华为MateBook D 14 W00D (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Brand: Huawei

锐龙本。

华为为其MateBook D配备了AMD 锐龙CPU，以此提供了一款极具吸引力的办公笔记本，其设计也非常适合商业环境。我们在评测中评估了Ryzen APU带给MateBook D买家的期望。

Mike Wobker, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 07/21/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL (MateBook D 14 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4 x 2 - 3.6 GHz, Zen

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Memory

8 GB

, 双通道，板载

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE083C, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, 256 GB

, 202 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio combo port, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 323 x 221

Battery

57.4 Wh, 7565 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9, (1280 x 720)

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 背光键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Huawei PC Manager, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.47 kg, Power Supply: 203 g

Price

3999 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE HP ProBook 445 G6 Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C (also serving as power connection), HDMI, 1x USB 3.0

Rignt side: audio combo port, 1x USB 2.0

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	675 (561^min - 737^max) MBit/s +31%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	638 (570^min - 673^max) MBit/s +24%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	590 (528^min - 688^max) MBit/s +15%
HP ProBook 445 G6 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	527 (323^min - 637^max) MBit/s +3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	514 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	332 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	635 MBit/s
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	630 (523^min - 670^max) MBit/s -1%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	616 (569^min - 634^max) MBit/s -3%
HP ProBook 445 G6 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	577 (462^min - 630^max) MBit/s -9%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	502 (323^min - 535^max) MBit/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	304 MBit/s -52%


295 cd/m²	283 cd/m²	282 cd/m²
277 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
257 cd/m²	275 cd/m²	254 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE083C tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 295 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 1148:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 5
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.99

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL BOE083C, , 1920x1080, 14"	HP ProBook 445 G6 Chi Mei CMN14D4, , 1920x1080, 14"	Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T AU Optronics AUO403D B140HAN04.0, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14"	Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, , 1920x1080, 14"
Display		-6%	-9%	-12%	50%
Display P3 Coverage	44.26	41.53 -6%	39.71 -10%	39.21 -11% 38.48 -13%	66.2 50%
sRGB Coverage	65.1	62 -5%	59.6 -8%	58.8 -10% 57.9 -11%	98.3 51%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	45.73	42.94 -6%	41.04 -10%	40.52 -11% 39.76 -13%	67.8 48%
Response Times		11%	9%	-4%	4171%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.4 ?(22.8, 19.6)	40 ?(23, 17) 6%	40 ?(19, 21) 6%	44.8 ?(20.4, 24.4) -6%	41 ?(21, 20) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	32.8 ?(18, 14.8)	26 ?(15, 11) 21%	29 ?(17, 12) 12%	33.6 ?(18, 15.6) -2%	30 ?(18, 12) 9%
PWM Frequency	198.4 ?(99)	208 ?(50) 5%			25000 ?(20) 12501%
Screen		1%	14%	3%	10%
Brightness middle	287	200 -30%	267 -7%	289 1%	291 1%
Brightness	276	196 -29%	257 -7%	271 -2%	276 0%
Brightness Distribution	86	67 -22%	91 6%	87 1%	90 5%
Black Level *	0.25	0.17 32%	0.2 20%	0.19 24%	0.27 -8%
Contrast	1148	1176 2%	1335 16%	1521 32%	1078 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.4	4.26 21%	3.79 30%	5.6 -4%	3.86 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.1	9.7 46%	8.18 55%	20.8 -15%	8.26 54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	5		4.71 6%	4.7 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	3.15 -2%	1.49 52%	2.7 13%	5.33 -72%
Gamma	1.99 ^111%	2.31 ^95%	2.48 ^89%	1.96 ^112%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6769 ^96%	6882 ^94%	6659 ^98%	6506 ^100%	7426 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	41.8	40 -4%	38 -9%	37.2 -11%	62 48%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	64.6	62 -4%	59 -9%	58.5 -9%	98 52%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		2% / 2%	5% / 9%	-4% / -2%	1410% / 798%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

198.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø583 (578.22-612.26)

Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø525 (518.44-565)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=101, last 2 years)	226 Points +63%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U	161 Points +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	150 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	139.5 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	139 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (124 - 142, n=15)	136.2 Points -2%
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	135 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office (242 - 2642, n=102, last 2 years)	1519 Points +147%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U	623 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	618 (591.81^min - 618.71^max) Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	615 (576.4^min - 616.38^max) Points
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	612 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (510 - 642, n=16)	598 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U	565 Points -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	361 Points -41%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

615 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

47.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=93, last 2 years)	5567 Points +58%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ	3764 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3534 Points
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3526 Points 0%
HP ProBook 445 G6 Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	3470 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3321 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (2501 - 3685, n=12)	3182 Points -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	3179 Points -10%
Essentials
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=93, last 2 years)	10024 Points +48%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ	7981 Points +18%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	7373 Points +9%
HP ProBook 445 G6 Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	6933 Points +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	6911 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	6756 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	6646 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (5288 - 7272, n=12)	6483 Points -4%
Productivity
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=93, last 2 years)	7672 Points +41%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ	6755 Points +25%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	5758 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	5425 Points
HP ProBook 445 G6 Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	5351 Points -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	5274 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4964 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3113 - 5574, n=12)	4571 Points -16%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office (1912 - 9773, n=93, last 2 years)	6243 Points +91%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3269 Points
HP ProBook 445 G6 Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	3059 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3014 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (2351 - 3363, n=12)	2971 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	2804 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ	2685 Points -18%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	2392 Points -27%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years)	4559 Points +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3550 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3420 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3049 - 3550, n=14)	3340 Points -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	3281 Points -4%
HP ProBook 445 G6 Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	3218 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4870 Points +10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	4556 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	4420 Points
HP ProBook 445 G6 Vega 8, R5 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	4379 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3437 - 4870, n=11)	4211 Points -5%
Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years)	3761 Points -15%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3420 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4420 points
PCMark 10 Score		3534 points
Help

	Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	HP ProBook 445 G6 SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB	Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	Average SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		78%	-19%	128%	45%	-2%	-2%
Write 4K	72.3	110.4 53%	55 -24%	72.2 0%	96.8 34%	60.5 -16%	71.3 ?(66.9 - 74.7, n=3) -1%
Read 4K	30.77	39.46 28%	28.79 -6%	35.25 15%	36.99 20%	21.63 -30%	25.3 ?(14.9 - 30.8, n=3) -18%
Write Seq	468.1	808 73%	307.5 -34%	1412 202%	463.1 -1%	450.9 -4%	473 ?(448 - 502, n=3) 1%
Read Seq	518	1130 118%	430 -17%	1523 194%	794 53%	482.3 -7%	517 ?(499 - 534, n=3) 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	214.2	260.8 22%	149.5 -30%	102.1 -52%	291.7 36%	248.9 16%	209 ?(197.5 - 214, n=3) -2%
Read 4K Q32T1	241.1	308 28%	207.2 -14%	170.9 -29%	352 46%	267.6 11%	234 ?(226 - 241, n=3) -3%
Write Seq Q32T1	482	816 69%	389.2 -19%	1429 196%	468.1 -3%	534 11%	494 ?(482 - 505, n=3) 2%
Read Seq Q32T1	537	1783 232%	497.1 -7%	3204 497%	1489 177%	563 5%	552 ?(537 - 560, n=3) 3%
AS SSD		110%	-66%	162%	66%	-2%	16%
Seq Read	500	1546 209%	487.6 -2%	2030 306%	1201 140%	458.3 -8%	499 ?(476 - 522, n=3) 0%
Seq Write	457.9	708 55%	392.7 -14%	1395 205%	434.5 -5%	268.6 -41%	474 ?(458 - 487, n=3) 4%
4K Read	25.12	34.12 36%	36.4 45%	38.63 54%	40.9 63%	26.87 7%	28.6 ?(25.1 - 30.6, n=3) 14%
4K Write	51.7	76.7 48%	26.46 -49%	63.9 24%	90 74%	51.7 0%	60.7 ?(51.7 - 66.1, n=3) 17%
4K-64 Read	220.7	528 139%	325.4 47%	1035 369%	425.5 93%	364.2 65%	298 ?(221 - 353, n=3) 35%
4K-64 Write	195.6	588 201%	87.2 -55%	371.5 90%	390.9 100%	137.3 -30%	233 ?(195.6 - 263, n=3) 19%
Access Time Read *	0.135	0.062 54%	0.432 -220%	0.054 60%	0.184 -36%	0.092 32%	0.1193 ?(0.092 - 0.135, n=3) 12%
Access Time Write *	0.07	0.048 31%	0.4 -471%	0.059 16%	0.048 31%	0.13 -86%	0.06033 ?(0.055 - 0.07, n=3) 14%
Score Read	296	717 142%	411 39%	1277 331%	586 98%	437 48%	376 ?(296 - 431, n=3) 27%
Score Write	293	735 151%	153 -48%	575 96%	524 79%	216 -26%	341 ?(293 - 378, n=3) 16%
Score Total	747	1785 139%	782 5%	2478 232%	1386 86%	875 17%	918 ?(747 - 1040, n=3) 23%
Copy ISO MB/s		576			310.1		514 ?()
Copy Program MB/s		159.8			88.4		259 ?()
Copy Game MB/s		330.8			166.4		521 ?()
Total Average (Program / Settings)		94% / 96%	-43% / -46%	145% / 148%	56% / 57%	-2% / -2%	7% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF

Sequential Read: 524 MB/s

Sequential Write: 469.2 MB/s

512K Read: 394.4 MB/s

512K Write: 374.4 MB/s

4K Read: 25.05 MB/s

4K Write: 58.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 226.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 206.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=94, last 2 years)	6644 Points +86%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	3565 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1668 - 4317, n=44)	3447 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U	3318 Points -7%
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	3164 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	2757 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1776 Points -50%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U	1415 Points -60%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=72, last 2 years)	26440 Points +50%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	17661 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7309 - 19399, n=37)	15327 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U	15299 Points -13%
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	13634 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	10209 Points -42%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	9730 Points -45%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U	7152 Points -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office (712 - 9375, n=97, last 2 years)	4719 Points +98%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	2381 Points
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U	2369 Points -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1095 - 2901, n=41)	2224 Points -7%
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	1940 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	1647 Points -31%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1245 Points -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U	838 Points -65%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Office (242 - 4109, n=97, last 2 years)	1537 Points
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U	710 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (523 - 790, n=23)	673 Points
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	556 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		3682 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		8316 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2184 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	27.96 fps +41%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	19.84 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7.6 - 28, n=30)	17.6 fps -11%
HP ProBook 445 G6 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	13.9 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	13.26 fps -33%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	9.9 fps -50%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	6 fps -70%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)				19.84
The Witcher 3 (2015)	28.98	16.37
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	69	60	34.8	32.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	26.5	19.4	18.2
F1 2019 (2019)	47.1	19.8	18.4	12

Noise Level

Idle		29.5 / 29.5 / 30.4 dB(A)
Load		31.5 / 33.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


44.2 °C	44.3 °C	42.8 °C
40.7 °C	40.4 °C	35.7 °C
31.8 °C	29.8 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 37.5 °C


42.2 °C	45 °C	43.6 °C
36.1 °C	40.5 °C	39.8 °C
29.8 °C	33 °C	33.3 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 38.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.1 °C / -7.3 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.41 / 0.57 Watt
Idle	5.3 / 7.8 / 8.46 Watt
Load	36.9 / 49.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	HP ProBook 445 G6 R5 2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	Average of class Office
Power Consumption		6%	2%	-7%	30%	18%	-7%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	5.3	4.8 9%	3.7 30%	6.2 -17%	2.9 45%	3.7 30%	5.68 ?(3.7 - 11.5, n=42) -7%	4.51 ?(2.2 - 13.8, n=96, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	7.8	6.9 12%	6.1 22%	8.6 -10%	5.6 28%	6.9 12%	8.75 ?(5.86 - 21.8, n=42) -12%	7.47 ?(3.8 - 14.9, n=96, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	8.46	9.8 -16%	8.3 2%	9.7 -15%	6.1 28%	8.4 1%	10.1 ?(6.36 - 22.2, n=42) -19%	9.11 ?(4.89 - 18.6, n=96, last 2 years) -8%
Load Average *	36.9	35 5%	43 -17%	37.4 -1%	29 21%	32 13%	37.8 ?(24.1 - 55.3, n=42) -2%	42.4 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=93, last 2 years) -15%
Load Maximum *	49.4	39.7 20%	61.6 -25%	44.8 9%	35.3 29%	32.6 34%	46.2 ?(26.5 - 65.6, n=42) 6%	60.5 ?(11.1 - 107, n=96, last 2 years) -22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		18h 57min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 41min

	Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8, 57.4 Wh	HP ProBook 445 G6 R5 2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh	Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, 37 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh	Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 50.7 Wh	Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		-29%	-39%	-43%	13%	21%	13%
Reader / Idle	1137	621 -45%		545 -52%		1414 24%	1300 ?(527 - 2296, n=16, last 2 years) 14%
WiFi v1.3	542	351 -35%	331.3 -39%	323 -40%	614 13%	597 10%	598 ?(300 - 1349, n=96, last 2 years) 10%
Load	101	93 -8%		65 -36%		129 28%	117.1 ?(56 - 218, n=57, last 2 years) 16%

Pros

+ 好看且坚固的机身

+ 出色的续航

+ 不错的屏幕色准

+ 性价比高

Cons

- -接口少

- 功耗高

- 色域差

- 没有升级选项

- 低光下有PWM调光

Verdict - A good performance with a mediocre display

华为MateBook D 14笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany

虽然大多数其他制造商在使用AMD处理器时并不能提供最好的性能，但华为在MateBook D的超薄笔记本电脑中展示了AMD技术的良好实施。性能高于同定位英特尔型号，并且只有续航时间略差。然而，两种设备之间的价格差异是一个很大的优势，因为我们在这里测试的带有AMD CPU的笔记本电脑的售价比配备较弱的Intel CPU的型号低300欧元（国内差价仅为700元，i5版Magicbook）。

华为MateBook D通过使用AMD处理器提供了更高的性能，但也继承了英特尔版本中已有的弱点。

之前列出的关于屏幕和接口的负面观点基本上和英特尔版一样，这也阻止了这台华为笔记本电脑获得更高的评价。总的来说，这台轻薄的设备在任何办公室环境都很搭，并且还能够满足这种环境对笔记本电脑性能的要求。

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL - 2019-10-29 10/29/2019 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

47 / 80 → 58%

Weight

69 / 20-75 → 90%

Battery

91%

Display

83%

Games Performance

56 / 78 → 71%

Application Performance

74 / 95 → 78%

Temperature

91%

Noise

97%

Audio

70%

Camera

51 / 85 → 60%

Average

76%

85%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 452583 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MateBook D 14 W00D (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) 笔记本电脑评测

Mike Wobker, 2019-07-21 (Update: 2019-07-21)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Verdict - A good performance with a mediocre display

More articles related to this device

Price comparison