摩托罗拉Moto E40智能手机评测--花钱少，滚动流畅
Possible competitors in comparison
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Motorola Moto E40 Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2 | 198 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 78.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Motorola Moto G20 Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP1 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 77.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Motorola Moto G10 SD 460, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 72.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Samsung Galaxy A02s SD 450, Adreno 506 | 196 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.3 % v7 (old) | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320 | 194 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 1600x720 |
外壳、功能和操作 - 带有专用microSD插槽的Moto手机
由于摩托罗拉现在也提供非常便宜的G系列智能手机，如 摩托G20或 摩托G10，廉价的Moto E系列几乎成了多余的。尽管如此，摩托罗拉还是保留了它，并推出了Moto E40，这是一款6.5英寸的设备，售价略低于140欧元（约合人民币158元）。
当然，外壳背面是由塑料制成的，但它看起来非常坚固，甚至可以根据IP52保护灰尘和溅水。在设计方面，摩托罗拉借鉴了 摩托G10并在Moto E40上也使用了波浪纹，但略有不同。相机模块也被更优雅地整合到Moto E40的外壳中。可用的颜色是中灰色和玫瑰金色调。
64GB eMMC闪存似乎已经成为一种标准，即使在较便宜的智能手机中也是如此，4GB的工作内存应该足以满足要求不高的日常生活。然而，与这个价格范围内的许多竞争机型一样，NFC是不存在的。因此，不能使用移动支付服务，例如。
由于有三个插槽，可以插入2张SIM卡和一张microSD卡。在这个价格范围内，我们参考的microSD Angelbird V60的microSD读卡器实现了体面的传输率，但比Moto G20的速度要慢一点。 摩托G20.在互联网方面，你必须使用Wi-Fi 4，即802.11n。摩托E40实现了体面的传输率，但无法跟上带有Wi-Fi 5的Moto G型号。
你在这里找不到5G，但至少支持中等数量的4G频率。在国外旅行时，你应该事先在互联网上查询是否可以在那里的LTE网络中使用这款廉价的手机。
背面有一个指纹传感器。在解锁智能手机之前，它需要一个纪念课，但它能可靠地工作。右侧还有一个谷歌助理按钮。
Android 11是预装的，安全补丁是2021年9月的，因此在测试时比较旧。该智能手机偶尔会出现连接电脑的问题，并出现崩溃。摩托罗拉应该紧急改善这一点。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G20 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Motorola Moto G10 | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
| Samsung Galaxy A02s | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Motorola Moto G10 | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
| Samsung Galaxy A02s | |
照相机 - 摩托E40没有广角摄像头
Moto E40的相机设备与Moto G机型的区别不大，但很重要。Moto E40没有广角摄像头，主摄像头的速度有点慢。作为回报，前置摄像头的光圈略宽，因此能捕捉到更多的光线。
在Moto E40中，主摄像头的分辨率也达到了4800万像素，但主要是拍摄1200万像素的照片。为了获得更多的光敏感度，每个人的4个像素被简单地收缩为一个。因此，在这个价格范围内，主摄像头拍摄的照片还算不错，但自然不会像更昂贵的镜头那样亮丽。然而，对于这样一款廉价的智能手机来说，在非常低的光线下，其清晰度仍然不错。
在实验室非常好的光线下，相机略显苍白，细节有些不干净，但色彩还原可以接受。至少在1勒克斯的照明下，一些图像内容仍然可以识别，这对于一个较低的中档智能手机来说是相当不错的表现。
视频可以以最大的1080p和30fps的速度录制。曝光变化和自动对焦工作相当快，而且相当可靠。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
显示 - 快速而明亮
三星或小米的类似价格的智能手机不能提供90赫兹的显示屏；摩托罗拉目前在这里几乎处于垄断地位。幸运的是，制造商甚至让我们选择是否总是想要90赫兹、60赫兹或由人工智能自动调整。
在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中，720p的屏幕甚至比这个价格范围内的其他机型更亮一些，但黑值也相当高，所以对比度受到影响，颜色在屏幕上看起来相当苍白。可以看到轻微的偏蓝，但总体而言，对于这样一个廉价的设备来说，色彩再现并不差。
我们没有注意到任何PWM，但对于要求高的用户来说，响应时间可能太慢。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 452 cd/m²
Contrast: 983:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.157
| Motorola Moto E40 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A02s PLS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G20 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G10 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT IPS LCD , 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 5% | 14% | -51% | -19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 48 ? -9% | 40 ? 9% | 67 ? -52% | 55 ? -25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 26 ? 19% | 26 ? 19% | 48 ? -50% | 36 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 53760 ? | ||||
| Screen | -10% | 12% | 12% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 452 | 482 7% | 389 -14% | 359 -21% | 374 -17% |
| Brightness | 431 | 460 7% | 352 -18% | 347 -19% | 345 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 83 -8% | 95 6% | 85 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.44 4% | 0.29 37% | 0.18 61% | 0.46 -0% |
| Contrast | 983 | 1095 11% | 1341 36% | 1994 103% | 813 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.15 | 5.52 -33% | 3.35 19% | 4.89 -18% | 3.86 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.47 | 7.78 -20% | 6.29 3% | 8.13 -26% | 8.07 -25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 6.3 -58% | 2.3 42% | 3.7 7% | 5.7 -43% |
| Gamma | 2.157 102% | 2.54 87% | 2.29 96% | 2.292 96% | 2.307 95% |
| CCT | 7557 86% | 7882 82% | 6923 94% | 7462 87% | 6932 94% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-7% | 13% /
13% | -20% /
-1% | -17% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--没有节流现象，运行时间良好
摩托罗拉Moto E40配备的是 Unisoc T700一个不寻常的SoC，但它为这个价格范围提供了很多性能。Moto E40的速度明显快于 小米红米9AT或 三星Galaxy A02s.
另一方面，内部eMMC存储相对较慢。这个速度对于日常使用来说是足够的，但在复制或加载时，你会注意到与更高质量的智能手机的明显区别。
最大的发热是无害的，从我们用 摩托G20我们也知道，SoC通常不会有节流的倾向。
底部边缘的小扬声器可以得到合理的声音，而且在声音方面也不是那么糟糕。当然，你不应该期待低音，但高音不会令人不快地过度强调，你肯定可以听一首歌。蓝牙或3.5毫米插孔可用于连接外部音频设备。
在我们的WLAN测试中，Moto E40的5000毫安时电池的运行时间为16：35小时。只要手机只是适度加载，例如上网，这应该足以满足一个以上的工作日。同时，我们还必须提到，所有对比设备的运行时间甚至更长。智能手机的充电功率最大为10瓦。然后有时需要2个多小时，直到大电池再次充满。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Average UNISOC Tangula T700 (8743 - 8746, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Motorola Moto G10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A02s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
| Average UNISOC Tangula T700 (19 - 19, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Motorola Moto G10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A02s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
| Average UNISOC Tangula T700 (11 - 11, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Motorola Moto G10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A02s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
| Average UNISOC Tangula T700 (12 - 12, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | |
| Motorola Moto G20 | |
| Motorola Moto G10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A02s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
| Average UNISOC Tangula T700 (3.7 - 3.7, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto E40 | Motorola Moto G20 | Motorola Moto G10 | Samsung Galaxy A02s | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 63% | 55% | -13% | 7% | 677% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 265 | 263.3 -1% | 295.9 12% | 299 13% | 266.4 1% | 274 ? 3% | 1839 ? 594% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 156.3 | 219.5 40% | 172.4 10% | 103.9 -34% | 84.2 -46% | 176.2 ? 13% | 1425 ? 812% |
| Random Read 4KB | 56 | 24.9 -56% | 123 120% | 84.8 51% | 46.49 -17% | 59.4 ? 6% | 277 ? 395% |
| Random Write 4KB | 30.7 | 12.6 -59% | 64.5 110% | 88.5 188% | 33.53 9% | 32 ? 4% | 309 ? 907% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Motorola Moto E40 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A02s audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Motorola Moto E40 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A02s 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G20 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G10 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 995 | 1201 21% | 1009 1% | 1038 4% | 1145 15% | 984 ? -1% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 不错，但竞争很激烈
摩托罗拉的Moto E40与同等价位的智能手机相比，绝对有一些优势。首先，当然是相当明亮的90赫兹屏幕，这在这个价格范围内仍然很难找到。此外，还有一个体面的扬声器，一个合格的摄像头，以及一个稍快的无线网络。
尽管采用了不寻常的SoC，其性能也是令人信服的，而且电池运行时间也相当有竞争力。
令人恼火的是，制造商没有使用NFC，而且软件有时会出现与PC连接的问题。
摩托罗拉通过Moto E40推出了一款价格低廉的引人注目的智能手机。90赫兹的屏幕是一个亮点，但也有一些限制，如缺少NFC。
此外，摩托罗拉也在与自己竞争。随着 摩托G20在制造商的产品系列中已经有了一个令人信服的替代品，它具有NFC、广角摄像头和更快的互联网。官方称，这两款智能手机之间有10欧元（约11美元）的价格差异，但这在零售商那里已经不存在了。只有当Moto E40比Moto G20便宜很多时，它才会成为我们真正的选择。 摩托G20.
价格和可用性
目前，你可以从制造商那里以不到140欧元（约158美元）的价格买到摩托罗拉Moto E40https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-moto-e-40/p#.但也有许多互联网零售商，如我们的贷款人Cyberport或amazon.de已经在他们的品种中拥有这款廉价的智能手机。
Motorola Moto E40
- 11/15/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
