华为Matebook 14 (i7-8565U, GeForce MX250) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Brand: Huawei

3：2超极本

MateBook 14比2018 MateBook X Pro性能更强，同时提供不常见的3：2屏幕。虽然功能强大，但CPU Turbo Boost还是比较一般，而且考虑到7000元的要价，Thunderbolt 3的缺乏有些不应该。

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 07/08/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Whiskey Lake

Test device courtesy of Huawei US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 (MateBook Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1518 MHz, RAM: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 430.39, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, 双通道，板载内存

Display

14.00 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 185 PPI, 十点触控, Chi Mei CMN8C02, IPS, P140KZA-BZ1, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Storage

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB

Soundcard

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 307.5 x 223.8

Battery

57.4 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: 巧克力背光键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, PC Manager, Huawei Connect, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.53 kg, Power Supply: 197 g

Price

1500 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 DIN A4 ❌

Left: USB Type-C (DisplayPort and Charging), 3.5 mm combo audio, HDMI

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	659 MBit/s
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Intel Wireless-AC 9560	530 MBit/s -20%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	513 MBit/s -22%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	505 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Intel Wireless-AC 9560	663 MBit/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	663 MBit/s
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	660 MBit/s 0%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	655 MBit/s -1%


393.5 cd/m²	385 cd/m²	384.7 cd/m²
383.9 cd/m²	401.7 cd/m²	379.8 cd/m²
380.9 cd/m²	384.4 cd/m²	382.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN8C02 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 401.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 386.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 401.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 956:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.36
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Chi Mei CMN8C02, IPS, 14", 2160x1440	Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160	Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080
Display		-2%	-3%	0%	-4%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	66.6	65.9 -1%	64.7 -3%	67.5 1%	64.7 -3%	64.3 -3%
sRGB Coverage	97.8	95.2 -3%	94.3 -4%	95.8 -2%	93.1 -5%	94.6 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.1	67.6 -1%	66 -3%	69 1%	65.3 -4%	66.2 -3%
Response Times		0%	-4%	-8%	-43%	-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(19.6, 18.4)	40.4 ?(19.2, 21.2) -6%	36.8 ?(19.6, 17.2) 3%	47.2 ?(23.6, 23.6) -24%	58 ?(26, 32) -53%	40.8 ?(20.4, 20.4) -7%
Response Time Black / White *	27.2 ?(17.2, 10)	25.6 ?(11.6, 14) 6%	30 ?(18.4, 11.6) -10%	24.8 ?(14, 10.8) 9%	36 ?(20, 16) -32%	27.6 ?(15.6, 12) -1%
PWM Frequency
Screen		9%	-6%	21%	1%	-17%
Brightness middle	401.7	442.7 10%	333.8 -17%	466 16%	404 1%	316 -21%
Brightness	386	428 11%	307 -20%	462 20%	389 1%	291 -25%
Brightness Distribution	95	84 -12%	83 -13%	90 -5%	85 -11%	83 -13%
Black Level *	0.42	0.31 26%	0.4 5%	0.33 21%	0.37 12%	0.36 14%
Contrast	956	1428 49%	835 -13%	1412 48%	1092 14%	878 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.11	2.24 45%	3.54 14%	1.93 53%	3.72 9%	5.9 -44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.93	7.19 19%	5.8 35%	4.26 52%	7.38 17%	12.9 -44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.36	1.11 18%	2.36 -74%	1.99 -46%	2.06 -51%	1.3 4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.1	9.7 -59%	4.7 23%	1.7 72%	4.44 27%	8.6 -41%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	1.42 ^155%	2.14 ^103%	2.15 ^102%	2.34 ^94%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	7222 ^90%	6227 ^104%	6261 ^104%	6382 ^102%	7095 ^92%	6854 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62.7	61.6 -2%	61.2 -2%	62.2 -1%	60 -4%	60.7 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98.6	95 -4%	94.7 -4%	95.7 -3%	93 -6%	94.5 -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		2% / 6%	-4% / -5%	4% / 13%	-15% / -6%	-8% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.2 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø522 (514.22-659.49)

Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø485 (464.55-537.4)

Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø627 (623.29-676.66)

Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø614 (574.66-670.36)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Intel Core i7-8565U	177 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U	174 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138.3 - 193, n=51)	172.5 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H Intel Core i5-8300H	166 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	147 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points -18%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	146 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 Intel Core i7-8550U	141 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H Intel Core i5-8300H	821 Points +25%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U	677 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Intel Core i7-8565U	659 Points
Huawei MateBook D 14, AMD Edition AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	642 (589.88^min - 641.56^max) Points -3%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	640 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52)	612 Points -7%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	538 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 Intel Core i7-8550U	537 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points -49%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

177 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

659 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

105.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years)	6454 Points +53%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	4219 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4205 Points
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	3835 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	3546 Points -16%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3463 Points -18%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3445 Points -18%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years)	10490 Points +25%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	8373 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8367 Points
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	8033 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7165 Points -14%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	7132 Points -15%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	7083 Points -15%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years)	8635 Points +25%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6916 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	6575 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	6101 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5886 Points -15%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	5749 Points -17%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5727 Points -17%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years)	8143 Points +133%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	3704 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3488 Points
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	3125 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	2872 Points -18%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	2751 Points -21%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	2735 Points -22%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	3873 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3612 Points
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	3519 Points -3%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3478 Points -4%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3218 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	3183 Points -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	1739 Points -52%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	5065 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4796 Points
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	4520 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	4417 Points -8%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4339 Points -10%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	4302 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	1609 Points -66%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3612 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4796 points
PCMark 10 Score		4205 points
Help

	Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
AS SSD		-25%	-70%	-45%	-15%	-55%
Seq Read	1225	2416 97%	476.1 -61%	2035 66%	1224 0%	1850 51%
Seq Write	1386	1170 -16%	487.4 -65%	658 -53%	907 -35%	661 -52%
4K Read	56.4	48.33 -14%	30.57 -46%	39.74 -30%	41.46 -26%	38.04 -33%
4K Write	137.6	103.1 -25%	66.1 -52%	105.7 -23%	126.2 -8%	95 -31%
4K-64 Read	1190	1039 -13%	352.9 -70%	461 -61%	1021 -14%	434.3 -64%
4K-64 Write	1377	399.6 -71%	263.1 -81%	300.1 -78%	1251 -9%	266.3 -81%
Access Time Read *	0.046	0.058 -26%	0.092 -100%	0.061 -33%	0.053 -15%	0.069 -50%
Access Time Write *	0.026	0.036 -38%	0.055 -112%	0.051 -96%	0.027 -4%	0.056 -115%
Score Read	1369	1329 -3%	431 -69%	704 -49%	1185 -13%	657 -52%
Score Write	1653	620 -62%	378 -77%	471 -72%	1468 -11%	427 -74%
Score Total	3743	2575 -31%	1040 -72%	1479 -60%	3250 -13%	1373 -63%
Copy ISO MB/s	1837	739 -60%	514 -72%	893 -51%	1404 -24%	539 -71%
Copy Program MB/s	473.6	312.3 -34%	259.3 -45%	287.9 -39%	402.4 -15%	209.7 -56%
Copy Game MB/s	1216	486.3 -60%	521 -57%	618 -49%	902 -26%	340 -72%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1775 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1720 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 611 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 572 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 962 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1009 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 28.04 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 165.9 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	39072 Points +73%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	29742 Points +32%
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	25900 Points +15%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	22615 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	21755 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25)	21491 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	21260 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	17345 Points -23%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8550U	10816 Points -52%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	9904 Points -56%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	9643 Points -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	6112 Points +67%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4239 Points +16%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3726 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3664 Points
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	3638 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3586 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29)	3531 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	2793 Points -24%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8550U	2069 Points -44%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	1740 Points -53%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1194 Points -67%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4938 Points +11%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4905 Points +10%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4514 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4459 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29)	4404 Points -1%
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	4384 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	3450 Points -23%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	2907 Points -35%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8550U	2613 Points -41%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1757 Points -61%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5417 Points +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4552 Points
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	4501 Points -1%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4394 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3532 - 4638, n=29)	4250 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4163 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	3567 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8550U	2395 Points -47%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	1872 Points -59%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1548 Points -66%

3DMark 11 Performance		4681 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		13455 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3350 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1240 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	91.5 fps +151%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	72.5 fps +99%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	38.2 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	36.5 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	35.6 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27)	35.3 fps -3%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	32.5 fps -11%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	23 fps -37%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	95 fps +117%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	44.6 fps +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	43.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (39 - 46.2, n=5)	41.8 fps -4%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	36.9 fps -16%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	26.5 fps -39%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	17.4 fps -60%

The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø37.2 (35-39)

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	64.5	36.5	21	11.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	74.9	43.7	24.1	19.4
Overwatch (2016)	171.7	122.5	58	35

	Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
Noise		-0%	3%	-1%	3%	-3%
off / environment *	28.1	27.9 1%	28.2 -0%	28.1 -0%	29.3 -4%	28.4 -1%
Idle Minimum *	28.1	27.9 1%	28.4 -1%	28.1 -0%	29.3 -4%	28.5 -1%
Idle Average *	28.1	27.9 1%	28.4 -1%	28.1 -0%	29.3 -4%	29 -3%
Idle Maximum *	29.7	27.9 6%	28.4 4%	29 2%	29.7 -0%	29.1 2%
Load Average *	31.2	36.2 -16%	35.7 -14%	41.1 -32%	31.8 -2%	42.8 -37%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44.5	45 -1%		41.1 8%		41.4 7%
Load Maximum *	47.5	45.2 5%	34.2 28%	41.1 13%	32.7 31%	41.6 12%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		28.1 / 28.1 / 29.7 dB(A)
Load		31.2 / 47.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


48.2 °C	47 °C	35.4 °C
45.4 °C	45.2 °C	31 °C
36.8 °C	31.4 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 38.9 °C


38.2 °C	53.6 °C	53.4 °C
34.6 °C	44.6 °C	48 °C
33.6 °C	39 °C	41.8 °C

Maximum: 53.6 °C
Average: 43 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


31.6 °C	31.2 °C	30 °C
30.8 °C	30.2 °C	29.2 °C
30.2 °C	29.2 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 30.2 °C


32 °C	33.2 °C	34 °C
31.2 °C	32.4 °C	33 °C
30.8 °C	31.6 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 32.3 °C

Room Temperature 22.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


45.2 °C	43.8 °C	34.4 °C
44.2 °C	43.6 °C	30 °C
35.6 °C	30.8 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


37 °C	51.2 °C	51.2 °C
33.2 °C	43 °C	45.4 °C
31.8 °C	36.2 °C	39.4 °C

Maximum: 51.2 °C
Average: 40.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-8.5 °C / -15.3 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.39 / 0.79 Watt
Idle	3.7 / 9.3 / 12.8 Watt
Load	58.8 / 65 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14"	Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9"	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9"	Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9"	Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption		11%	40%	18%	21%	-11%
Idle Minimum *	3.7	3.5 5%	2.7 27%	3.4 8%	3.3 11%	6.7 -81%
Idle Average *	9.3	8.9 4%	6 35%	6.3 32%	6.8 27%	8.6 8%
Idle Maximum *	12.8	12.3 4%	6.5 49%	10.4 19%	9.5 26%	9.4 27%
Load Average *	58.8	54.2 8%	32.5 45%	51 13%	40.8 31%	64.1 -9%
Witcher 3 ultra *	55.8	42.4 24%		39 30%		63.7 -14%
Load Maximum *	65	52.1 20%	35.5 45%	62.7 4%	57 12%	64.1 1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		23h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 49min

	Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 57.4 Wh	Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh	Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Battery Runtime		7%	48%	0%	4%	8%
Reader / Idle	1435	1243 -13%	2238 56%	1032 -28%	1710 19%	1432 0%
WiFi v1.3	503	557 11%	720 43%	498 -1%	506 1%	550 9%
Load	109	133 22%	159 46%	141 29%	99 -9%	124 14%

Pros

+ 即使不插电也是满血性能

+ 100%的sRGB覆盖率，高对比度

+ 可升级的M.2 SSD和WLAN

+ 25 W GeForce MX250 GPU

+ 低负荷时安静的风扇

+ USB Type-C充电

+ 高品质的机身

+ 锐利的3：2屏幕

+ 大面积触控板

+ HDMI端口

Cons

- 只有一个USB Type-C端口用于充电，数据和DP接口

- 25 W MX250性能几乎与25 W MX150相同

- 屏幕色准较差

- 游戏时充电速度非常慢

- 有限的CPU Turbo Boost性能

- 没有雷电3或SD读卡器

- 网络摄像头角度较差

- 游戏噪音较大

- 键盘键反馈太软

- 板载RAM

华为MateBook 14 KLV-W29 笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Huawei US

MateBook 14使Microsoft Surface Laptop看起来有些过时。毫无疑问，它在功能，做工，屏幕以及特别是图形性能方面都是更优质的3：2笔记本电脑，价格相同。如果独特的宽高比和相对高性能的GPU的组合很吸引人，那么MateBook 14将适合您。

但是，如果你的目的主要是多媒体播放或游戏，而不是文字处理或浏览，那么更传统的配备雷电3接口的16：9超级本，如华硕ZenBook S13 UX392或Razer Blade Stealth将更合适。 MateBook 14中的MX250与MateBook 13中的MX150相比几乎没有提升，CPU Turbo Boost性能仍然很弱。

即将推出的2019 MateBook X Pro将采用与MateBook 14完全相同的CPU和GPU选项，但采用更加纤薄的机身，配备更多USB Type-C端口和更高分辨率的触摸屏。当然，缺点是高昂的价格，相比之下，MateBook 14的价格则略低。如果您发现MateBook X Pro很具有吸引力但是价格较高，那么MateBook 14应该是值得一看。我们更加建议使用Core i5-8265U的SKU，因为它和i7版本性能上几乎完全相同。