Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar红米Note 7智能手机评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 1639:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -20% | -47% | -16% | -43% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 541 | 421 -22% | 528 -2% | 458 -15% | 675 25% | 429 -21% |
| Brightness | 540 | 389 -28% | 525 -3% | 463 -14% | 650 20% | 432 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 85 -7% | 89 -2% | 92 1% | 92 1% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.33 -0% | 0.51 -55% | 0.22 33% | 0.46 -39% | |
| Contrast | 1639 | 1276 -22% | 1035 -37% | 2082 27% | 1467 -10% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 3.4 -26% | 4.7 -74% | 4 -48% | 5.9 -119% | 3.39 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 5.9 -28% | 8.9 -93% | 7.4 -61% | 9.5 -107% | 5.25 -14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 3.9 -26% | 6.4 -106% | 4.7 -52% | 6.6 -113% | 3.3 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.36 93% | 2.238 98% |
| CCT | 6853 95% | 7330 89% | 7987 81% | 7425 88% | 7846 83% | 7135 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2336 Hz | ≤ 18 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | Huawei P20 Lite | Nokia 7 Plus | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 2% | 53% | -1% | -7% | 62% | 8% | 801% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 283.4 | 282.6 0% | 293.9 4% | 283.1 0% | 280.8 -1% | 692 144% | 274 ? -3% | 1839 ? 549% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 204.7 | 172.4 -16% | 198.3 -3% | 211.6 3% | 204.8 0% | 205.2 0% | 176.2 ? -14% | 1425 ? 596% |
| Random Read 4KB | 82.9 | 81.3 -2% | 48.19 -42% | 54.7 -34% | 51.3 -38% | 135.2 63% | 59.4 ? -28% | 277 ? 234% |
| Random Write 4KB | 16.06 | 18.75 17% | 71.1 343% | 19.62 22% | 15.43 -4% | 22.65 41% | 32 ? 99% | 309 ? 1824% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.2 ? | 85.9 ? 3% | 83.5 ? 0% | 82.2 -1% | 83.3 ? 0% | 77.4 ? -7% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.5 ? | 64 ? 8% | 69 ? 16% | 62.3 5% | 61.1 ? 3% | 58.3 ? -2% |
Asphalt 9 - Legends Compare
Subway Surfers Compare
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
| Idle |  0.61 / 1.95 / 2.03 Watt |
| Load |
4.56 / 9.15 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -3% | 3% | -1% | -69% | -32% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.56 8% | 0.98 -61% | 0.65 -7% | 0.63 -3% | 1.8 -195% | 1.052 ? -72% | 0.894 ? -47% |
| Idle Average * | 1.95 | 1.99 -2% | 2 -3% | 1.76 10% | 2.16 -11% | 2.9 -49% | 2.62 ? -34% | 1.456 ? 25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.03 | 2.05 -1% | 2.11 -4% | 1.78 12% | 2.18 -7% | 3.5 -72% | 2.88 ? -42% | 1.616 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 4.56 | 4.62 -1% | 3.9 14% | 4.47 2% | 4.48 2% | 4.8 -5% | 5.1 ? -12% | 6.45 ? -41% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.15 | 8.94 2% | 5.62 39% | 9.13 -0% | 7.87 14% | 11.2 -22% | 9.08 ? 1% | 9.8 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -29% | -35% | -22% | -31% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1950 | 1678 -14% | 750 -62% | 1703 -13% | 1374 -30% | 1401 -28% |
| H.264 | 940 | 662 -30% | 470 -50% | 706 -25% | 658 -30% | 921 -2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 768 | 547 -29% | 582 -24% | 672 -12% | 605 -21% | 694 -10% |
| Load | 259 | 150 -42% | 247 -5% | 158 -39% | 145 -44% | 191 -26% |
Pros
Cons
那么，具有高像素相机和其他中档硬件的小米手机如何在竞争中脱颖而出？
Note 7与P20 Lite相比具有明显的优势。这不仅仅是在原始性能方面，而且在其他领域也有所体现，如Wi-Fi性能和续航时间。
高通的竞争力相当均衡。根据存储配置，价格在999-1599元之间。因此，可供选择的细节包括额外的功能和外观，尽管其他三位竞品的相机像素根本无法与Note相媲美。
红米Note 7是一款优秀的中档智能手机; 48万像素摄像头是它的标志性功能。
客观来讲，我们可以欣赏来自小米的功能性MIUI，它提供了比我们在本次评论中所涵盖的更多的功能。不过中国模式还包含许多不必要的软件，而且一些AI功能显然不能在欧洲使用。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
- 11/04/2019 v7 (old)
Inge Schwabe
Price comparison
