Nokia 7.1
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24mm
Price comparison
Average of 46 scores (from 85 reviews)
Reviews for the Nokia 7.1
HMD's Nokia 7.1 is based on Android One, and thus free of unnecessary apps, most commonly referred to as bloatware. The result is supposed to be a minimalistic and fast system, designed to run even more demanding apps. Find out in our review whether or not this turned out to be true, and how the Nokia 7.1 did when compared to its rivals.
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 offers a winning combination of great performance, killer looks, and up-to-date Android software for a reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite some frustrating issues with the software, I've found the Nokia 7.1 to be a very enjoyable phone overall. I can breeze through almost everything I do on it, the screen is absolutely beautiful, and the camera usually produces very pleasant results, with vibrant colors that make pictures feel really alive. I also love the simple, but attractive design of the phone, with the silver accented edges really adding the right amount of flair to an otherwise plain look.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2019
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A9 looks very similar to the Galaxy A7, but the A9 got an additional camera. While the Galaxy A7 sports triple camera, the Galaxy A9 took a step further by offering new innovations in the form of a quad-camera setup on the rear side. That said, the phone follows Samsung’s glass and metal design language. There’s no flex whatsoever, but the delicate glass body can be cracked easily if it falls on the hard surface. I recommend a case just to protect the delicate back glass panel. The fingerprint sensor is right above the Samsung logo and it was easy to unlock my smartphone with one hand. Apart from the fingerprint scanner, the Galaxy A9 has included facial recognition which works like charm.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2019
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is tough to recommend because of its performance issues that left a dark cloud over my enjoyment of it, but it’s still worthy of some consideration.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2019
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At $350, this is the phone to beat going into 2019. The design feels significantly above what you pay for it, and it delivers performance that can get pretty close to matching phones double its price. You’ve got a ton of storage (64GB, with a microSD card slot), it has a headphone jack, and the camera’s not bad. The phones that do these things better are going to cost quite a bit more, and in some cases, you’re losing either the headphone jack or microSD card, if not both.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2019
Source: Reliance Digital EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is an elegantly designed smartphone at a budget price tag of Rs. 19,990*. It offers some premium features such as a HDR display, great camera and solid build quality, which can be great for everyday use. With the Android One support and its frequent security updates, this phone is a good future-proof option. However, the lack of top-end hardware can sometimes be noticed. If your daily activity demands use of graphic intensive applications and games like PUBG and Fortnite, you should consider the Nokia 8.1 which packs a more powerful piece of hardware such as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 and Adreno 616 GPU.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall though, the Poco F1 is definitely a better package. While Nokia 7.1 and Poco F1 are at par at most of the features and specifications, the Poco also has a better battery performance. The lower variant of the Poco F1, which is priced at Rs 20,999 (just Rs 1,000 more) also comes with 6 GB of RAM, as compared to 4 GB RAM on the Nokia 7.1. Though you must consider that Nokia 7.1 vs Poco F1 means, Android One vs MIUI OS. So, unless Xiaomi's custom UI is a problem, I'd say go for the Poco F1, no bargain here. But if you are looking for something stylish, the Nokia 7.1 is a better choice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Sydney Morning Herald EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But the software is the biggest selling point here. There are a few Android tricks that Google keeps for itself, like its fancy moving wallpapers and unlimited full-res photo storage, but for all intents and purposes using the Nokia 7.1 is like using a Pixel phone. It's clean, reliable and intuitive, and for some it will be tough to argue that the extra bit of power and sophistication you get with a Pixel 3 is worth another $700.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While Nokia 7.1 remains the cheapest HDR display smartphones right now, it is far from being a Value For Money (VFM) device. If you want a reliable Nokia device under Rs. 20,000, Nokia 7.1 is a good option. In case if you are specific about Android One, you can check out Moto One Power or Mi A2 at slightly cheaper rates. If you care about performance and gaming, POCO F1 is a very good option at the same price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7.1 is one of the most good-looking phones in this price segment in my opinion and the display stands out as well. Plus, you get Android Pie experience on this budget device. But its biggest competitor I feel is Nokia’s own 6.1 Plus which has a similar design and same processor at a lower price. Another option is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, which is made of aluminium 600 series, has a splash-resistant coating, and Snapdragon 636 as well.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Is the Nokia 7.1 worth upgrading to if you already own a mid-range Nokia phone? The short answer is no, especially if you have something like the Nokia 7 Plus, which sports many of the same specifications sans screen notch. If, however, it's been awhile since you bought a new phone and you're in the market for a mid-range device, your money would be well spent on the R6k Nokia 7.1.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is just a more polished Nokia 6.1 Plus and at the end of the day you will have to ask yourself whether you're willing to spend a little extra for a few premium features. The few new technologies such as the PureDisplay screen offers a noticeable improvement in the display. The Zeiss camera also offers better low-light performance than before. If these are features that matter to you a lot then the Nokia 7.1 makes sense, otherwise one should rather stick with the Nokia 6.1 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 scores big on display and camera but falls short of its competitor when it comes to performance. The design of the phone makes it a classy looking thing, but the lack of a TPU case in the box is concerning due to the all-glass construction. Its not an all-rounder, but it is great for people looking for a smartphone with a good camera in this budget.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Power users might be better served by Poco F1 (Review) and Honor Play (Review), which are powered by flagship grade processors. However, the all-plastic Poco F1 does not look or feel as premium as the Nokia 7.1 and both MIUI and EMUI are cluttered and laden with third-party bloat. For the average joe, the Nokia 7.1 would make for a solid everyday smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On paper, the Nokia 7.1 looks like one of the best phones at the price, but it's let down by poor battery life and general performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As you can probably guess, I am very taken with this second-generation Nokia 7.1. Nokia has pulled another rabbit out of the hat. There are no deal breakers; it offers features common to devices at twice the price (including the Nokia 8.1 Sirocco).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 98% price: 100% performance: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 isn’t a device without caveats but I think it’s one that’ll pay off for those looking to get a decent smartphone at a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia has quietly released one of the most exciting inexpensive phones of the year in the Nokia 7.1, a well-designed phone that delivers first-rate performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia knocked it out of the park with the Nokia 7.1. It looks and feels great, has a gorgeous display, excellent battery life, and much more. Performance can be a little sluggish at times, but for just $350, you're getting far more than your money's worth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With the Nokia 7.1, the brand continues its run of impressive mid-range phones carrying close-to-stock Android. While the phone has weaknesses, overall it offers better quality and features than you would expect at this price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Bill Bennett EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is only available from Spark in New Zealand. It’s an ideal choice for someone looking to get more phone for less money. If you buy phones for employees or for younger family members this will stretch your money further, with few compromises.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2018
Source: Tech Switch EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You aren’t getting something fancy like an in-screen fingerprint scanner – the fingerprint scanner is across the again, as regular. With a thickness of 8mm it is also barely chunkier than a few of the finest telephones round, although you are probably not going to note the distinction.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Like the Motorola One before it, the Nokia 7.1 is a good phone that simply can't compete with the best from Honor and Xiaomi. The biggest letdown here being the performance, which is a mar on an otherwise well-designed and pleasing device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, if you are keen on having one of the best Android One phones on the market, go and test the Nokia 7.1 for yourself. You may find it surprisingly fitting if blazing-fast performance isn't a must.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite the crowded mid-range the Nokia 7.1 is one of the better choices for a smartphone in the price range in what is a very crowded market.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia’s rendered an attractive handset with some capable hardware and a nice unique selling point for just a touch more than the likes of the Motorola One and Honor Play.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia Mobile is now in the top five of Android smartphone manufacturers and it's no wonder: the phones are great. Looking at this handset, it's really rather hard to justify spending double on a flagship handset even if some of the specs - notably the camera - are significantly better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Its generic but solid design is improved with an above average display and the ongoing attractiveness of opting for Android One mean it’s a phone we will fully review with interest and could be the sweet spot for Nokia’s busy line up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
First we saw the wave of ultra-expensive phones with notches. Now we get the backlash: notchy phones many more of us can afford. That has to be good news, right?
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It was only ever a matter of time until Nokia started getting noticed again. Once the initial wave of nostalgic joy subsided, the sticky business of putting out phones began, and so far Nokia has hardly skipped a beat. Nearly every phone it’s put out over that last two years has been great. This is no easy feat, not even in the mid-range Nokia occupies so comfortably. Despite the difficulties, the results are showing: Nokia is now in the top ten smartphone manufacturers globally and the top five in 25 markets. Not bad for a less-than-two-year-old effort.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The highlight of the Nokia 7.1 is the updated display technology, and with minor but useful improvements to the design and camera this may be one of the best affordable phones of the year.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Unless you're into rectangular phones with shiny accents, the Nokia 7.1 probably isn't going to win you over with its looks -- a neutral tone with shiny accents around the buttons and rim. But it might win you over with a combination of its price, which starts at a reasonable $349, and its specs. A midrange device in the US and abroad, the 2018 version of the Nokia 7 aims to excel in the middle ground. It tees up good overall specs and performance for the cost.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We liked the Nokia 7.1 and are looking forward to testing out the 3,060mAh battery, the new dual camera and give that HDR 10-compliant display a go at our scientific tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 82% features: 67% display: 86% mobility: 71%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 64% performance: 58% display: 80% mobility: 54% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/13/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: MuyComputer ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 95%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 93%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/11/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 78%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 65% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 85% mobility: 40% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 90% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 509:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 636:
中档八核SoC,具有8个高达1.8 GHz的Kryo 260 CPU内核,Adreno 509 GPU,LPDDR4-2666内存控制器和X12 LTE(Cat 13 / 12,300 / 150 MBit)调制解调器。采用现代14nm工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.84":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.