华为 MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 平板电脑简短评测
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro (MediaPad M5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 405, Core: 550 MHz
Memory
2048 MB
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, 电容式，10点触控, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB
, 9.8 GB free
Weight
461 g, Power Supply: 62 g
Price
300 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 385.3 cd/m² Minimum: 21.88 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 392 cd/m²
Contrast: 664:1 (Black: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.47
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 1920x1200, IPS, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 1024x768, TFT, 9.7" | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 1920x1200, IPS, 10.1" | Haier Pad 971 2048x1536, IPS, 9.7" | Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 1280x800, IPS, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 1920x1200, IPS, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 7% | -8% | 11% | 18% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 392 | 394 1% | 343 -12% | 294 -25% | 458 17% | 385 -2% |
| Brightness | 385 | 392 2% | 328 -15% | 294 -24% | 434 13% | 383 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 80 -12% | 88 -3% | 90 -1% | 86 -5% | 91 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.59 | 0.51 14% | 0.38 36% | 0.37 37% | 0.43 27% | 0.41 31% |
| Contrast | 664 | 773 16% | 903 36% | 795 20% | 1065 60% | 939 41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 3.59 20% | 6.86 -52% | 3.2 29% | 4.18 7% | 5.31 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 6.5 17% | 8.57 -10% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 4.25 11% | 6.95 -45% | 3 37% | 4.54 5% | 5.58 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.56 86% | 2.32 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 7426 88% | 7148 91% | 7249 90% | 6882 94% | 7083 92% | 7044 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 35 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | AnTuTu v6 | AnTuTu v5 | BaseMark OS II | PCMark for Android
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| BQ Aquaris M5.5 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| BQ Aquaris M5.5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| BQ Aquaris M5.5 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| AnTuTu v5 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| BQ Aquaris M5.5 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| Dead Trigger 2 - high | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |
| high | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| very low | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.12 / 0.24 Watt |
| Idle |  1.58 / 4.12 / 4.15 Watt |
| Load |
6.2 / 9.27 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 615 MSM8939, 1920x1200 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 410 APQ8016, 1024x768 | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 Z3735F, 1920x1200 | Haier Pad 971 RK3288, 2048x1536 | Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 MT8135, 1280x800 | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch Kirin 930, 1920x1200 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -7% | 36% | 15% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.58 | 1.1 30% | 1.6 -1% | 1.38 13% | 1.24 22% | 1.6 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 4.12 | 3.6 13% | 4.8 -17% | 1.46 65% | 3.81 8% | 4.13 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.15 | 3.9 6% | 4.9 -18% | 1.6 61% | 3.92 6% | 4.22 -2% |
| Load Average * | 6.2 | 6.8 -10% | 6.8 -10% | 5.06 18% | 5.94 4% | 6.57 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.27 | 8.4 9% | 8.4 9% | 6.95 25% | 5.94 36% | 8.32 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 mAh | Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 6660 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 89% | 6% | 2% | -5% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1230 | 2950 140% | 1564 27% | 1142 -7% | 988 -20% | |
| H.264 | 593 | 532 -10% | 624 5% | 602 2% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 862 107% | 485 17% | 423 2% | 450 8% | 698 68% |
| Load | 248 | 297 20% | 221 -11% | 188 -24% | 266 7% |
Pros
+ LTE机型支持通话功能
+ 明亮的IPS屏幕
+ 低发热量
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 实用的后置相机
Cons
- 一般的性能
- 读卡器较慢
- 充电时间长
- 前置相机较弱
- 仅支持安卓5.1
和名字不同的是，华为MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro并不是一台为办公用户设计的设备。它的分屏显示功能并不足以支持这个命名。不过，它是一台十分不错的家用平板电脑，也可以用于打电话。它的软件并不是最新版本，也不太可能得到大幅度的更新。不过，安卓5.1搭配华为EMUI提供了不错的使用体验。另外，我们也得到了一块明亮的IPS屏幕，以及不错的扬声器。
这台平板电脑在性能上有些孱弱。在日常使用中也会遇到卡顿延迟。略高的性能将会让它受益不浅。有相似问题的还有它的读卡器。尽管我们可以通过microSD卡槽拓展存储空间，但它读卡器的低速度十分影响实用性，特别是在游戏和大型应用的情况下。
MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro是一台不错的家用平板电脑。它的LTE版本并不便宜，售价约300欧元（约2180人民币），而它的性能还有待提升。但是，我们的测试机也没有任何明显的缺陷。
整体上，我们并不太希望向用户推荐这台售价接近300欧元的平板电脑，特别是来自同一家生产商的MediaPad M2售价仅350欧元（约2544人民币）。因此，价位约240欧元（约1744人民币）的Wi-Fi版本MediaPad T2可能更有吸引力。它没有会影响用户考虑购买的任何严重问题。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
- 06/17/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Tablet - Weighted Average
Price comparison
