华为 MediaPad T3 10 平板电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 410 cd/m²
Contrast: 1281:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 IPS, 1280x800, 9.6" | Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) IPS, 1280x800, 9.6" | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -37% | -30% | -34% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 410 | 457 11% | 392 -4% | 370 -10% | 542 32% |
Brightness | 409 | 453 11% | 385 -6% | 351 -14% | 520 27% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 91 -1% | 89 -3% | 91 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.49 -53% | 0.59 -84% | 0.4 -25% | 0.68 -113% |
Contrast | 1281 | 933 -27% | 664 -48% | 925 -28% | 797 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5.75 -28% | 4.5 -0% | 4.6 -2% | 4.2 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.2 | 7.8 45% | 9.5 33% | 6.7 53% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 5.33 -167% | 4.8 -140% | 6.5 -225% | 4.8 -140% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.61 84% | 2.47 89% | 2.17 101% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6930 94% | 6820 95% | 7426 88% | 6354 102% | 7434 87% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
* ... smaller is better
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 18 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
Real Racing 3 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 27 fps | ||
low | 49 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) 5000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 6% | 12% | 94% | |
Reader / Idle | 1134 | 850 -25% | 1230 8% | 1275 12% | 2634 132% |
H.264 | 527 | 502 -5% | 593 13% | 603 14% | 893 69% |
WiFi v1.3 | 439 | 518 18% | 416 -5% | 435 -1% | 826 88% |
Load | 229 | 264 15% | 248 8% | 279 22% | 428 87% |
Pros
Cons
和预想的一样,华为MediaPad T3 10并不是一个革新,而是更新。在这方面,华为有点令人困惑:在上一代,有个中档的而且更强大的Pro型号,这一代呢,有一个轻薄的顶级设备 (M3 Lite) 以及一个较弱的中档设备 T3 10。它可以提供一个简洁轻薄的外壳,硬件合理,软件优秀。您甚至可以使用LTE模式进行电话通话,该LTE模式不是LTE平板电脑所能提供的。
对于摄像头,用户不能抱太多希望,毕竟它是一个临时的解决方案,而不能用于严肃摄影摄像。屏幕亮度一般,亮度分布和对比度喜人,虽然说颜色覆盖率低。
可惜,华为的 MediaPad T3 10处境尴尬:不算是价格取胜,也不能在某个方面拔尖。因此,这是一个平庸的平板电脑,必须忍受它漫长的充电时间。
处理器水平较高,而且储存能力也不错。此外,我们有两个观点:一方面,显卡不足以支持要求高解析能力的游戏;另一方面,电池的续航时间很棒,而你也必须忍受漫长的充电时间。
总的来说,该机不算是特别实惠的选择,是可以说是一个平庸的选择吧。在有些情况下,高性能处理器,和低价才算是有用的组合。此外,我们找到了更棒的设备三星 Galaxy Tab A ,它续航更久,而且显卡性能更棒。
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
- 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Wimmer