华为MateBook D 14笔记本电脑评测：脱缰的AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS (MateBook D 14 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 4 x 2.1 - 3.7 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Memory
8 GB
, 双通道，板载
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1404, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB
, 428 GB free
Weight
1.382 kg, Power Supply: 198 g
Price
700 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 R5 3500U, Radeon 540X | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 81.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 74.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230 | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2019 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.8 % v6 (old) | 06 / 2019 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (619-656)
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (375-465)
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (322-341)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø652 (593-667)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø502 (323-535)
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø645 (332-675)
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø598 (519-628)
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø305 (288-327)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (335-729)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (528-688)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei CMN1404 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 250 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 241.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 251 cd/m²
Contrast: 1136:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
46.54% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Chi Mei CMN1404, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AU Optronics AUO28ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL BOE083C, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 38% | -10% | -13% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 46.54 | 66.7 43% | 41.84 -10% | 40.49 -13% | 44.26 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 69.8 | 92.3 32% | 62.3 -11% | 60.9 -13% | 65.1 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 48.1 | 67.5 40% | 43.33 -10% | 41.84 -13% | 45.73 -5% |
| Response Times | -26% | -33% | -7% | -39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.2 ? | 36 ? 13% | 41 ? -0% | 43.6 ? -6% | 42.4 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 26 ? 10% | 31 ? -8% | 31.2 ? -8% | 32.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 44 ? -100% | 2500 ? -90% | 198.4 ? -99% | |
| Screen | -10% | -5% | 9% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle | 250 | 253 1% | 226 -10% | 271 8% | 287 15% |
| Brightness | 241 | 245 2% | 214 -11% | 256 6% | 276 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 78 -17% | 92 -2% | 90 -4% | 86 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.225 -2% | 0.17 23% | 0.15 32% | 0.25 -14% |
| Contrast | 1136 | 1124 -1% | 1329 17% | 1807 59% | 1148 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 8.89 -102% | 5.21 -18% | 4.7 -7% | 5.4 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.7 | 4.56 77% | 22.15 -12% | 20.4 -4% | 18.1 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.2 | 4.9 -17% | 4.43 -5% | 4.6 -10% | 5 -19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 6.33 -118% | 3.27 -13% | 1.6 45% | 3.1 -7% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.52 87% | 2.36 93% | 2.17 101% | 1.99 111% |
| CCT | 7045 92% | 6745 96% | 6538 99% | 6649 98% | 6769 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44.3 | 60 35% | 40 -10% | 38.5 -13% | 41.8 -6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 69.6 | 91 31% | 62 -11% | 60.6 -13% | 64.6 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-4% | -16% /
-11% | -4% /
3% | -16% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø661 (656.73-674.67)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø411 (394.45-481.96)
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø512 (499.03-642.87)
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø585 (569.39-649.92)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø669 (662.73-672.62)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø583 (578.22-612.26)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø525 (518.44-565)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3669 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4772 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3818 points | |
Help | ||
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -34% | 2% | -7% | 18% | |
| Write 4K | 145.4 | 118.8 -18% | 159.6 10% | 134.8 -7% | 164.3 ? 13% |
| Read 4K | 46.25 | 41.62 -10% | 53.5 16% | 41.68 -10% | 48.2 ? 4% |
| Write Seq | 2583 | 796 -69% | 1174 -55% | 1651 -36% | 2096 ? -19% |
| Read Seq | 2141 | 1101 -49% | 1648 -23% | 2300 7% | 2123 ? -1% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 239.5 | 234.7 -2% | 420.8 76% | 260 9% | 451 ? 88% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 340 | 313.8 -8% | 564 66% | 335.1 -1% | 509 ? 50% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2701 | 842 -69% | 1231 -54% | 1641 -39% | 2551 ? -6% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2871 | 1645 -43% | 2274 -21% | 3452 20% | 3330 ? 16% |
| AS SSD | -25% | -93% | -4% | 4% | |
| Seq Read | 2263 | 1417 -37% | 2074 -8% | 2613 15% | 2605 ? 15% |
| Seq Write | 2255 | 781 -65% | 775 -66% | 1549 -31% | 1905 ? -16% |
| 4K Read | 40.36 | 37.03 -8% | 37.81 -6% | 47.15 17% | 45.8 ? 13% |
| 4K Write | 116.9 | 80.1 -31% | 101.3 -13% | 111.6 -5% | 155.6 ? 33% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1282 | 740 -42% | 1265 -1% | 748 -42% | 1181 ? -8% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1224 | 748 -39% | 383.5 -69% | 1275 4% | 1372 ? 12% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.074 | 0.047 36% | 0.081 -9% | 0.062 16% | 0.0801 ? -8% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.045 -15% | 0.263 -574% | 0.042 -8% | 0.04195 ? -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-29% | -46% /
-46% | -6% /
-6% | 11% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2871 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2701 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
340 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
239.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2141 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2583 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
46.25 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
145.4 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7309 - 19399, n=37) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1095 - 2901, n=41) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (523 - 790, n=23) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4013 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13711 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2372 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 120 | 21.05 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 70.9 | 63.7 | 39 | 36.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 26.6 | 20.2 | 17.1 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.7 / 33.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.66 Watt |
| Idle | 5.2 / 7.7 / 8.7 Watt |
| Load |
35.4 / 48.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -5% | -8% | -1% | 17% | -8% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 3.6 31% | 4.7 10% | 5.2 -0% | 5.3 -2% | 3.7 29% | 5.68 ? -9% | 4.43 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 7.7 | 7.2 6% | 6.6 14% | 8.8 -14% | 7.8 -1% | 6.9 10% | 8.75 ? -14% | 7.58 ? 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 10.8 -24% | 5.9 32% | 10.2 -17% | 8.46 3% | 8.4 3% | 10.1 ? -16% | 9.43 ? -8% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 38 -7% | 56 -58% | 37.5 -6% | 36.9 -4% | 32 10% | 37.8 ? -7% | 45.8 ? -29% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.3 | 45.2 6% | 60.2 -25% | 50.9 -5% | 49.4 -2% | 32.6 33% | 46.2 ? 4% | 68.7 ? -42% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8, 56 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, 42 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, 42 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8, 57.4 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | -34% | -40% | -24% | -9% | -6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 862 | 404 -53% | 390 -55% | 470 -45% | 542 -37% | 597 -31% | 729 ? -15% |
| Load | 113 | 125 11% | 98 -13% | 75 -34% | 101 -11% | 129 14% | 116.5 ? 3% |
Pros
+ CPU未在负载下降频
+ 续航时间长
+ 不错的输入设备
+ 紧凑而坚固的外壳
Cons
- -几乎没有维护选项
- 颜色覆盖范围一般
- 蛙眼视角的网络摄像头
- 没有Home键和End键
Verdict – Huawei Did Many Things Right with the MateBook D 14
华为的MateBook D 14又是一个例子，证明了设计精良的笔记本不一定必须很昂贵。其最大的好处是其稳定的CPU性能，即使在负载和不插电情况下也不会受到限制。另一个好处是冷却系统能够压住内部组件并保持较低的整体温度，而同时又不会降低静音性能。通过这种组合，这台14英寸笔记本电脑不仅性能强大，而且非常适合噪声敏感的环境。
华为再次完全控制住了MateBook D 14的温度，从而实现了最高性能。
就像在D15上一样，我们对D 14的唯一的不满是摄像头，有限维护选项以及键盘上没有Home键和End键的情况。但是，考虑到笔记本电脑的整体性能和低廉的价格，这些缺点不是很重要，特别是考虑到并非所有人都会受到这些限制的同等影响。
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS
- 03/08/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Price comparison
