Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar摩托罗拉Moto E6s智能手机评测：就是台便宜的手机
Vergleichsgeräte
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.8 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Motorola Moto E6s Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 160 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 1560x720 | |
| 74.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 12 / 2019 | Nokia 2.3 Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300 | 183 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1520x720 | |
| 75.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Huawei Y6s Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300 | 150 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
| 74.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11 / 2019 | Xiaomi Redmi 8A SD 439, Adreno 505 | 188 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.22" | 1520x720 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 488 cd/m²
Contrast: 1952:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
| Motorola Moto E6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.1" | Nokia 2.3 IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | Huawei Y6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.1" | Xiaomi Redmi 8A IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 8% | -9% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 64 ? | 49.2 ? 23% | 54 ? 16% | 52 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 25.6 ? -7% | 32 ? -33% | 28 ? -17% |
| PWM Frequency | 7692 ? | 100 ? | 595 ? | |
| Screen | -15% | -35% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 488 | 515 6% | 424 -13% | 441 -10% |
| Brightness | 481 | 488 1% | 397 -17% | 421 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 85 -11% | 89 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.23 8% | 0.35 -40% | 0.38 -52% |
| Contrast | 1952 | 2239 15% | 1211 -38% | 1161 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.02 | 6.1 -22% | 6.45 -28% | 4.46 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.99 | 13.4 -49% | 12.76 -42% | 8.01 11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 7.7 -75% | 8.5 -93% | 5.4 -23% |
| Gamma | 2.252 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.231 99% | 2.146 103% |
| CCT | 7841 83% | 8639 75% | 9108 71% | 7901 82% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-10% | -22% /
-30% | -7% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 7465, n=18) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5380, n=21) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.4 - 7.6, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.8, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | Nokia 2.3 | Huawei Y6s | Xiaomi Redmi 8A | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 19% | -4% | 0% | -9% | 948% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 275 | 261.8 -5% | 263.2 -4% | 282 3% | 242 ? -12% | 1839 ? 569% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 103.5 | 149.2 44% | 118 14% | 106.4 3% | 100.5 ? -3% | 1425 ? 1277% |
| Random Read 4KB | 69.4 | 69.6 0% | 46.7 -33% | 73.1 5% | 43.2 ? -38% | 277 ? 299% |
| Random Write 4KB | 17.7 | 30.33 71% | 18.6 5% | 15.8 -11% | 22.4 ? 27% | 309 ? 1646% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.3 ? | 83.7 ? 2% | 80.9 ? -2% | 84.9 ? 3% | 71.8 ? -13% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.5 ? | 63.7 ? 0% | 60.6 ? -5% | 61.7 ? -3% | 52.9 ? -17% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto E6s 3000 mAh | Nokia 2.3 4000 mAh | Huawei Y6s 3020 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 8A 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 806 | 919 14% | 743 -8% | 1145 42% | 981 ? 22% |
Pros
Cons
总结——便宜，轻：
摩托罗拉Moto E6s是一款轻巧方便的智能手机，外观时尚，由于背面采用了颜色渐变，因此看起来很高级。相机能拍照片，但对比度很小。尽管如此，小巧的电池仍可提供不错的续航时间，并且其价格范围内的性能合理。
您应该知道，不能指望这个价格能有什么奇迹，但是摩托罗拉在有限的整体预算中制造出了不错的智能手机。在这个价格范围内，指纹传感器居然标配的，专用存储插槽也是一件好事。同样令人乐观的是：我们的评测中，手机仅提供了Android 9，但具有最新的安全补丁。
如果您正在寻找一款轻巧且价格合理的智能手机，并且该手机仍具有较长的续航时间，那么摩托罗拉Moto E6s将助您一臂之力。
我们发现非常慢的WLAN（甚至无法与同类产品进行比较）令人讨厌。尽管如此，只要将摩托罗拉Moto E6s的用于要求较低的活动，还是可以推荐的。
Motorola Moto E6s
- 05/06/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
