联想 Moto Z Play 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 509 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
| Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | |||||||
| Brightness middle | 509 | 378 -26% | 518 2% | 505 -1% | 451 -11% | 419 -18% | 485 -5% |
| Brightness | 511 | 380 -26% | 475 -7% | 468 -8% | 443 -13% | 431 -16% | 490 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 81 -13% | 88 -5% | 93 0% | 84 -10% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.4 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.95 11% | 6.8 -209% | 4.1 -86% | 5.4 -145% | 4.1 -86% | 2.1 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 3.09 47% | 11.4 -97% | 5.8 -0% | 9.9 -71% | 12 -107% | 5.5 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.86 7% | 7 -250% | 4.9 -145% | 6.7 -235% | 3.3 -65% | 2.6 -30% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.35 94% | 2.5 88% | 2.33 94% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6768 96% | 6376 102% | 8151 80% | 7116 91% | 8262 79% | 6550 99% | 6843 95% |
| Contrast | 849 | 682 | 1128 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 88.14 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 243.9 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | Sony Xperia XA | Huawei P9 Lite | Honor 8 | OnePlus 3 | Lenovo Moto Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -38% | -22% | -27% | -11% | 91% | 77% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.78 | 22.9 -41% | 22.05 -43% | 38.22 -1% | 34.16 -12% | 137.6 255% | 117.2 202% |
| Random Write 4KB | 45.58 | 11.2 -75% | 10.6 -77% | 15.35 -66% | 31.5 -31% | 18.23 -60% | 74.9 64% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 73.1 | 60.4 -17% | 68.6 -6% | 46.24 -37% | 119.3 63% | 153.3 110% | 168.3 130% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 254.8 | 209.4 -18% | 240.4 -6% | 283.5 11% | 247.5 -3% | 408.7 60% | 439.7 73% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 50.6 | 50.7 0% | 25.1 -50% | 23.59 -53% | 45.64 -10% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 74.6 | 72.9 -2% | 60.8 -18% | 53.7 -28% | 78.5 5% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 56 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto Z Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
no name audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.17 Watt |
| Idle |  0.51 / 0.87 / 0.9 Watt |
| Load |
1.69 / 4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -74% | -69% | -98% | -108% | -104% | -62% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.51 | 0.96 -88% | 0.72 -41% | 0.73 -43% | 0.78 -53% | 0.57 -12% | 0.66 -29% |
| Idle Average * | 0.87 | 1.64 -89% | 1.5 -72% | 2.09 -140% | 1.89 -117% | 1.24 -43% | 1.01 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 0.9 | 1.71 -90% | 1.57 -74% | 2.11 -134% | 2.02 -124% | 1.36 -51% | 1.09 -21% |
| Load Average * | 1.69 | 2.98 -76% | 3.48 -106% | 4.15 -146% | 5.28 -212% | 5.92 -250% | 3.97 -135% |
| Load Maximum * | 4 | 5.08 -27% | 6.04 -51% | 5.05 -26% | 5.44 -36% | 10.53 -163% | 8.34 -109% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | -65% | -46% | -49% | -33% | -47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2540 | 2323 -9% | 775 -69% | 1404 -45% | 1487 -41% | 1338 -47% | 1371 -46% |
| H.264 | 1190 | 672 -44% | 460 -61% | 568 -52% | 526 -56% | 847 -29% | 724 -39% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 824 | 626 -24% | 353 -57% | 604 -27% | 499 -39% | 840 2% | 407 -51% |
| Load | 652 | 483 -26% | 170 -74% | 272 -58% | 255 -61% | 268 -59% | 320 -51% |
Pros
Cons
和Moto Z相似，Moto Z Play可以通过Moto Mod扩展功能。根据联想提供的信息，这些模组将会支持至少三代设备。不过，用户需要从口袋里掏出更多的钱。尽管可能很难理解，但是我们认为Moto Z Play仍然值得考虑：Snapdragon 625 处理器在高能效的前提下也提供了很强的性能，这台设备有很长的续航，它的屏幕对比鲜明且可视角度宽广，而金属玻璃材质的机身则具备一流的质感。除此之外，这台测试机具备十分丰富的功能，如双SIM卡，NFC，USB-C接口和快速的指纹感应器——它也提供了3.5寸耳机接口。这台测试机的最大缺点之一是较弱的相机自动对焦。
考虑到Moto Z和Moto Z Play之间的200欧巨大差距（约1505人民币），这台价位较低机型只有极少一些小缺陷让我们十分吃惊。可以放弃高锐度屏幕、超薄设计和高性能的用户可以相应得到Moto Z Play近两倍的电池续航。
同样搭配Snapdragon 625处理器的另一款值得考虑的产品是华硕 ZenFone 3。这台设备具备高品质机身，同时提供了十分丰富的预装软件。不过，和Moto Z Play不同的是，它不支持NFC和模块扩展。希望在中端价位上享受高端性能的用户可以参考我们即将发布的中兴 Axon 7评测。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo Moto Z Play
- 10/27/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian
Price comparison
