Notebookcheck Logo

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53 review: Affordable gaming laptop with RTX 3050 ↺

中产阶级的光线追踪。

过去，光线追踪是为昂贵的高端显卡保留的。随着GeForce RTX 3050 (Ti)，Nvidia现在将这一令人兴奋的技术带到了中端范围。我们用宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ测试该GPU。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

宏碁Nitro 5由于其通常良好的性价比而非常受欢迎，存在各种CPU和GPU的配置。我们采取了其中一个最便宜的型号，AN517-53-54DQ，并通过它的步伐。这款17英寸的机型，在（虚拟）柜台前徘徊，价格略低于1000欧元（约1180美元），可以依靠英特尔目前虎湖一代的四核处理器，更确切地说，是 酷睿i5-11300H.

苛刻的图形计算（该笔记本支持Nvidia的Optimus技术）是由 GeForce RTX 3050笔记本GPU，这是一个基于Nvidia安培架构的全新中端芯片。操作系统（Windows 10 Home 64位）安装在一个M.2格式的512GB NVMe SSD上。显示屏是哑光IPS面板，像素为1,920 x 1,080，频率为144 Hz。

当涉及到工作内存时，购买者将不得不做出一些让步。安装的8GB DDR4内存只有单级，而且只能在单通道模式下运行，这有时会花费更多，有时会导致性能降低，这取决于（3D）应用。

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ (Nitro 5 AN517 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11300H 4 x 3.1 - 4.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1500 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 461.79, Optimus
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel, Single-Rank, 2 slots (one in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4), IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, 512 GB 
, slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 (one in use) & 1x 2,5
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 Combo (Mic/Headset)
Networking
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 404 x 280
Battery
57 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 135 W Power Supply, Nitro Sense, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.568 kg, Power Supply: 387 g
Price
999 EUR
Links
Acer homepage
Acer notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ的竞争对手包括其他经济实惠的17英寸游戏机，配备四核CPU和中档GPU，如 联想Legion 5 17IMH05，以及 微星GF75 Thin 10SCXR和 华硕TUF FX705DT-AU068T，它们都仍然配备了旧的 GeForce GTX 1650，即RTX 3050的前身。我们还比较了惠普Omen 15-ek0456ng配备的 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti进行了测试。

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		2.6 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg32 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2020
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.9 kg26.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2021
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.2 kg23.1 mm17.30"1920x1080
77.8 %
v7 (old)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.7 kg26.6 mm17.30"1920x1080

由于该机箱与最近评测的宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7基本相同，我们将不在本文中更详细地介绍机箱、设备（接口等）和输入设备。你可以在以下文章中找到相应的信息 链接的评论.唯一引人注目的变化是关于键盘的。Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ提供的不是白色字体和RGB照明的键盘，而是一个红色的模型（包括字体和照明）。

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ

Size comparison

❌
404 mm 280 mm 25 mm 2.6 kg399.8 mm 279.4 mm 26.6 mm 2.7 kg398.6 mm 290 mm 26.2 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 260 mm 23.1 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 240 mm 32 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

沟通

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1422 (1363min - 1490max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
  (758 - 1514, n=10)
1250 MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1050 MBit/s -26%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (722min - 1235max) MBit/s -28%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
610 (562min - 651max) MBit/s -57%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
201 (89min - 272max) MBit/s -86%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1375 (1253min - 1402max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
  (887 - 1670, n=10)
1319 MBit/s -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1184min - 1487max) MBit/s -6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
905 (709min - 946max) MBit/s -34%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
215 (199min - 221max) MBit/s -84%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1374 (1253-1402)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (1363-1490)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ: 12.13 ∆E min: 3.31 - max: 19.73 ∆E

显示 - 144赫兹，但黑暗和无色。

尽管144赫兹的面板与Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7相匹配，但确定的数值在某些地方略有偏差。这是一个典型的现象，因为在系列生产中总是存在一定的波动。

285
cd/m²		280
cd/m²		263
cd/m²
263
cd/m²		286
cd/m²		259
cd/m²
237
cd/m²		236
cd/m²		243
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 286 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 261.3 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 286 cd/m²
Contrast: 1243:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 4.73
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
37.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.175
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
85%
7%
67%
Display P3 Coverage
36.7
69.4
89%
39.46
8%
62.3
70%
sRGB Coverage
55
97.1
77%
58.4
6%
89.1
62%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
37.9
71.2
88%
40.77
8%
63.7
68%
Response Times
36%
-52%
-39%
-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
24.8 ?(12.4, 12.4)
17 ?(9, 8)
31%
38.4 ?(19.6, 18.8)
-55%
34 ?(18, 16)
-37%
41 ?(20, 21)
-65%
Response Time Black / White *
18.8 ?(10.8, 8)
11 ?(7, 4)
41%
28 ?(15.6, 12.4)
-49%
26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8)
-40%
30 ?(16, 14)
-60%
PWM Frequency
Screen
18%
-5%
-21%
6%
Brightness middle
286
314
10%
326
14%
251.2
-12%
316
10%
Brightness
261
293
12%
304
16%
242
-7%
294
13%
Brightness Distribution
83
87
5%
89
7%
92
11%
84
1%
Black Level *
0.23
0.22
4%
0.25
-9%
0.34
-48%
0.32
-39%
Contrast
1243
1427
15%
1304
5%
739
-41%
988
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.92
2.51
49%
4.42
10%
4.5
9%
3.39
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19.29
4.42
77%
9.44
51%
20
-4%
5.56
71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.73
1.71
64%
1.53
68%
3.91
17%
2.14
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
3.26
-72%
5.8
-205%
4
-111%
3.17
-67%
Gamma
2.175 101%
2.42 91%
2.261 97%
2.25 98%
2.39 92%
CCT
6782 96%
6150 106%
6822 95%
5882 111%
7098 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71
37.3
51
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
58.1
89
Total Average (Program / Settings)
27% / 21%
9% / 8%
-18% / -17%
3% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

虽然我们的测试设备的黑值（0.23cd/m²）和对比度（1,243:1）令人信服，但亮度并不惊人。平均261cd/m²的亮度对于大多数室内区域来说是足够的，但是17英寸的设备在更明亮的地方（温室、露台等）明显缺乏亮度。我们期望至少有300cd/m²的平均亮度，即使是对于一个经济型的游戏者。

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）。
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

然而，色彩空间被证明是最大的弱点。55%的sRGB覆盖率和大约38%的Adobe RGB覆盖率是非常令人失望的，使画面相当苍白。在对比设备中，只有微星GF75的表现同样糟糕。这同样适用于色彩准确性，尽管联想Legion 5在这方面也有不足之处。

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53与sRGB的比较
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53与sRGB的比较
子像素
子像素
宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53 VS AdobeRGB
宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53 VS AdobeRGB

其他的速率则相当不令人瞩目。例如，从黑到白的响应时间不到19毫秒，从灰到灰的响应时间为25毫秒，既不坏也不特别好。我们无法确定在降低亮度时的闪烁。视角处于通常的IPS水平。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8580 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

测试条件--Nitro Sense几乎没有提供任何选项

与宏碁的其他游戏笔记本相比，预装的Nitro Sense工具的功能和选项非常少。除了风扇控制，你只能改变节能计划。我们的测量是在交付状态下进行的（见屏幕截图）。

硝基感应
硝基感应

性能 - 现代的中档组件

四核CPU表示中端硬件，以及8GB内存和4GB VRAM的GPU。如果你投资多一点，你也可以得到具有高端功能的Nitro 5（8核CPU，16GB内存，6-8GB GPU）。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
AS SSD基准测试
水晶盘标志

处理器

如前所述，酷睿i5-11300H是来自Tiger Lake 系列的四核型号，它终于不再采用英特尔使用多年的过时的14纳米工艺制造。这款10纳米的CPU提供8MB L3缓存，并可通过超线程技术并行处理多达8个线程。与经典的6核和8核芯片相比，TDP只有35瓦而不是45瓦。根据WiNFO工具，Nitro 5的处理器被设定为40瓦PL1和64瓦PL2。时钟--取决于应用和负载--在负载下在3.1和4.4GHz之间。

我们使用Cinebench R15检查了CPU在很长一段时间内的表现。酷睿i5-11300H的性能在循环中保持相当稳定，并如预期的那样，将自己置于旧的 酷睿i5-10300H在循环中。

Cinebench R15 Multi long-term test

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø980 (953.06-988.73)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø897 (886.62-902.36)
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø850 (539.07-902.4)
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø768 (755.39-839.42)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø709 (702.86-742.45)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=157, last 2 years)
277 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
211 Points
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
190 Points -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (123 - 211, n=8)
173.4 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
144 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
108 Points -49%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5600, n=160, last 2 years)
3309 Points +235%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
989 (953.06min - 988.73max) Points
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
907 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (632 - 990, n=11)
895 Points -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (755.39min - 839.42max) Points -15%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
548 Points -45%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
30491
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8663
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11506
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
93.2 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
989 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2533 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
546 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6581 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1426 Points
Help

系统性能

尽管内存配置不高，但在系统基准测试中，它足以获得测试领域的第一名。PCMark 10认为Nitro 5领先竞争对手8%至40%，据此，在启动时间和加载时间等方面，所有设备上的日常Windows体验应该感觉非常相似。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=140, last 2 years)
7826 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
5705 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
5705 Points 0%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
5301 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5127 Points -10%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4339 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B
4077 Points -29%
PCMark 10 Score
5705 points
Help

DPC延迟

尽管与竞争对手相比，17英寸机以最低的延迟率大放异彩，但LatencyMon工具表明在实时处理音频和视频内容方面可能存在问题。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3178 μs * -132%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2952 μs * -116%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B
1688 μs * -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1369 μs *

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

人们对快速的大容量存储赞不绝口。过去，最高速度为500-600MB/s的SATA III固态硬盘在预算领域很常见，而快速的PCIe/NVMe固态硬盘正在缓慢但肯定地成为标准剧目的一部分。Nitro 5提供了一个特别强大的代表，它采用了SK海力士BC711的512GB版本，将竞争对手的NVMe型号甩在了后面，有时还很明显。

不错：如果你想扩大存储空间，你会发现机箱内有一个免费的M.2插槽和一个2.5英寸的插槽（包括合适的电缆）。

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N		HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G		Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B		MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-31%
-41%
-38%
-48%
Write 4K
206.1
120
-42%
134.7
-35%
140.7
-32%
145
-30%
Read 4K
77.8
36.09
-54%
44.84
-42%
43.18
-44%
45.28
-42%
Write Seq
2842
1778
-37%
1053
-63%
1829
-36%
1301
-54%
Read Seq
2552
1362
-47%
1241
-51%
1095
-57%
1362
-47%
Write 4K Q32T1
583
429.1
-26%
499.8
-14%
431.7
-26%
249.1
-57%
Read 4K Q32T1
663
493.2
-26%
518
-22%
527
-21%
342.1
-48%
Write Seq Q32T1
3014
2936
-3%
1022
-66%
1831
-39%
1301
-57%
Read Seq Q32T1
3556
3227
-9%
2263
-36%
1708
-52%
1732
-51%
AS SSD
-30%
-46%
-94%
-64%
Seq Read
2859
2053
-28%
1635
-43%
1007
-65%
1546
-46%
Seq Write
2693
2562
-5%
913
-66%
1755
-35%
1182
-56%
4K Read
68.8
42.46
-38%
46.18
-33%
39.88
-42%
36.54
-47%
4K Write
154.5
97.2
-37%
101.7
-34%
111.6
-28%
109.2
-29%
4K-64 Read
1860
1414
-24%
773
-58%
751
-60%
612
-67%
4K-64 Write
1680
1471
-12%
745
-56%
402.6
-76%
436.6
-74%
Access Time Read *
0.043
0.079
-84%
0.05
-16%
0.084
-95%
0.113
-163%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.039
-39%
0.037
-32%
0.151
-439%
0.034
-21%
Score Read
2214
1662
-25%
983
-56%
892
-60%
803
-64%
Score Write
2104
1825
-13%
938
-55%
690
-67%
664
-68%
Score Total
5451
4364
-20%
2399
-56%
2085
-62%
1869
-66%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / -30%
-44% / -44%
-66% / -70%
-56% / -57%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3556 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3014 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 663 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 583 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2552 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2842 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 206.1 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

对许多用户来说，最有趣的方面可能是GPU。虽然我们过去能够对移动GeForce RTX 3050 Ti进行一次或两次检查，但到目前为止，几乎没有RTX 3050的基准测试结果。与RTX 3050 Ti相比，DirectX 12模型必须用2048个而不是2560个着色器来做。

然而，性能主要取决于冷却系统（关键词时钟余量）和设定的TGP。后者对于RTX 3050（无动态提升）来说，在35至80瓦之间变化。在Nitro 5的情况下，它是75瓦，包括动态提升，所以它是一个相当好的价值，处于上三分之一。

我们认为有限的显存是其弱点。RTX 3050和RTX 3050 Ti都只有4GB的GDDR6 VRAM（128位接口），在2021年，特别是考虑到当前许多游戏的VRAM要求，这已经不是最新的了，对笔记本电脑的未来发展有负面影响。即使在中端市场，到现在至少6GB也是合适的。

然而，安培GPU在与旧版GTX 1650的比赛中很轻松，因为它仍然没有光线追踪支持。在3DMark测试中，领先优势通常为30%至40%。然而，它并没有完全达到GTX 1660 Ti的水平--这在之前是可以预期的。

3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 53059, n=162, last 2 years)
30835 Points +142%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14746 Points +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
12736 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (9138 - 14157, n=22)
11708 Points -8%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9621 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9423 Points -26%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9274 Points -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 22717, n=157, last 2 years)
12842 Points +163%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5735 Points +17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
4888 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (3281 - 5295, n=23)
4448 Points -9%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3506 Points -28%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3461 Points -29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3455 Points -29%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
36425 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
43216 points
3DMark 11 Performance
14587 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
61606 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24215 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11041 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4877 points
Help

游戏性能

与合成基准类似，移动GeForce RTX 3050在游戏过程中也排在GTX 1650（Ti）和GeForce GTX 1660 Ti之间，据此，帧率有时更倾向于一个方向，有时更倾向于另一个方向，这取决于游戏和VRAM消耗。

总的来说，GeForce RTX 3050笔记本GPU的速度足以在1,920 x 1,080的原生分辨率下运行大多数游戏，并具有高至最大的细节。只有在启用光线追踪或非常密集的计算和/或适度优化的游戏，如《刺客信条瓦尔哈拉》 和 《赛博朋克2077》 ，它才会变得紧张，甚至中等设置也成为一种挑战。RTX 3050很难适用于QHD和4K游戏。为此，我们建议使用高端设备，配备 GeForce RTX 3060向上。

Performance Rating | Vampire Bloodhunt | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Ghostwire Tokyo | Elden Ring | Elex 2 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | GRID Legends | Dying Light 2 | Rainbow Six Extraction | God of War | Halo Infinite | Farming Simulator 22 | Battlefield 2042 | Forza Horizon 5 | Call of Duty Vanguard | Riders Republic | Guardians of the Galaxy | Alan Wake Remastered | Back 4 Blood | Far Cry 6 | FIFA 22 | New World | Deathloop | Monster Hunter Stories 2 | F1 2021 | Days Gone | Mass Effect Legendary Edition | Resident Evil Village | Outriders | Hitman 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | Immortals Fenyx Rising | Crysis Remastered | Yakuza Like a Dragon | Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | Dirt 5 | Watch Dogs Legion | FIFA 21 | Star Wars Squadrons | Mafia Definitive Edition | Serious Sam 4 | Flight Simulator 2020 | Valorant | Horizon Zero Dawn | Strange Brigade | Death Stranding | F1 2020 | Gears Tactics | Doom Eternal | Hunt Showdown | Escape from Tarkov | Red Dead Redemption 2 | Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | Need for Speed Heat | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | GRID 2019 | Ghost Recon Breakpoint | FIFA 20 | Borderlands 3 | Control | F1 2019 | Rage 2 | Anno 1800 | The Division 2 | Apex Legends | Metro Exodus | Battlefield V | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Fortnite | Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) | Dota 2 Reborn | Overwatch | The Witcher 3 | GTA V
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming -227!
 
95.7 pt
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD -84!
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
85.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ -247!
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
66.5 pt
MSI GP75 -257!
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
63.5 pt
MSI GL75 -267!
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
56.6 pt

顶点：在60分钟的测试中 的时候Witcher 3(FHD/Ultra)没有出现任何异常。时钟速率和性能都相当稳定。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile; FPS: Ø40.1 (36-43)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø45.1 (42-48)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile: Ø54 (49-58)
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile: Ø33.8 (31-37)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile: Ø35 (31-39)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 157 120 63.9 48 46.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 142 84.5 48.7 33.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 115 104 92.1 88.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 71.8 48.6 33 17.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 85.2 65.9 57.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 86 80 74 52 19
Strange Brigade (2018) 93.4 75.7 67.9 48.7 34
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 66 63 57 44 23
Battlefield V (2018) 92.8 89.4 83.2 65.7 35
Apex Legends (2019) 126 100 89.8 68.4 37.1
Metro Exodus (2019) 63.4 46.9 37.1 29 17.2
The Division 2 (2019) 87 69 52 35 16
Anno 1800 (2019) 88 60.3 31.2 22.9 12.4
Rage 2 (2019) 81.3 69.8 68.8 43 14.2
Control (2019) 62.1 45.1 29.1 13.3
Borderlands 3 (2019) 81.3 57.1 43.4 30.3 15.6
GRID 2019 (2019) 93.3 71.1 36.4 22.8 11.4
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 64.7 62.5 61.1 47.1 23.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 86.6 80 71.6 52.6 25.3
Hunt Showdown (2020) 73.5 67.7 42 19.5
Doom Eternal (2020) 133 107
Gears Tactics (2020) 129 84.6 62.4 42.1 21.6
Death Stranding (2020) 79.2 73.6 71 38.8 19
Crysis Remastered (2020) 99.3 52.2 35.9 24.4 13.8
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 63.5 48.9 39.1 29.9
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 64 58.9 40.1 20.4
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 164 145 143 93.8 50.6
FIFA 21 (2020) 186 180 175 166 112
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 61 54
Dirt 5 (2020) 73.4 54.6 44.2 33 16.9
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 60 27 20 19
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 57.1 55.3 50.7 37.1 19.1
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 69 50 45 29 15
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 41.2 36 29.5 16.4 4.68
Hitman 3 (2021) 103 60.5 55.7 39.7 21.4
Outriders (2021) 53.2 51 47.2 30.6 22.9
Resident Evil Village (2021) 73.5 66.6 57.2 41.6 17.4
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 96.8 78.2 43.5
Days Gone (2021) 78.4 69.9 51.6 37.3 20.8
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 95.6 91.4 78.4 60.5
F1 2021 (2021) 144 115 55 30 12

排放--相当不引人注目

噪声排放

噪音水平与竞争对手一致。虽然我们在空闲模式下可以从17英寸的设备中获得25至33分贝（A）（该设备在理想条件下是无声的），但在负载下是43至47分贝（A）（在使用一小时后平均44分贝（A）Witcher 3 ）。简而言之：Nitro 5在3D模式下既不安静，也没有令人不快的声音。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 31 / 33 dB(A)
Load
43 / 47 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.738.137.63736.735.92534.235.637.234.53336.93144.649.143.541.645.845.74032.634.432.428.629.833.75028.626.23027.224.227.36328.731.52531.325.230.98023.825.123.421.219.125.210022.924.222.718.619.8241252426.121.423.118.727.916026.224.620.119.820.1302002826.122.821.82229.825026.823.218.117.116.728.43153022.6191514.136.240028.321.724.314.412.831.75002921.83314.112.931.363030.924.217.81312.13480030.222.214.21311.133.8100032.622.513.612.511.435.8125034.324.416.813.21238.2160035.225.614.112.311.638.5200032.521.512.612.111.836.3250032.818.212.611.912.136.2315030.416.512.712.712.539.240002615.812.812.812.931.4500024.914.313.112.91329.5630021.313.913.51313.226.8800020.81413.413.113.224.31000018.713.313.112.81322.11250016.413.113.212.812.816.51600016.512.512.512.612.813.9SPL42.933.131.325.324.947.3N3.91.71.30.70.65.6median 28median 21.8median 14.1median 13median 12.9median 31.3Delta4.14.441.325.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-5%
4%
-4%
-5%
2%
off / environment *
25
27
-8%
24
4%
28.4
-14%
30.8
-23%
24 ?(20.4 - 27.9, n=131, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
25
32.4
-30%
24
4%
33
-32%
30.8
-23%
25.6 ?(22.8 - 35, n=131, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Average *
31
32.4
-5%
25
19%
33
-6%
30.8
1%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=131, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
33
32.4
2%
29
12%
33.1
-0%
32.2
2%
30.4 ?(23 - 46, n=131, last 2 years)
8%
Load Average *
43
32.5
24%
43
-0%
37.7
12%
38.6
10%
42.1 ?(24 - 62.9, n=131, last 2 years)
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
47.2
-7%
46
-5%
39.2
11%
Load Maximum *
47
51.9
-10%
51
-9%
46
2%
44.8
5%
53.5 ?(39.4 - 67.5, n=131, last 2 years)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

这台17英寸的笔记本电脑在温度发展方面也相当不显眼。考虑到所提供的性能，确定的机箱率是可以接受的 - 至少在上侧。在压力测试和60分钟的《 Witcher 3 》之后，底面的温度高达54℃（129.2°F），这就是为什么你在游戏时不一定要把笔记本放在腿上。当Nitro 5无事可做时，其表面保持令人愉悦的凉爽（低于30 °C/86 °F）。你可以在截图中看到组件（CPU、GPU等）的温度。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 45 °C47 °C44 °C 
 35 °C43 °C42 °C 
 28 °C30 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
52 °C51 °C49 °C
54 °C53 °C34 °C
28 °C29 °C30 °C
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 42.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
4%
-10%
-19%
-1%
-11%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
40.2
14%
47
-0%
42
11%
41.6
11%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=131, last 2 years)
2%
Maximum Bottom *
54
48.4
10%
44
19%
53.4
1%
38
30%
49.3 ?(33.6 - 66, n=131, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Upper Side *
25
25.6
-2%
35
-40%
34.2
-37%
31.7
-27%
31.3 ?(24 - 42.8, n=131, last 2 years)
-25%
Idle Bottom *
25
26.7
-7%
30
-20%
37.4
-50%
29.5
-18%
32.5 ?(24 - 43.6, n=131, last 2 years)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.236.9253636.93141.649.64029.633.55026.129.66327.432.78019.72610021.829.612518.134.316019.836.120024.544.925020.654.931516.557.540012.960.450013.462.563011.671.280011.568.2100011.468125012.168.9160011.870.3200012.367.5250012.468.1315012.966.6400013.262.4500013.364.8630013.961.6800013.662100001362.11250012.559.81600012.152.4SPL25.479N0.744.1median 13median 62.1Delta1.98.532.228.232.237.632.337.637.834.137.829.725.829.730.427.130.425.925.525.92420.72425.418.525.433.218.833.235.31835.331.217.131.23816.23844.714.944.752.514.652.55614.8565814.35859.714.359.754.71454.751.913.951.947.914.147.95014.15051.414.651.455.114.655.154.114.754.154.514.854.557.814.857.858.115.158.15415.2545216.45245.815.445.86726.76722.10.822.1median 52median 14.8median 527.10.87.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQHP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 15-ek0456ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (58.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 高运行时间

消耗功率

由于笔记本提供了图形切换功能，而且宏碁在目前的配置中没有使用高端硬件，因此能耗被控制在4到15瓦（空闲）和85到135瓦（负载）的范围内。135瓦的电源似乎是足够大的尺寸。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 9 / 15 Watt
Load midlight 85 / 135 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-49%
13%
-57%
17%
-105%
Idle Minimum *
4
9.2
-130%
2
50%
13
-225%
3.9
2%
13.4 ?(2 - 39, n=131, last 2 years)
-235%
Idle Average *
9
14.6
-62%
8
11%
15.7
-74%
9.6
-7%
18.7 ?(8 - 55.6, n=131, last 2 years)
-108%
Idle Maximum *
15
18.1
-21%
16
-7%
21
-40%
12.2
19%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=131, last 2 years)
-78%
Load Average *
85
84
1%
58
32%
87
-2%
59
31%
103.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=129, last 2 years)
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
104
142
-37%
89
14%
96.4
7%
Load Maximum *
135
194
-44%
169
-25%
145.8
-8%
80
41%
247 ?(64.5 - 399, n=131, last 2 years)
-83%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ: Ø104.2 (102-113)

电池寿命

经测试，Nitro 5的最大亮点之一是充足的电池寿命。尽管电池容量只有57瓦特（竞争对手有51-80瓦特），但在完美的条件下，即最低的显示亮度和没有负载的情况下，这台17英寸的笔记本可以持续17小时以上。对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说，这一数值与在中等显示亮度下通过WLAN上网约7小时一样值得尊敬。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 22min
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 57 Wh		HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 70.91 Wh		Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 80 Wh		MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-6%
40%
-38%
13%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1041
703
-32%
1399
34%
463
-56%
815
-22%
578 ?(239 - 1290, n=56, last 2 years)
-44%
WiFi v1.3
432
391
-9%
683
58%
283
-34%
469
9%
384 ?(85 - 889, n=131, last 2 years)
-11%
Load
82
101
23%
104
27%
63
-23%
124
51%
85.4 ?(41 - 164, n=92, last 2 years)
4%
H.264
383
860
485
440 ?(129 - 884, n=63, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 价格-性能比
+ 均衡的硬件
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ NVMe SSD
+ 144赫兹

Cons

- 显示屏亮度和色彩空间微不足道
- 内存只有单级/单通道
- 糟糕的网络摄像头
- 没有Thunderbolt

评语 - 总体表现良好

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ，评测单位提供。
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ，评测单位提供。

宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ对于那些希望在游戏笔记本上最多花费1000欧元（约1180美元）的价格敏感型游戏玩家来说是一个不错的选择。

这款17英寸的设备提供了--除了有点不幸的内存配置（单通道，单级）--平衡的硬件组合，只要你使用1,920 x 1,080的原生分辨率，就可以在高到最大的细节中流畅地渲染大多数当前游戏。

Core i5-11300H 和GeForce RTX 3050笔记本GPU 组成了一个成功的、具有价格吸引力的团队。

显示屏给人的感觉相当复杂。一方面，对比度和黑值令人满意，另一方面，色彩空间和亮度可以做得更好。其他方面（端口、外壳质量、输入设备等）几乎没有在人群中脱颖而出，大多处于中场。为数不多的独特卖点之一是慷慨的电池寿命，在互联网冲浪期间约为7小时。

目前基于RTX-3050或3050-Ti的对应产品相当罕见或几乎没有，这主要是因为仍然普遍存在的芯片短缺，但在未来几周和几个月内，它们应该变得越来越普遍。

价格和可用性

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ目前在notebooksbilliger.de上以999欧元（约1179美元）的价格出售。.

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ - 08/11/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
77 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
51 / 80 → 63%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Battery
75 / 95 → 79%
Display
81%
Games Performance
89%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 89%
Noise
78 / 90 → 87%
Audio
71%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
74%
81%
Gaming - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ (Nitro 5 AN517 Series)
Review
•
Acer Nitro 5 with RTX 3060 in ...
|
Review
•
宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-52 笔记本电脑评测：几乎全...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53评论：经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑与RTX 3050
Florian Glaser, 2021-08-18 (Update: 2024-11- 4)