Notebookcheck Logo

Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1) 笔记本电脑简短评测

大尺寸入门级游戏本。 Nexoc G739是一台搭配强劲Kaby Lake架构酷睿i7处理器和全新Pascal架构GeForce GTX 1050 Ti显卡的17.3寸笔记本电脑。不过它的高性能也带来了高噪音。
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
Nexoc G739
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1493 MHz, RAM: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.92, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400, 双通道, 2/2插槽已占用, 最高支持 32 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN1738, IPS, 全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, m.2固态硬盘 Typ 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 + Seagate Mobile ST1000LM035, 1TB HDD @5400 rpm, 2.5 寸
Soundcard
Realtek ALC269
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机和麦克风接口, Card Reader: 六合一 (MMC, RSMMC, SD, Mini SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 419 x 289
Battery
62 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6芯电池
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 200万像素
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Sound Blaster Cinema 3, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 120瓦电源适配器，DVD驱动盘, Control Center, 微软 Office (试用版), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.865 kg, Power Supply: 464 g
Price
1360 EUR
Links
Nexoc homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: no connections
Front: no connections
Right: head phones, microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Right: head phones, microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Links: Kensington Lock, power supply, RJ45-LAN, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB Typ-C (Gen1), USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Links: Kensington Lock, power supply, RJ45-LAN, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB Typ-C (Gen1), USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Back: no connections
Back: no connections
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G739
 
78 MB/s
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
 
76.3 MB/s -2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
 
73 MB/s -6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
72.6 MB/s -7%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
 
26 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
 
87 MB/s 0%
Nexoc G739
 
87 MB/s
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
 
85.8 MB/s -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
84.6 MB/s -3%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
 
28 MB/s -68%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
543 MBit/s +40%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s +35%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
294 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s +52%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s +50%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s -22%
277
cd/m²		324
cd/m²		297
cd/m²
294
cd/m²		312
cd/m²		308
cd/m²
301
cd/m²		315
cd/m²		310
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CMN1738 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 304.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 312 cd/m²
Contrast: 1357:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.72 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3"		HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3"		MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
-4%
-3%
25%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
66.7
67.1
1%
67.2
1%
90.7
36%
65.1
-2%
sRGB Coverage
91
84.8
-7%
86.6
-5%
99.9
10%
83.5
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.4
62
-7%
63.3
-5%
85.2
28%
61.1
-8%
Response Times
12%
17%
54%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 ?(20, 25)
33.2 ?(14.4, 18.8)
26%
35 ?(14, 21)
22%
27 ?(13, 14)
40%
38 ?(12, 26)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
28 ?(7, 21)
28.8 ?(7.6, 21.2)
-3%
25 ?(4, 21)
11%
9 ?(6, 3)
68%
23 ?(5, 18)
18%
PWM Frequency
450 ?(90)
Screen
-21%
-6%
-16%
-35%
Brightness middle
312
349
12%
342
10%
253
-19%
326
4%
Brightness
304
337
11%
331
9%
230
-24%
312
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
84
-1%
86
1%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.23
0.58
-152%
0.32
-39%
0.24
-4%
0.5
-117%
Contrast
1357
602
-56%
1069
-21%
1054
-22%
652
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.19
4.5
-7%
4.35
-4%
5.01
-20%
6.3
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.7
10.2
-17%
9.24
-6%
10.4
-20%
11.69
-34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.72
3.3
11%
3.73
-0%
7.26
-95%
7.37
-98%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.15 102%
2.23 99%
2.09 105%
2.37 93%
CCT
7104 91%
6103 107%
6801 96%
6329 103%
7116 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
55.7
-6%
57
-3%
76
29%
55
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
75.7
-17%
86
-5%
100
10%
83
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -14%
3% / -2%
21% / 1%
-8% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 450 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 450 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 450 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.4 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
743 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points -6%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points -10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -17%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
741 Points 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points -9%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -18%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.49 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.32 Points -35%
PCMark 8 | PCMark 7
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points +10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points +9%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4088 Points -4%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points -8%
PCMark 7 - Score
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6331 Points
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5990 Points -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5810 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points -35%
PCMark 7 Score
6331 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4270 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5420 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5243 points
Help
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)		HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G		MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-60%
-70%
-51%
-96%
Read Seq
1666
475.7
-71%
495
-70%
540
-68%
134.6
-92%
Write Seq
1192
419.1
-65%
180.2
-85%
495.7
-58%
130.6
-89%
Read 512
857
336.1
-61%
315.5
-63%
455.1
-47%
44.85
-95%
Write 512
827
346.6
-58%
172.4
-79%
481.4
-42%
63.3
-92%
Read 4k
60.7
24.7
-59%
20.25
-67%
22.7
-63%
0.602
-99%
Write 4k
154.5
76.8
-50%
76.1
-51%
112.9
-27%
1.146
-99%
Read 4k QD32
636
247.6
-61%
141.6
-78%
372.5
-41%
1.106
-100%
Write 4k QD32
544
234.9
-57%
170.8
-69%
212.9
-61%
1.186
-100%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1666 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1192 MB/s
512K Read: 857 MB/s
512K Write: 827 MB/s
4K Read: 60.7 MB/s
4K Write: 154.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 636 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 544 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14642 Points +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14317 Points +43%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10186 Points +2%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10008 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
7360 Points -26%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
79107 Points +52%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
74982 Points +44%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
51987 Points
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
49223 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
35884 Points -31%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11326 Points +41%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11311 Points +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8086 Points +1%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8027 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
5784 Points -28%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
5421 Points -32%
3DMark 11 Performance
9687 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22876 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6950 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2519 points
Help
Battlefield 1 | The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | For Honor | BioShock Infinite
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
79 fps +56%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
78.5 fps +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.8 fps 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.8 fps
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
41.1 fps -19%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
87.4 fps +57%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
86.6 fps +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
56.7 fps +2%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
55.7 fps
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
46.5 fps -17%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
27.6 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
26.9 fps -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
19.7 fps -29%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.4 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
48.7 fps -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
29.1 fps -42%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
40.7 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
39.7 fps -2%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
31.2 fps -23%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
47.6 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
47.4 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
37.1 fps -22%
For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
46.1 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
45.8 (33min - 64max) fps -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
62.9 (51min - 77max) fps +1%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
62.1 fps
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
99.1 fps +37%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
98.9 fps +36%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
72.5 fps
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 72.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 89.8 50.4 27.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 84.2 47.6 40.7
Battlefield 1 (2016) 79.2 55.7 50.8
For Honor (2017) 65.8 62.1 46.1

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 32 / 38 dB(A)
HDD
31 dB(A)
Load
44 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ		HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ		MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise
-0%
-6%
-1%
5%
off / environment *
30
28.8
4%
31
-3%
30
-0%
30.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31
33.9
-9%
35
-13%
34
-10%
31.4
-1%
Idle Average *
32
33.9
-6%
36
-13%
35
-9%
31.4
2%
Idle Maximum *
38
37.8
1%
37
3%
36
5%
31.5
17%
Load Average *
44
42.7
3%
44
-0%
41
7%
40.9
7%
Load Maximum *
50
47.4
5%
54
-8%
49
2%
46.2
8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 48.5 °C50.6 °C43.3 °C 
 48.7 °C50.1 °C44 °C 
 42.5 °C42.8 °C31.3 °C 
Maximum: 50.6 °C
Average: 44.6 °C
46.5 °C50 °C50.8 °C
45.8 °C48.9 °C40.9 °C
37 °C39.2 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 50.8 °C
Average: 44.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.9 °C / -25 F).
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ		HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ		MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat
19%
2%
0%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
50.6
37.7
25%
41.5
18%
45.8
9%
53.1
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
36.3
29%
45.5
10%
45.2
11%
44.9
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28.7
25.7
10%
31.8
-11%
31.7
-10%
32.9
-15%
Idle Bottom *
27.1
24.4
10%
29.6
-9%
29.9
-10%
33.4
-23%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42531.632.43133.328.2403433.95034.132.16329.628.98032.831.710029.729.912527.6251602625.320024.227.425024.235.531521.647.740021.749.150021.450.963019.251.880018.157.8100018.266.8125018.16816001866.9200017.764.7250017.861.2315017.566.3400017.865.1500017.663.3630017.855800017.758.51000017.849.91250017.953.51600017.755.4SPL30.776N1.532.9median 18.1median 55Delta2.312.736.839.132.432.930.731.229.530.328.630.628.13126.932.425.132.624.231.323.347.122.557.521.661.720.859.819.95919.660.218.971.718.268.817.964.117.764.617.162.917.165.81767.51768.11768.517.371.41775.617.373.817.667.917.560.317.561.229.981.51.352.1median 17.7median 64.11.95.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNexoc G739Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Nexoc G739 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7 / 14 / 23 Watt
Load midlight 82 / 163 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ		HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ		MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption
16%
-40%
-27%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
7
6.2
11%
17
-143%
14
-100%
15.6
-123%
Idle Average *
14
12.2
13%
22
-57%
20
-43%
20.2
-44%
Idle Maximum *
23
14.8
36%
29
-26%
25
-9%
21.4
7%
Load Average *
82
84.9
-4%
72
12%
82
-0%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
163
120.7
26%
141
13%
135
17%
147
10%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
4h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 08min
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 62 Wh		Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 48 Wh		HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, 95.8 Wh		MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 51.4 Wh		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
-30%
6%
-38%
-27%
Reader / Idle
613
515
-16%
543
-11%
353
-42%
H.264
322
313
-3%
195
-39%
262
-19%
WiFi v1.3
288
261
-9%
363
26%
184
-36%
250
-13%
Load
128
45
-65%
145
13%
87
-32%

Pros

+ 可维护升级的内部组件
+ 高对比度全高清IPS屏幕
+ 背光键盘
+ 优秀的性能
+ 稳定的机身底座

Cons

- 在高负载下机身温度高
- 3D程序中风扇噪音大
- 电源适配器功率不足
- 扬声器较差
- 不支持Thunderbolt 3
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.

由于搭配了强劲的硬件，Nexoc G739是一台性能不俗的入门级游戏本。它的显卡和全高清屏幕可以完美协作，同时这块屏幕在亮度和其他方面表现都十分不错。但是这款设备在如连接性，机身和输入设备等一些方面的表现只是一般般。

在性能上，Nexoc G739没有任何弱点，可以满足甚至是要求较高的游戏的需求，不过基于Clevo-N870HK1准系统的散热设计还有待改进。

它的最大弱点在于发热量和噪音控制。这个机身为更强大的散热系统也提供了足够的空间，不过它搭配的两个小尺寸风扇不仅会制造很高的噪音，还无法有效控制硬件温度。在接口配备方面它也需要改进（无Thunderbolt接口），我们也十分期待一些特别的游戏功能如G-Sync。

整体上，Nexoc G739显然不是一款糟糕的游戏本，不过同时考虑一下竞争机型大概是个好主意。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

Nexoc G739 - 06/23/2018 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
75%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 74%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 85%
Battery
81%
Display
87%
Games Performance
89%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 86%
Noise
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
45%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
73%
81%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-04-13 (Update: 2017-04-14)