Nomu S30 智能手机简短评测

Name: Nomu S30
Brand: Nomu

坚固多媒体伴侣。 S30是Nomu带来的一款搭配强劲科技的智能手机，考虑到配置它的售价较低，将与其他实惠型多媒体设备以及户外设备竞争。

Benjamin Gärtner, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Nomu

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nomu S30

Processor

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 52 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD最大支持32 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，陀螺仪，指南针, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20); 下载／上传带宽： 300 Mbps/50 Mbps (LTE), 21 Mbps/5.76 Mbps (UMTS), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 13 x 162 x 83

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 1680 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED闪光灯, f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 位于底部的扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 充电器，USB数据线, 智能助理，SOS设定，手套模式, 12 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless, ruggedized

Weight

260 g, Power Supply: 75 g

Price

260 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +228%
Nomu S30 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s
Archos 50 Saphir Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51.3 MBit/s -50%
UMI Plus Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755	34.4 MBit/s -66%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s +178%
Nomu S30 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash	101 MBit/s
Archos 50 Saphir Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45.9 MBit/s -55%
UMI Plus Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755	31.2 MBit/s -69%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


433 cd/m²	422 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	423 cd/m²	418 cd/m²
408 cd/m²	405 cd/m²	423 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 435 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 421.1 cd/m² Minimum: 11.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 423 cd/m²
Contrast: 1627:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.32

	Nomu S30 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	Archos 50 Saphir IPS, 1280x720, 5"	UMI Plus LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 IPS, 800x480, 4.5"
Screen		34%	-38%	19%	-10%
Brightness middle	423	350 -17%	545 29%	432.8 2%	452 7%
Brightness	421	351 -17%	527 25%	430 2%	436 4%
Brightness Distribution	93	98 5%	87 -6%	86 -8%	91 -2%
Black Level *	0.26		0.58 -123%	0.232 11%	0.53 -104%
Contrast	1627		940 -42%	1866 15%	853 -48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.8	2.04 74%	12.5 -60%	4.93 37%	5.71 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.5	3.25 78%	24.4 -68%	8.34 42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.8	1.63 83%	15.4 -57%	5.18 47%	5.02 49%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.07 ^106%	1.87 ^118%	2.4 ^92%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	9828 ^66%	6391 ^102%	12705 ^51%	7461 ^87%	7441 ^87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.35

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	50904 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	38747 Points -24%
UMI Plus	48558 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points +151%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	759 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	634 Points -16%
UMI Plus	693 Points -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	2859 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	1761 Points -38%
UMI Plus	2695 Points -6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	10763 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	6839 Points -36%
UMI Plus	10840 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	3093 Points -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	10373 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	6138 Points -41%
UMI Plus	10532 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	2591 Points -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nomu S30	12394 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	11393 Points -8%
UMI Plus	12078 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	9613 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nomu S30	592 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	266 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points +359%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nomu S30	522 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	220 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points +478%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nomu S30	1114 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	973 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nomu S30	416 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	175 Points -58%
UMI Plus	419 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2170 Points +422%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nomu S30	351 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	142 Points -60%
UMI Plus	352 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2216 Points +531%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nomu S30	1182 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	985 Points -17%
UMI Plus	1272 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2022 Points +71%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30	17 fps
Archos 50 Saphir	19 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps +212%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	15.1 fps -11%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30	17 fps
Archos 50 Saphir	11 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps +394%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	5.4 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nomu S30	7.1 fps
Archos 50 Saphir	8.6 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps +280%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	2.3 fps -68%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30	7.1 fps
Archos 50 Saphir	4 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps +463%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	0.8 fps -89%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30	4.7 fps
Archos 50 Saphir	6.1 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps +219%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30	2.5 fps
Archos 50 Saphir	2.6 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps +1020%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	3175 Points
UMI Plus	3069 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points +52%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nomu S30	964 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	591 Points -39%
UMI Plus	341 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	443 Points -54%
System (sort by value)
Nomu S30	2216 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	1284 Points -42%
UMI Plus	2120 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	1103 Points -50%
Memory (sort by value)
Nomu S30	942 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	402 Points -57%
UMI Plus	992 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	366 Points -61%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nomu S30	670 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	383 Points -43%
UMI Plus	666 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	129 Points -81%
Web (sort by value)
Nomu S30	618 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	619 Points 0%
UMI Plus	10 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	744 Points +20%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	3279 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	3483 Points +6%
UMI Plus	3887 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points +301%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	2059 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Nomu S30	23914 ms *
Archos 50 Saphir	10544 ms * +56%
UMI Plus	10343 ms * +57%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2562 ms * +89%

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Nomu S30	21.52 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir	18.3 MB/s -15%
UMI Plus	21.55 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53.6 MB/s +149%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Nomu S30	36.94 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir	28.55 MB/s -23%
UMI Plus	35.95 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7	72.3 MB/s +96%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30	8.84 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir	4.79 MB/s -46%
UMI Plus	11.54 MB/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7	16.01 MB/s +81%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	4 MB/s -55%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30	27.99 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir	14.48 MB/s -48%
UMI Plus	25.75 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7	85.9 MB/s +207%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	15.8 MB/s -44%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30	194.9 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir	12.21 MB/s -94%
UMI Plus	128.5 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7	145.7 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	25.6 MB/s -87%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30	242 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir	140.9 MB/s -42%
UMI Plus	244.1 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	483.8 MB/s +100%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3	113.5 MB/s -53%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30	24.23 Points
Archos 50 Saphir	22 Points -9%
UMI Plus	26.05 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points +205%

Legend

Nomu S30 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Saphir Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Plus Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2,

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 Marvell Armada PXA1908, Vivante GC7000UL, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


41.1 °C	39 °C	35.4 °C
40.1 °C	39.2 °C	35.4 °C
42.3 °C	40 °C	34.9 °C

Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 38.6 °C


33.2 °C	35.1 °C	38.3 °C
32.8 °C	34.2 °C	39.5 °C
32.7 °C	34.4 °C	39.3 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 35.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Nomu S30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Archos 50 Saphir audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

UMI Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.46 Watt
Idle	0.93 / 2.31 / 2.35 Watt
Load	4.57 / 6.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nomu S30 5000 mAh	Archos 50 Saphir 5000 mAh	UMI Plus 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 mAh
Power Consumption		4%	-61%	42%
Idle Minimum *	0.93	0.65 30%	2.6 -180%	0.6 35%
Idle Average *	2.31	1.9 18%	3.2 -39%	1.2 48%
Idle Maximum *	2.35	2.05 13%	3.3 -40%	1.3 45%
Load Average *	4.57	6.14 -34%	7.7 -68%	2.6 43%
Load Maximum *	6.1	6.54 -7%	4.8 21%	3.6 41%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		13h 52min

	Nomu S30 5000 mAh	Archos 50 Saphir 5000 mAh	UMI Plus 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 mAh
Battery Runtime		17%	-33%	-40%
WiFi v1.3	832	973 17%	561 -33%	503 -40%
Reader / Idle			1319	1002
Load			292	166
H.264				678

Pros

+ 强劲的硬件

+ 实用的功能

+ 坚固的机身

+ 明亮的屏幕

+ 双SIM卡

+ 支持LTE

+ microSD卡槽

Cons

- 重量

- GPS准确度不够

- 缺少独立功能按键

- 一般的相机

In review: Nomu S30 smartphone. Review unit provided by Nomu

来自Nomu的户外智能手机面向那些除了日常使用还希望可以带着手机进行户外旅行而不用担心它会轻易损伤的用户。它得到了IP68认证，采用Gorilla Glass 4屏幕玻璃，接口也均有保护盖。另外Nomu还为S30提供了不错的技术参数，包括LTE支持，胜过其他户外设备的强劲处理器。尽管它的性能在同类设备中鹤立鸡群，但电池续航也不会让用户失望。

表现远胜同类设备，但并不适合所有用户！

与这些成功特性形成鲜明对比的是它较为脆弱的屏幕边角设计，这会限制设备正面的坚固度。它的多媒体用途也十分有限，因为这台设备不仅沉重还十分笨拙，手小的用户将很难用它玩游戏。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Nomu S30 - 2017-04-04 04/04/2017 v6 ^(old)
Benjamin Gärtner

Chassis

78%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 93%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

43 / 60 → 72%

Weight

87%

Battery

97%

Display

81%

Games Performance

20 / 63 → 31%

Application Performance

37 / 70 → 53%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

56%

Average

68%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Nomu S30 智能手机简短评测

Benjamin Gärtner, 2017-04-22 (Update: 2017-04-23)