Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 Memo Pad 8 ME181CX (Pro 7 Entertainment Pad) 平板电脑简短评测

众乐乐? 来自华硕的Memo Pad 8平板也有名为“Pro Sieben Entertainment Pad”的版本。与Media Markt合作的这款平板将会为购买者提供“价值100欧元(763人民币)的代金券”。请阅读我们的评测以了解这个代金券究竟是什么,而这款平板的表现又如何。
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen
217 mm 136 mm 8.95 mm 360 g215 mm 130 mm 8.5 mm 360 g214.4 mm 120.7 mm 7.9 mm 341 g210.8 mm 124.2 mm 9.9 mm 338 g211.7 mm 124.9 mm 8.8 mm 338 g210 mm 132 mm 9.5 mm 372 g200 mm 141 mm 8 mm 340 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
367
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 352.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 362 cd/m²
Contrast: 823:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.94
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735G, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Iconia Tab 8
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 16 GB SSD
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 910, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo A8-50
SGX544, MT8121, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-0%
-6%
-2%
3%
10%
Brightness middle
362
376
4%
295
-19%
330
-9%
328
-9%
348.1
-4%
Brightness
352
353
0%
278
-21%
316
-10%
308
-12%
322
-9%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
84
-2%
91
6%
84
-2%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.44
0.59
-34%
0.38
14%
0.54
-23%
0.46
-5%
0.452
-3%
Contrast
823
637
-23%
776
-6%
611
-26%
713
-13%
770
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.78
5.07
25%
8.01
-18%
5.47
19%
5.23
23%
4.41
35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.26
5.58
23%
6.58
9%
5.36
26%
4.68
36%
2.99
59%
Gamma
2.94 75%
2.14 103%
1.72 128%
2.14 103%
2.15 102%
2.21 100%
CCT
6355 102%
6122 106%
6001 108%
6342 102%
7185 90%
6468 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
46.68

* ... smaller is better

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
771 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
326 Points -58%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
481 Points -38%
Lenovo A8-50
351 Points -54%
Gigaset QV830
325 Points -58%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
763 Points -1%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
2324 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1047 Points -55%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
1452 Points -38%
Lenovo A8-50
1156 Points -50%
Gigaset QV830
1077 Points -54%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
2397 Points +3%
Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
9784 points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
5117 points -48%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
9473 points -3%
Lenovo A8-50
4019 points -59%
Gigaset QV830
3969 points -59%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
9199 points -6%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
3876 points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
2965 points -24%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
3432 points -11%
Gigaset QV830
2608 points -33%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
3879 points 0%
Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
230 MFLOPS
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
84.1 MFLOPS -63%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
205 MFLOPS -11%
Lenovo A8-50
114.2 MFLOPS -50%
Gigaset QV830
38.4 MFLOPS -83%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
206.5 MFLOPS -10%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
565 MFLOPS
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
236.9 MFLOPS -58%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
558 MFLOPS -1%
Lenovo A8-50
221.9 MFLOPS -61%
Gigaset QV830
127.1 MFLOPS -78%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
326.9 MFLOPS -42%
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
33462 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
17949 Points -46%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
36659 Points +10%

Legend

 
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX Intel Atom Z3745, Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G Pad 8.0 V480 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏ Intel Atom Z3735G, Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 8 Intel Atom Z3745, Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 16 GB SSD
 
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0 HiSilicon Kirin 910, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo A8-50 Mediatek MT8121, PowerVR SGX544, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset QV830 Mediatek MT8125, PowerVR SGX544, 8 GB SSD
 
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C Intel Atom Z3745, Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
14142 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
4605 Points -67%
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏
12741 Points -10%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
16915 Points +20%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
4925 Points -65%
Lenovo A8-50
2869 Points -80%
Gigaset QV830
2551 Points -82%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
12762 Points -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
13414 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
4108 Points -69%
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏
12339 Points -8%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
16455 Points +23%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
4410 Points -67%
Gigaset QV830
2136 Points -84%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
11835 Points -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
17455 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
7983 Points -54%
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏
14383 Points -18%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
18752 Points +7%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
8327 Points -52%
Gigaset QV830
7990 Points -54%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
17581 Points +1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
27.3 fps
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
10.3 fps -62%
Gigaset QV830
5.6 fps -79%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
27.5 fps +1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
14.2 fps
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
5.8 fps -59%
Gigaset QV830
2.7 fps -81%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
16.9 fps +19%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
16.2 fps
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
3.8 fps -77%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
8.6 fps -47%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
14.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
8.5 fps
Acer Iconia Tab 8
8.7 fps +2%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
0 fps -100%
WebXPRT 2013
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
378 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
160 Points -58%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
485 Points +28%
Gigaset QV830
157 Points -58%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
382 Points +1%
Photo Effects (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
654 ms *
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1774 ms * -171%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
795 ms * -22%
Gigaset QV830
2792 ms * -327%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
655 ms * -0%
Face Detection (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
3307 ms *
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
4701 ms * -42%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
1201 ms * +64%
Gigaset QV830
3707 ms * -12%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
3296 ms * -0%
Stocks Dashboard (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
783 ms *
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
2368 ms * -202%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
647 ms * +17%
Gigaset QV830
2243 ms * -186%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
762 ms * +3%
Offline Notes (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
859 ms *
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
2312 ms * -169%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
874 ms * -2%
Gigaset QV830
2111 ms * -146%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
847 ms * +1%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
5148 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1989 Points -61%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
6510 Points +26%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
1467 Points -72%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
5189 Points +1%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
5356 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1770 Points -67%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
6009 Points +12%
Lenovo A8-50
2179 Points -59%
Gigaset QV830
1738 Points -68%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
5266 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
5496 ms *
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
14907 ms * -171%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
6009 ms * -9%
Gigaset QV830
25950 ms * -372%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
5837 ms * -6%
Vellamo 3.x
Browser (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
2944 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1644 Points -44%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
3108 Points +6%
Multicore Beta (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
1446 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1222 Points -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
1581 Points +9%
Metal (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
1098 Points
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
800 Points -27%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
1117 Points +2%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
609 ms *
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1034 ms * -70%
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏
770 ms * -26%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
700 ms * -15%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
1444 ms * -137%
Lenovo A8-50
1454 ms * -139%
Gigaset QV830
1268 ms * -108%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
601 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
95 MB/s
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
114.8 MB/s +21%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
100.4 MB/s +6%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
38.74 MB/s -59%
Lenovo A8-50
62.5 MB/s -34%
Gigaset QV830
50.9 MB/s -46%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
93.3 MB/s -2%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
14 MB/s
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
18.75 MB/s +34%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
12.23 MB/s -13%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
12.13 MB/s -13%
Lenovo A8-50
23.18 MB/s +66%
Gigaset QV830
6.14 MB/s -56%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
18.29 MB/s +31%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
13 MB/s
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
16.34 MB/s +26%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
8.54 MB/s -34%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
9.12 MB/s -30%
Lenovo A8-50
13.1 MB/s +1%
Gigaset QV830
13.43 MB/s +3%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
16 MB/s +23%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
0.7 MB/s
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
1.72 MB/s +146%
Acer Iconia Tab 8
0.58 MB/s -17%
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
0.95 MB/s +36%
Lenovo A8-50
0.94 MB/s +34%
Gigaset QV830
0.44 MB/s -37%
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
1.17 MB/s +67%
Max. Load
 33.3 °C27.6 °C27.8 °C 
 34.9 °C28 °C28.7 °C 
 32.7 °C27.3 °C27.7 °C 
Maximum: 34.9 °C
Average: 29.8 °C
26.9 °C30.1 °C34.7 °C
27.7 °C28.9 °C35 °C
27 °C28.5 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 30.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.8 / 2.5 Watt
Load midlight 3.8 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 33min
WiFi Surfing
7h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 03min
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG G Pad 8.0 V480
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Toshiba WT8-B-102‏
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735G, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Iconia Tab 8
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 16 GB SSD
Huawei MediaPad M1 8.0
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 910, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Memo Pad HD 7 ME176C
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
57%
-24%
16%
70%
23%
H.264
501
729
46%
320
-36%
WiFi
442
653
48%
390
-12%
385
-13%
751
70%
398
-10%
Load
183
326
78%
265
45%
283
55%
In Review: Asus Memo Pad 8. Test device courtesy of Asus Germany.
In Review: Asus Memo Pad 8. Test device courtesy of Asus Germany.

我们必须要告诉读者的是,在这个价位还有比这款Pro Sieben Entertainment Pad更好的选择。它的相机基本上可以算是个摆设,而GPS模组的响应缓慢而不甚精确,机身的稳定性有待提高,且无线网络的传输速度也十分低。最后,它的扬声器音效很一般,低于华硕宣称的水平。

但Pro Sieben Entertainment Pad即华硕Memo Pad 8仍然是一款不错的平板,因为它有很强的性能,低发热量,实用的电池续航时间还有许多系统设置可供个性化。

来自Pro Sieben的服务对于对在线音乐、电影播放感兴趣的用户来说十分具有吸引力。不过,它赠送的使用时间仅为几个月,且如果你不需要这些功能的话这款平板的性价比就会变得更低。相对的,你也需要接受来自Pro Sieben的很多广告

华硕Memo Pad 8"Pro Sieben Entertainment Pad"是一款实用的平板电脑,但无法兑现它所许诺的所有功能。如果你只是需要优秀的性能,且也会实用来自Pro Sieben的服务的话,那么就会从中得到一些额外的价值。我们仍然建议用户在选择这款设备之前也考虑一下这个价位的其他平板产品

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX与Pro Sieben协作销售。
Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX与Pro Sieben协作销售。
这也解释了它的命名来源。
这也解释了它的命名来源。
它预装了许多来自Pro Sieben的应用,可以通过屏幕底部的菜单访问。
它预装了许多来自Pro Sieben的应用,可以通过屏幕底部的菜单访问。
你可以获得在线媒体播放的一些优惠券。
你可以获得在线媒体播放的一些优惠券。
这款平板自身素质一般。
这款平板自身素质一般。
我们很喜欢它的胶质机背表面。
我们很喜欢它的胶质机背表面。
Intel的处理器提供了充足的性能。
Intel的处理器提供了充足的性能。
它的游戏性能也十分不错。
它的游戏性能也十分不错。
它的屏幕质量也很好。
它的屏幕质量也很好。
我们特别喜欢它关于显示效果的设定。
我们特别喜欢它关于显示效果的设定。
例如,色温的设定。
例如,色温的设定。
不过显示效果如果能更加锐利就好了。
不过显示效果如果能更加锐利就好了。
对比度和亮度相对还算不错。
对比度和亮度相对还算不错。
它的机身采用了塑料材质,工艺质量属于可以接受的水平。
它的机身采用了塑料材质,工艺质量属于可以接受的水平。
不过,你可以轻易的折弯它。
不过,你可以轻易的折弯它。
它最大的一个缺点:相机的分辨率非常低。
它最大的一个缺点:相机的分辨率非常低。
它不太适合专门用于拍照。
它不太适合专门用于拍照。
micro USB接口和耳机接口都安排在了顶部。
micro USB接口和耳机接口都安排在了顶部。
它的扬声器设计在了机背的底部,声音效果十分单薄。
它的扬声器设计在了机背的底部,声音效果十分单薄。
通过音效设定也无法有太大的改善。
通过音效设定也无法有太大的改善。
你可以选择不同的节能模式,不过电池续航依然十分一般。
你可以选择不同的节能模式,不过电池续航依然十分一般。
它的键盘支持很多功能。
它的键盘支持很多功能。
预装的Pro Sieben应用中有很多提供了免费的试用期,相应地也有很多只是单纯的广告。
预装的Pro Sieben应用中有很多提供了免费的试用期,相应地也有很多只是单纯的广告。
如果你比较关注售价,而也对Pro Sieben的服务感兴趣的话,那它是一款不错的设备。它的主要缺陷在于扬声器,GPS模组,和无线信号。
如果你比较关注售价,而也对Pro Sieben的服务感兴趣的话,那它是一款不错的设备。它的主要缺陷在于扬声器,GPS模组,和无线信号。
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Specifications

Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX (Memo Pad Series)
Processor
Intel Atom Z3745 4 x 1.3 - 1.9 GHz, Bay Trail-T
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, 10点触控,电容型, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm 整合耳机插头, Card Reader: microSD读卡器最大支持64GB, Sensors: 陀螺仪,位置传感器,磁感仪, Miracast
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 211.7 x 124.9
Battery
15 Wh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 9 h
Operating System
Android 4.4 KitKat
Camera
Webcam: 主相机:200万像素,前置相机:30万像素
Additional features
Speakers: 后置立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, Pro Sieben娱乐代金券, 电源适配器, USB数据线, Goal One, RanDuell, MaxDome, 7TV, Deezer, News Republic, Party Link, Zinio, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
338 g, Power Supply: 53 g
Price
149 Euro

 

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

惠普 Stream 8 5900ng 平板电脑简短评测
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Atom Z3735G
Acer Iconia One 8 平板电脑简短评测
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Atom Z3735G
东芝 WT8-B-102‏ 平板电脑简短评测
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Atom Z3735G

Pros

+ 纤薄机身
+ 易于握持的机背
+ 许多Pro Sieben应用的免费使用期
+ 系统设置功能众多
+ 可靠的触控屏幕
+ 不错的屏幕,有色彩设定
+ 系统性能高

Cons

- 机身易扭折
- 许多预装的Pro Sieben广告软件
- 载入网页有时耗时过长
- 缓慢而不准确的GPS
- 相机拍摄质量差
- 扬声器音质低
- 尽管功耗低,但电池续航一般

Asus Memo Pad 8 ME181CX - 11/06/2014 v4 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
63%
Keyboard
61 / 80 → 76%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
38 / 65 → 58%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Battery
90%
Display
80%
Games Performance
61 / 68 → 90%
Application Performance
44 / 76 → 58%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
40 / 91 → 44%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Average
68%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 Memo Pad 8 ME181CX (Pro 7 Entertainment Pad) 平板电脑简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2014-11-24 (Update: 2014-11-24)