Notebookcheck Logo

Nomu S30 智能手机简短评测

坚固多媒体伴侣。 S30是Nomu带来的一款搭配强劲科技的智能手机,考虑到配置它的售价较低,将与其他实惠型多媒体设备以及户外设备竞争。
Android Smartphone
Nomu S30
Processor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD最大支持32 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,近距感应器,陀螺仪,指南针, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (​900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​​B7/​B8/​B20); 下载/上传带宽: 300 Mbps/​50 Mbps (LTE), 21 Mbps/​5.76 Mbps (UMTS), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 13 x 162 x 83
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 1680 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED闪光灯, f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 位于底部的扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 充电器,USB数据线, 智能助理,SOS设定,手套模式, 12 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless, ruggedized
Weight
260 g, Power Supply: 75 g
Price
260 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nomu S30
Nomu S30
Nomu S30
Nomu S30
Nomu S30
Nomu S30
Nomu S30
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +228%
Nomu S30
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s
Archos 50 Saphir
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 MBit/s -50%
UMI Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755
34.4 MBit/s -66%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s +178%
Nomu S30
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s
Archos 50 Saphir
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.9 MBit/s -55%
UMI Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755
31.2 MBit/s -69%
GPS Nomu S30: overview
GPS Nomu S30: overview
GPS Nomu S30: crossroads
GPS Nomu S30: crossroads
GPS Nomu S30: riverbank
GPS Nomu S30: riverbank
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500: riverbank
GPS Garmin Edge 500: riverbank

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
433
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 435 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 421.1 cd/m² Minimum: 11.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 423 cd/m²
Contrast: 1627:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.32
Nomu S30
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"
Archos 50 Saphir
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
UMI Plus
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
IPS, 800x480, 4.5"
Screen
34%
-38%
19%
-10%
Brightness middle
423
350
-17%
545
29%
432.8
2%
452
7%
Brightness
421
351
-17%
527
25%
430
2%
436
4%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
87
-6%
86
-8%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.26
0.58
-123%
0.232
11%
0.53
-104%
Contrast
1627
940
-42%
1866
15%
853
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.8
2.04
74%
12.5
-60%
4.93
37%
5.71
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.5
3.25
78%
24.4
-68%
8.34
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.8
1.63
83%
15.4
-57%
5.18
47%
5.02
49%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.07 106%
1.87 118%
2.4 92%
2.15 102%
CCT
9828 66%
6391 102%
12705 51%
7461 87%
7441 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.35

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
50904 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
38747 Points -24%
UMI Plus
48558 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points +151%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
759 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
634 Points -16%
UMI Plus
693 Points -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
2859 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
1761 Points -38%
UMI Plus
2695 Points -6%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
10763 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
6839 Points -36%
UMI Plus
10840 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
3093 Points -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
10373 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
6138 Points -41%
UMI Plus
10532 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2591 Points -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nomu S30
12394 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
11393 Points -8%
UMI Plus
12078 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
9613 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nomu S30
592 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
266 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points +359%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nomu S30
522 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
220 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points +478%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nomu S30
1114 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
973 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nomu S30
416 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
175 Points -58%
UMI Plus
419 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points +422%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nomu S30
351 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
142 Points -60%
UMI Plus
352 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points +531%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nomu S30
1182 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
985 Points -17%
UMI Plus
1272 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points +71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30
17 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
19 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps +212%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
15.1 fps -11%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30
17 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
11 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps +394%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
5.4 fps -68%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nomu S30
7.1 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
8.6 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps +280%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2.3 fps -68%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30
7.1 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
4 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps +463%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
0.8 fps -89%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30
4.7 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
6.1 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps +219%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nomu S30
2.5 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
2.6 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps +1020%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
3175 Points
UMI Plus
3069 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points +52%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nomu S30
964 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
591 Points -39%
UMI Plus
341 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
443 Points -54%
System (sort by value)
Nomu S30
2216 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
1284 Points -42%
UMI Plus
2120 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
1103 Points -50%
Memory (sort by value)
Nomu S30
942 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
402 Points -57%
UMI Plus
992 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
366 Points -61%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nomu S30
670 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
383 Points -43%
UMI Plus
666 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
129 Points -81%
Web (sort by value)
Nomu S30
618 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
619 Points 0%
UMI Plus
10 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
744 Points +20%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
3279 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
3483 Points +6%
UMI Plus
3887 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points +301%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2059 Points -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Nomu S30
23914 ms *
Archos 50 Saphir
10544 ms * +56%
UMI Plus
10343 ms * +57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2562 ms * +89%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Nomu S30
21.52 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
18.3 MB/s -15%
UMI Plus
21.55 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53.6 MB/s +149%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Nomu S30
36.94 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
28.55 MB/s -23%
UMI Plus
35.95 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
72.3 MB/s +96%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30
8.84 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
4.79 MB/s -46%
UMI Plus
11.54 MB/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7
16.01 MB/s +81%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
4 MB/s -55%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30
27.99 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
14.48 MB/s -48%
UMI Plus
25.75 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
85.9 MB/s +207%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
15.8 MB/s -44%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30
194.9 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
12.21 MB/s -94%
UMI Plus
128.5 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7
145.7 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
25.6 MB/s -87%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Nomu S30
242 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
140.9 MB/s -42%
UMI Plus
244.1 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
483.8 MB/s +100%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
113.5 MB/s -53%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nomu S30
24.23 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
22 Points -9%
UMI Plus
26.05 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points +205%

Legend

 
Nomu S30 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Saphir Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Plus Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2,
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 Marvell Armada PXA1908, Vivante GC7000UL, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 41.1 °C39 °C35.4 °C 
 40.1 °C39.2 °C35.4 °C 
 42.3 °C40 °C34.9 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
33.2 °C35.1 °C38.3 °C
32.8 °C34.2 °C39.5 °C
32.7 °C34.4 °C39.3 °C
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.62525.438.33125.335.94032.928.15033.628.86331.631.98028.432.31002730.612520.832.81602231.820021.33625020.838.631521.246.240019.456.450019.564.463017.772.480017.976.9100017.880125017.378.7160017.479.8200016.779.6250017.281.5315018.283.4400017.981.2500017.670.5630017.763.9800017.859.11000017.961.81250018.160.11600018.250SPL3090.8N1.375.9median 17.9median 64.4Delta1.416.631.63925.436.425.332.232.932.433.630.331.632.728.437.42739.220.845.32252.121.359.820.861.821.267.119.47219.575.617.776.817.975.217.879.617.381.417.481.716.78117.278.118.273.117.970.917.675.217.775.917.874.717.971.918.171.618.258.63089.81.382.3median 17.9median 74.71.47.137.634.334.834.833.731.233.931.933.33231.333.232.234.429.729.730.629.727.431.526.829.92629.624.833.223.940.523.446.722.752.822.459.422.664.22267.921.766.521.567.121.272.921.173.920.977.320.978.82172.62162.621.258215221.243.33484.42.249.2median 22median 581.914.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNomu S30Archos 50 SaphirUMI Plus
Nomu S30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Archos 50 Saphir audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

UMI Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 2.31 / 2.35 Watt
Load midlight 4.57 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nomu S30
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Saphir
5000 mAh
UMI Plus
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
 mAh
Power Consumption
4%
-61%
42%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.65
30%
2.6
-180%
0.6
35%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.9
18%
3.2
-39%
1.2
48%
Idle Maximum *
2.35
2.05
13%
3.3
-40%
1.3
45%
Load Average *
4.57
6.14
-34%
7.7
-68%
2.6
43%
Load Maximum *
6.1
6.54
-7%
4.8
21%
3.6
41%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
13h 52min
Nomu S30
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Saphir
5000 mAh
UMI Plus
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
 mAh
Battery Runtime
17%
-33%
-40%
WiFi v1.3
832
973
17%
561
-33%
503
-40%
Reader / Idle
1319
1002
Load
292
166
H.264
678

Pros

+ 强劲的硬件
+ 实用的功能
+ 坚固的机身
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 双SIM卡
+ 支持LTE
+ microSD卡槽

Cons

- 重量
- GPS准确度不够
- 缺少独立功能按键
- 一般的相机
In review: Nomu S30 smartphone. Review unit provided by Nomu
In review: Nomu S30 smartphone. Review unit provided by Nomu

来自Nomu的户外智能手机面向那些除了日常使用还希望可以带着手机进行户外旅行而不用担心它会轻易损伤的用户。它得到了IP68认证,采用Gorilla Glass 4屏幕玻璃,接口也均有保护盖。另外Nomu还为S30提供了不错的技术参数,包括LTE支持,胜过其他户外设备的强劲处理器。尽管它的性能在同类设备中鹤立鸡群,但电池续航也不会让用户失望。

表现远胜同类设备,但并不适合所有用户!

与这些成功特性形成鲜明对比的是它较为脆弱的屏幕边角设计,这会限制设备正面的坚固度。它的多媒体用途也十分有限,因为这台设备不仅沉重还十分笨拙,手小的用户将很难用它玩游戏。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Nomu S30 - 04/04/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Gärtner

Chassis
78%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
43 / 60 → 72%
Weight
87%
Battery
97%
Display
81%
Games Performance
20 / 63 → 31%
Application Performance
37 / 70 → 53%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
56%
Average
68%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Nomu S30 智能手机简短评测
Benjamin Gärtner, 2017-04-22 (Update: 2017-04-23)