Medion Erazer Beast X25 (Tongfang GM7ZG8P) 游戏笔记本电脑评测。轻巧而又强大
高端笔记本电脑必须非常笨重的日子已经一去不复返了。来自Medion的Erazer Beast X25是新的、相当苗条和轻盈的一代游戏笔记本电脑的最佳例子之一,尽管它的尺寸为17英寸,但仅重2.3公斤,而且也相对较薄,总高度为2.3厘米(包括机箱脚在内为2.6厘米)。这使得这款17英寸的产品在携带时有些舒适,而且不会在桌面上占用太多的空间。结合谨慎的设计,Beast X25看起来相当温和。只有当你打开它,键盘上色彩鲜艳的RGB灯光被激活时,你才能注意到它的游戏性质。
当涉及到硬件时,Medion将踏板放在金属上。AMDRyzen 9 5900HX处理器和Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080笔记本电脑显卡,配备16GB的VRAM,是目前笔记本电脑市场上最快的组件之一。此外--正如最初提到的--还有大量的内存和存储。64GB的DDR4-3200内存(双通道模式下的2x 32GB)和2TB的M.2 NVMe固态硬盘一样充足(如果需要,还有空间再装一个M.2固态硬盘)。在我们的评测样本中,MD63835的价格略低于2,700欧元(约合3,191美元),该配置由一个具有1920x1080像素的快速240赫兹面板来完成。喜欢更清晰显示的用户应该对MD62210型号感到满意,它的价格高出200欧元(约合236美元),采用QHD显示屏(165赫兹,2560x1440像素)。
Erazer Beast X25的竞争对手包括其他配备GeForce RTX 3080和现代高端CPU的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如华硕Strix Scar 17 G733QSA ,华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD,技嘉Aero 17 HDR YD, Aorus 17G YD,所有这些都作为对比设备出现在表中。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 22 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus 17G YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Aorus 17G YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
网络摄像头
显示--240赫兹,反应时间快
该显示屏由全高清分辨率的无光泽IPS面板组成,由于其240赫兹的高频率,在任何情况下都感觉非常流畅。响应时间也同样可观。我们能够在从黑色到白色以及从灰色到灰色的过程中测量到10毫秒以下。因此,这台17英寸显示器也完全适合于特别快的游戏,如第一人称射击游戏。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 329 cd/m²
Contrast: 997:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.223
Medion Erazer Beast X25 BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD AU Optronics AUO329B, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Aorus 17G YD Sharp LQ173M1JW04, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 21% | 17% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.4 | 71 1% | 86.9 23% | 94.2 34% | 72.3 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.4 0% | 100 0% | 98.7 -1% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.6 | 72.2 1% | 99.6 39% | 84.4 18% | 73.7 3% |
Response Times | -33% | -415% | 3% | -56% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.2 ? | 6.6 ? 28% | 52 ? -465% | 4.8 48% | 13.6 ? -48% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 ? | 10.8 ? -93% | 26 ? -364% | 8 -43% | 9.2 ? -64% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 4% | 32% | -20% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 329 | 303.8 -8% | 488 48% | 322 -2% | 286 -13% |
Brightness | 315 | 292 -7% | 467 48% | 288 -9% | 282 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 86 -2% | 72 -18% | 73 -17% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.23 30% | 0.33 -0% | 0.3 9% | 0.24 27% |
Contrast | 997 | 1321 32% | 1479 48% | 1073 8% | 1192 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.03 | 1.87 8% | 1.23 39% | 3.05 -50% | 2.79 -37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 3.26 41% | 2.94 47% | 5.23 5% | 6.23 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.82 | 1.45 -77% | 0.77 6% | 1.92 -134% | 0.82 -0% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.7 23% | 1.5 57% | 3.11 11% | 3.5 -0% |
Gamma | 2.223 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.169 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.358 93% |
CCT | 6526 100% | 6436 101% | 6614 98% | 6553 99% | 6147 106% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.6 | 99 | 84 | 74 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 99 | 99 | 96 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-2% | -121% /
-34% | 0% /
-9% | -20% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
其余的参数在积极意义上是相当不起眼的。亮度值略低于315cd/m²,应能满足大多数买家的要求,对比度约为1,000:1,即使竞争对手的对比度更高一些。同时,色彩空间覆盖率分别为99.8%(sRGB)和71.6%(AdobeRGB),与竞争对手持平。只有技嘉Aero 17 HDR YD的4K面板能够在这个类别中明显脱颖而出(99.6% AdobeRGB)。
在色彩准确性方面,Beast X25的表现很好。在Calman测量软件的ColorChecker测试中,DeltaE 2000值保持在理想范围内,平均为2.03(最高为3),通过校准甚至可以获得更好的值。我们相应的ICC文件在上面的亮度分布图旁边进一步链接。作为IPS面板的典型,在视角稳定性方面也没有什么可抱怨的。
最多,在户外使用时,全高清面板会暴露出弱点。虽然在阴凉处亮度通常足够,但你会发现自己希望在阳光充足的地方有更高的亮度。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
测试条件 - 控制中心的许多选项
裸机制造商同方的综合控制中心值得大加赞扬。这个预装的工具可以用来调整大量的系统设置。例如,你可以(取消)激活Optimus图形切换功能或改变性能配置文件。
我们的测试都是使用Optimus技术和 "游戏 "性能模式进行的。后者为CPU提供50瓦,并将显卡的TGP设置为130瓦(125瓦+5瓦的动态提升)。如果你想从17英寸的显示器中榨取更多的性能,你可以将动态提升增加到最大15瓦,这导致总功率为140瓦。其他两种模式的标准设置,即 "办公 "和 "涡轮",可以在下面的截图中看到。一个有趣的事实:根据Nvidia驱动程序和Medion的主页,该显卡甚至可以达到165瓦的TGP。然而,在我们的测试设备中,这个数值是无法选择的。
性能--AMD与Nvidia的结合
如果你非常关心未来,Medion Erazer Beast X25是一个完美的伴侣。即使在游戏领域,64GB的内存和2TB的SSD存储也不是必然的。许多竞争对手不得不用16到32GB和500到1000GB的固态硬盘来凑合。适当地,Medion安装了当时最强大的移动Nvidia GPU和最强大的移动AMD CPU之一。
处理器
Ryzen 9 5900HX是一个极其强大的八核型号,配备了16MB的L3缓存,可以使用SMT并行处理多达16个线程。在45瓦,TDP与英特尔的竞争产品相似,但AMD使用的是略微精细的制造工艺(7纳米对10纳米 @Tiger Lake )。
* ... smaller is better
从纸面上看,时钟速率从3.3到最高4.6GHz。在我们的Cinebench R15测试中,CPU在单核负载下达到3.6至4.6 GHz,当所有核心都处于负载状态时,平均为3.7 GHz。这个数值对于Ryzen 9 5900HX来说有点差。华硕Strix Scar 17 G733QSA也配备了5900HX,在直接比较中提供了更好的基准测试结果。性能更符合基于英特尔酷睿i7-11800H或酷睿i9-11980H(K)的笔记本电脑。在使用涡轮增压模式或在控制中心程序中手动增加CPU值时,Beast X25应该能够胜过英特尔的竞争对手。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
根据上图,你可以看到,即使经过几次运行,CPU的性能仍然相当稳定,并没有出现任何重大的下降。
系统性能
可能是由于固态硬盘的结果相对较弱,当涉及到系统测试时,Erazer在我们的测试领域中排名最后。尽管如此,这款笔记本电脑还是以非常高的系统速度获得了分数,在快速启动、加载和响应时间等方面表现突出。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6807 - 7416, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (10018 - 10593, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (8546 - 10066, n=6) | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (9377 - 10582, n=6) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6842 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
在用LatencyMon工具进行的延迟测试中没有明显的问题。17英寸机似乎是实时音频和视频编辑的理想选择。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
* ... smaller is better
储存
就像竞争对手一样,Medion安装了来自三星的快如闪电的PCIe 4固态硬盘,但在AS固态硬盘基准测试和CrystalDiskMark中却出人意料地落后于对比笔记本电脑,正如我们的表格所显示的。很好。由于有免费的M.2插槽,如果需要的话,存储空间可以不费吹灰之力就能扩大。
Medion Erazer Beast X25 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Aorus 17G YD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 54% | 65% | 58% | 41% | |
Write 4K | 129.7 | 235.9 82% | 230.4 78% | 244.2 88% | 227.4 75% |
Read 4K | 62.4 | 48.02 -23% | 91.6 47% | 89.8 44% | 91.3 46% |
Write Seq | 2436 | 4822 98% | 4216 73% | 2241 -8% | |
Read Seq | 2354 | 5043 114% | 4543 93% | 4496 91% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 512 | 625 22% | 667 30% | 607 19% | 661 29% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 436.2 | 392.3 -10% | 728 67% | 658 51% | 712 63% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3541 | 5350 51% | 5043 42% | 5270 49% | 1540 -57% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3568 | 7130 100% | 6821 91% | 7091 99% | 6806 91% |
AS SSD | 14% | 47% | 64% | 25% | |
Seq Read | 2591 | 4981 92% | 5438 110% | 5085 96% | 5150 99% |
Seq Write | 1900 | 3050 61% | 3904 105% | 4434 133% | 3920 106% |
4K Read | 53.9 | 57 6% | 56.2 4% | 80.3 49% | 46.6 -14% |
4K Write | 112.6 | 261.3 132% | 165.8 47% | 214.7 91% | 145.8 29% |
4K-64 Read | 1335 | 1205 -10% | 2489 86% | 2573 93% | 2071 55% |
4K-64 Write | 2966 | 1290 -57% | 3480 17% | 2972 0% | 3267 10% |
Access Time Read * | 0.038 | 0.032 16% | 0.054 -42% | 0.018 53% | 0.078 -105% |
Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.044 -22% | 0.026 28% | 0.02 44% | 0.029 19% |
Score Read | 1648 | 1760 7% | 3089 87% | 3161 92% | 2633 60% |
Score Write | 3269 | 1857 -43% | 4036 23% | 3631 11% | 2805 -14% |
Score Total | 5733 | 4428 -23% | 8620 50% | 8380 46% | 7716 35% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
31% | 56% /
55% | 61% /
62% | 33% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
GeForce RTX 3080,这是Nvidia安培一代的绝对高端型号,具有6144个CUDA核心和16GB GDDR6 VRAM,负责Erazer中苛刻的图形计算。GPU-Z工具报告说,该芯片的时钟速度在1,110和1,545 MHz之间(基础/提升),其内存的时钟速度为1,750 MHz。
目前Nvidia GPU的性能在很大程度上取决于配置的TGP,制造商可以相对自由地选择。正如以前的报告,DirectX 12芯片在 "游戏模式 "下运行的功率为130瓦,包括动态提升,考虑到我们的RTX 3080笔记本电脑文章 ,这代表了一个合格的价值;这相应地反映在图形基准上,野兽X25通常在我们比较领域的(低)中场。
3DMark 11 Performance | 27989 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 48998 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23834 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10580 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
尽管在我们的游戏测试中,Beast X25并没有排在最前面,但其3D性能非常高。所有最新的游戏都可以在1920x1080的原始分辨率和高到最大的细节下顺利进行。对于外部QHD(2560x1440像素)或UHD(3840x2160像素)显示器来说,往往会有足够的潜力。只有在极端的CPU密集型游戏中,情况才会变得困难,如赛博朋克2077和/或在没有DLSS的情况下启用光线追踪时,情况才会变得困难。
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (149 - 242, n=32) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (85.1 - 123, n=40) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (137 - 176, n=30) | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (68.6 - 114.6, n=34) | |
Aorus 17G YD | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (55.5 - 115, n=34) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Aorus 17G YD |
我们检查了RPG热门游戏的帧率是否在很长一段时间内保持不变。 我们检查了Witcher 3我们运行了60分钟(全高清/超清)。就像我们在CPU测试中已经看到的那样,Erazer在这里也没有受到性能下降的影响。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 180 | 157 | 91.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 175 | 97.9 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 147 | 141 | 126 | 119 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 170 | 127 | 97 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 101 | 87.4 | 72.1 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 119 | 110 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 332 | 199 | 180 | 168 |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 122 | |||
Death Stranding (2020) | 135 | 134 | ||
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 104 | |||
Resident Evil Village (2021) | 155 | 144 | ||
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 109 | |||
Days Gone (2021) | 130 | 100 | ||
F1 2021 (2021) | 165 | 111 |
排放 - 喷气式飞机
噪声排放
薄型结构的一个主要缺点是噪音大,尽管大多数游戏笔记本电脑都要在这方面做斗争。Witcher 3 ,一小时后约为52 dB(A),相当响亮,不戴耳机只能部分忍受。只有华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD在测试中明显地更安静。
Beast X25在空闲模式下的表现也需要改进。尽管笔记本电脑有时完全无声(除了暂时的线圈啸叫),或者它只是以略低于30 dB(A)的相当微妙的水平发出嘶嘶声,但风扇偶尔会无缘无故地转速超过40 dB(A),这将使敏感的用户感到烦恼。控制中心的 "办公室模式 "提供了一个解决方案,或至少提供了一些衰减。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 30 / 43 dB(A) |
Load |
| 54 / 55 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 16% | -0% | 19% | -2% | 12% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 23 8% | 25 -0% | 24 ? 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 25.2 3% | 30 -15% | 23 12% | 32 -23% | 25.5 ? 2% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 25.2 16% | 32 -7% | 23 23% | 33 -10% | 27.2 ? 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 43 | 25.2 41% | 41 5% | 23 47% | 39 9% | 30.2 ? 30% |
Load Average * | 54 | 30.7 43% | 43 20% | 41 24% | 43 20% | 42.5 ? 21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 51.3 1% | 51 2% | 45 13% | 52 -0% | |
Load Maximum * | 55 | 51.3 7% | 59 -7% | 52 5% | 61 -11% | 53.4 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管噪音水平很高,但17英寸机箱在负载下会变得相对较热。在这种情况下,我们在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行压力测试时,机箱顶部的温度高达54℃(约129°F),底部的温度高达57℃(约135°F)(最高温度分别为52℃(约126°F)和55℃(约131°F),@TheWitcher 3 )。另一方面,机箱在空闲使用时感觉相当凉爽,最高温度为35°C(约95°F)。
像往常一样,组件变得相当热。虽然Ryzen 9 5900HX在全负荷下节流到2.3 GHz,但HWMonitor工具报告了一个高但仍然不关键的85℃(约185°F)。GeForce RTX 3080的情况要好一些,在压力测试中(没有节流),它舒适地稳定在82°C左右(约180°F)。在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中,温度相似,但该设备能够达到更高的时钟速率(见截图)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.1 °C / -29 F).
Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 11% | 7% | -1% | 16% | 11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 40 26% | 44 19% | 59 -9% | 36 33% | 46.1 ? 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 39.8 30% | 56 2% | 53 7% | 52 9% | 49.2 ? 14% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 34.6 -2% | 32 6% | 35 -3% | 29 15% | 31.2 ? 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 35 | 38.4 -10% | 35 -0% | 35 -0% | 33 6% | 32.2 ? 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Medion Erazer Beast X25 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 强大的91Wh电池
能源消耗
对于一个具有图形切换功能的高端笔记本电脑来说,其能量率也不是很好或特别差。闲置时的22至34瓦和负载时的120至231瓦一样,与大多数竞争对手一致。只要你不过度使用控制中心的设置,附带的230瓦电源适配器有足够的容量。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 2.3 Watt |
Idle | 22 / 26 / 34 Watt |
Load |
120 / 231 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 21% | -5% | 3% | 1% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 22 | 10.9 50% | 25 -14% | 21.7 1% | 24 -9% | 13.5 ? 39% |
Idle Average * | 26 | 14.7 43% | 28 -8% | 27 -4% | 26 -0% | 18.9 ? 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 26.8 21% | 40 -18% | 33 3% | 38 -12% | 26.7 ? 21% |
Load Average * | 120 | 106.7 11% | 114 5% | 108 10% | 101 16% | 106.6 ? 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 189 | 192.4 -2% | 176 7% | 195 -3% | 164 13% | |
Load Maximum * | 231 | 228.4 1% | 236 -2% | 210 9% | 230 -0% | 249 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test
电池寿命
虽然其他制造商在谈到电池寿命时喜欢讲童话故事,但Medion网站上提供的信息是非常保守的,最多3小时(视频播放)。在我们的自动Wi-Fi测试中,六芯91.2Wh的电池持续了近7个小时(在中等显示亮度下访问各种网站),这在游戏笔记本电脑领域是一个非常可敬的比率。在理想的条件下(无负载,最低亮度),17英寸的笔记本需要在10小时内再次插入电源。
Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 26% | -17% | 55% | -0% | -2% | |
Reader / Idle | 591 | 797 35% | 541 -8% | 565 ? -4% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 410 | 559 36% | 334 -19% | 449 10% | 360 -12% | 376 ? -8% |
Load | 81 | 86 6% | 70 -14% | 162 100% | 96 19% | 85.3 ? 5% |
H.264 | 430 | 370 | 408 ? | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 62 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 价格昂贵,但比许多竞争对手便宜
Medion Erazer Beast X25是一款理想的笔记本电脑,适合那些正在寻找一个谨慎、苗条和相对轻巧的设备的热情玩家,同时也是高度面向未来的。
虽然由于AMD处理器的存在,该机箱没有提供Thunderbolt端口,但该设备拥有(几乎)其他一切你可以从现代高端笔记本电脑中得到的东西。除了快速的240赫兹全高清面板(Beast X25还可以选择165赫兹的QHD显示屏),这里应该提到充足的内存和存储(64GB内存,2TB NVMe SSD)。
Ryzen 9 5900HXCPU和 GeForce RTX 3080笔记本GPU的组合在运行3D应用时特别强大。与其他制造商的笔记本电脑不同的是,CPU和GPU的TDP是固定的,你可以在预装的控制中心通过选择配置文件或手动调整相应的值--这是一个很大的优点和一个很好的独特卖点。
然而,强大的硬件导致了负载下的显著噪音水平,这鼓励使用耳机。闲置时的风扇控制也是次优的(关键词:"转速")。这也是评论中提到的竞争设备(例如华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 )在总体评级中得分略高的原因之一。
相对较好的性价比说明了Erazer Beast X25的优势。许多RTX 3080笔记本电脑的价格超过3000欧元(约3545美元),甚至接近4000欧元(约4723美元)大关。
价格和可用性
在美国,一个使用同方裸机系统作为其笔记本电脑基础的知名电子供应商是Eluktronics公司。在这种情况下,你会发现他们的MAX-17模型与我们的审查样本相当。价格从1799美元开始,你可以全面定制该设备以满足你的需求。
Medion Erazer Beast X25
- 07/25/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser