华硕 N552VX-FY103T 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: 988:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF | Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 6% | 23% | 7% | -38% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.9 | 67.3 -1% | 84.9 25% | 67.8 0% | 38.55 -43% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.7 | 96.7 10% | 99.8 14% | 97.5 11% | 57.6 -34% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64 | 69.4 8% | 83.3 30% | 70 9% | 39.86 -38% |
Response Times | -7% | 6% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 44 ? -5% | 40.8 ? 3% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 28 ? -8% | 24 ? 8% | ||
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 58.1 | |||
Screen | -12% | -41% | 4% | -24% | |
Brightness middle | 336 | 323 -4% | 249 -26% | 326 -3% | 258.6 -23% |
Brightness | 304 | 312 3% | 240 -21% | 317 4% | 242 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 83 -2% | 86 1% | 91 7% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.38 -12% | 0.48 -41% | 0.31 9% | 0.277 19% |
Contrast | 988 | 850 -14% | 519 -47% | 1052 6% | 934 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.26 | 7.4 -41% | 10.15 -93% | 4.14 21% | 8.1 -54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.49 | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.26 | 6.24 -46% | 12.13 -185% | 5.46 -28% | 7.23 -70% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.98 74% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% | 1.99 111% |
CCT | 6758 96% | 8098 80% | 13445 48% | 7574 86% | 6567 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 69 21% | 74 30% | 64 12% | 36.5 -36% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88 | 100 14% | 97 10% | 57.2 -35% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-7% | -8% /
-22% | 6% /
5% | -19% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF | Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cinebench R10 | -30% | 1% | -6% | -2% | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | 5453 | 4773 -12% | 5547 2% | 5104 -6% | 5283 -3% |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | 20388 | 10668 -48% | 20433 0% | 19276 -5% | 20302 0% |
Cinebench R11.5 | -33% | 1% | -5% | -6% | |
CPU Single 64Bit | 1.68 | 1.46 -13% | 1.68 0% | 1.54 -8% | 1.48 -12% |
CPU Multi 64Bit | 7.42 | 3.5 -53% | 7.48 1% | 7.35 -1% | 7.46 1% |
Cinebench R15 | -32% | 1% | -5% | -6% | |
CPU Single 64Bit | 146 | 130 -11% | 148 1% | 133 -9% | 129 -12% |
CPU Multi 64Bit | 673 | 323 -52% | 677 1% | 669 -1% | 676 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-32% | 1% /
1% | -5% /
-5% | -5% /
-4% |
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF | Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMark 7 | -3% | -2% | 41% | 36% | |
Score | 4714 | 4131 -12% | 4673 -1% | 5829 24% | 5918 26% |
Creativity | 7837 | 7266 -7% | 7654 -2% | 10382 32% | 9899 26% |
Productivity | 3507 | 3494 0% | 3382 -4% | 5180 48% | 5008 43% |
Lightweight | 3709 | 3941 6% | 3745 1% | 5889 59% | 5543 49% |
PCMark 8 | -12% | 7% | 8% | 11% | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4503 | 3881 -14% | 4747 5% | 4972 10% | 5011 11% |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3452 | 3113 -10% | 3719 8% | 3637 5% | 3845 11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-6% | 3% /
1% | 25% /
30% | 24% /
28% |
PCMark 7 Score | 4714 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3452 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4503 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551JK-CN166H |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4579 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 58288 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14578 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2917 points | |
Help |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T |
BioShock Infinite | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW | |
MSI PE60 2QD | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H |
Dirt Rally | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Asus N551ZU-CN007H |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 101.5 | 84.3 | 27.7 | |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 90.7 | 56.3 | 21.7 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 35 | 21 |
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF | Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -2% | 5% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 31.3 | ||||
Idle Minimum * | 33.1 | 32.1 3% | 32.6 2% | 30 9% | 30.4 8% |
Idle Average * | 33.2 | 32.9 1% | 32.6 2% | 30 10% | 30.5 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.2 | 33.7 -2% | 32.6 2% | 31.3 6% | 33.3 -0% |
Load Average * | 37.7 | 42 -11% | 42.7 -13% | 36.9 2% | 41.4 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 43.4 | 44.8 -3% | 45.5 -5% | 44.7 -3% | 47 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33.1 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 33.3 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 37.7 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.7 / 43.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.3 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF | Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 3% | 4% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 8.6 -23% | 6 14% | 6.2 11% | |
Idle Average * | 10.9 | 12 -10% | 9.8 10% | 10.3 6% | |
Idle Maximum * | 12.9 | 13 -1% | 11.4 12% | 12.2 5% | |
Load Average * | 72 | 72.2 -0% | 84 -17% | 77 -7% | |
Load Maximum * | 109 | 104 5% | 113.5 -4% | 105 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 7 / 10.9 / 12.9 Watt |
Load |
72 / 109 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus N552VX-FY103T 44 Wh | Asus N551JK-CN166H 56 Wh | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 56 Wh | Asus GL552JX-CN154H 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 17% | 51% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 357 | 436 22% | 715 100% | 223 -38% |
WiFi v1.3 | 268 | 255 -5% | 221 -18% | |
Load | 68 | 76 12% | 108 59% | 100 47% |
WiFi | 271 |
Pros
Cons
Nvidia GeForce 950M显卡搭配2048MB的DDR3显存可能并不适合要求较高的游戏玩家。最新游戏需要降低视效设置或者分辨率才能运行。不过,对于其他多媒体应用它完全能够胜任。因此,华硕N552VX-FY103T比较适合不需要在高设置下玩游戏,通常连接电源使用笔记本电脑的用户考虑。它的机身品质无可挑剔,屏幕、音响效果、输入设备、(连接电源时的)性能和散热噪音控制也都非常优秀。
遗憾的是,很多人希望看到的大满贯并没有得到实现。
在不足1000欧元(约7266人民币)的价位上,这台测试机带来了很好的性价比。价格高出约30%的一个好选择可能是Acer Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4。这台17寸笔记本电脑在电池模式下也有降频问题。对联想 Y700 15ISK 80NW来说,全速运行毫无问题,不过它的屏幕品质略逊一筹。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Asus N552VX-FY103T
- 12/09/2016 v6 (old)
Marcus Conrad