华硕 N552VX-FY103T 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus N552VX-FY103T
Brand: Asus

拜托，除了电池模式什么都行。 成功的机身和配置随处可见。相比前代机型，机身更薄也是它的优势之一。四核处理器，GeForce GTX 950M显卡和8GB DDR4内存让我们期待它是能够胜任游戏的全能型多媒体笔记本电脑。

Marcus Conrad (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 03/22/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Skylake Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus N552VX-FY103T (N552 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1124 MHz, RAM: 2002 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 359.06, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, Hynix HMA 41GS6AFr8N-TF, 两个内存槽, 一个已占用, 最大支持16GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB5, AH-IPS, 26万色，6位eDP(双线)30针, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Sunrise Point HM170

Storage

Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm, 1000 GB 混合式硬盘 @ 5400 RPM + 空余 M.2 插槽 (2280)

Soundcard

Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频输入输出接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 RJ 45 (以太网口)

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 29.9 x 383 x 260

Battery

44 Wh, 3200 mAh, 4芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 由ICEpower Bang & Olufsen技术提供, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，电源线，快速开始说明，质保卡, Office (试用版), McAfee Internet Security (试用版), Evernote 5.9.2, Dropbox (25 GB), Foxit PhantomPDF, CyberLink PhotoDirector 5 & PowerDirector 12, Asus software, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.53 kg, Power Supply: 554 g

Price

1000 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications


297 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	315 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	300 cd/m²	297 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 336 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 304.3 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: 988:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Display		6%	23%	7%	-38%
Display P3 Coverage	67.9	67.3 -1%	84.9 25%	67.8 0%	38.55 -43%
sRGB Coverage	87.7	96.7 10%	99.8 14%	97.5 11%	57.6 -34%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	69.4 8%	83.3 30%	70 9%	39.86 -38%
Response Times			-7%		6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(18, 24)		44 ?(25, 19, short plateau) -5%		40.8 ?(16.4, 24.4) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(5, 21)		28 ?(11, 17, short plateau) -8%		24 ?(4, 20) 8%
PWM Frequency			200 ?(90)		58.1
Screen		-12%	-41%	4%	-24%
Brightness middle	336	323 -4%	249 -26%	326 -3%	258.6 -23%
Brightness	304	312 3%	240 -21%	317 4%	242 -20%
Brightness Distribution	85	83 -2%	86 1%	91 7%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.34	0.38 -12%	0.48 -41%	0.31 9%	0.277 19%
Contrast	988	850 -14%	519 -47%	1052 6%	934 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.26	7.4 -41%	10.15 -93%	4.14 21%	8.1 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.49
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.26	6.24 -46%	12.13 -185%	5.46 -28%	7.23 -70%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.98 ^74%	2.48 ^89%	2.44 ^90%	1.99 ^111%
CCT	6758 ^96%	8098 ^80%	13445 ^48%	7574 ^86%	6567 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	69 21%	74 30%	64 12%	36.5 -36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88		100 14%	97 10%	57.2 -35%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -7%	-8% / -22%	6% / 5%	-19% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Cinebench R10		-30%	1%	-6%	-2%
Rendering Single 32Bit	5453	4773 -12%	5547 2%	5104 -6%	5283 -3%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit	20388	10668 -48%	20433 0%	19276 -5%	20302 0%
Cinebench R11.5		-33%	1%	-5%	-6%
CPU Single 64Bit	1.68	1.46 -13%	1.68 0%	1.54 -8%	1.48 -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit	7.42	3.5 -53%	7.48 1%	7.35 -1%	7.46 1%
Cinebench R15		-32%	1%	-5%	-6%
CPU Single 64Bit	146	130 -11%	148 1%	133 -9%	129 -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit	673	323 -52%	677 1%	669 -1%	676 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-32% / -32%	1% / 1%	-5% / -5%	-5% / -4%

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5453

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20388

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6672

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

39.67 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.42 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.68 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

146 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

673 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

44.81 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
PCMark 7		-3%	-2%	41%	36%
Score	4714	4131 -12%	4673 -1%	5829 24%	5918 26%
Creativity	7837	7266 -7%	7654 -2%	10382 32%	9899 26%
Productivity	3507	3494 0%	3382 -4%	5180 48%	5008 43%
Lightweight	3709	3941 6%	3745 1%	5889 59%	5543 49%
PCMark 8		-12%	7%	8%	11%
Work Score Accelerated v2	4503	3881 -14%	4747 5%	4972 10%	5011 11%
Home Score Accelerated v2	3452	3113 -10%	3719 8%	3637 5%	3845 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-8% / -6%	3% / 1%	25% / 30%	24% / 28%

PCMark 7 Score		4714 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3452 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4503 points
Help

... in comparison

HD Tune

Toshiba MQ02ABD100H

Transfer Rate Minimum: 51 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 112.3 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 88.3 MB/s

Access Time: 17.9 ms

Burst Rate: 71.5 MB/s

CPU Usage: 3.8 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	5678 Points +24%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	4703 Points +3%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4624 Points +1%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	4579 Points
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	4488 Points -2%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	4255 Points -7%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	4036 Points +38%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3410 Points +17%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	2918 Points 0%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	2917 Points
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	2726 Points -7%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	2675 Points -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	17554 Points +20%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	16063 Points +10%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	14828 Points +2%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	14578 Points
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	14081 Points -3%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	9818 Points -33%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	84441 Points +45%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	84067 Points +44%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	61456 Points +5%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	58288 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		4579 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		58288 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		14578 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2917 points
Help

... in comparison

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Dirt Rally

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	37.7 (35^min - 41^max) fps +8%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	37.5 (35^min - 42^max) fps +7%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	35 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	21.4 (19^min - 24^max) fps +2%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	21 (19^min - 23^max) fps 0%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	21 fps

BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	137.3 fps +35%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	113 fps +11%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	101.5 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	96.2 fps -5%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	67.9 fps -33%
1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	122.5 fps +45%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	99 fps +17%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	84.3 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	78.2 fps -7%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	62 fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	46.5 fps +68%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	38.3 fps +38%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	27.7 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	26.9 fps -3%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	26.5 fps -4%

Dirt Rally
1366x768 Medium Preset
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	106.4 fps +17%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	102.9 fps +13%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	90.7 fps
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	53 (36^min - 76^max) fps -42%
1920x1080 High Preset
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	60.2 fps +7%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	56.3 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	52.2 fps -7%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	38.8 (28^min - 55^max) fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	24.6 fps +13%
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	22.2 fps +2%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	21.7 fps
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	20.7 (16^min - 33^max) fps -5%

	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	101.5	84.3	27.7
Dirt Rally (2015)	90.7	56.3	21.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	35	21

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Noise		-2%	-2%	5%	-0%
off / environment *	31.3
Idle Minimum *	33.1	32.1 3%	32.6 2%	30 9%	30.4 8%
Idle Average *	33.2	32.9 1%	32.6 2%	30 10%	30.5 8%
Idle Maximum *	33.2	33.7 -2%	32.6 2%	31.3 6%	33.3 -0%
Load Average *	37.7	42 -11%	42.7 -13%	36.9 2%	41.4 -10%
Load Maximum *	43.4	44.8 -3%	45.5 -5%	44.7 -3%	47 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		33.1 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A)
HDD		33.3 dB(A)
DVD		37.7 / dB(A)
Load		37.7 / 43.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.3 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


39.4 °C	33.9 °C	27.5 °C
41.5 °C	36.6 °C	28 °C
30.4 °C	32.2 °C	28.9 °C

Maximum: 41.5 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


25.4 °C	30.8 °C	39 °C
25.6 °C	38.1 °C	38.4 °C
27.5 °C	26.5 °C	27.6 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 31 °C

Power Supply (max.) 51.9 °C | Room Temperature 24.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF
Power Consumption		-6%	3%	4%
Idle Minimum *	7	8.6 -23%	6 14%	6.2 11%
Idle Average *	10.9	12 -10%	9.8 10%	10.3 6%
Idle Maximum *	12.9	13 -1%	11.4 12%	12.2 5%
Load Average *	72	72.2 -0%	84 -17%	77 -7%
Load Maximum *	109	104 5%	113.5 -4%	105 4%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	7 / 10.9 / 12.9 Watt
Load	72 / 109 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 57min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 28min
DVD		1h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 08min

	Asus N552VX-FY103T 44 Wh	Asus N551JK-CN166H 56 Wh	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 56 Wh	Asus GL552JX-CN154H 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		17%	51%	-3%
Reader / Idle	357	436 22%	715 100%	223 -38%
WiFi v1.3	268		255 -5%	221 -18%
Load	68	76 12%	108 59%	100 47%
WiFi		271

Pros

+ 连接电源时无降频问题

+ 连接电源时非常优秀的加速利用率

+ 非常优秀的安静背光键盘

+ 非常优秀的触控版

+ 非常优秀的屏幕

+ 低发热量和噪音

+ 空闲M.2接口

+ 四核i7，8线程

+ 双频无线网络

+ 超强音响效果

+ 机身部分采用铝合金，高品质

+ 经典而独特的外观设计

Cons

- 在使用电池时处理器根据运行程序不同有不同的降频

- 不可更换电池，电池容量小

- GeForce 950M仅搭配了2048MB DDR3显存

- M.2接口无法通过维护底盖看到

- 无法接触到风扇（需要拆机）

- 数字键盘区尺寸缩小

- 不支持蓝光光驱或4K屏幕

In review: Asus N552VX-FY103T. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany

Nvidia GeForce 950M显卡搭配2048MB的DDR3显存可能并不适合要求较高的游戏玩家。最新游戏需要降低视效设置或者分辨率才能运行。不过，对于其他多媒体应用它完全能够胜任。因此，华硕N552VX-FY103T比较适合不需要在高设置下玩游戏，通常连接电源使用笔记本电脑的用户考虑。它的机身品质无可挑剔，屏幕、音响效果、输入设备、（连接电源时的）性能和散热噪音控制也都非常优秀。

遗憾的是，很多人希望看到的大满贯并没有得到实现。

在不足1000欧元（约7266人民币）的价位上，这台测试机带来了很好的性价比。价格高出约30%的一个好选择可能是Acer Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4。这台17寸笔记本电脑在电池模式下也有降频问题。对联想 Y700 15ISK 80NW来说，全速运行毫无问题，不过它的屏幕品质略逊一筹。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus N552VX-FY103T - 2016-12-09 12/09/2016 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Conrad

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

55 / 81 → 68%

Weight

60 / 20-67 → 85%

Battery

78%

Display

86%

Games Performance

75 / 85 → 88%

Application Performance

85 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

93%

Noise

82 / 95 → 86%

Audio

80%

Camera

52 / 85 → 61%

Average

78%

85%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 N552VX-FY103T 笔记本电脑简短评测

Marcus Conrad, 2016-03-22 (Update: 2016-03-24)