Nexoc G734III (Clevo P670RS-G) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Nexoc G734III
Brand: Nexoc

同帕斯卡游戏。 Nexoc也进入了英伟达的帕斯卡架构时代，为它的最新17.3寸笔记本搭配了GeForce GTX 1070。这台高性能设备同时搭配了高品质机身和不错的输入设备。我们只是对它的风扇噪音和发热量有些担忧。

Nino Ricchizzi, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/17/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Nexoc

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Clevo P670RS-G

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake, 4 核, 热设计功率 45 瓦

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1443 MHz, RAM: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 372.54, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, 双通道, SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Timing 14-14-14-35, 4个内存槽2个已占用, 最大支持64 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), IPS, G-Sync, 60赫兹, 全高清, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB

, 固态硬盘 + Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK1721, 1 TB 传统硬盘 @ 5400 rpm. 硬盘槽: 2x m.2 type 2280 & 2x 2.5寸

Soundcard

Realtek ALC899 @ Intel Skylake PCH-H - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机/SPIF接口, 麦克风接口, 音频输入接口, Card Reader: MMC,RSMMC,SD,Mini SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168B/8111B Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 417 x 287

Battery

60 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 200万像素全高清

Additional features

Speakers: 2.1 (Sound Blaster X-Fi MB5), Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器：230瓦，配件：LG DVD刻录机，清洁布，用户说明，导热胶, 软件: Control Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.34 kg, Power Supply: 738 g

Price

2460 EUR

Links

Nexoc homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

good build quality of the 17.3-inch notebook

You have to remove the bottom panel for maintenance

There is a bay for adding a third storage device.

Size Comparison

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Nexoc G734III DIN A4 ❌

Right: headphones, microphone, line-in, card reader, USB 3.0, Ethernet port, Kensington Lock

Left: Mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB 3.1 Typ-C, 2x USB 3.0

Rear: power-in, HDMI out, mini DisplayPort

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451	155 MB/s +101%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US	135.3 MB/s +76%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s +1%
Nexoc G734III	77 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451	196 MB/s +128%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US	186.3 MB/s +117%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s +2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s 0%
Nexoc G734III	86 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	601 MBit/s +5%
Nexoc G734III Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	575 MBit/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	566 MBit/s -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	322 MBit/s -44%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	528 MBit/s +17%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	502 MBit/s +12%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	465 MBit/s +3%
Nexoc G734III Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	450 MBit/s


307 cd/m²	318 cd/m²	316 cd/m²
310 cd/m²	314 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
294 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	296 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 308.4 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 314 cd/m²
Contrast: 1121:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160
Display		29%	1%	-1%	35%
Display P3 Coverage	67.4	91.2 35%	68.3 1%	66.9 -1%	86.9 29%
sRGB Coverage	85.8	100 17%	86.7 1%	85.2 -1%	100 17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62.8	84.9 35%	63.4 1%	62.3 -1%	99.4 58%
Response Times		49%	-3%	-1%	-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(14, 22)	26 ?(12, 14) 28%	34.4 ?(15.6, 18.8) 4%	38 ?(14, 24) -6%	37 ?(13, 24) -3%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(5, 18)	6.8 ?(4.2, 2.6) 70%	25.2 ?(4.8, 20.4) -10%	22 ?(4, 18) 4%	24 ?(5, 19) -4%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(5)
Screen		-28%	4%	3%	13%
Brightness middle	314	314 0%	348.7 11%	328 4%	336 7%
Brightness	308	294 -5%	327 6%	317 3%	320 4%
Brightness Distribution	92	89 -3%	89 -3%	88 -4%	88 -4%
Black Level *	0.28	0.23 18%	0.323 -15%	0.3 -7%	0.25 11%
Contrast	1121	1365 22%	1080 -4%	1093 -2%	1344 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.17	9.74 -134%	4.09 2%	3.74 10%	3.61 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.94	15.71 -76%	9.02 -1%	8.97 -0%	6.02 33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.84	9.58 -149%	2.14 44%	2.67 30%	4.78 -24%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.5 ^88%	2.25 ^98%	2.41 ^91%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	6950 ^94%	11854 ^55%	6885 ^94%	6861 ^95%	6185 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56	76 36%	56.9 2%	56 0%	88 57%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86	100 16%	86.5 1%	85 -1%	100 16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		17% / -6%	1% / 3%	0% / 2%	15% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 5 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points +13%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	158 Points +12%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points 0%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	130 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	860 Points +27%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points +17%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	656 Points -3%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.78 Points +10%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points +9%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.62 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	9.53 Points +29%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points +17%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.38 Points 0%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.37 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.62 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.37 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

62.5 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

141 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

677 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +33%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	5034 Points +20%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	4620 Points +11%
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4180 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -3%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +15%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	5186 Points +3%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	5095 Points +2%
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5011 Points

PCMark 7 Score		5233 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4180 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5262 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5011 points
Help

... in comparison

	Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		53%	-61%	16%
Read Seq	1917	3285 71%	529 -72%	1718 -10%
Write Seq	1283	2560 100%	338.5 -74%	1305 2%
Read 512	871	1775 104%	288.9 -67%	1250 44%
Write 512	1199	2327 94%	319.2 -73%	1438 20%
Read 4k	51	52.2 2%	23.1 -55%	44.42 -13%
Write 4k	142.1	153.1 8%	99.4 -30%	154.4 9%
Read 4k QD32	603	627 4%	147.5 -76%	744 23%
Write 4k QD32	382.4	527 38%	236.9 -38%	578 51%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1917 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1283 MB/s

512K Read: 871 MB/s

512K Write: 1199 MB/s

4K Read: 51 MB/s

4K Write: 142.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 603 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 382.4 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17498 Points +8%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17354 Points +7%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16757 Points +3%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16219 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15718 Points -3%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	5554 Points +6%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	5303 Points +1%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	5233 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23586 Points +13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22282 Points +7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21228 Points +2%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20881 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	13760 Points -34%

3DMark 11 Performance		15486 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		85380 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22639 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12458 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4990 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 | Doom | BioShock Infinite

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	58 fps +9%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	57 (47^min - 64^max) fps +7%
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	53.2 fps

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	119.7 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	101.6 fps -15%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	137.1 (34.5^min - 271.3^max) fps +12%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	129.5 fps +6%
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	122 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	194	178.8	152.6	122
The Witcher 3 (2015)	203	157	98.1	53.2
Doom (2016)	149	142	127	119.7

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 32 / 33 dB(A)
Load		49 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise		3%	3%	4%	-4%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	28.9 4%	30 -0%	31 -3%
Idle Minimum *	31	32 -3%	32.4 -5%	31 -0%	33 -6%
Idle Average *	32	33 -3%	32.4 -1%	32 -0%	34 -6%
Idle Maximum *	33	35 -6%	32.4 2%	33 -0%	40 -21%
Load Average *	49	35 29%	39.4 20%	40 18%	44 10%
Load Maximum *	50	49 2%	52 -4%	47 6%	50 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


49.2 °C	48.7 °C	45.4 °C
50 °C	49.3 °C	39.1 °C
31.6 °C	33.6 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 42.2 °C


40.8 °C	47.2 °C	60.5 °C
37.1 °C	47.1 °C	52.1 °C
33.6 °C	38.2 °C	37.7 °C

Maximum: 60.5 °C
Average: 43.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46.8 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.5 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).

	Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat		-4%	5%	7%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	50	44.9 10%	40.6 19%	42.9 14%	42.6 15%
Maximum Bottom *	60.5	51.2 15%	59.4 2%	41.5 31%	44.9 26%
Idle Upper Side *	29.1	32.7 -12%	28.2 3%	31.6 -9%	33.1 -14%
Idle Bottom *	26.9	34.2 -27%	27.8 -3%	29.5 -10%	28.9 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Nexoc G734III audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus G752VS-XB78K audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 1.1 Watt
Idle	13 / 20 / 27 Watt
Load	90 / 210 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-57%	-37%	-35%	-51%
Idle Minimum *	13	31 -138%	22.3 -72%	24 -85%	25 -92%
Idle Average *	20	35 -75%	27.3 -37%	31 -55%	35 -75%
Idle Maximum *	27	40 -48%	30 -11%	36 -33%	46 -70%
Load Average *	90	106 -18%	152.2 -69%	94 -4%	103 -14%
Load Maximum *	210	218 -4%	204.2 3%	204 3%	223 -6%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		6h 40min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 25.10586.0.0)		2h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 35min

	Nexoc G734III 60 Wh	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 75.2 Wh	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US 83 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 88 Wh
Battery Runtime		-12%	-0%	-7%	-8%
Reader / Idle	400	290 -27%	322 -19%	311 -22%	278 -30%
H.264	208			186 -11%
WiFi v1.3	177	206 16%	224 27%	210 19%	200 13%
Load	95	72 -24%	86 -9%	84 -12%	89 -6%

Pros

+ 可定义键盘背光

+ 优秀的可维护性

+ 不错的输入设备

+ 高端机身

+ G-Sync

Cons

- 风扇的不稳定高频率噪音

- 一般的电池续航

- 不支持Thunderbolt

In review: Nexoc G734III. Test model provided by Nexoc.

除了类似的缺点外，Nexoc G734III (Clevo P670RS-G)确实十分优秀。它的高端机身品质优异而相对轻盈，为它争得了不少分数。整体上这台17寸设备当然无法算是轻盈，不过它相比其他高端设备更加易于携带。遗憾的是，它没有提供可以帮助用户升级硬件的维护底盖。它的背光键盘和触控板都让我们爱不释手。

它的另外一个优势是支持G-Sync的高对比度IPS屏幕。GeForce GTX 1070通常可以轻松应对1920x1080像素分辨率。这块帕斯卡芯片在4K分辨率下才会有些力不从心。由于搭配最新的显卡，大部分游戏都可以在最高设定下流畅运行。

不过，它高频的风扇噪音又些让人不耐烦，如果带上耳机或者开大扬声器音量的话这个问题可能会有所缓解。它的散热系统应该还有改进的空间。最后，尽管支持显卡切换它的电池续航仍然不算出色。