Nokia 5
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix AF, 1,12 µm, f/2, 84 degrees field of view
Price comparison
Average of 38 scores (from 64 reviews)
Reviews for the Nokia 5
华丽转身。 从微软分离开后,诺基亚发布了一些新手机。凭借5.2英寸的中端机型诺基亚5,该制造商迅速得分。因为很多用户喜欢这些产品,只有少数不喜欢。
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’ve long been lovers of the Moto G series for the top pick in the budget Android category, but the Nokia 5 knocks it off the top spot. With a better camera, better performance and a stunning design, we are blown away by the low price tag offered here.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall I would say the Nokia 5 has its flaws, but on the whole it could be a whole lot worse. As a first time user will it be sufficient. However for someone who may be looking for something with more raw power and performance then it might be worth looking at what other device might be available for under $400-$500 market range.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’ve long been lovers of the Moto G series for the top pick in the budget Android category, but the Nokia 5 knocks it off the top spot. With a better camera, better performance and a stunning design, we are blown away by the low price tag offered here.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadget Diary EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Priced at 12,499 INR, the Nokia 5 can be recommended to the basic users, simply because of the limited RAM and storage. At the same time, its premium build quality and iconic branding will certainly appeal to many buyers. So if you don’t play high-end games on your smartphone or indulge in heavy multitasking and want a Nokia Smartphone, you can consider Nokia 5 as an option.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To help meet its price target, Nokia has prioritised hardware design and robustness over processor speed and storage space, and also opted for a simple camera setup and a moderate-resolution screen. The inclusion of a fingerprint scanner is welcome the face of such compromises.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I always find it tricky to review budget devices like this. When you spend this little – €189 to be exact – you know that you’re not likely to get the very best design, specs, and camera. Instead you need to choose which of these things matters most to you and where you want the limited budget to go. The Nokia 5 is for those people to whom looks matter more than specs and performance. If you want a phone that will serve as a bit more of a fashion statement and look good when you use it, then this might be a solid choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 65% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's the best-looking phone at its price point, but isn't as sharp in use as its rivals. Battery life struggles when pushed, and load times can be lengthy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All things considered, the Nokia 5 is a pretty smartphone that comes with a clean and up-to-date software, but ultimately disappoints in terms of performance. Some people will undoubtedly find it – as well as its €190 ($222) price tag – appealing, but it certainly isn't the best budget phone on the market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 5 certainly gives a good first impression, with its shiny metal unibody, nostalgic design and low asking price. Boot it up and you’re presented with a clean version of Android Nougat, along with expandable storage for filling the phone with your apps and media collection. You even get full fingerprint security and NFC support for contactless payments.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Independent EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, this is a highly attractive phone. Though it can’t match the super-fast processors or dual-lens cameras of flagship phones, it looks fantastic and performs better than the price point suggests. With more phones to come, HMD has planted a flag in the sand to indicate that Nokia phones, including this one, are likely to be capable, powerful and great-looking.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/25/2017
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 5 is an upgraded version of Nokia 3 and it has fingerprint scanner in it which is a plus point. It has given us positive results in every section and the features are quiet impressive. The device has affordable price value which can target the audience easily because users used to love Nokia a lot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Some makers have a dozen of series of smartphones, a handful of models in each - the new Nokia has just three models, with a 4th one allegedly on the way. But even with these three currently in existence, the reborn Finnish brand covers the low-to-mid tier quite efficiently.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/21/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 5 is the best-looking smartphone at its price point, but in use it’s not quite as sharp as some of its rivals. Battery life struggles when pushed, and you’ll need to be patient, as load times can be lengthy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With a neat design, a low price and power enough for the essentials, the Nokia 5 is budget Android done well.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’re impressed by the Nokia 5, particularly when considering the price tag. It’s good-looking with decent specs and we love addition of Android without overcomplicating it with any sort of overlay. We expect the Nokia 5 could become a really popular choice for anyone in the market for a mid-range phone, and a strong contender for the Moto G5.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the price, the Nokia 5 seems to offer an excellent selection of features, but it’s surrounded by equally capable handsets above and below it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’re impressed by the Nokia 5, particularly when considering the price tag. It’s good-looking with decent specs and we love addition of Android without overcomplicating it with any sort of overlay. We expect the Nokia 5 could become a really popular choice for anyone in the market for a mid-range phone, and a strong contender for the Moto G5.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia's strategy is to offer a selection of affordable Android smartphones, carrying that Nokia name and giving you a no compromise design and build. That's been achieved and although we don't think that the Nokia 5 is as good looking as the Nokia 6, there's no denying that it feels solid - it's an impressive phone for the asking price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Connect - 10/17
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 69% mobility: 77% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2017
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 65% display: 75% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 65% workmanship: 75%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/02/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/24/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% display: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2017
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 55% performance: 50% display: 40% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/22/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 58%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% display: 75% mobility: 78% workmanship: 80%
Source: Puhelinvertailu →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
430:
中低端八核ARM Cortex-A53处理器,主频最高1.4 GHz,集成Adreno 505显卡和DDR3L-1600内存控制器以及一个X6 LTE 模组
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.