Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 变形本简短评测

Surface追随者。 这台二合一设备追随微软Surface Pro 4的脚步,应该也会被拿来与之比较。联想的这台变形本提供了更好的连接性和更优秀的固态硬盘,不过在屏幕和相机上则略显不足。
Skylake Windows Touchscreen Convertible / 2-in-1
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (Miix 510 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4 双通道
Display
12.20 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 186 PPI, 10点触控, native pen support, Unknown, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB 
, 185 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Brightness Sensor, Micro-SIM (可选 LTE)
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 300 x 205
Battery
50 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 英特尔 SR1 Real Battery, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix 定焦
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 后置,搭配闪光灯
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声,支持Dolby Audio, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 45瓦电源适配器,使用电池的主动式手写笔,手写笔架,保护套, Lenovo ID, Always Online, App Explorer for FPC, CCSDK, WRITEit, PC Manager, Cloud Disk, Microsoft Office Desktop, Yandex, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.236 kg, Power Supply: 176 g
Price
980 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 510-12ISK sitting on the keyboard dock

Size Comparison

300 mm 205 mm 9.9 mm 1.2 kg300 mm 213.5 mm 8.05 mm 1.2 kg293 mm 224 mm 14.5 mm 1.1 kg291 mm 201 mm 11 mm 1.3 kg292.1 mm 201.4 mm 8.4 mm 1.1 kg278.8 mm 194.1 mm 6.9 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Power On/Off, volume, headphone jack
Power On/Off, volume, headphone jack
Power adapter, USB 3.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, right + left dual array microphone
Power adapter, USB 3.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, right + left dual array microphone
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
638 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
579 MBit/s -9%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)
534 MBit/s -16%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s -21%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
500 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
461 MBit/s -8%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)
453 MBit/s -9%
331
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Unknown tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 324.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: 934:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2"
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3"
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1"
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12"
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12"
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12"
Display
3%
-18%
3%
6%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
65
1%
53.8
-17%
65.5
2%
68.1
6%
65.8
2%
sRGB Coverage
92
96.5
5%
73.7
-20%
96.1
4%
97.4
6%
96.2
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.5
67
2%
53.8
-18%
66.9
2%
70.2
7%
66.8
2%
Response Times
-45%
0%
230%
33%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33 ?(21, 12)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between)
-39%
33.2 ?(15.2, 18)
-1%
20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)
39%
30 ?(11, 19)
9%
25 ?(9, 16)
24%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(10, 13)
31.2 ?(6, 25.2, Spikes in between)
-36%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
1%
34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU)
-48%
16 ?(4.4, 11.6)
30%
17 ?(4, 13)
26%
PWM Frequency
125 ?(90)
50 ?(50)
-60%
1000 ?(100)
700%
200 ?(18)
60%
Screen
21%
1%
6%
4%
4%
Brightness middle
327
413
26%
322
-2%
345
6%
341
4%
451
38%
Brightness
324
396
22%
319
-2%
328
1%
318
-2%
425
31%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
97
10%
91
3%
87
-1%
80
-9%
Black Level *
0.35
0.36
-3%
0.42
-20%
0.38
-9%
0.36
-3%
0.37
-6%
Contrast
934
1147
23%
767
-18%
908
-3%
947
1%
1219
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.54
3.09
53%
6.02
8%
8.4
-28%
6
8%
11.04
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.59
10.06
35%
11.9
24%
14.92
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.52
3.92
59%
6.29
34%
4.3
55%
8.12
15%
10.45
-10%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
2.63 84%
2.23 99%
2 110%
CCT
8802 74%
7333 89%
7712 84%
7368 88%
7011 93%
8849 73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
61
3%
47.8
-19%
62
5%
63.4
7%
74
25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
97
5%
73.2
-20%
97.4
6%
100
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / 4%
-6% / -3%
80% / 50%
14% / 10%
11% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN Graylevels
CalMAN Graylevels
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 125 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 125 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 125 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Systeminfo: CPU-Z CPU
Systeminfo: CPU-Z Mainboard
Systeminfo: CPU-Z Memory
Systeminfo: CPU-Z Cache
Systeminfo: GPU-Z HD 520
Systeminfo: HWinfo
Latency Monitor
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel Core i5-6300U
122 Points +5%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points -2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points -4%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54
111 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
107 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
99 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel Core i5-6300U
306 Points +24%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
255 Points +4%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
246 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
232 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points -16%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54
205 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
200 Points -19%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
246 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
39.88 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3264 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points -9%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
2979 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2770 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2733 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2717 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4197 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
4076 Points -3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3837 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3697 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2721 Points -35%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3264 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4197 points
Help
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Liteon L8H-256V2G
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-39%
-27%
-38%
-36%
-25%
Read Seq
1271
666
-48%
501
-61%
518
-59%
497.9
-61%
512
-60%
Write Seq
305.4
154.2
-50%
297.2
-3%
199.9
-35%
153.5
-50%
462.1
51%
Read 512
651
266.3
-59%
351.7
-46%
374.9
-42%
401.2
-38%
376
-42%
Write 512
305.2
154.2
-49%
295.7
-3%
201
-34%
154.5
-49%
295.2
-3%
Read 4k
41.07
28.51
-31%
28.31
-31%
29.3
-29%
36.2
-12%
31.83
-22%
Write 4k
122.7
101.5
-17%
90.3
-26%
76.8
-37%
95.5
-22%
64.5
-47%
Read 4k QD32
411.2
368.3
-10%
285
-31%
272
-34%
389.5
-5%
269.6
-34%
Write 4k QD32
305.1
153.6
-50%
268.4
-12%
197.1
-35%
154
-50%
178.2
-42%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Sequential Read: 1271 MB/s
Sequential Write: 305.4 MB/s
512K Read: 651 MB/s
512K Write: 305.2 MB/s
4K Read: 41.07 MB/s
4K Write: 122.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 411.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 305.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
1402 Points +7%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1306 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1200 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1014 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
781 Points -40%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
7455 Points +19%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
6308 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6271 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5638 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5259 Points -16%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
905 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
797 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
697 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
1428 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4755 points
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
58.1 fps +25%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
54.4 fps +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
52.4 fps +13%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
46.3 fps
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
44.1 fps -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
33.1 fps -29%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
26.5 fps -43%
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
18.2 fps
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
13.9 fps -24%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
17.4 fps
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
17 fps -2%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
7.3 fps -58%
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 46.3 24.9
Thief (2014) 18.2 11.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 17.4 9.2

Noise Level

Idle
30.15 / 30.8 / 31 dB(A)
Load
36.8 / 33.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.15 dB(A)
 26.3 °C27.6 °C27.2 °C 
 26.8 °C27.3 °C27.5 °C 
 36.8 °C33.8 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 29.9 °C
25.1 °C26.1 °C25 °C
25.4 °C26.2 °C25.5 °C
25.1 °C25.7 °C25.5 °C
Maximum: 26.2 °C
Average: 25.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.332.831.32529.532.529.53130.136.930.14028.329.928.35026.631.226.66326.826.326.88026.726.326.710026.526.626.51252824.72816031.224.131.220032.622.232.62503021.53031537.120.737.140053.22053.250053.819.253.863056.618.556.6800541854100056.71856.7125059.517.559.5160060.317.260.3200053.917.553.9250055.917.455.9315063.217.663.2400060.617.860.650006117.861630050.117.950.1800050.117.950.11000055.917.855.91250053.417.753.41600040.722.140.7SPL70.430.270.4N25.31.425.3median 53.8median 18median 53.8Delta10.51.510.531.331.733.430.429.528.926.227.234.531.237.939.536.646.749.358.665.465.259.863.261.764.464.862.763.767.274.668.855.446.97868.73921.8median 59.8median 45.311.223.437.536.637.239.838.639.136.936.639.536.941.746.752.756.261.666.366.164.862.46763.861.562.653.944.646.245.350.355.954.3median 54.38.633.532.233.53231.73235.131.835.131.631.431.632.430.432.430.326.830.328.526.828.529.526.129.533.52633.536253638.224.338.238.922.738.947.22247.25621.35652.520.652.561.419.661.46819.16865.118.865.158.918.658.963.718.863.762.618.362.663.418.663.466.218.666.265.118.765.158.318.858.355.918.955.956.719.156.750.81950.844.818.844.836.318.736.374.931.274.9331.633median 56median 19median 5610.71.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GEAcer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HMLenovo IdeaPad Miix 700Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.33 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.2 / 11.5 / 11.7 Watt
Load midlight 31 / 27.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2"
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1"
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"
Power Consumption
18%
18%
-7%
0%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
4.4
-5%
3.7
12%
7.3
-74%
7.4
-76%
Idle Average *
11.5
9
22%
6.8
41%
10
13%
11.6
-1%
Idle Maximum *
11.7
10.7
9%
7.6
35%
10.15
13%
11.6
1%
Load Average *
31
19.6
37%
22.5
27%
25.2
19%
16.8
46%
Load Maximum *
27.4
19.9
27%
34.5
-26%
29.3
-7%
19.1
30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
11h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 51min
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 41 Wh
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh
Battery Runtime
21%
20%
-2%
34%
-18%
Reader / Idle
696
899
29%
732
5%
640
-8%
861
24%
478
-31%
WiFi v1.3
322
427
33%
443
38%
321
0%
440
37%
263
-18%
Load
111
111
0%
130
17%
112
1%
157
41%
106
-5%
H.264
432
468
450

Pros

+ 优秀的键盘
+ A型和C型USB接口
+ 坚固高品质机身
+ 可选LTE模组
+ 实用的主相机
+ 优秀的麦克风效果

Cons

- 屏幕色彩不够鲜明
- 低于90%屏幕亮度时使用闪烁亮度控制
- 风扇在待机和连接电源时一直旋转
- 无视频输出接口
- 一般的前置摄像头
- 电池续航不算出色
In review: Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE. Test model courtesy of campuspoint
In review: Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE. Test model courtesy of campuspoint

联想Miix 510 Pro是Surface Pro 4的有力挑战者吗?是的,不过这台二合一设备的整体表现并不及更成熟的微软设备。Miix需要更长的电池续航,更好的主相机品质和色彩更绚丽的屏幕,才能得到更高的分数。

我们十分欣赏它的高品质机身和优秀的键盘,不过尺寸较小的触控版则让我们很难满意。它的应用程序性能十分出色,尽管处理器只能在测试中保持标准速度。归功于出色的键盘,不错的麦克风和物理接口(USB-A和C),Miix 510可以成为工作交流极为便利的随身设备。我们更希望它能够在机身上提供一个视频输出接口,用户目前需要购买额外的拓展坞才能连接显示器。

联想为Miix 510提供了多种配置可供用户选择,从入门级到高端各不相同。宏碁也为Switch 12 Alpha采用了相似的策略,它的售价从650欧元到1200欧元不等(约4805到8871人民币)。

Aspire Switch Alpha 12当然也是一个不错的选择,特别是如果你需要更高的屏幕分辨率的话。它不支持LTE,但宏碁提供了512GB固态硬盘可选。一些机型附带手写笔,但更需要注意的是,不是所有机型都附带键盘底座。

搭配Type Cover和256GB硬盘的微软 Surface Pro 4售价1300欧元(约9610人民币)。它的酷睿 i5 6300U处理器性能表现相当(并没有快很多)。Surface Pro搭配的屏幕提供了更高的分辨率,更丰富的色彩和手写笔,但缺少LTE网络和USB-C接口。售价980欧元(约7245人民币)的Miix 510 Pro定位十分合理。我们的测试机型搭配了英特尔酷睿 i5 6200U,8GB DDR4内存和256GB固态硬盘;键盘底座也随机附带。联想的这台二合一设备定价略高于配置相近的Switch 12 Alpha

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE - 11/01/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
84%
Pointing Device
80%
Connectivity
40 / 80 → 50%
Weight
72 / 35-78 → 86%
Battery
84%
Display
81%
Games Performance
55 / 68 → 81%
Application Performance
83 / 87 → 96%
Temperature
89%
Noise
92%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
74%
82%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 变形本简短评测
Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-11-10 (Update: 2016-11-12)