摩托罗拉 Moto G55 智能手机评测--低价不一定无聊
多彩而明亮。
全新的 SoC、不寻常的色彩和无 PWM 的明亮显示屏--摩托罗拉 Moto G55 希望以此撼动今年的经济型中端手机市场。我们将在测试中揭晓它是否成功。Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
摩托罗拉 Moto G55 5G 只有在你愿意的情况下才会显得乏味:黑色的光滑机身显得庄重而内敛。而粉色或绿色的仿皮机背则非常抢眼。我们的测试设备做工整洁,设计优雅,但也比同类手机重一些。
电池的续航时间适合日常使用,SoC 选择得当,通常能流畅运行。我们喜欢快速指纹传感器和 eSIM 支持,即使在更昂贵的设备上也找不到这样的功能。
此外,该机还提供了不错的更新承诺,相机的成像质量在同价位产品中也颇具吸引力。最重要的是,相机在我们的测试过程中没有出现任何重大故障。无 PWM 显示屏是另一个亮点,尤其是它可以变得相当明亮。另一方面,色彩准确度和响应时间则要靠后。
总而言之,摩托罗拉 Moto G55 是一款经济实惠的中端手机,由于其外观吸引人,所以看起来更加昂贵。它在测试中几乎没有犯任何真正的错误,但你不应该对它的价格抱有过高的期望。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
价格和供应情况
摩托罗拉 Moto G55 可从许多零售商处购买。直接从制造商处您可以以大约 250 欧元(约合 263 美元)的价格买到这款手机。在亚马逊(amazon.de)上,测试时的价格也差不多。
不过,也有更便宜的报价,您最多可以节省 50 欧元(约合 53 美元)。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G55 MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $7.99 (3+2 Pack) For Motorola Moto... 3. $163.00 Motorola Moto G54 5G Dual SI... List Price: 249€ | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.49" 2400x1080 406 PPI IPS | |
CMF Phone 1 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $27.00 CMF Buds Wireless Bluetooth ... 2. $7.99 Anoowkoa [2 Pack for Nothing... 3. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... List Price: 269€ | 197 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI Super AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $214.00 List Price: 212 Euro | 174.5 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
HMD Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 613 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.99 Ranyi [3 Pack] for HMD Fusio... 2. $9.59 Ranyi [5 Pack] Tempered Glas... 3. $11.99 18W USB-C Charger for Nokia ... List Price: 299€ | 202.5 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.56" 1612x720 269 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $5.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $4.99 Mr.Shield [3-Pack] Screen Pr... 3. $8.99 QsmQam 3 Pack Screen Protect... List Price: 230€ | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI AMOLED |
注:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 此处.
住房和设备--由您选择
摩托罗拉 Moto G55 可以是一个非常高贵的伴侣,在这种情况下,你应该选择背面光滑的黑色版本。如果你更喜欢引人注目的外观,这款手机也有粉色或绿色仿皮后壳可供选择。
我们测试的是绿色人造革版本,做工非常整洁,手感很好,看起来非常时尚:摩托罗拉在摄像头模块和略显扁平的背面之间设计了一个轻微的弧度过渡,这使得它比其他一些制造商要优雅得多。不过,尽管 Moto G55 的屏幕相当小,但 202 克(约 7.1 盎司)的重量还是相对较重。
对于这样一款廉价手机来说,屏幕四周的边缘还算可以,但明显比更昂贵的手机要宽。屏幕由大猩猩 3 号玻璃保护。手机对压力相当不敏感,几乎无法扭曲。它通过了 IP 54 认证,因此防尘和防水溅应该不成问题。不过,游泳时手机必须放在岸上。
该手机配备了用于无线支付的 NFC 功能和 FM 收音机接收器:插入耳机作为天线,即使没有网络也能收听广播。
Moto G55 只有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,但也可以存储 eSIM 配置文件,从而实现双 SIM 卡操作。还有一个专用的 microSD 插槽,使用我们的 Angelbird V60 参考卡可以提供不错的传输性能,但甚至无法达到该卡的最大数据传输速率。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
HMD Fusion (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Motorola Moto G55 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
CMF Phone 1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和软件 - 配备 5G 调制解调器的 Moto G55
WiFi 5 是目前最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。摩托罗拉 Moto G55 的传输速率在 210 到 350 MBit/s 之间,表现平平。这使得它比同类手机稍慢,但仍在预期范围内。在日常使用中,网站加载速度相当快,但距离路由器较远时,信号强度会迅速下降。
Moto G55 支持 5G,并提供足够的 4G 和 5G 网络频率,因此即使在国外旅行,也能经常使用移动互联网。不过,某些频段在全球范围内使用时会有缺失。
我们随机抽样测试信号强度,并与高端手机进行比较。就其低廉的价格而言,Moto G55 的表现相当不错,即使在高楼之间等困难情况下也不会完全失去信号。
摩托罗拉的操作系统以Android 14 为基础,几乎没有改变原有的Android 。制造商自己的大部分功能都外包给了独立的应用程序,以便更容易更新。手机上预装了一些第三方应用程序,但如果不喜欢,也可以轻松卸载。
Moto G55 印有 "Android 企业推荐 "标志,这意味着制造商承诺至少每两个月提供一次更新,并保证在 2028 年 9 月之前提供安全补丁。在这个价位的手机中,这已经是相当不错的成绩了,尽管三星仍遥遥领先。摩托罗拉对新的操作系统版本守口如瓶,但我们预计这款手机至少会有Android 16。
Networking | |
Motorola Moto G55 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
CMF Phone 1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HMD Fusion | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性和操作 - 快速指纹传感器
在互联网上甚至还能找到摩托罗拉 G55 5G 一生中的二氧化碳排放量估算,这在摩托罗拉设备中实属罕见。制造商在这里指出,二氧化碳当量为 54.2 千克。这是一个合理的数字,主要原因是手机的生产。
包装部分由回收纤维制成,并使用大豆油油墨印刷。它也不含塑料。产品上没有关于回收材料的信息。
快速触摸屏每秒最多可显示 120 幅图像,操作非常可靠和流畅:SoC 通常功能强大,可实现快速操作。
用于解锁手机或确认登录应用程序的指纹传感器集成在外壳右侧的待机键中。指纹一旦被扫描,就会被快速、可靠地识别,几乎无需等待即可解锁手机。
通过面部识别解锁也是可行的,但这完全是基于前置摄像头的图像,不需要红外传感器,因此这种方法更容易被篡改。
照相机 - 良好的照相设备
背面的主摄像头最大分辨率为 5000 万像素,但通常只使用四分之一的分辨率来拍摄图像。这样可以获得更强的光照强度,图像处理速度也更快,但如果需要,也可以使用全分辨率拍摄图像。
该款相机在日光下拍摄的照片相当不错,尽管缺乏一些细节。总体而言,图像质量处于中等水平,但考虑到价格相对较低,使用主摄像头也能拍出不错的照片。
在弱光和高对比度环境下,明亮区域很快就会变得太亮,而暗处则看不清什么。不过,我们很喜欢这种情况下的清晰度。
主摄像头可以录制 1080p 格式的视频,最高每秒 60 帧。图像质量相当不错,自动对焦在大多数情况下也能快速工作。
背面还有一个广角摄像头,也可用于拍摄极限特写。它的分辨率为 800 万像素,拍摄的全景照片细节比较粗糙,但对于快照来说已经足够。
前置 1600 万像素摄像头用于自拍。自拍效果相当不错,但在明亮的环境中背景往往会被遮挡。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide Angle camera显示屏 - PWM 无闪烁
尽管许多竞争对手现在都在使用 AMOLED 屏幕,即使是在这个非常实惠的价格范围内,但摩托罗拉在 Moto G55 中仍然坚持使用 IPS 显示屏。Moto G55 的屏幕尺寸为 6.5 英寸,制造商很好地兼顾了设备的可管理性和尽可能大的屏幕面积。
我们使用分光光度计测定的最大亮度为 968 cd/m²,因此处于较高水平。这意味着,即使没有官方的 HDR 认证,这款手机也可以在明亮的户外使用,甚至可以显示高对比度。
对 AMOLED 感到头疼的人也可以松一口气了:根据我们的测量,IPS 屏幕不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
在色彩分析中,我们注意到有轻微的偏绿现象,但总体而言,色彩显示足够准确,足以满足日常使用需求。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 968 cd/m²
Contrast: 2420:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.289
Motorola Moto G55 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | CMF Phone 1 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | HMD Fusion IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 96% | 95% | -51% | 95% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.5 ? | 1.42 ? 95% | 1.13 ? 96% | 48.1 ? -63% | 1.6 ? 95% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 1.03 ? 96% | 1.55 ? 94% | 35.7 ? -39% | 1.3 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 120 | 120 ? | 90 | ||
Screen | 42% | 34% | -0% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 968 | 1169 21% | 958 -1% | 554 -43% | 705 -27% |
Brightness | 870 | 1183 36% | 965 11% | 533 -39% | 701 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 97 17% | 83 0% | 94 13% | 96 16% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.27 32% | |||
Contrast | 2420 | 2052 -15% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.98 | 1.5 50% | 1.43 52% | 3.28 -10% | 1.88 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.76 | 2.9 67% | 2.51 71% | 5.97 32% | 4.57 48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 1.9 62% | 1.4 72% | 3.6 28% | 1.5 70% |
Gamma | 2.289 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.145 103% | 2.116 104% |
CCT | 6509 100% | 6733 97% | 6476 100% | 7322 89% | 6501 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 69% /
56% | 65% /
49% | -26% /
-10% | 58% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.1 ms rise | |
↘ 14.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
29.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise | |
↘ 13.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命--与同价位产品相比,动力强劲
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7025是一款中端 SoC,配备 8 核处理器,主频高达 2.5GHz。摩托罗拉 Moto G55 5G 在基准测试中的表现相当不错,在日常使用中执行要求不高的任务时通常都能提供流畅的性能。
在图形性能方面,摩托罗拉 G55 5G 也比其他竞争对手更强劲。
Moto G55 还安装了快速 UFS 3.1 内存,数据传输速度快,加载时间短。
在高负荷运行一小时后,我们测得外壳温度略高: 45.8 °C(114.44 °F)尚不严重,但在环境温度较高时温度可能会进一步升高。
底部边缘的小型扬声器由听筒支撑,听筒用作第二个扬声器。这意味着当手机水平放置时,也能产生轻微的立体声效果。声音可以变得相当响亮,听起来也相当可以接受,但对于真正的音频发烧友来说,可能高音太重了。
耳机和扬声器可通过 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙连接。连接没有任何问题,音质非常纯净。目前几乎所有的音频编解码器都可用于无线音频传输。
在实际 WLAN 测试中,我们测得的续航时间为 15:44 小时。这使 Moto G55 在对比设备中处于中场位置。在正常使用的情况下,日常使用的运行时间应该不会超过一天。该设备的最大充电功率为 30 瓦,但手机不附带充电器。它与我们测试的所有充电器都配合良好,在电池完全耗尽的情况下,充电时间最长可达 1:45 小时左右。
Geekbench ML | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU | |
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=41, last 2 years) | |
CMF Phone 1 | |
Motorola Moto G55 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 () | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32432, n=41, last 2 years) | |
CMF Phone 1 | |
Motorola Moto G55 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 () | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=41, last 2 years) | |
CMF Phone 1 | |
Motorola Moto G55 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 () |
Motorola Moto G55 | CMF Phone 1 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | HMD Fusion | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 19% | -7% | -8% | -26% | 48% | 59% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 950.4 | 1024.12 8% | 951.97 0% | 894.5 -6% | 499.6 -47% | 1742 ? 83% | 1882 ? 98% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 815.8 | 535.66 -34% | 503.79 -38% | 778 -5% | 498.1 -39% | 1160 ? 42% | 1467 ? 80% |
Random Read 4KB | 234.6 | 294.28 25% | 243.8 4% | 218.4 -7% | 194 -17% | 286 ? 22% | 278 ? 18% |
Random Write 4KB | 222.4 | 394.59 77% | 240.36 8% | 189.4 -15% | 223.5 0% | 319 ? 43% | 310 ? 39% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
发言人
Motorola Moto G55 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
CMF Phone 1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G | |
Motorola Moto G55 | |
HMD Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
Pros
Cons
Notebookcheck 总体评分
摩托罗拉 Moto G55 5G 是一款性能稳定、价格实惠的智能手机,性能不错,摄像头也不错。
它的亮点包括无 PWM(如果需要的话)、相当明亮的屏幕,支持 eSIM 配置文件和非常别致的设计,您可以在低调和华丽的色彩之间进行选择。
注:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 此处.
Motorola Moto G55
- 12/14/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.