小米NoteBook 14地平线版笔记本电脑评测。削减成本的做法不妥当
自相当长一段时间以来，小米一直在提供不少针对中端和教育用例的笔记本电脑。早在2018年，我们已经审查了 小米笔记本Pro和 小米笔记本SKU。在经历了某种程度的沉寂之后，该公司再次开始专注于笔记本电脑，推出了小米NoteBook 14系列和AMD Ryzen 5 4500U-笔记本电脑红米书16
我们这里有小米NoteBook 14地平线版，这是小米在2020年推出的最高端机型。我们的测试样本是由英特尔彗星湖-U酷睿i7-10510U处理器和一个专门的 NvidiaGeForce MX350GPU。小米在包括地平线版在内的所有2020年小米笔记本变体中提供8GB的内存。该设备还配备了512GB PCIe Gen 3 NVMe SSD。我们对小米NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition进行了试驾，看看它在竞争中的表现如何。
Potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition i7-10510U, GeForce MX350 | 1.4 kg | 17.15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350 | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 80.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2020 | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng i7-10510U, GeForce MX350 | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.2 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
小米NoteBook 14地平线版目前在印度的售价为56,999英镑（660欧元/768美元），这使它成为一个不错的便宜货。 这种积极的定价使它在某种程度上难以与竞争对手直接比较，后者通常被置于接近或高于1000欧元的大体类似规格。不过，小米确实不得不走一些弯路来实现这一点，我们将在这次审查过程中看到。
外壳：坚固的结构，感觉很高级
小米NoteBook 14 Horizon版仅重1.35公斤。该设备的铝镁合金底盘采用了阳极喷砂处理，感觉相当高档。它并不像 MacBook Air级，但它能完成工作。设计是简约的--你能找到小米品牌的唯一地方是在底边框和底盖--灰色的表面可以补充几乎任何环境。
只需一个手指就可以打开盖子，设备不会滑动或向后倾倒。铰链看起来很光滑，但很牢固。我们没有注意到显示屏有任何晃动，当我们试图对盖子施加压力时，也没有任何明显的弯曲。触摸板是我们观察到一些异响的唯一区域。
总的来说，小米笔记本14地平线版的底盘结构基本正确，尽管看起来是预算价格。
连接性。走更多的弯路
小米为Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon配备了一个体面的端口选择。在左边，我们有一个单一的USB 2.0 Type-A端口和一个3.5毫米的组合音频插孔。在右边，我们可以看到一个用于数据传输的USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C端口（无电源传输），一对USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A端口，HDMI 1.4b输出，以及一个充电端口。
也是在这里，我们注意到第一个削减成本的措施--没有microSD读卡器，甚至没有Kensington锁插槽。
沟通
小米笔记本14 Horizon实现了高通QCA61x4A WLAN卡，它支持Wi-Fi 5和蓝牙5.0。Wi-Fi性能明显落后于竞争对手。
Wi-Fi速度应该足以满足绝大多数的互联网需求，但本地网络可能比预期的要慢。值得庆幸的是，WLAN卡可以换成性能更强的替代品。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
网络摄像头
小米NoteBook 14 Horizon实际上没有内置网络摄像头。但考虑到大流行的工作/在家学习的情况，小米在每次购买时都会捆绑一个独立的USB摄像头模块。尽管是在一个独特的模块中，外部网络摄像头的表现相当差，细节少，清晰度差。
小米本来可以为Windows Hello配备一个红外摄像头，以弥补指纹传感器的不足，但价格略微提高，或者至少在外部模块中使用一个更好的传感器，所以这似乎是一个浪费的机会。
安全问题
默认情况下，没有内置的安全措施。这款笔记本电脑缺乏任何形式的生物识别登录。然而，用户的 小米手环的用户可以配置Blaze Unlock功能，用手环解锁笔记本电脑。然而，一个独立的TPM 2.0模块是可用的，所以升级到Windows 11应该不是一个问题。
辅料
除了外置网络摄像头、常规文书和65W电源适配器外，盒子里没有其他附件。
维护
没有维修用的挡板。卸下九颗螺丝后，可以将底板移开，但要费些力气。
有一些用户维修的空间。虽然内存是焊接的，但Wi-Fi卡和NVMe SSD可以换成更好的选择。没有额外的驱动器托架或M.2插槽用于存储扩展。
担保
小米为小米笔记本14地平线版提供一年的标准保修。买家可以在结账时选择几个附加的小米保护计划，包括小米笔记本保险和小米延长保修期，最长可达2年。
输入设备。剪刀装置，无背光
键盘
除了机箱设计，小米似乎还从MacBooks的剪刀机构键盘中得到了灵感。这些按键听起来确实像剪刀式开关。键盘被指定提供1.3毫米的键程。然而，在实际使用中，键程感觉要浅得多。触觉反馈，虽然不错，但有点偏低，所以长时间的打字有时会显得有点乏味。
键盘缺乏任何形式的背光，这对这个价格范围内的设备来说是一个主要的负面因素。
触摸板
触摸板提供流畅的滑行体验，并支持WindowsPrecision 手势。然而，触摸板的面积只有11厘米×5.5厘米，感觉有些拥挤。触摸板的左下角和右上角可以作为相应的鼠标按钮，而整个表面，甚至是角落，都可以作为一般的左键使用。
这些按钮很结实，点击的声音也比我们的偏好大一些。触摸板还支持掌纹识别，这在我们的测试中似乎效果不错。
显示。适合休闲使用，但PWM非常低
我们的测试装置配备了一个14英寸FHD 16:9面板，刷新率为60赫兹。该显示器没有任何诱人的特点，考虑到预算定位，这是可以预期的。然而，它没有显示任何明显的背光渗漏，这表现在91%的体面亮度分布上。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 268.65 cd/m²
Contrast: 1644:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.76
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Panda LM140LF4L01, TFT-LCD, 14", 1920x1080 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel TV140WTM-NH0, IPS LED, 14", 2160x1440 | Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU AU Optronics B140HAK02.5, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng AU Optronics AUO3A8C, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 71% | 70% | 7% | 71% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.9 | 67.1 72% | 69.2 78% | 41.55 7% | 67.1 72% | 37.2 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 99.1 69% | 93.7 60% | 62 6% | 99.1 69% | 55.9 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.2 | 69 72% | 68.6 71% | 42.99 7% | 69.2 72% | 38.43 -4% |
| Response Times | 33016% | -34% | 90% | -80% | -39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.41 ? | 37.6 ? -42% | 37 ? -40% | 34 ? -29% | 56 ? -112% | 41 ? -55% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20.37 ? | 22.4 ? -10% | 26 ? -28% | 24 ? -18% | 30 ? -47% | 25 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 59520 ? 99100% | 250 ? 317% | |||
| Screen | 30% | 7% | -8% | 49% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 279.47 | 458 64% | 323 16% | 220 -21% | 466 67% | 269 -4% |
| Brightness | 269 | 448 67% | 308 14% | 204 -24% | 418 55% | 244 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 90 -1% | 68 -25% | 85 -7% | 83 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.25 -47% | 0.35 -106% | 0.155 9% | 0.215 -26% | 0.23 -35% |
| Contrast | 1644 | 1832 11% | 923 -44% | 1419 -14% | 2167 32% | 1170 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 3.4 39% | 3.07 45% | 5.23 7% | 1.06 81% | 4.94 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.18 | 6.7 59% | 5.8 64% | 21.51 -33% | 1.59 90% | 20.37 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.76 | 1.7 55% | 3.07 18% | 4.4 -17% | 1.09 71% | 5.03 -34% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 4.9 28% | 2.99 56% | 3.77 45% | 1.3 81% | 1.71 75% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.32 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.39 92% | 2.52 87% |
| CCT | 7876 83% | 7704 84% | 6097 107% | 6666 98% | 6699 97% | 6535 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.5 | 61 | 40 | 63 | 35 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.1 | 93 | 62 | 99 | 56 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11039% /
6636% | 14% /
15% | 30% /
14% | 13% /
36% | -17% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
小米NoteBook 14 Horizon的显示屏在所有三个色域的覆盖率都很一般。开箱后的色彩准确性并不理想，平均Delta E为5.6。然而，我们可以通过色彩校准将其降低到更合理的3.76。虽然对于基本的生产力和媒体消费来说已经足够好了，但我们不推荐这款显示器用于任何严肃的图像或视频编辑任务。
我们测量了从黑色到白色的综合响应时间为20.37毫秒，从50%的灰色到80%的灰色为26.41毫秒。小米NoteBook 14地平线版的定位不是游戏笔记本，所以这些响应时间是在这个面板的预期线上。
然而，该显示器使用PWM进行背光调节。我们记录了从0到60%亮度水平的PWM为60赫兹。在61%的亮度下，PWM增加到2.7 kHz，之后就没有观察到PWM了。因此，在低亮度设置下使用该设备的人应该警惕低的PWM频率，这有可能导致头疼和眼睛疲劳。
关于PWM的更多信息，请查看我们的文章："为什么脉冲宽度调制（PWM）是如此令人头痛"。另外，请看我们的PWM排名表 ，以了解所有被评测设备的PWM和响应时间数据的概况。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.82 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.55 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.06 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.35 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ≤ 60 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
虽然没有特别标明是IPS显示屏，但这个TFT屏幕的可视角度相当好。虽然你可能想避免阳光直射，但在最大亮度下，户外可视性并不差。
小米声称设备的可视角度为178°，这在大部分情况下是真实的。然而，从不同角度看时，会有大量的亮度降低和颜色损失。
性能。与竞争对手持平或更好
我们的测试样本采用的是 酷睿i7-10510U这是一个4C/8T处理器，基本时钟为1.8GHz，提升频率为4.9GHz。该设备还具有一个专门的 NvidiaGeForce MX350GPU，以增加图形马力。小米还提供了小米NoteBook 14 Horizon，配置为 酷睿i5-10210U配置，其余的规格都是一样的。
处理器
我们看到Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon的性能非常好。 酷睿i7-10510U特别是单核得分与竞争对手持平或更好。而 AMD Ryzen 7 4700U-供电 Acer Swift 3提供了明显更高的多核分数，但我们测试设备中的酷睿i7-10510U仍然能够比采用该处理器的竞争笔记本电脑表现得更好。
尽管Cinebench R15的多核结果明显高于其他搭载Core i7-10510U的笔记本电脑，但我们确实看到循环测试中的表现相当不稳定。也就是说，该设备确实试图恢复到接近最大的分数，即使它似乎正在经历间歇性的节流。
在默认配置中，没有特殊的电源模式或应用程序来改变性能模式。将Windows电池滑块调整到交流电源上的最佳性能，可以得到32W的PL1和51W的PL2。在电池电源上，这下降到25W PL1和40W PL2。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3626 - 4239, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1066 - 1207, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
由于在电池上运行时降低了功率限制，我们看到Cinebench R20的多核得分减少了近32%，与我们在交流电源上的记录相比，单核得分减少了近23%。
因此，用户在移动中进行重度计算时，可以预期会有明显的性能退步。
请看我们专门的酷睿i7-10510U页面了解更多信息和基准测试。
系统性能
Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon在一般生产力方面没有问题，包括视频会议、文字处理、电子表格和轻度图像编辑的混合。在PCMark 10中，小米NoteBook 14 Horizon仅比搭载Ryzen 7 4700U的宏碁Swift 3落后6%，比华硕ViviBook S14快约17%。 华硕VivoBook S14采用相同的处理器。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (4134 - 4611, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (7534 - 8942, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (5883 - 7451, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (3130 - 4496, n=4) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4355 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6280 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4611 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延时
系统延迟是用LatencyMon测量的。这个过程包括打开我们网站的多个标签，播放我们的4K视频样本，并运行一个简短的Prime95原地大FFTs压力测试10秒。
我们记录了2152.40微秒的高延迟，这意味着该设备不适合实时音频工作流程。
请看我们的 DPC延时排名页面，了解更多的延迟比较
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
小米NoteBook 14地平线版配备了东芝（现在的Kioxia）512GB PCIe NVMe SSD，占据了主板上唯一的M.2 2280插槽。由于没有额外的M.2扩展槽或驱动器托架，需要增加存储的用户将不得不把现有的SSD换成更高容量的驱动器。
该驱动器在我们的固态硬盘基准测试套件中表现不错，但我们在其他笔记本电脑中看到相同的驱动器有更高的分数。尽管我们在队列深度为8的DiskSpd循环测试中没有发现任何节流现象，但该硬盘在31轮之后才能达到峰值性能。
请查看我们专门的SSD和HDD基准测试 页面，了解更多存储性能比较。
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 37% | 19% | -15% | 1% | -14% | 31% | |
| Seq Read | 2199 | 2933 33% | 2057 -6% | 957 -56% | 1587 -28% | 1960 -11% | 2456 ? 12% |
| Seq Write | 922 | 810 -12% | 1244 35% | 353.1 -62% | 709 -23% | 1547 68% | 1493 ? 62% |
| 4K Read | 38.82 | 56.6 46% | 48.07 24% | 62.4 61% | 52 34% | 31.56 -19% | 44.1 ? 14% |
| 4K Write | 81.7 | 147.6 81% | 125.8 54% | 122.8 50% | 144 76% | 116.6 43% | 119.3 ? 46% |
| 4K-64 Read | 598 | 856 43% | 875 46% | 386.2 -35% | 322.8 -46% | 454.7 -24% | 980 ? 64% |
| 4K-64 Write | 908 | 1099 21% | 785 -14% | 605 -33% | 835 -8% | 262.1 -71% | 1180 ? 30% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.11 | 0.046 58% | 0.107 3% | 0.103 6% | 0.08057 ? 27% | ||
| Access Time Write * | 0.047 | 0.028 40% | 0.031 34% | 0.046 2% | 0.045 4% | 0.034 28% | 0.055 ? -17% |
| Score Read | 856 | 1206 41% | 1129 32% | 544 -36% | 533 -38% | 682 -20% | 1269 ? 48% |
| Score Write | 1082 | 1328 23% | 1035 -4% | 763 -29% | 1050 -3% | 533 -51% | 1449 ? 34% |
| Score Total | 2322 | 3059 32% | 2712 17% | 1581 -32% | 1832 -21% | 1552 -33% | 3326 ? 43% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1348 | 1600 19% | 1483 10% | 974 -28% | 1894 ? 41% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 470.3 | 517 10% | 730 55% | 356.5 -24% | 552 ? 17% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1052 | 1009 -4% | 943 -10% | 621 -41% | 1187 ? 13% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 54% | 19% | 27% | 2% | 6% | 47% | |
| Write 4K | 91.7 | 161.8 76% | 151.8 66% | 124.9 36% | 146.3 60% | 98.8 8% | 112.8 ? 23% |
| Read 4K | 42.01 | 60.6 44% | 55 31% | 147.9 252% | 55.7 33% | 32.44 -23% | 42.7 ? 2% |
| Write Seq | 1589 | 2209 39% | 1292 -19% | 753 -53% | 949 -40% | 1582 0% | 1489 ? -6% |
| Read Seq | 1844 | 2473 34% | 1668 -10% | 1223 -34% | 1494 -19% | 1471 -20% | 1771 ? -4% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 259.8 | 514 98% | 440.7 70% | 369.2 42% | 408.5 57% | 375.4 44% | 345 ? 33% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 247 | 586 137% | 477.4 93% | 358.1 45% | 304 23% | 491.9 99% | 359 ? 45% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2236 | 2205 -1% | 1169 -48% | 1057 -53% | 984 -56% | 1574 -30% | 2257 ? 1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3258 | 3352 3% | 2245 -31% | 2738 -16% | 1779 -45% | 2329 -29% | 2926 ? -10% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 249.7 | 1080 ? 333% | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 794 | 1232 ? 55% | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 46% /
44% | 19% /
19% | 6% /
3% | 2% /
1% | -4% /
-6% | 39% /
38% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
小米NoteBook 14地平线版使用了一个独立的 NvidiaGeForce MX350GPU，以及 UHD Graphics 620在我们的样品中，MX350的性能明显优于采用相同GPU的竞争笔记本电脑。
然而，从3DMarkTime Spy 的结果来看，在电池供电运行时，GPU性能下降了约12.3%。
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (5191 - 6540, n=13) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2018 - 24900, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (4363 - 5341, n=13) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6295 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 79728 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11700 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3938 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1369 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
MX350只能够在低到中等设置下运行有点老的游戏，尽管那些玩不太密集的MOBA游戏，如Dota 2 Reborn ，即使在1080p Ultra下也能顺利完成。
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (32.9 - 196.4, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (49.1 - 90.8, n=14) | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.6 - 177.4, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (35.5 - 72.3, n=14) | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (30.2 - 63.7, n=14) | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19 - 225, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (36.5 - 49.2, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9.75 - 162.4, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.4 - 23.9, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (10.7 - 15.1, n=5) | |
| Strange Brigade | |
| 1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (39.7 - 460, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (90.9 - 94.4, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (15.2 - 300, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (31.7 - 35, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12.8 - 244, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (24.6 - 27.2, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
| 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (18.8 - 20.1, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition | |
Witcher 3 FPS图表
我们的测试样本能够在保持稳定的帧率方面做得相当不错，在TheWitcher 3，在1080p Ultra的压力测试中没有太多节流。我们确实注意到一些帧数下降，但它们只是间歇性地发生。
请看我们专门的 NvidiaGeForce MX350网页，了解更多性能基准和比较。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 218.2 | 135 | 111.4 | 43.36 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 81.5 | 49.7 | 28.5 | 15 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 112.8 | 97.3 | 78.7 | 66.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 43.3 | 23.2 | 14.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.1 | 43.5 | 36.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 90.9 | 31.7 | 24.6 | 18.9 |
Emissions: Single heatpipe-fan combo leads to higher emissions
系统噪音
只要没有额外的压力，Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon是一个安静的操作者。然而，与竞争对手相比，我们确实注意到在各种负载下的噪音水平更高。
最大的噪音水平是在用《Witcher 3》在1080p Ultra的压力下记录的。在测试期间，我们没有观察到任何恼人的噪音，如线圈啸叫、咔嚓声或哔哔声。
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 8% | -7% | 7% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 27.24 | 29.3 -8% | 27 1% | 30.7 -13% | 25.4 7% | 31.2 -15% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.24 | 29.3 -8% | 27 1% | 31 -14% | 25.4 7% | 31.2 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 27.24 | 29.3 -8% | 27 1% | 31 -14% | 25.4 7% | 31.2 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.24 | 30.8 -13% | 27 1% | 31.3 -15% | 25.4 7% | 31.2 -15% |
| Load Average * | 42.76 | 35.7 17% | 35 18% | 43.4 -1% | 40.6 5% | 33.8 21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.9 | 35.7 19% | 42.8 3% | 36.3 17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 43.65 | 37.9 13% | 32.8 25% | 41.5 5% | 39.1 10% | 33.5 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 27.24 / 27.24 / 27.24 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.76 / 43.65 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27.24 dB(A) | ||
温度
在常规使用中，表面温度是相当可控的。然而，单风扇和单热管系统在紧张的条件下似乎有点不够用。
在包括Prime95和FurMark的最大负荷下，我们看到右上角和左下角的区域变得相当热。在《Witcher 3》的压力下，也出现了类似的热量曲线。这意味着该设备在受压时不能在膝上使用。然而，掌托和触摸板区域继续保持相对凉爽。
请注意，这些都是极端条件，现实生活中的应用不可能对设备造成如此大的压力。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.48 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.6 °C / -13.7 F).
压力测试
尽管酷睿i7-10510U实际上提供了32 W/51 W的PL1/PL2，但我们发现在压力测试中，该处理器只允许12 W/40 W。当单独用Prime95对CPU进行压力测试时，我们看到CPU的时钟达到了1.6GHz的最大值。将FurMark加入到测试中，CPU时钟下降到0.9GHz，而MX350 GPU达到1,493 MHz，这比额定的1,468 MHz的提升频率略高。
在《Witcher 3》的压力下，我们看到GPU时钟保持稳定的1,493 MHz，没有任何节流现象。虽然CPU时钟达到3.5GHz，但它们波动很大，经常下降到2.8GHz的水平。这可能解释了为什么我们在这个压力测试中看到间歇性的帧数波动，尽管GPU的运行相当稳定。
| 压力测试 | CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | CPU平均温度（℃） | GPU平均温度（℃）。 |
| 系统空闲 | 0.8 | 139 | 49 | 39.4 |
| Prime95 | 1.59 | 139 | 69 | 50.5 |
| Prime95 + FurMark | 0.9 | 1493 | 72 | 72.5 |
| Witcher 3 | 2.79 | 1493 | 70 | 71.4 |
发言人
小米NoteBook 14 Horizon配备了一对底部发射的扬声器，其质量与预算定价相符。对于偶尔的视频通话和休闲聆听来说，音频是可用的。然而，低音是不存在的，中音似乎有点太尖锐，尽管高频会好一点。小米包括DTS音频处理应用程序，允许调整一些预设。
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (19.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management: Economical on AC power
消耗功率
与竞争对手相比，在整体功耗方面，Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition是一个有点经济的设备。所提供的65瓦交流适配器似乎足以满足该设备的需求，即使是在最大负荷下。
| Off / Standby | 0 / 0.91 Watt |
| Idle | 2.22 / 4.64 / 5.86 Watt |
| Load |
51.97 / 56.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14" | Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -44% | -17% | -10% | 6% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.22 | 3 -35% | 3.6 -62% | 2.4 -8% | 2 10% | 2.8 -26% |
| Idle Average * | 4.64 | 9 -94% | 5.8 -25% | 4.2 9% | 4 14% | 4.8 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.86 | 11 -88% | 9.5 -62% | 7.8 -33% | 6.5 -11% | 6.7 -14% |
| Load Average * | 51.97 | 60.8 -17% | 42 19% | 57 -10% | 44 15% | 28 46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.2 | 56 -14% | 52 -6% | 57 -16% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 56.2 | 65.6 -17% | 31 45% | 64 -14% | 55.6 1% | 31 45% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命
所提供的46Wh电池落后于那些提供更大电池的竞争对手。也就是说，当屏幕设置为150尼特的亮度时，有可能获得略高于11.5小时的运行时间，以及约16小时的视频播放。在游戏或压力下，电池运行时间会受到极大的影响。
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 46 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 56 Wh | Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 51 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 60% | 37% | -26% | 30% | 27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1920 | 1549 -19% | 941 -51% | 1392 -27% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 697 | 768 10% | 676 -3% | 514 -26% | 630 -10% | 715 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 66 | |||||
| Load | 56 | 117 109% | 131 134% | 141 152% | 114 104% |
Pros
Cons
裁定。2021年的相关性值得怀疑
小米NoteBook 14地平线版是小米最近为降低中端多媒体笔记本电脑的入门点所做的尝试之一。该设备采用了良好的金属合金结构，铰链牢固，干扰最小。虽然端口选择不错，但缺乏专用读卡器，甚至没有肯辛顿锁插槽，可能会让很多人感到不舒服。
虽然小米在包装中提供了一个外部网络摄像头，但其质量并不比大多数集成网络摄像头好。缓慢的Wi-Fi速度也是一个令人担忧的原因。狭窄的触摸板，无背光键盘，以及缺乏生物识别技术，是买家不得不面对的其他问题。
小米NoteBook 14地平线版尽力做好基本工作，但似乎比需要的时候走了更多弯路。由于第11代笔记本电脑已经广泛使用，它作为2021年新的购买选择的相关性不是没有问题。
小米NoteBook 14 Horizon在性能方面弥补了失地，CPU和GPU的整体得分不错。Nvidia MX350 GPU不会在2021年打破任何记录，但应该比iGPU提供更好的硬件加速。然而，CPU和GPU得分在电池上都会下降，顺便说一下，这是小米妥协的另一个领域。
小米NoteBook 14地平线版本身不是一款糟糕的多媒体笔记本电脑，但竞争对手显然提供了更好的设备。尽管诸如华为MateBook 14 2020 和惠普Envy 13 等笔记本电脑在原始性能上落后于小米NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition，但它们确实提供了一个更好的整体包装。然而，小米显然有价格优势，这是你应该考虑的因素。
随着包括小米在内的大多数原始设备制造商已经在Tiger Lake ，选择具有几个明显缺陷的彗星湖设备可能不是2021年作为新的日常驱动笔记本电脑的最佳选择。
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
- 09/29/2021 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Price comparison
