酷派 Modena 2 智能手机简短评测

Name: Coolpad Modena 2
Brand: Coolpad

冰冷的掌设。 实惠的主流手机Modena的下一代的确符合它的品牌名Coolpad(酷派)。在我们评测过的手机中，来自中国的Modena 2是最冰冷的手机之一。但这台手机是不是仅有较低的外壳温度？我们将在会在评测中找到答案。

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 11/28/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Coolpad Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Coolpad Modena 2 (Modena Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, 电容屏, 多点触控, LCD, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.2 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大32GB MicroSD 储存卡, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 距离传感器, 加速度计, 磁场传感器

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM: 900/1800/1900 MHz ; 3G HSPA+: 900/2100 MHz; 4G LTE FDD: 1 (2100), 3 (1800), 8 (900), 7 (2600) 20 (800), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.85 x 154.5 x 76.5

Battery

2500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 180 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 4 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix LED 闪光灯, 索尼 IMX219 传感器, 自动对焦, f/2.2, HDR
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2, HDR

Additional features

Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器，UBC线缆, CoolUI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, SAR 未知, fanless

Weight

143 g, Power Supply: 43 g

Price

180 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
UMI Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	98.8 MBit/s +104%
Coolpad Modena 2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.4 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
UMI Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	103 MBit/s +131%
Coolpad Modena 2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.5 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	491 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	109 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45.6 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	360 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.7 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Coolpad Modena 2

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Cannon EOS 70D

click to load images

Coolpad Modena 2

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Cannon EOS 70D

click to load images

Coolpad Modena 2

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Cannon EOS 70D


479 cd/m²	484 cd/m²	499 cd/m²
463 cd/m²	482 cd/m²	478 cd/m²
431 cd/m²	465 cd/m²	431 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 499 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 468 cd/m² Minimum: 10.73 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 482 cd/m²
Contrast: 765:1 (Black: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.91

	Coolpad Modena 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Coolpad Modena IPS, 960x540, 5.5"	UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Coolpad Torino S IPS, 1280x720, 4.7"	Archos 50 Power IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen		12%	30%	29%	11%	1%	5%	11%	34%
Brightness middle	482	345 -28%	522 8%	418 -13%	312 -35%	360 -25%	304 -37%	412 -15%	485 1%
Brightness	468	338 -28%	498 6%	410 -12%	302 -35%	358 -24%	311 -34%	414 -12%	490 5%
Brightness Distribution	86	93 8%	86 0%	85 -1%	79 -8%	87 1%	83 -3%	94 9%	92 7%
Black Level *	0.63	0.29 54%	0.23 63%	0.31 51%	0.15 76%	0.45 29%	0.31 51%	0.42 33%
Contrast	765	1190 56%	2270 197%	1348 76%	2080 172%	800 5%	981 28%	981 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.5	5.59 14%	6.9 -6%	4.4 32%	8.2 -26%	6.8 -5%	5.9 9%	5.6 14%	2.1 68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.4	10.58 15%	12.3 1%	6.5 48%	16.5 -33%	11.3 9%	14.3 -15%	9.7 22%	5.5 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.3	6.75 8%	9.2 -26%	3.6 51%	9.2 -26%	6.2 15%	4.6 37%	6.9 5%	2.6 64%
Gamma	1.91 ^115%	2.38 ^92%	2.38 ^92%	2.36 ^93%	2.29 ^96%	2.14 ^103%	2.51 ^88%	2.4 ^92%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7249 ^90%	8290 ^78%	8687 ^75%	6993 ^93%	9017 ^72%	7975 ^82%	7088 ^92%	8422 ^77%	6843 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)									88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)									100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 36 ms rise
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	18.25 MB/s
UMI Max	18.07 MB/s -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17.88 MB/s -2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.62 MB/s -31%
Coolpad Torino S	16.54 MB/s -9%
Archos 50 Power	MB/s -100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	51.1 MB/s +180%
Lenovo Moto Z	45.64 MB/s +150%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	35.59 MB/s
UMI Max	36.64 MB/s +3%
UMI Super Euro Edition	36.22 MB/s +2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	22.77 MB/s -36%
Coolpad Torino S	25.79 MB/s -28%
Archos 50 Power	MB/s -100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	65.5 MB/s +84%
Lenovo Moto Z	78.5 MB/s +121%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	6.79 MB/s
Coolpad Modena	3.88 MB/s -43%
UMI Max	10.91 MB/s +61%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11.88 MB/s +75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.26 MB/s +22%
Coolpad Torino S	6.94 MB/s +2%
Archos 50 Power	8.78 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28.31 MB/s +317%
Lenovo Moto Z	74.9 MB/s +1003%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	23.03 MB/s
Coolpad Modena	11.97 MB/s -48%
UMI Max	26.66 MB/s +16%
UMI Super Euro Edition	28.17 MB/s +22%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	18.24 MB/s -21%
Coolpad Torino S	18.34 MB/s -20%
Archos 50 Power	26.47 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.9 MB/s -22%
Lenovo Moto Z	117.2 MB/s +409%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	42.56 MB/s
Coolpad Modena	7.73 MB/s -82%
UMI Max	69.5 MB/s +63%
UMI Super Euro Edition	126.9 MB/s +198%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	70.3 MB/s +65%
Coolpad Torino S	41.81 MB/s -2%
Archos 50 Power	41.43 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	43.95 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Moto Z	168.3 MB/s +295%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	147 MB/s
Coolpad Modena	122 MB/s -17%
UMI Max	257.9 MB/s +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition	257.8 MB/s +75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	187.3 MB/s +27%
Coolpad Torino S	140.3 MB/s -5%
Archos 50 Power	199.7 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	144.1 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	439.7 MB/s +199%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	24875 Points
Coolpad Modena	18230 Points -27%
UMI Max	49057 Points +97%
UMI Super Euro Edition	50072 Points +101%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	23822 Points -4%
Coolpad Torino S	22766 Points -8%
Archos 50 Power	23996 Points -4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28399 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points +419%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena	471 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	404 Points
Coolpad Torino S	494 Points
Archos 50 Power	471 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	2080 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena	1372 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1147 Points
Coolpad Torino S	1511 Points
Archos 50 Power	1331 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	5450 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	1274 Points
UMI Max	2701 Points +112%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2818 Points +121%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points +210%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	459 Points
UMI Max	734 Points +60%
UMI Super Euro Edition	727 Points +58%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points +222%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	3222 Points
UMI Max	10942 Points +240%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10791 Points +235%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3070 Points -5%
Coolpad Torino S	4430 Points +37%
Archos 50 Power	3001 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4432 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points +680%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	2789 Points
UMI Max	10612 Points +280%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10567 Points +279%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2645 Points -5%
Coolpad Torino S	3858 Points +38%
Archos 50 Power	2581 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	3858 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points +856%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	7061 Points
UMI Max	12239 Points +73%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11654 Points +65%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	7026 Points 0%
Coolpad Torino S	9205 Points +30%
Archos 50 Power	6981 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9256 Points +31%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	130 Points
Coolpad Modena	0 Points -100%
UMI Max	598 Points +360%
UMI Super Euro Edition	595 Points +358%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	124 Points -5%
Coolpad Torino S	52 Points -60%
Archos 50 Power	122 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	53 Points -59%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +2225%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	106 Points
UMI Max	521 Points +392%
UMI Super Euro Edition	523 Points +393%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	101 Points -5%
Coolpad Torino S	41 Points -61%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	42 Points -60%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +3408%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	621 Points
UMI Max	1239 Points +100%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1144 Points +84%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	618 Points 0%
Coolpad Torino S	735 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	716 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points +194%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	8.9 fps
UMI Max	17 fps +91%
UMI Super Euro Edition	18 fps +102%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.2 fps -8%
Coolpad Torino S	5.3 fps -40%
Archos 50 Power	8.6 fps -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9.6 fps +8%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps +496%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	5 fps
UMI Max	17 fps +240%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17 fps +240%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	4.9 fps -2%
Coolpad Torino S	9.8 fps +96%
Archos 50 Power	4.9 fps -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	5.2 fps +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps +1440%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	4 fps
UMI Max	7.1 fps +78%
UMI Super Euro Edition	7.5 fps +88%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.8 fps -55%
Coolpad Torino S	1.8 fps -55%
Archos 50 Power	3.6 fps -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4.1 fps +3%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps +550%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	1.8 fps
UMI Max	7.1 fps +294%
UMI Super Euro Edition	7.1 fps +294%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3.4 fps +89%
Coolpad Torino S	4.3 fps +139%
Archos 50 Power	1.6 fps -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1.8 fps 0%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +2178%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	1.2 fps
UMI Max	4.7 fps +292%
UMI Super Euro Edition	5.1 fps +325%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.2 fps 0%
Archos 50 Power	2.5 fps +108%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps +1150%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	2.9 fps
UMI Max	4.7 fps +62%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4.7 fps +62%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2.5 fps -14%
Archos 50 Power	0.87 fps -70%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +831%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	3119 Points
Coolpad Modena	2966 Points -5%
UMI Max	4485 Points +44%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4596 Points +47%
Coolpad Torino S	3932 Points +26%
Archos 50 Power	2824 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4283 Points +37%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +145%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	483 Points
Coolpad Modena	477 Points -1%
UMI Max	341 Points -29%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1043 Points +116%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	448 Points -7%
Coolpad Torino S	602 Points +25%
Archos 50 Power	176 Points -64%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	603 Points +25%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points +388%
System (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	909 Points
Coolpad Modena	972 Points +7%
UMI Max	2123 Points +134%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2187 Points +141%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	801 Points -12%
Coolpad Torino S	1102 Points +21%
Archos 50 Power	911 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1035 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points +274%
Memory (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	598 Points
Coolpad Modena	262 Points -56%
UMI Max	998 Points +67%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1052 Points +76%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	487 Points -19%
Coolpad Torino S	607 Points +2%
Archos 50 Power	643 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	741 Points +24%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points +266%
Graphics (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	178 Points
Coolpad Modena	314 Points +76%
UMI Max	666 Points +274%
UMI Super Euro Edition	666 Points +274%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	174 Points -2%
Coolpad Torino S	321 Points +80%
Archos 50 Power	173 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	313 Points +76%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +2328%
Web (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	565 Points
Coolpad Modena	614 Points +9%
UMI Max	10 Points -98%
UMI Super Euro Edition	771 Points +36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	592 Points +5%
Coolpad Torino S	599 Points +6%
Archos 50 Power	9 Points -98%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	551 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points +70%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	1975 Points
Coolpad Modena	2721 Points +38%
UMI Max	4231 Points +114%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4117 Points +108%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1910 Points -3%
Coolpad Torino S	2364 Points +20%
Archos 50 Power	2116 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	2773 Points +40%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points +293%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	13.15 Points
Coolpad Modena	17.9 Points +36%
UMI Max	25.5 Points +94%
UMI Super Euro Edition	26.21 Points +99%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.73 Points -3%
Coolpad Torino S	14.45 Points +10%
Archos 50 Power	13.16 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.09 Points +30%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points +261%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Coolpad Modena 2	19647 ms *
Coolpad Modena	13569 ms * +31%
UMI Max	9796 ms * +50%
UMI Super Euro Edition	9410 ms * +52%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	19234 ms * +2%
Coolpad Torino S	15784 ms * +20%
Archos 50 Power	18481 ms * +6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	12953 ms * +34%
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * +84%

Legend

Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Coolpad Modena Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Power Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


30.7 °C	30.3 °C	28.8 °C
30.7 °C	30.8 °C	28.5 °C
30.8 °C	30.6 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 30.8 °C
Average: 30 °C


27.2 °C	29 °C	30.4 °C
27.6 °C	28.6 °C	31 °C
27.1 °C	29.1 °C	31.2 °C

Maximum: 31.2 °C
Average: 29 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Coolpad Modena 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 0.15 Watt
Idle	0.64 / 1.96 / 1.98 Watt
Load	4.99 / 5.48 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh	Coolpad Modena 2500 mAh	UMI Max 4000 mAh	UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh	Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh
Power Consumption		13%	14%	-19%	26%	6%	-48%	19%
Idle Minimum *	0.64	0.79 -23%	1.02 -59%	0.84 -31%	0.63 2%	0.68 -6%	1.66 -159%	0.68 -6%
Idle Average *	1.96	1.51 23%	1.53 22%	1.94 1%	1.37 30%	2.2 -12%	2.88 -47%	1.58 19%
Idle Maximum *	1.98	1.63 18%	1.62 18%	2.07 -5%	1.71 14%	2.26 -14%	3.46 -75%	1.61 19%
Load Average *	4.99	3.37 32%	2.91 42%	5.88 -18%	2.82 43%	3.47 30%	3.96 21%	3.36 33%
Load Maximum *	5.48	4.67 15%	2.93 47%	7.67 -40%	3.36 39%	3.71 32%	4.34 21%	3.91 29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		8h 38min

	Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh	Coolpad Modena 2500 mAh	UMI Max 4000 mAh	UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh	Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	518	616 19%	588 14%	638 23%	517 0%	397 -23%	592 14%	630 22%	407 -21%

Pros

+ 低温

+ 高亮度IPS屏

+ 良好的电池续航时间

Cons

- 低速Soc

- GPS不准确

- 低速eMMC存储

- 5.5寸屏幕仅有HD分辨率

- 塑料外壳

- 有限的功能

In review: Coolpad Modena 2. Test model courtesy of Coolpad Germany.

酷派Modena 2并不差，但它的竞争对手在同价位上提供了更好的配置——这是我们简洁明了的评价。相比于前代产品来说，中国的厂商并没有对于各个方面做出正确的调整，因为实际上例如电池续航时间，GPU性能，IPS屏幕面板的对比度以及色彩准确度等都不如从前。在180欧元（约合192美金）这个价位上，我们认为联发科入门级Soc，2GB内存和低速eMMC存储的组合还不够好。

它还是遭遇了同样的处境：在评测中，第二代Modena并不能使我们满意，因为相比起上一代的升级程度不够大。

如果你正在寻找一台有着高亮度大屏幕的手机，酷派Modena 2并不是一个不好的选择。但尽管如此，UMi Max和Honor 5C在这个价位上提供了更好的配置。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Coolpad Modena 2 - 2016-11-08 11/08/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

79%

Keyboard

63 / 75 → 84%

Pointing Device

82%

Connectivity

36 / 60 → 60%

Weight

93%

Battery

91%

Display

80%

Games Performance

7 / 63 → 11%

Application Performance

29 / 70 → 41%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

59%

Average

67%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 酷派 Modena 2 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-28 (Update: 2016-11-28)