Nokia 7 Series
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 636, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 508, Qualcomm Adreno 509, Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 5.20 inch, 5.84 inch, 6.00 inch, 6.30 inch
Weight: 0.153kg, 0.16kg, 0.18kg, 0.186kg
Price: 300, 340, 399, 400 euro
Average of 146 scores (from 287 reviews)
Nokia 7
Specifications
Notebook: Nokia 7Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 508
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.153kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: Nokia homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/19/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/19/2017
Nokia 7 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: Nokia 7 PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 6.00 inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.186kg
Price: 399 euro
Links: Nokia homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Android One smartphone. Buyers of the Nokia 7 Plus will enjoy timely software updates, stock Android and up-to-date security patches thanks to the Android One Program. Whether the new mid-range smartphone with the brand-new Snapdragon 660 can also impress in terms of hardware, you can learn in our extensive review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Girl EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is actually a great phone if you want to make some decent content and ensure it lasts the day. It felt good in my hand and did everything I needed it to. In terms of after sale support – Nokia is now run by HMD Global and they seem to have a decent presence here locally. The R5500 price tag is also rather attractive. A solid purchase if you’re looking for a new phone and… Android Pie.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/19/2018
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus was a phone I was really excited to get hands on. Not only because it is one of the latest devices from a brand I have followed for years, but because it was also one of the first non-Pixel phones to get access to Android 9 Pie.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 96% performance: 96% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus is a flagship smartphone that can be your choice, however, there are other smartphones that better choice in this price range.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
From its solid design to a large display and capable camera, the Nokia 7 Plus is a great mid-range device. Similar spec competitors exist at this price, but with its 2x zoom option the Nokia has an interesting edge.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Bill Bennett EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia won’t thank me for saying this, but the two Android One phones are excellent choices for buyers who don’t care to show off a prestige brand. They are all about bang for buck. They are affordable, capable handsets that can do all the important things you buy a phone for. If you want more camera, you need to spend more. Otherwise, there’s not that last bit of fairy dust sprinkled on phones to add $1000 to the price.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 07/01/2018
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you are in the market for a new phone, one that does not cost an arm and a leg but still offers a great software experience while still looking great then you could do a lot worse than grabbing yourself a Nokia 7 Plus. This phone is a mid-range phone with high end performance in most areas.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 95% mobility: 90% workmanship: 89%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So is the Nokia 7 Plus every bit of a premium mid-range as promised? That’s a definite yes. From its stunning and premium design down to its respectable performance, the phone delivers. Couple that with an amazing set of cameras, for both photo and video, and stellar battery life and you have a complete mid-range package. You’ll definitely feel that every centavo of your Php 21,990 is very well spent.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2018
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7 Plus has 2.3GHz octa-core processor with the chipset of Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 which is considered as one of the best chipsets among all its competitors. It varies in two options with 4GB RAM or 6GB RAM but unfortunately, we have a 4GB version. It didn’t give us any lag or error and we did multi-tasking also and it has performed well in every section.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus is billed as the phone you can rely on. It is a strange, unique selling proposition as you can rely on most phones. Still, we set out to find out why.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus is billed as the phone you can rely on. It is a strange, unique selling proposition as you can rely on most phones. Still, we set out to find out why.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Fantastic battery life and a big, bright screen make this the best phone from the ‘new’ Nokia.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It doesn’t quite blow away the competition, but this is a very good phone with a superb screen for the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Even if it’s a little predictable, not every purchase needs a twist. Sometimes you want something that works as intended, and the Nokia 7 Plus fits that mold nicely.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus hits all the right spots, an important quality for a mid-ranger. While it doesn’t excel at any one particular area, it delivered good performance, images, has a nice build for the price and has solid day and a half battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus is one of the better mid-range phones on the market and has one of the best cameras on a device of its price. The design is close to premium in feel and the display is top notch (without an actual notch).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Both the Nokia 6.1 and the Nokia 7 plus are capable handsets for their price points, but competition is tough in this mid-market segment -- just look at the Moto G6 Plus, which at £269 is an attractive alternative to both.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 05/29/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As far as the processing power of the phone goes, Qualcomm’s mid-range SD660 chip is very capable. We’ve seen the lower-spec’d SD636 deliver excellent performance in lower priced phones, and we expect better performance from the faster processor. With an Adreno 512 GPU the chipset is more than a match for graphically taxing games and apps, though we will have to see how well it performs during our review process.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/18/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At 25,999 rupees (~$387) in India, some of my media colleagues at the launch said that it was priced a tad high — I disagree. There’s a justifiable premium for visual appeal and dependable hardware that comes in a package with an overall finesse. For me, the Nokia 7 Plus has just the right mix of performance and aesthetics. In a segment that’s usually under-served, the Nokia 7 Plus deserves the crown.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 91% display: 91% mobility: 93% workmanship: 92%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus is currently selling for 350 EUR (about $415) and is one of the best phones you can get for this kind of money if you don't mind big, somewhat blocky handsets that aren't conducive to one-handed operation. It is sturdy, well built, the copper accents add to the stylish looks, and is one of your last good options for a metal phone that is less likely to shatter when it hits the pavement sans a case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techniqued EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7 Plus is priced Rs 25,999 and available in retail stores as well as available exclusively on Amazon. While the pricing might be slightly higher compared to the hardware, Nokia 7 Plus is a worthy mid-ranger with great build quality, excellent software, and performance, a good set of cameras and great battery life. With the device launched under Android One, you don’t have to worry about updates too. If you are looking for a good mid-range smartphone around 25k price, the Nokia 7 plus is probably the best choice.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus is the best mid-range smartphone I have seen in years. And it’s shocking that after so many years, it’s HMD’s Nokia that suddenly stands tall in a segment that has been dominated by the selfie-happy class of Chinese smartphones from Vivo, Oppo and Huawei.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For an everyday user this handset might just be the best horse to bet upon. This is not only because of the looks that make it captivating but also the set of specifications it delivers for that Rs 25,999 price. The 18:9 aspect ratio display is immersive, the operating system is bloat free and smooth, the processor is well performing, cameras perform well and the battery has its own plus points. If the smartphone was priced at Rs 22,000 or less, it would’ve cannibalized the market that is crowded with all the Motos and Honors at the moment. But until that becomes a reality, you can really consider this as a dependable smartphone that strongly implies it won’t go unnoticed without making a mark.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech PP EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So should you be going for the Nokia 7 Plus? There is no compelling reason against it, as it checks most boxes very ably. The challenge it faces is that there is no compelling reason for it, either. While it does almost everything very well, it does nothing exceptionally so. This is a very good phone, rather than a great one. And its price puts it on the cusp of the very good and the great, that middle ground that separates the more expensive mid-segment devices and the budget flagships.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 75% performance: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 plus leaves the office much like it entered it - without much fuss. We found no issues with it, it cruised through the tests, it delivered in all key areas.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus might not instantly be the best mid-range phone out there but it’s certainly going to be a tempting choice for a lot of people; especially those who don’t mind a slightly larger and heavier device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2018
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7 Plus is perhaps the best smartphone ever made by HMD Global. It’s very well made, feels good in the hand, performs well, and has a decent camera on board. If Google ever thought of making a mid-end Pixel smartphone, it would be like the Nokia 7 Plus. At Rs 25,999, Nokia 7 Plus is a dependable smartphone in my option. Ironically, the biggest competition for the Nokia 7 Plus is not from Xiaomi or Vivo, but from the Nokia 8 which currently sells for Rs 28,000 on various e-commerce platforms.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus upholds the iconic brand’s promise of reliability, ease of use and design innovation. The phone delivers on all three fronts with a premium metal unibody design, high-end performance and clean, stock Android. It also has a good camera marred only by slow processing speeds which could be fixed via a software update. All good things come at a price and so does the Nokia 7 Plus at Rs 25,999 but unlike last time when all the Nokia phones felt overpriced, this one manages to justify the higher asking rate.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus would be my pick for the best under Rs 30,000 phone and I feel it outshines a lot of the other phones in this price range. The only threat to the phone is sadly from within since the Nokia 8 is available now at almost the same price. Unless HMD plans to discontinue its 2017 flagship phone, or drop the price of the 7 Plus by Rs 1,000 to Rs 2,000, I think people are going to be torn between the two.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HMD Global has managed to get quite a few things right with the 7 Plus. It is up-to-date with an 18:9 display and feels like it is built to last. The company has also managed to get the right balance of performance and efficiency. The processor is powerful, yet frugal enough to get you through the day without the battery needing to be recharged. As a part of the Android One programme, the device is guaranteed to get quick software updates and security patches. However, the camera could do with some fine-tuning to improve low-light performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
From the games we checked out, it’s a respectable option if you can tolerate the smooth back that makes it tough to grip over extended sessions of play. It’s a minor quibble, but a perceptible one nonetheless. This aside, the combination of an efficient processor and solid screen is a welcome one. It will be interesting to see how it will stack up in the future, with the likes of Unreal Engine-powered fare such as Fortnite on the horizon. Right now though, if you’re planning to check out Nokia’s latest and you’re an avid gamer on the go, the Nokia 7 Plus is worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude, the Nokia 7 Plus is certainly not a bezel-less smartphone, but it is solid and premium and you can thank the black and copper combination for that. The display looks promising and the computing power is at par with the rest of the competition. The Zeiss-powered dual rear cameras click some good photos and being an Android One smartphone, means that you will get timely updates. So enough to keep any serious buyer who likes the Nokia badge, really interested. So, stay tuned with us for a detailed review of Nokia 7 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus might not instantly be the best mid-range phone out there but it’s certainly going to be a tempting choice for a lot of people; especially those who don’t mind a slightly larger and heavier device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Do not forget to follow us on our Facebook group and page to keep you always aware of the latest advances, News, Updates, review, and giveaway on smartphones, tablets, gadgets and more from the technology world of the future.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A big screen, promise of excellent battery life, relatively premium design and affordable price tag makes the Nokia 7 Plus an enticing proposition.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The mid-range market is a crowded place right now, and there are plenty of fantastic options to choose from. Saying that, the Nokia 7+ has a lot going for it and I can see it being a real hit.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, there's a lot to like about this phone. We think that a lot of people will be drawn to its features and capabilities, as well as its build quality. We're not too sure whether the colour schemes will go down well once buyers see both options in person, and of course pricing will be a huge factor. The Nokia 7 Plus is scheduled to launch in India in end-May/ June.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus might not instantly be the best mid-range phone out there but it’s certainly going to be a tempting choice for a lot of people; especially those who don’t mind a slightly larger and heavier device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The mid-range market is a crowded place right now, and there are plenty of fantastic options to choose from. Saying that, the Nokia 7+ has a lot going for it and I can see it being a real hit.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A big screen, promise of excellent battery life, relatively premium design and affordable price tag makes the Nokia 7 Plus an enticing proposition.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7 Plus not only pushes the mid-range specs and build quality, but it also pushes Nokia's prices up a little higher too. Sitting at €399, it's not flagship expensive - but there is a lot of competition in this mid-range from companies like Honor and Moto, both offering compelling devices in this segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia unveiled a whole bunch of phones at this year's MWC - so it says something about the Nokia 7 Plus that it's our favourite of the lot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 76% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 94% display: 88% mobility: 85% workmanship: 88%
Source: Heute DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Golem DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2018
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Wintech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/08/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: InstaNews IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% features: 86% display: 85% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 79% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2018
Rating: features: 83%
Source: Techzine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/03/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2018
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: HWSW HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/30/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/16/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2018
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/29/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2018
Source: Dinside NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/18/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2018
Nokia 7.1
Specifications
Notebook: Nokia 7.1Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 636
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 509
Display: 5.84 inch, 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.16kg
Price: 340 euro
Links: Nokia homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
HMD's Nokia 7.1 is based on Android One, and thus free of unnecessary apps, most commonly referred to as bloatware. The result is supposed to be a minimalistic and fast system, designed to run even more demanding apps. Find out in our review whether or not this turned out to be true, and how the Nokia 7.1 did when compared to its rivals.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 offers a winning combination of great performance, killer looks, and up-to-date Android software for a reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite some frustrating issues with the software, I've found the Nokia 7.1 to be a very enjoyable phone overall. I can breeze through almost everything I do on it, the screen is absolutely beautiful, and the camera usually produces very pleasant results, with vibrant colors that make pictures feel really alive. I also love the simple, but attractive design of the phone, with the silver accented edges really adding the right amount of flair to an otherwise plain look.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2019
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A9 looks very similar to the Galaxy A7, but the A9 got an additional camera. While the Galaxy A7 sports triple camera, the Galaxy A9 took a step further by offering new innovations in the form of a quad-camera setup on the rear side. That said, the phone follows Samsung’s glass and metal design language. There’s no flex whatsoever, but the delicate glass body can be cracked easily if it falls on the hard surface. I recommend a case just to protect the delicate back glass panel. The fingerprint sensor is right above the Samsung logo and it was easy to unlock my smartphone with one hand. Apart from the fingerprint scanner, the Galaxy A9 has included facial recognition which works like charm.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2019
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is tough to recommend because of its performance issues that left a dark cloud over my enjoyment of it, but it’s still worthy of some consideration.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2019
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At $350, this is the phone to beat going into 2019. The design feels significantly above what you pay for it, and it delivers performance that can get pretty close to matching phones double its price. You’ve got a ton of storage (64GB, with a microSD card slot), it has a headphone jack, and the camera’s not bad. The phones that do these things better are going to cost quite a bit more, and in some cases, you’re losing either the headphone jack or microSD card, if not both.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2019
Source: Reliance Digital EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is an elegantly designed smartphone at a budget price tag of Rs. 19,990*. It offers some premium features such as a HDR display, great camera and solid build quality, which can be great for everyday use. With the Android One support and its frequent security updates, this phone is a good future-proof option. However, the lack of top-end hardware can sometimes be noticed. If your daily activity demands use of graphic intensive applications and games like PUBG and Fortnite, you should consider the Nokia 8.1 which packs a more powerful piece of hardware such as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 and Adreno 616 GPU.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall though, the Poco F1 is definitely a better package. While Nokia 7.1 and Poco F1 are at par at most of the features and specifications, the Poco also has a better battery performance. The lower variant of the Poco F1, which is priced at Rs 20,999 (just Rs 1,000 more) also comes with 6 GB of RAM, as compared to 4 GB RAM on the Nokia 7.1. Though you must consider that Nokia 7.1 vs Poco F1 means, Android One vs MIUI OS. So, unless Xiaomi's custom UI is a problem, I'd say go for the Poco F1, no bargain here. But if you are looking for something stylish, the Nokia 7.1 is a better choice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Sydney Morning Herald EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But the software is the biggest selling point here. There are a few Android tricks that Google keeps for itself, like its fancy moving wallpapers and unlimited full-res photo storage, but for all intents and purposes using the Nokia 7.1 is like using a Pixel phone. It's clean, reliable and intuitive, and for some it will be tough to argue that the extra bit of power and sophistication you get with a Pixel 3 is worth another $700.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While Nokia 7.1 remains the cheapest HDR display smartphones right now, it is far from being a Value For Money (VFM) device. If you want a reliable Nokia device under Rs. 20,000, Nokia 7.1 is a good option. In case if you are specific about Android One, you can check out Moto One Power or Mi A2 at slightly cheaper rates. If you care about performance and gaming, POCO F1 is a very good option at the same price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7.1 is one of the most good-looking phones in this price segment in my opinion and the display stands out as well. Plus, you get Android Pie experience on this budget device. But its biggest competitor I feel is Nokia’s own 6.1 Plus which has a similar design and same processor at a lower price. Another option is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, which is made of aluminium 600 series, has a splash-resistant coating, and Snapdragon 636 as well.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Is the Nokia 7.1 worth upgrading to if you already own a mid-range Nokia phone? The short answer is no, especially if you have something like the Nokia 7 Plus, which sports many of the same specifications sans screen notch. If, however, it's been awhile since you bought a new phone and you're in the market for a mid-range device, your money would be well spent on the R6k Nokia 7.1.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is just a more polished Nokia 6.1 Plus and at the end of the day you will have to ask yourself whether you're willing to spend a little extra for a few premium features. The few new technologies such as the PureDisplay screen offers a noticeable improvement in the display. The Zeiss camera also offers better low-light performance than before. If these are features that matter to you a lot then the Nokia 7.1 makes sense, otherwise one should rather stick with the Nokia 6.1 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 scores big on display and camera but falls short of its competitor when it comes to performance. The design of the phone makes it a classy looking thing, but the lack of a TPU case in the box is concerning due to the all-glass construction. Its not an all-rounder, but it is great for people looking for a smartphone with a good camera in this budget.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Power users might be better served by Poco F1 (Review) and Honor Play (Review), which are powered by flagship grade processors. However, the all-plastic Poco F1 does not look or feel as premium as the Nokia 7.1 and both MIUI and EMUI are cluttered and laden with third-party bloat. For the average joe, the Nokia 7.1 would make for a solid everyday smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On paper, the Nokia 7.1 looks like one of the best phones at the price, but it's let down by poor battery life and general performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As you can probably guess, I am very taken with this second-generation Nokia 7.1. Nokia has pulled another rabbit out of the hat. There are no deal breakers; it offers features common to devices at twice the price (including the Nokia 8.1 Sirocco).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 98% price: 100% performance: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 isn’t a device without caveats but I think it’s one that’ll pay off for those looking to get a decent smartphone at a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia has quietly released one of the most exciting inexpensive phones of the year in the Nokia 7.1, a well-designed phone that delivers first-rate performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia knocked it out of the park with the Nokia 7.1. It looks and feels great, has a gorgeous display, excellent battery life, and much more. Performance can be a little sluggish at times, but for just $350, you're getting far more than your money's worth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With the Nokia 7.1, the brand continues its run of impressive mid-range phones carrying close-to-stock Android. While the phone has weaknesses, overall it offers better quality and features than you would expect at this price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Bill Bennett EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is only available from Spark in New Zealand. It’s an ideal choice for someone looking to get more phone for less money. If you buy phones for employees or for younger family members this will stretch your money further, with few compromises.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2018
Source: Tech Switch EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You aren’t getting something fancy like an in-screen fingerprint scanner – the fingerprint scanner is across the again, as regular. With a thickness of 8mm it is also barely chunkier than a few of the finest telephones round, although you are probably not going to note the distinction.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Like the Motorola One before it, the Nokia 7.1 is a good phone that simply can't compete with the best from Honor and Xiaomi. The biggest letdown here being the performance, which is a mar on an otherwise well-designed and pleasing device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, if you are keen on having one of the best Android One phones on the market, go and test the Nokia 7.1 for yourself. You may find it surprisingly fitting if blazing-fast performance isn't a must.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite the crowded mid-range the Nokia 7.1 is one of the better choices for a smartphone in the price range in what is a very crowded market.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia’s rendered an attractive handset with some capable hardware and a nice unique selling point for just a touch more than the likes of the Motorola One and Honor Play.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia Mobile is now in the top five of Android smartphone manufacturers and it's no wonder: the phones are great. Looking at this handset, it's really rather hard to justify spending double on a flagship handset even if some of the specs - notably the camera - are significantly better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Its generic but solid design is improved with an above average display and the ongoing attractiveness of opting for Android One mean it’s a phone we will fully review with interest and could be the sweet spot for Nokia’s busy line up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
First we saw the wave of ultra-expensive phones with notches. Now we get the backlash: notchy phones many more of us can afford. That has to be good news, right?
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It was only ever a matter of time until Nokia started getting noticed again. Once the initial wave of nostalgic joy subsided, the sticky business of putting out phones began, and so far Nokia has hardly skipped a beat. Nearly every phone it’s put out over that last two years has been great. This is no easy feat, not even in the mid-range Nokia occupies so comfortably. Despite the difficulties, the results are showing: Nokia is now in the top ten smartphone manufacturers globally and the top five in 25 markets. Not bad for a less-than-two-year-old effort.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The highlight of the Nokia 7.1 is the updated display technology, and with minor but useful improvements to the design and camera this may be one of the best affordable phones of the year.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Unless you're into rectangular phones with shiny accents, the Nokia 7.1 probably isn't going to win you over with its looks -- a neutral tone with shiny accents around the buttons and rim. But it might win you over with a combination of its price, which starts at a reasonable $349, and its specs. A midrange device in the US and abroad, the 2018 version of the Nokia 7 aims to excel in the middle ground. It tees up good overall specs and performance for the cost.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We liked the Nokia 7.1 and are looking forward to testing out the 3,060mAh battery, the new dual camera and give that HDR 10-compliant display a go at our scientific tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 82% features: 67% display: 86% mobility: 71%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 64% performance: 58% display: 80% mobility: 54% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/13/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: MuyComputer ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 95%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 93%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/11/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 78%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 65% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 85% mobility: 40% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 90% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Nokia 7.2
Specifications
Notebook: Nokia 7.2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 6.30 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.18kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Nokia homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
After an excellent start of the 7-series, the Nokia 7.1 provided long faces in the test, because especially its battery life could not convince. With the Nokia 7.2 everything is supposed to get better and HMD Global is adding a thick scoop of battery performance, more memory and a triple camera.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Priced lower, the Nokia 7.2 has the potential to be a smash hit, but that’s where the Nokia 6.2 comes in. Between the similar design, and not-much-worse performance, the Nokia 6.2 is better positioned to take a swipe at the competition in some markets. The Nokia 7.2 packs all the right ingredients, but the inconsistent performance and less-than-competitive battery life is problematic. As it stands, it is just too expensive for what it brings to the table, which makes it too hard to recommend over the excellent competition. The phone becomes even harder to recommend in 2020 as it doesn’t deliver on competitive internals or the latest version of Android. Unless pure Android is the only feature you are interested in, steer clear of the Nokia 7.2.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 59% display: 77% mobility: 53%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 brings the best of Nordic design sensibilities and pairs it with a competitive camera and stock Android. Unfortunately, the rest of the package doesn't quite match up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 59% display: 77% mobility: 53%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 isn’t a great choice for anyone hoping for quality audio using their phone’s speaker. The lack of stereo speakers is an immediate handicap in playing back most music sources and movie soundtracks, and detracts from immersive gaming experiences as well. In addition, the speaker doesn’t produce much volume, and tones are unevenly reproduced.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 isn't a bad phone by any means, and there are aspects of it — particularly the phone's quality design and bright, HDR-compatible display — that are compelling at the $350 price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia also promises that the device will get two years of software updates and three years of security updates so its off-the-shelf life should be expanded beyond a year. That said, the 7.2 still hasn’t been updated to Android 10. The phone is currently on sale in Canada for $549 at Best Buy, but Amazon.ca has it listed for as low as $473, which is a much more attractive price for this handset.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7.2 with 6GB RAM and 128GB internal storage is still retailing for P15,990. As a phone, it’s not a bad performer. The battery life is surprisingly good and the Android One program seems to keep the performance in check. The quality of the design is arguably its best feature. However, it’s going to have a tough time on the market now that Realme XT(P16,990) and Redmi Note 8 Pro (P12,990). Those two are more packed with features and better specs. Should you get the Nokia 7.2 in 2020? Nope. Unless it retails for less than P10k, then maybe, just maybe.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/23/2020
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Retailing for R6 299, you'll be hard pressed to find a better all-round mid-range phone than the Nokia 7.2. As with past Nokia Mobile devices we've reviewed, every inch of this phone is solid. Where it wins us over though is the camera performance, yielding richly detailed pictures in a variety of scenarios, which is really all you're looking for in your smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When you're dealing with a smartphone in that $300 range, it's really about value for price. None of the features are actually going to be the best in the market; those titles will go to thousand-dollar phones. The Nokia 7.2 provides a heck of a lot of value, probably more than the Moto G7, something I never thought I'd say. The Moto G series has been my top pick for that price range for about five years now.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 may not look all that powerful, but it’s a delight to use. The Snapdragon 660 is perfectly capable of handling the lightweight stock Android interface, offering reliable performance in handling the usual daily tasks, as well as during gaming. The camera is the dark horse, delivering consistently good results provided the subject is well-lit. Low-light images is a weakness however. The Nokia 7.2 also is one of the best looking smartphones in its segment, despite having a polycarbonate body and a rather big camera bump.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 79% performance: 78% workmanship: 68%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While Nokia has previously experimented with some interesting camera configurations to try and distinguish itself in the market, the 7.2 is a more conventional offering. The triple-camera setup with ultra-wide and depth-sensing options provides some versatility, and serious smartphone videographers will welcome the option of 4K video. For stills, good exposure, wide dynamic range, and pleasant color mean that Nokia gets some of the basics right, but autofocus instabilities, high noise, and regular ghosting artifacts are all areas requiring future development.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2020
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a solid, affordable smartphone that caters to those who enjoy massive screens and clean Android software. It costs $330 at the time of writing, which positions it in the lower mid-range category. Make no mistake, though, you are getting what you’re paying for with the Nokia 7.2. This isn’t to say that you’re in for any unpleasant surprises; it just means that no wonders should be expected out of this otherwise likable handset.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a fairly affordable mid-ranger, so you would not expect flagship front camera performance, but better options are available even at its price point. The Nokia is capable of decent image and video results in good conditions, but quality drops off in low light, and there are too many issues overall, including exposure and color instabilities as well as a range of artifacts, to merit recommending the 7.2 to any passionate selfie shooter.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/03/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The design of the Nokia 7.2 is eye-catching and unique compared to most of the competition - for better or for worse - with a fairly angular design and a glass back that refracts the light to provide a high-end look. The internals are fairly standard for a mid-range device too. The main issue is disappointing camera performance, especially with regards to the ultra-wide camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On its own, the Nokia 7.2 is an excellent buy. It has a premium design, fantastic display, and clean software backed by guaranteed updates. It has its fair share of flaws, however, with some of the main points being the sluggish performance and a disappointing ultra-wide camera. The overall value you're getting with the 7.2 is quite good, but competing phones like the Pixel 3a make it a tougher sell.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 offers premium design and solid performance at a mid-range price. It’s only when the phone tries to go above and beyond with features like a wide-angle camera that it stumbles.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia is attacking the low to mid-range of the device market with quality handsets at the sub-$300 price tag — and it’s doing it better than Moto in my mind. To me, the overall hardware and camera experience is better on almost all the Nokia phones I’ve tested when compared to Moto. The same is true here with the Nokia 7.2 which lines up nicely against the Moto G7.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/05/2019
Source: Team Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HMD Global, extending its diverse Android phone lineup, has recently released new Nokia 7.2. The new addition picks up from where Nokia 7.1 left off, it improves a lot and retains all that was great! We recently received our review unit and after some thorough testing, here is what we think about the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a critical smartphone from HMD Global. The Finnish company seems to be betting a lot on the success of its latest mid-range smartphone in India, but I think the phone fell short on performance. While I do like the Nokia 7.2’s classic design and display, the phone does make compromises and the list is long. I wish the phone had a better processor and at least 6GB RAM on an entry-level model. The camera could have been better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The design and quality of the phone is brilliant. But the price at which its available is very high. So, Nokia should rethink about it. And if they want to have a good sale in the market. They must reconsider their price tag.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2019
Source: Business Standard EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At Rs 18,599, the Nokia 7.2 is one of HMD Global’s most comprehensive midrange smartphone in recent times. It has a solid build, something that is true of most Nokia-branded phones. The phone’s display is good and its PureDisplay technology makes it ideal for video consumption. The cameras are not exceptionally good, but they are not bad, and the phone’s overall performance is smooth. Additionally, the phone’s cleverly implemented features, such as notification light in the power button and multi-purpose capacitive fingerprint sensor on the back, make it fun and convenient to use.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2019
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7.2 is HMD’s star smartphone right now and of course one would expect a good overall value for the device considering the Nokia 7.1 series and the Nokia 7 Plus. The device scores the highest in the camera and design department but there’s nothing else that we can say that makes it really ‘worth’. The ‘PureDisplay’ tech is good to look at but it still has some downers like what we mentioned above. The battery performance is decent. A major downside here is the older Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. Many may not fall for that. But if you are all for the experience and camera regardless of the specifications, this might just make the cut.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Team Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Inspecting other contents within the box, there is a SIM ejection tool provided right beneath where the phone lays. Further, there are standard accessories provided as well. A pair of regular headphones with built-in mic, a USB Type-C to type-A cable along with a wall-adapter that provides a maximum output of 10W.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 looked like a promising phone on paper, and we hoped it would offer the same understated goodness that we remember the 7 plus for. That ended up not being the case though. For the price Nokia is asking for the 7.2 you can have better camera quality, superior display, longer battery life, beefier chipset - often more than one of these on the same phone. As such, the 7.2 is hard to recommend to anyone but the die-hard brand loyalist on a budget.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HMD Global squandered a potentially great opportunity with the Nokia 7.2. The Zeiss-branded triple cameras could have enticed previous Lumia die-hards to come back to the fold, but instead, it’ll probably leave them disappointed. With sub-par performance in low-light shooting and a disappointing night mode, it’s hard to recommend the Nokia 7.2 when there’s a lot better and cheaper, options in the market for budding mobile photographers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2019
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the US, the 7.2 puts up a fight against some great competitors. The Pixel 3a series is priced just a bit higher, but delivers a superior imaging experience. The 3a matches the 7.2 with the same stock Android experienc, but tacks on a higher quality display and a wide-angle front-facing camera. You could also look at the Samsung Galaxy A50 which is an absolutely fantastic mid-ranger.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 59% display: 80% mobility: 53%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Priced at PHP 15,990, the Nokia 7.2 can stand its ground in the competitive mid-range market. While we wish it came with a better chipset, we can’t deny that the Nokia 7.2 is a competent smartphone with cameras that deliver well. Also, let’s not forget, this device runs on Stock Android, and the Nokia 7.2 fills in that gap in the market for an affordable device running on Stock Android. If you’re looking for that pure Stock Android experience alongside satisfying cameras and a solid design, then consider the Nokia 7.2 in your choices.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At a price of less than £300, the Nokia 7.2 is a classy customer. We like its sleek but practical design and sharp display, while Android One continues to do wonders with relatively limited hardware. It’s an accomplished phone in most respects. What keeps the Nokia 7.2 from glowing praise is its patchy triple-camera system, which suffers from some inconsistent results and an ineffectual Night Mode.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you have only a couple hundred dollars to spend on a smartphone, HMD Global’s latest Nokia mid-rangers should be at the top of your list. The Nokia 7.2 and Nokia 6.2 may share the same design and materials, but each has its own internals that set up widely different price points.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The design of the Nokia 7.2 is eye-catching and unique compared to most of the competition - for better or for worse - with a fairly angular design and a glass back that refracts the light to provide a high-end look. The internals are fairly standard for a mid-range device too. The main issue is disappointing camera performance, especially with regards to the ultra-wide camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Had your fingers crossed for a cut-price Pixel 3a alternative? The Nokia 7.2 gets tantalisingly close. It looks the part, runs a clean version of Android (with the latest version set to follow swiftly) and has a battery that should last all day.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A month after the triple-camera toting Nokia 7.2 was unveiled in IFA, HMD Global has brought the new smartphone to our shores. Armed with a Zeiss-branded, triple camera module headlined by a high-resolution 48-megapixel main camera, the Nokia 7.2 is the company’s contender in the highly competitive mid-range market.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/15/2019
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Building on the strengths of its predecessor, the Nokia 7.2 offers an attractive design and solid specs, but it faces stiff competition.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a meaningful upgrade over its predecessor, adding a faster processor, more capable cameras, and a new design language that is quite appealing. The phone's display is quite good, and its day-to-day performance is dependable. The cameras of the Nokia 7.2 are decent, but not the best in the segment. As for battery life, this phone can last easily last a day.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A great software experience and an extremely flashy design aside, I believe that users will find no extra value for money in the Nokia 7.2. Yes it has decent cameras, but so does the Realme XT or the Vivo Z1X, both of which start at more than Rs 2,000 cheaper. The performance of the device will leave you wanting and while the battery on the device could be sufficient for some, competing devices will definitely offer a higher battery capacity with faster-charging speeds.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia 7.2 is an expectedly delightful upgrade over its predecessor. We loved the look and feel of the Nokia 7.1 and the new model once again brings the same elegant charm and class, if not better. The Cyan Green colour is one I would vouch for, and you will be quite satisfied with how premium the phone feels in the hand.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nokia is getting closer to making the phone that might crack into the mainstream in a similar way that the Moto has done with its budget-friendly Moto G7. No other phone in this price range offers its alluring combo of 128GB of onboard storage by default; a svelte, matte glass design; and stock Android software with guaranteed updates. Its strengths even make it a convincing choice among other midrange phones. But if you’re able to spring an extra $50 and put up with half the amount of storage, the Pixel 3A provides a better camera and broader carrier support.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Perhaps the biggest problem with the Nokia 7.2 is the competition: the Pixel 3a, for example, has one of the best cameras around and doesn't cost much more. If there is a complaint against the Nokia 7.2 it's that it doesn't really stand out enough – but when you're talking about less than £300 for a phone, doing something that's really compelling is a tricky challenge for any smartphone maker.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a tough one to judge as in some areas it excels, but at the same time, other areas fall short of what’s on offer from the competition. We do generally like the angular design of the Nokia 7.2, with little details like building a notification LED into the power button and offering a dedicated Google Assistant button enhancing the overall look and feel of the device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2019
Source: Tech PP EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Unlike its mid-segmented predecessors that used to lag well behind offerings from the competition, the Nokia 7.2 actually manages to go toe to toe with them. If you are a spec hunter, you might not get too impressed by the chip on the Nokia 7.2 and might hem and haw about the battery. But if you are looking at a phone that looks premium and takes great pictures and for the most part, performs very smoothly, the 7.2 could well be the phone for you. The Redmi and Realme mid-segments might beat it in terms of newer processors and larger batteries but the 7.2 closes the gap on them in terms of the camera on them and opens up a gap of its own in terms of design. Add the stock Android with regular update factor and a battery life that while not being outstanding is more than adequate and we guess Realme and Redmi have reason to look over their shoulders.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On its own, the Nokia 7.2 is an excellent buy. It has a premium design, fantastic display, and clean software backed by guaranteed updates. It has its fair share of flaws, however, with some of the main points being the sluggish performance and a disappointing ultra-wide camera. The overall value you're getting with the 7.2 is quite good, but competing phones like the Pixel 3a make it a tougher sell.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude, Nokia 7.2 is one of the best-designed smartphones from HMD Global. The phone looks sturdy and the display seems to be decent enough for streaming. The performance is yet to be tested out, though the pure Android experience is one strong point of this smartphone. As for the competition is concerned, the phone will be put against the likes of Realme XT, Oppo K3, Xiaomi Redmi K20 and more.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2019
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HMD Global on Thursday made its first appearance at IFA, one of Europe's most important technology trade exhibitions, to talk about how it is growing internationally and expanding on its strengths. The company unveiled two new smartphones and three featurephones, showcasing its strategy of appealing to multiple markets. The new Nokia 7.2 and Nokia 6.2 are both mid-budget Android smartphones but both promise premium features and looks. They should be launched internationally, including in India, within a few months. Gadgets 360 was live at the scene of the launch in Berlin, and here are our first impressions of both new devices.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/06/2019
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 offers premium design, a big display and an array of camera skills to tempt you towards the mid-range. Mission accomplished: this is a great looking phone that has plenty of appeal.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’ll reserve our full verdict for now, but based on our hands-on impressions, the Nokia 7.2 has the potential to be one of the best mid-range smartphones in 2019. The design is eye-catching and unique, the display is bright and crisp, and the rear-facing camera setup could potentially compete with what premium smartphones offer.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a solid step up from the Nokia 7.1 in a variety of ways, but it’s unlikely to make you a Nokia fan if you weren’t already, and there are other smartphones at the same price that are perhaps a little more interesting.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With a starting price of €299, the Nokia 7.2 is a seriously tempting prospect. It looks to have a great screen, capable camera and all the benefits that come with Android One software.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
These phones hit the market in mere weeks. The Nokia 7.2 should arrive before the end of September for 349 euros. It will be sold in most markets worldwide, include the U.S. (via open channels). HMD says it is working to strengthen its relationships with U.S. carriers and until it does the open market is the way it will go. The Nokia 6.2 will go on sale in mid-October at the more affordable price point of 209 euros. The 6.2 will not be sold in the U.S. and is something HMD expects to sell across Asia, Africa, and EMEA. The pricing and availability details are not final and may change.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2020
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/06/2020
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 65% workmanship: 90%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2020
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2020
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 65% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/08/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 80%
Source: Zive CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2019
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2019
Source: Techtimes.vn VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/23/2019
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/23/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/23/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/18/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/17/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2019
Source: Danviet VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/06/2019
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Input DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 80% performance: 40% workmanship: 60%
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Nokia:
Qualcomm Adreno 508:
Qualcomm Adreno 512:
Qualcomm Adreno 509:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 660:
高性能中档ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 260内核(集群中的4个高速2.2 GHz内核和2个省电1.8 GHz内核)和Adreno 512 GPU。采用14纳米工艺制造。
SD 636:
中档八核SoC,具有8个高达1.8 GHz的Kryo 260 CPU内核,Adreno 509 GPU,LPDDR4-2666内存控制器和X12 LTE(Cat 13 / 12,300 / 150 MBit)调制解调器。采用现代14nm工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
77.8%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.