现更加全面。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Huawei Mate 8
- 04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
