摩托罗拉Moto G8 Power智能手机评测：续航足够，相机优秀
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610 | 197 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
| 80.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2019 | Sharp Aquos V SD 835, Adreno 540 | 173 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 5.90" | 2160x1080 | |
| 77.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | Nokia 6.2 SD 636, Adreno 509 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
| 78.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2019 | Xiaomi Mi A3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 173.8 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
| 80.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | TCL Plex SD 675, Adreno 612 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sharp Aquos V | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sharp Aquos V | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 462 cd/m²
Contrast: 711:1 (Black: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
| Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4" | Sharp Aquos V IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Nokia 6.2 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.1" | TCL Plex IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 15% | 25% | -15% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 462 | 507 10% | 611 32% | 348 -25% | 432 -6% |
| Brightness | 483 | 486 1% | 582 20% | 355 -27% | 418 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 93 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.65 | 0.55 15% | 0.4 38% | 0.43 34% | |
| Contrast | 711 | 922 30% | 1528 115% | 1005 41% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 4.43 22% | 5.2 9% | 5.86 -3% | 3.4 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.9 | 7.13 20% | 10.2 -15% | 15.6 -75% | 6 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 5 23% | 6.1 6% | 3.6 45% | 3.8 42% |
| Gamma | 2.303 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.232 99% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 8073 81% | 7739 84% | 8100 80% | 7051 92% | 6151 106% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 714 Hz |  | |
| ≤ 15 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 714 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 714 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Sharp Aquos V | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Sharp Aquos V | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Nokia 6.2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
| Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
| Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
| Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | Sharp Aquos V | Nokia 6.2 | Xiaomi Mi A3 | TCL Plex | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 40% | -4% | 29% | 38% | -9% | 432% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 300.9 | 651 116% | 296.8 -1% | 502 67% | 522 73% | 274 ? -9% | 1863 ? 519% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 181.9 | 206.2 13% | 158.5 -13% | 184 1% | 199.7 10% | 176.2 ? -3% | 1446 ? 695% |
| Random Read 4KB | 57.7 | 157.2 172% | 78.8 37% | 126.9 120% | 130.8 127% | 59.4 ? 3% | 278 ? 382% |
| Random Write 4KB | 132.6 | 16.8 -87% | 14.88 -89% | 117.4 -11% | 130.1 -2% | 32 ? -76% | 309 ? 133% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 69.4 ? | 78.5 ? 13% | 83.4 ? 20% | 67.8 ? -2% | 74.9 ? 8% | 77.4 ? 12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 49.7 ? | 54.5 ? 10% | 61.5 ? 24% | 50.1 ? 1% | 56.2 ? 13% | 58.3 ? 17% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 6.2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.4 Watt |
| Idle |  0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt |
| Load |
3.2 / 7.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Nokia 6.2 3500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | TCL Plex 3820 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -37% | -21% | -24% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.72 20% | 0.8 11% | 0.73 19% | 1.017 ? -13% | 0.885 ? 2% |
| Idle Average * | 1.3 | 2.22 -71% | 2 -54% | 2.17 -67% | 1.893 ? -46% | 1.451 ? -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 2.23 -39% | 3.3 -106% | 2.23 -39% | 2.36 ? -48% | 1.608 ? -1% |
| Load Average * | 3.2 | 3.98 -24% | 4.1 -28% | 4.56 -43% | 3.77 ? -18% | 6.55 ? -105% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.1 | 6.86 3% | 7.7 -8% | 5.22 26% | 6.66 ? 6% | 9.92 ? -40% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Sharp Aquos V 3160 mAh | Nokia 6.2 3500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | TCL Plex 3820 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1002 | 718 -28% | 611 -39% | 985 -2% | 616 -39% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Good value for money
在Moto G8 Power上，用户应该期望智能手机具有更长的续航时间。在我们实际的Wi-Fi测试中，该设备可以持续使用16个小时以上，因此在这方面表现完美。但是，Moto G8 Power不仅提供长续航这一个优点。例如，它的相机非常出色，几乎完整的Android体验也是如此。总体而言，Moto G8 Power以这种价格为设备提供了一套可靠的硬件。
摩托罗拉Moto G8 Power凭借其电池续航能力将特别令人信服。
虽然设备结构良好，但其较大的电池使它相当厚。是否困扰您只是一个品味问题，但是该设备在Wi-Fi连接方面不及竞争对手。虽然对于大多数家庭网络而言，仅支持最高Wi-Fi 4标准就足够了，但这意味着Moto G8 Power在这方面已被竞争对手超越。最后，摩托罗拉Moto G8 Power是一款不错的价格适中的手机，但是它的缺点是否困扰您将取决于您在智能手机上的价值观。
Motorola Moto G8 Power
- 03/21/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
