Nexoc G734III (Clevo P670RS-G) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III |
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 314 cd/m²
Contrast: 1121:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080 | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080 | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 29% | 1% | -1% | 35% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.4 | 91.2 35% | 68.3 1% | 66.9 -1% | 86.9 29% |
sRGB Coverage | 85.8 | 100 17% | 86.7 1% | 85.2 -1% | 100 17% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.8 | 84.9 35% | 63.4 1% | 62.3 -1% | 99.4 58% |
Response Times | 49% | -3% | -1% | -4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 26 ? 28% | 34.4 ? 4% | 38 ? -6% | 37 ? -3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 6.8 ? 70% | 25.2 ? -10% | 22 ? 4% | 24 ? -4% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | ||||
Screen | -28% | 4% | 3% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 314 | 314 0% | 348.7 11% | 328 4% | 336 7% |
Brightness | 308 | 294 -5% | 327 6% | 317 3% | 320 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 89 -3% | 88 -4% | 88 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.23 18% | 0.323 -15% | 0.3 -7% | 0.25 11% |
Contrast | 1121 | 1365 22% | 1080 -4% | 1093 -2% | 1344 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.17 | 9.74 -134% | 4.09 2% | 3.74 10% | 3.61 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.94 | 15.71 -76% | 9.02 -1% | 8.97 -0% | 6.02 33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 9.58 -149% | 2.14 44% | 2.67 30% | 4.78 -24% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.5 88% | 2.25 98% | 2.41 91% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6950 94% | 11854 55% | 6885 94% | 6861 95% | 6185 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 76 36% | 56.9 2% | 56 0% | 88 57% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 100 16% | 86.5 1% | 85 -1% | 100 16% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
-6% | 1% /
3% | 0% /
2% | 15% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 5 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Nexoc G734III |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Nexoc G734III |
PCMark 7 Score | 5233 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4180 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5262 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5011 points | |
Help |
Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122 | Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 53% | -61% | 16% | |
Read Seq | 1917 | 3285 71% | 529 -72% | 1718 -10% |
Write Seq | 1283 | 2560 100% | 338.5 -74% | 1305 2% |
Read 512 | 871 | 1775 104% | 288.9 -67% | 1250 44% |
Write 512 | 1199 | 2327 94% | 319.2 -73% | 1438 20% |
Read 4k | 51 | 52.2 2% | 23.1 -55% | 44.42 -13% |
Write 4k | 142.1 | 153.1 8% | 99.4 -30% | 154.4 9% |
Read 4k QD32 | 603 | 627 4% | 147.5 -76% | 744 23% |
Write 4k QD32 | 382.4 | 527 38% | 236.9 -38% | 578 51% |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US |
3DMark 11 Performance | 15486 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85380 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22639 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12458 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4990 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III |
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
Nexoc G734III |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 194 | 178.8 | 152.6 | 122 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 203 | 157 | 98.1 | 53.2 |
Doom (2016) | 149 | 142 | 127 | 119.7 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 31 / 32 / 33 dB(A) |
Load |
| 49 / 50 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 3% | 4% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 28.9 4% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 32 -3% | 32.4 -5% | 31 -0% | 33 -6% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 33 -3% | 32.4 -1% | 32 -0% | 34 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 33 | 35 -6% | 32.4 2% | 33 -0% | 40 -21% |
Load Average * | 49 | 35 29% | 39.4 20% | 40 18% | 44 10% |
Load Maximum * | 50 | 49 2% | 52 -4% | 47 6% | 50 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.5 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 5% | 7% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 44.9 10% | 40.6 19% | 42.9 14% | 42.6 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 60.5 | 51.2 15% | 59.4 2% | 41.5 31% | 44.9 26% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.1 | 32.7 -12% | 28.2 3% | 31.6 -9% | 33.1 -14% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.9 | 34.2 -27% | 27.8 -3% | 29.5 -10% | 28.9 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Nexoc G734III audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus G752VS-XB78K audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 13 / 20 / 27 Watt |
Load |
90 / 210 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -57% | -37% | -35% | -51% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 31 -138% | 22.3 -72% | 24 -85% | 25 -92% |
Idle Average * | 20 | 35 -75% | 27.3 -37% | 31 -55% | 35 -75% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 40 -48% | 30 -11% | 36 -33% | 46 -70% |
Load Average * | 90 | 106 -18% | 152.2 -69% | 94 -4% | 103 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 210 | 218 -4% | 204.2 3% | 204 3% | 223 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Nexoc G734III 60 Wh | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 75.2 Wh | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US 83 Wh | Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 88 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -12% | -0% | -7% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 400 | 290 -27% | 322 -19% | 311 -22% | 278 -30% |
H.264 | 208 | 186 -11% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 177 | 206 16% | 224 27% | 210 19% | 200 13% |
Load | 95 | 72 -24% | 86 -9% | 84 -12% | 89 -6% |
Pros
Cons
除了类似的缺点外,Nexoc G734III (Clevo P670RS-G)确实十分优秀。它的高端机身品质优异而相对轻盈,为它争得了不少分数。整体上这台17寸设备当然无法算是轻盈,不过它相比其他高端设备更加易于携带。遗憾的是,它没有提供可以帮助用户升级硬件的维护底盖。它的背光键盘和触控板都让我们爱不释手。
它的另外一个优势是支持G-Sync的高对比度IPS屏幕。GeForce GTX 1070通常可以轻松应对1920x1080像素分辨率。这块帕斯卡芯片在4K分辨率下才会有些力不从心。由于搭配最新的显卡,大部分游戏都可以在最高设定下流畅运行。
不过,它高频的风扇噪音又些让人不耐烦,如果带上耳机或者开大扬声器音量的话这个问题可能会有所缓解。它的散热系统应该还有改进的空间。最后,尽管支持显卡切换它的电池续航仍然不算出色。
除了这些不足之外,Nexoc G734III可以算是一台称职的游戏笔记本电脑。
预算更高,需要更好散热系统的用户可以考虑微星GT73VR或GT72VR,Acer Predator 17或华硕G752VS。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Nexoc G734III
-
09/11/2016 v5.1 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi