小米 Mi Air (13.3寸) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Brand: Xiaomi

闪亮登场。小米为进入笔记本市场推出了它的第一台笔记本电脑Mi Notebook Air。这家中国生产商野心勃勃，向强劲的竞争对手们发起了挑战。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解这台新设备是否有足够的底气做到这点。

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 10/28/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Skylake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of https://tradingshenzhen.com/

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Mi Notebook Air 13.3 (Mi Notebook Air Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 1024 MB VRAM, GDDR5, Nvidia Driver 369.09

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4 2133 MHz, 单通道, 板载

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB

Soundcard

Realtek High Definition Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Sensors: 重力传感器

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14.8 x 309.6 x 210.9

Battery

40 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 100万像素

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.28 kg, Power Supply: 218 g

Price

867 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

...has a maximum opening angle of about 130 °.

Right: USB 3.0, USB Type-C (AC-In), Power-LED

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	634 MBit/s
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	563 MBit/s -11%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	385 MBit/s -39%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	547 MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	510 MBit/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	438 MBit/s -14%


368 cd/m²	368 cd/m²	351 cd/m²
347 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	327 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	297 cd/m²	294 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung LTN133HL09-M01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 368 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 333.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 347 cd/m²
Contrast: 1285:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3"	Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple APP9CF0, , 1440x900, 13.3"	Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 APPA02A, , 2560x1600, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display		-16%	-3%	-38%	0%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	66	54.8 -17%	64.6 -2%	40.1 -39%	65.9 0%	65.9 0%
sRGB Coverage	95.5	82.3 -14%	91.6 -4%	59.8 -37%	97 2%	97 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.8	56.6 -17%	66.5 -2%	41.51 -39%	67.4 -1%	68 0%
Response Times		11%	11%			87%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	49 ?(20, 29)	42.8 ?(16, 26.8) 13%	31 ?(13, 18) 37%			56 ?(22, 34) -14%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(8, 19)	24.8 ?(5.2, 19.6) 8%	31.2 ?(10.8, 20.4) -16%			44 ?(9.2, 34.8) -63%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(30)					219.3 ?(59) 339%
Screen		1%	-4%	-25%	8%	-37%
Brightness middle	347	385 11%	444 28%	329 -5%	361 4%	349 1%
Brightness	334	350 5%	393 18%	310 -7%	342 2%	339 1%
Brightness Distribution	80	86 8%	82 3%	82 3%	81 1%	88 10%
Black Level *	0.27	0.17 37%	0.33 -22%	0.405 -50%	0.361 -34%	0.393 -46%
Contrast	1285	2265 76%	1345 5%	812 -37%	1000 -22%	888 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.29	4.17 -27%	4 -22%	3.96 -20%	1.82 45%	6.85 -108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.69	7.61 -62%	7.7 -64%	7.51 -60%	3.26 30%	10.27 -119%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.62	5.39 -49%	2.83 22%	3.51 3%	1.8 50%	6.43 -78%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.12 ^104%	2.05 ^107%	3.83 ^57%	2.49 ^88%	1.83 ^120%
CCT	7307 ^89%	7404 ^88%	6963 ^93%	6711 ^97%	6417 ^101%	7820 ^83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62	62.7 1%	59.3 -4%	38.4 -38%	61.9 0%	61.9 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95	99.8 5%	91.4 -4%	59.8 -37%	96.9 2%	97.3 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / -1%	1% / -2%	-32% / -28%	4% / 6%	17% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s 20FA003FPB Intel Core i7-6600U	127 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U	118 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Core i7-5650U	112 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US Intel Core i5-6200U	107 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s 20FA003FPB Intel Core i7-6600U	346 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Core i7-5650U	296 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	287 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US Intel Core i5-6200U	273 Points -7%

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

49.24 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.23 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.21 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

51.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

294 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

118 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 HD Graphics 6000, 5650U, Apple SSD SD0256F	3579 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	3414 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3144 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	3024 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	2837 Points -10%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	2761 Points -12%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 HD Graphics 6000, 5650U, Apple SSD SD0256F	4367 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	4339 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4274 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	4121 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	3863 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3144 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4274 points
Help

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-4%	-28%	-74%	-38%
Read Seq	1209	1168 -3%	514 -57%	446.5 -63%	524 -57%
Write Seq	314	329 5%	459.5 46%	171.1 -46%	157.5 -50%
Read 512		1015	413.4	259.2	398.9
Write 512		307	424.5	167.2	157.7
Read 4k	43.4	33 -24%	36.34 -16%	5.78 -87%	36.57 -16%
Write 4k	153.4	132 -14%	100.1 -35%	35.47 -77%	99.4 -35%
Read 4k QD32	487.6	525 8%	313.8 -36%	94.9 -81%	397.5 -18%
Write 4k QD32	312.2	325 4%	96.8 -69%	36.43 -88%	157 -50%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256

Sequential Read: 1209 MB/s

Sequential Write: 314 MB/s

4K Read: 43.4 MB/s

4K Write: 153.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 487.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 312.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book, Intel Core i7-6600U	2606 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2417 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	2101 Points -13%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	1947 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U	1706 Points -29%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1541 Points -36%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	12078 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	11531 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book, Intel Core i7-6600U	11420 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	9788 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U	7894 Points -35%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7684 Points -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book, Intel Core i7-6600U	2120 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2091 Points
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	1194 Points -43%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U	1020 Points -51%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	924 Points -56%

3DMark 11 Performance		2578 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7168 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1832 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	19.82 fps
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	19.3 fps -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	13.6 (5.1^min - 45^max) fps -31%
1366x768 High Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	57.1 fps
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	53.1 fps -7%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	39.5 (7.4^min - 85.1^max) fps -31%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	65.6 fps
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	60.1 fps -8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	47.7 (8.1^min - 79.8^max) fps -27%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	107.8 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	106.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	85.3 (17.2^min - 143.8^max) fps -20%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Civilization 5 (2010)	70.9			20.7
BioShock Infinite (2013)	106.5	65.6	57.1	19.82
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	37.1	29.3	16.46
Total War: Rome II (2013)	82.7	64.8	56	14.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	35.7	23.2	13.2
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	23.5
Doom (2016)	26.75	11.97

Noise Level

Idle		31.15 / 31.15 / 31.15 dB(A)
HDD		31.15 dB(A)
Load		38.2 / 41.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.15 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


44.2 °C	51 °C	47 °C
42 °C	50.3 °C	32.2 °C
29.9 °C	27.4 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 39.1 °C


47 °C	46.6 °C	45.2 °C
35 °C	40.3 °C	40.7 °C
30 °C	32.6 °C	33.8 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 39 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.7 Watt
Idle	4 / 6.6 / 7.4 Watt
Load	41.7 / 52.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, , 3200x1800, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 6600U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), Samsung MZFLV512 NVMe, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5"	Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 5257U, Iris Graphics 6100, Apple SSD SM0128G, IPS-Panel, 2560x1600, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption		19%	5%	-29%	-9%	15%
Idle Minimum *	4	3.7 7%	3.3 17%	4.5 -13%	2.8 30%	3.7 7%
Idle Average *	6.6	6.1 8%	7.4 -12%	9.8 -48%	7.8 -18%	6.8 -3%
Idle Maximum *	7.4	6.5 12%	8.2 -11%	12.2 -65%	8.1 -9%	7.3 1%
Load Average *	41.7	29.5 29%	36.5 12%	46 -10%	52.4 -26%	26.3 37%
Load Maximum *	52.4	33 37%	43.7 17%	56 -7%	62.8 -20%	34.6 34%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 23min

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 66 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime		11%	25%	24%	43%	65%
Reader / Idle	718	810 13%	844 18%	915 27%		1572 119%
H.264	423	486 15%		534 26%	547 29%
WiFi v1.3	389	418 7%	403 4%	395 2%	526 35%	620 59%
Load	83	89 7%	128 54%	116 40%	137 65%	97 17%

Pros

+ 出色的性价比

+ 非常优秀的IPS屏幕

+ 一体式机身

+ 紧凑机身内搭载英伟达显卡

+ 优秀的输入设备

+ 两个M.2固态硬盘槽

+ 风扇噪音低

+ 电池充电速度快

Cons

- 一般的电池续航

- 无SD读卡器

- 镜面屏幕

- 非常低频率的屏幕闪烁亮度控制

- 目前需要进口付税

- 负载下温度略高

- 无德语键盘机型

In review: Mi Notebook Air. Test model provided by Trading Shenzen Shop

Mi Notebook Air标志着小米在笔记本市场的成功登场。生产商的成功设计让它几乎没有弱点。而优势则包括了非常优秀的屏幕，高品质一体式机身，高效冷却系统（也受到一定限制），优秀的输入设备和强劲的性能——它搭配了一块英伟达独立显卡，在同类设备中几乎独一无二。

它的一些瑕疵在于细节中：这台设备没有搭配SD读卡器，采用镜面屏幕，同时在负载下机身会变得很热。让我们最失望的是它的电池：Mi Notebook Air的续航时间只能算是一般水平。其他生产商在这方面做得更加出色，比如戴尔的XPS 13。另外，感兴趣的用户可以参考一下即将上市的Kaby Lake架构超极本，如惠普 Spectre x360和联想 Yoga 910。它们实际上都是变形本，可能并不会让所有用户感兴趣。同时它们也相比XPS和Mi Notebook Air更笨重。

小米的首台笔记本电脑提供了优秀的性能；生产商没有犯任何重大错误。目前唯一的问题是它需要通过进口渠道才能得到。

可能Mi Notebook Air最大的优势在于价位，所有之前提到的竞争机型都昂贵很多。价位相近的联想 IdeaPad 710S可能会是个值得考虑的选择。

Mi Notebook Air值得推荐吗？是的，不过它目前并没有在德国正式上市。这会带来一些问题，如英语键盘，无CE认证，或难以得到保修服务。其他的信息请参考我们的文章“CE认证和进口”。如果小米会在德国正式推出Mi Notebook Air的话，它将无疑成为一款成功的产品。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 - 10/15/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

89 / 98 → 91%

Keyboard

82%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

48 / 80 → 61%

Weight

72 / 35-78 → 86%

Battery

89%

Display

86%

Games Performance

66 / 68 → 97%

Application Performance

83 / 87 → 95%

Temperature

89 / 91 → 98%

Noise

88%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Average

78%

86%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Mi Air (13.3寸) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Benjamin Herzig, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Pros

Cons

Price comparison