Notebookcheck Logo

小米NoteBook 14地平线版笔记本电脑评测。削减成本的做法不妥当

狭窄的视野。

通过Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition,小米旨在降低有能力的多媒体笔记本电脑的入门点。虽然定价对于配备Nvidia MX350独立显卡的Core i7 Comet Lake设备来说似乎是正确的,但它也有几个妥协。它们是如何影响整体使用的呢?让我们拭目以待。
Chinese Tech Comet Lake Geforce Laptop / Notebook

自相当长一段时间以来,小米一直在提供不少针对中端和教育用例的笔记本电脑。早在2018年,我们已经审查了 小米笔记本Pro小米笔记本SKU。在经历了某种程度的沉寂之后,该公司再次开始专注于笔记本电脑,推出了小米NoteBook 14系列和AMD Ryzen 5 4500U-笔记本电脑红米书16

我们这里有小米NoteBook 14地平线版,这是小米在2020年推出的最高端机型。我们的测试样本是由英特尔彗星湖-U酷睿i7-10510U处理器和一个专门的 NvidiaGeForce MX350GPU。小米在包括地平线版在内的所有2020年小米笔记本变体中提供8GB的内存。该设备还配备了512GB PCIe Gen 3 NVMe SSD。我们对小米NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition进行了试驾,看看它在竞争中的表现如何。

Mi Notebook 14 Horizon Edition (Mi Notebook Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 32 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-U
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1468 MHz, RAM: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, Game Ready Driver 471.96, Switchable: Yes
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4 2666 MHz Dual-Channel, Timings: 19-19-19-43
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Touchscreen: No, Panda LM140LF4L01, TFT-LCD, 178° Wide-viewing Angle, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, 443 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack
Networking
Qualcomm QCA61x4A (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.15 x 321.3 x 206.8
Battery
46 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: External, 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2x2W Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, Mi Blaze Unlock, Mi Smart Share, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.35 kg
Price
56999 INR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
78 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350
1.4 kg17.15 mm14.00"1920x1080
86.3 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2020
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350
1.5 kg15.9 mm14.00"2160x1440
87 %
v7 (old)
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620
1.2 kg16.6 mm14.00"1920x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2020
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250
1.4 kg16 mm14.00"1920x1080
87.1 %
v7 (old)
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350
1.3 kg16 mm13.30"1920x1080
86.5 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7
1.2 kg16.55 mm14.00"1920x1080

小米NoteBook 14地平线版目前在印度的售价为56,999英镑(660欧元/768美元),这使它成为一个不错的便宜货。 这种积极的定价使它在某种程度上难以与竞争对手直接比较,后者通常被置于接近或高于1000欧元的大体类似规格。不过,小米确实不得不走一些弯路来实现这一点,我们将在这次审查过程中看到。

外壳:坚固的结构,感觉很高级

小米NoteBook 14 Horizon版仅重1.35公斤。该设备的铝镁合金底盘采用了阳极喷砂处理,感觉相当高档。它并不像 MacBook Air级,但它能完成工作。设计是简约的--你能找到小米品牌的唯一地方是在底边框和底盖--灰色的表面可以补充几乎任何环境。

只需一个手指就可以打开盖子,设备不会滑动或向后倾倒。铰链看起来很光滑,但很牢固。我们没有注意到显示屏有任何晃动,当我们试图对盖子施加压力时,也没有任何明显的弯曲。触摸板是我们观察到一些异响的唯一区域。

总的来说,小米笔记本14地平线版的底盘结构基本正确,尽管看起来是预算价格。

325 mm 230 mm 16.6 mm 1.2 kg325 mm 214 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg323.4 mm 218.9 mm 16.55 mm 1.2 kg321.3 mm 206.8 mm 17.15 mm 1.4 kg307.5 mm 223.8 mm 15.9 mm 1.5 kg306 mm 194 mm 16 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性。走更多的弯路

小米为Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon配备了一个体面的端口选择。在左边,我们有一个单一的USB 2.0 Type-A端口和一个3.5毫米的组合音频插孔。在右边,我们可以看到一个用于数据传输的USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C端口(无电源传输),一对USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A端口,HDMI 1.4b输出,以及一个充电端口。

也是在这里,我们注意到第一个削减成本的措施--没有microSD读卡器,甚至没有Kensington锁插槽。

左侧:排气口、USB 2.0、组合音频插孔
左侧:排气口、USB 2.0、组合音频插孔
右边。USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, HDMI 1.4b-out, 电源指示灯, 充电接口
右边。USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, HDMI 1.4b-out, 电源指示灯, 充电接口

沟通

高通公司的WLAN模块是用户可更换的
高通公司的WLAN模块是用户可更换的

小米笔记本14 Horizon实现了高通QCA61x4A WLAN卡,它支持Wi-Fi 5和蓝牙5.0。Wi-Fi性能明显落后于竞争对手。

Wi-Fi速度应该足以满足绝大多数的互联网需求,但本地网络可能比预期的要慢。值得庆幸的是,WLAN卡可以换成性能更强的替代品。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1775 (1540min - 1830max) MBit/s +302%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1337 (691min - 1388max) MBit/s +203%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
660 (642min - 680max) MBit/s +50%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
641 (341min - 713max) MBit/s +45%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
621 (554min - 657max) MBit/s +41%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Qualcomm QCA61x4A
441 (404min - 484max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1440 (1357min - 1468max) MBit/s +529%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1230 (708min - 1294max) MBit/s +437%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (879min - 923max) MBit/s +295%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
875 (787min - 909max) MBit/s +282%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
830 (784min - 880max) MBit/s +262%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Qualcomm QCA61x4A
229 (207min - 276max) MBit/s
20725730735740745750755760765770775780785790795710071057110711571207125713071357140714571507155716071657170717571807Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Qualcomm QCA61x4A; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø229 (207-276)
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1230 (708-1294)
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (1357-1468)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (879-923)
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Qualcomm QCA61x4A; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø441 (404-484)
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1314 (691-1388)
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1775 (1540-1830)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (642-680)

网络摄像头

小米提供了一个外部网络摄像头来代替内置摄像头
小米提供了一个外部网络摄像头来代替内置摄像头

小米NoteBook 14 Horizon实际上没有内置网络摄像头。但考虑到大流行的工作/在家学习的情况,小米在每次购买时都会捆绑一个独立的USB摄像头模块。尽管是在一个独特的模块中,外部网络摄像头的表现相当差,细节少,清晰度差。

小米本来可以为Windows Hello配备一个红外摄像头,以弥补指纹传感器的不足,但价格略微提高,或者至少在外部模块中使用一个更好的传感器,所以这似乎是一个浪费的机会。

ColorChecker
1.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition: 5.78 ∆E min: 1.41 - max: 11.89 ∆E

安全问题

默认情况下,没有内置的安全措施。这款笔记本电脑缺乏任何形式的生物识别登录。然而,用户的 小米手环的用户可以配置Blaze Unlock功能,用手环解锁笔记本电脑。然而,一个独立的TPM 2.0模块是可用的,所以升级到Windows 11应该不是一个问题。

辅料

除了外置网络摄像头、常规文书和65W电源适配器外,盒子里没有其他附件。

维护

没有维修用的挡板。卸下九颗螺丝后,可以将底板移开,但要费些力气。

有一些用户维修的空间。虽然内存是焊接的,但Wi-Fi卡和NVMe SSD可以换成更好的选择。没有额外的驱动器托架或M.2插槽用于存储扩展。

小米笔记本14地平线版内部结构
小米笔记本14地平线版内部结构

担保

小米为小米笔记本14地平线版提供一年的标准保修。买家可以在结账时选择几个附加的小米保护计划,包括小米笔记本保险和小米延长保修期,最长可达2年。

输入设备。剪刀装置,无背光

键盘

除了机箱设计,小米似乎还从MacBooks的剪刀机构键盘中得到了灵感。这些按键听起来确实像剪刀式开关。键盘被指定提供1.3毫米的键程。然而,在实际使用中,键程感觉要浅得多。触觉反馈,虽然不错,但有点偏低,所以长时间的打字有时会显得有点乏味。

键盘缺乏任何形式的背光,这对这个价格范围内的设备来说是一个主要的负面因素。

触摸板

触摸板提供流畅的滑行体验,并支持WindowsPrecision 手势。然而,触摸板的面积只有11厘米×5.5厘米,感觉有些拥挤。触摸板的左下角和右上角可以作为相应的鼠标按钮,而整个表面,甚至是角落,都可以作为一般的左键使用。

这些按钮很结实,点击的声音也比我们的偏好大一些。触摸板还支持掌纹识别,这在我们的测试中似乎效果不错。

键盘缺乏背光,触摸板区域相当小
键盘缺乏背光,触摸板区域相当小

显示。适合休闲使用,但PWM非常低

我们的测试装置配备了一个14英寸FHD 16:9面板,刷新率为60赫兹。该显示器没有任何诱人的特点,考虑到预算定位,这是可以预期的。然而,它没有显示任何明显的背光渗漏,这表现在91%的体面亮度分布上。

子像素排列
子像素排列
在全亮度下没有明显的背光渗漏现象
在全亮度下没有明显的背光渗漏现象
282.05
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
265.64
cd/m²
264.08
cd/m²
279.47
cd/m²
259.05
cd/m²
257.84
cd/m²
277.07
cd/m²
257.18
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Panda LM140LF4L01 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 282.05 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 269.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 268.65 cd/m²
Contrast: 1644:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.76
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Panda LM140LF4L01, TFT-LCD, 14", 1920x1080
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
TV140WTM-NH0, IPS LED, 14", 2160x1440
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
AU Optronics B140HAK02.5, IPS, 14", 1920x1080
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 14", 1920x1080
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
AU Optronics AUO3A8C, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080
Display
71%
70%
7%
71%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
38.9
67.1
72%
69.2
78%
41.55
7%
67.1
72%
37.2
-4%
sRGB Coverage
58.5
99.1
69%
93.7
60%
62
6%
99.1
69%
55.9
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.2
69
72%
68.6
71%
42.99
7%
69.2
72%
38.43
-4%
Response Times
33016%
-34%
90%
-80%
-39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
26.41 ?(11.06, 15.35)
37.6 ?(18, 19.6)
-42%
37 ?(18, 19)
-40%
34 ?(16, 18)
-29%
56 ?(26, 30)
-112%
41 ?(19, 22)
-55%
Response Time Black / White *
20.37 ?(10.82, 9.55)
22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8)
-10%
26 ?(14, 12)
-28%
24 ?(14, 10)
-18%
30 ?(15, 15)
-47%
25 ?(14, 11)
-23%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(60)
59520 ?(30)
99100%
250 ?(20)
317%
Screen
30%
7%
-8%
49%
-7%
Brightness middle
279.47
458
64%
323
16%
220
-21%
466
67%
269
-4%
Brightness
269
448
67%
308
14%
204
-24%
418
55%
244
-9%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
90
-1%
68
-25%
85
-7%
83
-9%
Black Level *
0.17
0.25
-47%
0.35
-106%
0.155
9%
0.215
-26%
0.23
-35%
Contrast
1644
1832
11%
923
-44%
1419
-14%
2167
32%
1170
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.6
3.4
39%
3.07
45%
5.23
7%
1.06
81%
4.94
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
16.18
6.7
59%
5.8
64%
21.51
-33%
1.59
90%
20.37
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.76
1.7
55%
3.07
18%
4.4
-17%
1.09
71%
5.03
-34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
4.9
28%
2.99
56%
3.77
45%
1.3
81%
1.71
75%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
2.35 94%
2.39 92%
2.52 87%
CCT
7876 83%
7704 84%
6097 107%
6666 98%
6699 97%
6535 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.5
61
40
63
35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.1
93
62
99
56
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11039% / 6636%
14% / 15%
30% / 14%
13% / 36%
-17% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

小米NoteBook 14 Horizon的显示屏在所有三个色域的覆盖率都很一般。开箱后的色彩准确性并不理想,平均Delta E为5.6。然而,我们可以通过色彩校准将其降低到更合理的3.76。虽然对于基本的生产力和媒体消费来说已经足够好了,但我们不推荐这款显示器用于任何严肃的图像或视频编辑任务。

vs. sRGB - 58.5%的覆盖率
vs. sRGB - 58.5%的覆盖率
vs. AdobeRGB - 40.2%的覆盖率
vs. AdobeRGB - 40.2%的覆盖率
对比DCI-P3 - 38.9%的覆盖率
对比DCI-P3 - 38.9%的覆盖率
校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频

我们测量了从黑色到白色的综合响应时间为20.37毫秒,从50%的灰色到80%的灰色为26.41毫秒。小米NoteBook 14地平线版的定位不是游戏笔记本,所以这些响应时间是在这个面板的预期线上。

然而,该显示器使用PWM进行背光调节。我们记录了从0到60%亮度水平的PWM为60赫兹。在61%的亮度下,PWM增加到2.7 kHz,之后就没有观察到PWM了。因此,在低亮度设置下使用该设备的人应该警惕低的PWM频率,这有可能导致头疼和眼睛疲劳。

关于PWM的更多信息,请查看我们的文章:"为什么脉冲宽度调制(PWM)是如此令人头痛"。另外,请看我们的PWM排名表 ,以了解所有被评测设备的PWM和响应时间数据的概况。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.82 ms rise
↘ 9.55 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.06 ms rise
↘ 15.35 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

虽然没有特别标明是IPS显示屏,但这个TFT屏幕的可视角度相当好。虽然你可能想避免阳光直射,但在最大亮度下,户外可视性并不差。

小米声称设备的可视角度为178°,这在大部分情况下是真实的。然而,从不同角度看时,会有大量的亮度降低和颜色损失。

在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
从不同角度看时,颜色和亮度的损失
从不同角度看时,颜色和亮度的损失

性能。与竞争对手持平或更好

我们的测试样本采用的是 酷睿i7-10510U这是一个4C/8T处理器,基本时钟为1.8GHz,提升频率为4.9GHz。该设备还具有一个专门的 NvidiaGeForce MX350GPU,以增加图形马力。小米还提供了小米NoteBook 14 Horizon,配置为 酷睿i5-10210U配置,其余的规格都是一样的。

处理器

小米笔记本14地平线版中的酷睿i7-10510U提供良好的整体性能
小米笔记本14地平线版中的酷睿i7-10510U提供良好的整体性能

我们看到Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon的性能非常好。 酷睿i7-10510U特别是单核得分与竞争对手持平或更好。而 AMD Ryzen 7 4700U-供电 Acer Swift 3提供了明显更高的多核分数,但我们测试设备中的酷睿i7-10510U仍然能够比采用该处理器的竞争笔记本电脑表现得更好。

尽管Cinebench R15的多核结果明显高于其他搭载Core i7-10510U的笔记本电脑,但我们确实看到循环测试中的表现相当不稳定。也就是说,该设备确实试图恢复到接近最大的分数,即使它似乎正在经历间歇性的节流。

在默认配置中,没有特殊的电源模式或应用程序来改变性能模式。将Windows电池滑块调整到交流电源上的最佳性能,可以得到32W的PL1和51W的PL2。在电池电源上,这下降到25W PL1和40W PL2。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

522.7577.7632.7687.7742.7797.7852.7907.7962.71017.7Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Intel Core i7-10510U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø652 (581.05-710.72)
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Intel Core i7-10510U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø561 (522.67-564.75)
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU Intel Core i7-10510U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø593 (549.96-726.41)
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Core i7-10510U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø568 (535.78-642.12)
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng Intel Core i7-10510U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø537 (532.18-539.24)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5683 Points +296%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2401 Points +67%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
1525 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
1435 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (1015 - 1897, n=38)
1412 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
1370 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
1317 Points -8%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
1237 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points +40%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
466 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
466 Points
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
451 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
446 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (362 - 497, n=37)
437 Points -6%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
433 Points -7%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
429 Points -8%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
15387 Points +324%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3626 - 4239, n=3)
3866 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
3626 Points
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)
1757 Points +65%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (1066 - 1207, n=3)
1142 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
1066 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2435 Points +242%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1035 Points +46%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
726 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
711 (581.05min - 710.72max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (482 - 856, n=45)
666 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
642 (535.78min - 642.12max) Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
565 (522.67min - 564.75max) Points -21%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
539 (532.18min - 539.24max) Points -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)
257 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
186 Points
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
185 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
182 Points -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
180 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (113 - 202, n=42)
178.4 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
177.6 Points -5%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
177 Points -5%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
856 Seconds * -36%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
820 Seconds * -31%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
797 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (628 - 1051, n=31)
796 Seconds * -27%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
782 Seconds * -25%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
628 Seconds *
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
524 Seconds * +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * +60%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5722 MIPS +19%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
4792 MIPS
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
4740 MIPS -1%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
4722 MIPS -1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4681 MIPS -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
4678 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3747 - 4981, n=31)
4591 MIPS -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4292 MIPS -10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60265 MIPS +211%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
26652 MIPS +37%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
19396 MIPS
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
18159 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (12196 - 21298, n=31)
17704 MIPS -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
17186 MIPS -11%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
16487 MIPS -15%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
16152 MIPS -17%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1818 Points +50%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
1225 Points +1%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
1225 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
1222 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
1216 Points
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
1211 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (977 - 1287, n=31)
1197 Points -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1101 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
11967 Points +189%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4792 Points +16%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
4314 Points +4%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
4242 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
4145 Points
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
4008 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
3721 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (2474 - 4484, n=31)
3687 Points -11%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps +172%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7.81 fps +29%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
6.04 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.69 fps -22%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3.41 - 6.04, n=31)
4.65 fps -23%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.6 fps -24%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.56 fps -25%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.31 fps -29%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
74.9 s *
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (50.7 - 77.8, n=27)
59.9 s * +20%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
59.8 s * +20%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
55.8 s * +26%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
55.8 s * +26%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
54.2 s * +28%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
51 s * +32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.6 s * +34%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (0.637 - 0.81, n=28)
0.68 sec * -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.67 sec * -2%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.67 sec * -2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.654 sec *
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.651 sec * -0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.638 sec * +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.629 sec * +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.484 sec * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
711 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
106 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
186 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1435 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
466 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3626 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1066 Points
Help
Cinebench R20在使用电池供电时显示的分数明显较低
Cinebench R20在使用电池供电时显示的分数明显较低

由于在电池上运行时降低了功率限制,我们看到Cinebench R20的多核得分减少了近32%,与我们在交流电源上的记录相比,单核得分减少了近23%。

因此,用户在移动中进行重度计算时,可以预期会有明显的性能退步。

请看我们专门的酷睿i7-10510U页面了解更多信息和基准测试。

系统性能

Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon在一般生产力方面没有问题,包括视频会议、文字处理、电子表格和轻度图像编辑的混合。在PCMark 10中,小米NoteBook 14 Horizon仅比搭载Ryzen 7 4700U的宏碁Swift 3落后6%,比华硕ViviBook S14快约17%。 华硕VivoBook S14采用相同的处理器。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6795 Points +47%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4886 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4611 Points
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
4438 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
4364 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (4134 - 4611, n=4)
4324 Points -6%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4134 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
3933 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10521 Points +18%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9244 Points +3%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
9183 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
8942 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8894 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (7534 - 8942, n=4)
8398 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
8310 Points -7%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8222 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8932 Points +20%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7451 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
7443 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7431 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
7286 Points -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
7273 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (5883 - 7451, n=4)
7013 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6845 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9202 Points +130%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4709 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4004 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (3130 - 4496, n=4)
3778 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
3482 Points -13%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
3473 Points -13%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3130 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
2903 Points -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4355 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6280 points
PCMark 10 Score
4611 points
Help

DPC延时

系统延迟是用LatencyMon测量的。这个过程包括打开我们网站的多个标签,播放我们的4K视频样本,并运行一个简短的Prime95原地大FFTs压力测试10秒。

我们记录了2152.40微秒的高延迟,这意味着该设备不适合实时音频工作流程。

请看我们的 DPC延时排名页面,了解更多的延迟比较

小米笔记本14地平线受制于高DPC延迟
小米笔记本14地平线受制于高DPC延迟
ndis.sys显示出最高的执行时间
ndis.sys显示出最高的执行时间
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
2865 μs * -33%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2597 μs * -21%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2152 μs *
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1087 μs * +49%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
573 μs * +73%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
395.3 μs * +82%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

小米笔记本14地平线版提供一个M.2 NVMe SSD插槽
小米笔记本14地平线版提供一个M.2 NVMe SSD插槽

小米NoteBook 14地平线版配备了东芝(现在的Kioxia)512GB PCIe NVMe SSD,占据了主板上唯一的M.2 2280插槽。由于没有额外的M.2扩展槽或驱动器托架,需要增加存储的用户将不得不把现有的SSD换成更高容量的驱动器。

该驱动器在我们的固态硬盘基准测试套件中表现不错,但我们在其他笔记本电脑中看到相同的驱动器有更高的分数。尽管我们在队列深度为8的DiskSpd循环测试中没有发现任何节流现象,但该硬盘在31轮之后才能达到峰值性能。

请查看我们专门的SSD和HDD基准测试 页面,了解更多存储性能比较。

AS-SSD
AS-SSD
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
CrystalDiskMark 6
CrystalDiskMark 6
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Lite-On CA5-8D512
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
 
AS SSD
37%
19%
-15%
1%
-14%
31%
Seq Read
2199
2933
33%
2057
-6%
957
-56%
1587
-28%
1960
-11%
Seq Write
922
810
-12%
1244
35%
353.1
-62%
709
-23%
1547
68%
4K Read
38.82
56.6
46%
48.07
24%
62.4
61%
52
34%
31.56
-19%
4K Write
81.7
147.6
81%
125.8
54%
122.8
50%
144
76%
116.6
43%
4K-64 Read
598
856
43%
875
46%
386.2
-35%
322.8
-46%
454.7
-24%
4K-64 Write
908
1099
21%
785
-14%
605
-33%
835
-8%
262.1
-71%
Access Time Read *
0.11
0.046
58%
0.107
3%
0.103
6%
0.08057 ?(0.029 - 0.148, n=14)
27%
Access Time Write *
0.047
0.028
40%
0.031
34%
0.046
2%
0.045
4%
0.034
28%
Score Read
856
1206
41%
1129
32%
544
-36%
533
-38%
682
-20%
Score Write
1082
1328
23%
1035
-4%
763
-29%
1050
-3%
533
-51%
Score Total
2322
3059
32%
2712
17%
1581
-32%
1832
-21%
1552
-33%
Copy ISO MB/s
1348
1600
19%
1483
10%
974
-28%
Copy Program MB/s
470.3
517
10%
730
55%
356.5
-24%
Copy Game MB/s
1052
1009
-4%
943
-10%
621
-41%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
54%
19%
27%
2%
6%
47%
Write 4K
91.7
161.8
76%
151.8
66%
124.9
36%
146.3
60%
98.8
8%
112.8 ?(21.6 - 209, n=14)
23%
Read 4K
42.01
60.6
44%
55
31%
147.9
252%
55.7
33%
32.44
-23%
Write Seq
1589
2209
39%
1292
-19%
753
-53%
949
-40%
1582
0%
Read Seq
1844
2473
34%
1668
-10%
1223
-34%
1494
-19%
1471
-20%
Write 4K Q32T1
259.8
514
98%
440.7
70%
369.2
42%
408.5
57%
375.4
44%
Read 4K Q32T1
247
586
137%
477.4
93%
358.1
45%
304
23%
491.9
99%
Write Seq Q32T1
2236
2205
-1%
1169
-48%
1057
-53%
984
-56%
1574
-30%
Read Seq Q32T1
3258
3352
3%
2245
-31%
2738
-16%
1779
-45%
2329
-29%
2926 ?(998 - 3511, n=14)
-10%
Write 4K Q8T8
249.7
1080 ?(250 - 1573, n=4)
333%
Read 4K Q8T8
794
1232 ?(794 - 1490, n=4)
55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
46% / 44%
19% / 19%
6% / 3%
2% / 1%
-4% / -6%
39% / 38%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3258 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2236 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 247 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 259.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1844 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1589 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.01 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 91.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 249.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 794 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

小米NoteBook 14地平线版使用了一个独立的 NvidiaGeForce MX350GPU,以及 UHD Graphics 620在我们的样品中,MX350的性能明显优于采用相同GPU的竞争笔记本电脑。

然而,从3DMarkTime Spy 的结果来看,在电池供电运行时,GPU性能下降了约12.3%。

3DMarkTime Spy 显示在电池上的得分减少了12%。
3DMarkTime Spy 显示在电池上的得分减少了12%。
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20075 Points +230%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (5191 - 6540, n=13)
6142 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
6085 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
5989 Points -2%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
5191 Points -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
4990 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
4785 Points -21%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
1999 Points -67%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Multimedia
  (2018 - 24900, n=77, last 2 years)
12981 Points +154%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
5267 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
5117 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (4363 - 5341, n=13)
5089 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
4546 Points -11%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
4363 Points -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3663 Points -28%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
1912 Points -63%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points +132%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (23194 - 26239, n=9)
24858 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
24555 Points
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
23194 Points -6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
22895 Points -7%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
10913 Points -56%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14437 Points +230%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (3999 - 4656, n=14)
4390 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
4371 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
4311 Points -1%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
3999 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
3819 Points -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3134 Points -28%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
1351 Points -69%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (66941 - 354020, n=7, last 2 years)
137927 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
80922 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (67621 - 85655, n=3)
77658 Points
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
48528 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5446 Points +323%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (1123 - 1595, n=12)
1322 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
1288 Points
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
1163 Points -10%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
1139 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-10510U
1123 Points -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
973 Points -24%
3DMark 11 Performance
6295 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
79728 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
11700 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3938 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1369 points
Help

游戏性能

MX350只能够在低到中等设置下运行有点老的游戏,尽管那些玩不太密集的MOBA游戏,如Dota 2 Reborn ,即使在1080p Ultra下也能顺利完成。

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average of class Multimedia
  (37.2 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
138.7 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (102.8 - 145, n=14)
122.9 fps +9%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
119.1 (97.3min) fps +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
113 (99.1min) fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
112.8 (98.1min) fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
102.4 (83.2min) fps -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
90.6 (80.3min) fps -20%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
77.8 (67.2min) fps -31%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.7 - 208, n=80, last 2 years)
120.8 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (93.8 - 130, n=14)
110.6 fps +14%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
106.2 (90.7min) fps +9%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
103 (91.1min) fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
97.3 (83.3min) fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
90.5 (78.6min) fps -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
72.8 (61min) fps -25%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
50.3 (43.7min) fps -48%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years)
103.8 fps +32%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
82.8 (72.3min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (64.1 - 88.4, n=14)
81.1 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
78.7 (66min) fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
71.3 (62min) fps -9%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
64.1 (42.6min) fps -19%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
46.4 (41.6min) fps -41%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
22 (20.4min) fps -72%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.4 fps +45%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
75.6 (64.3min) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (52.3 - 80.6, n=14)
72.5 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
66.6 (57.6min) fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
63.8 (53.5min) fps -4%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
52.3 (33.8min) fps -21%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
44.1 (39min) fps -34%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
19.6 (18.2min) fps -71%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 428, n=47, last 2 years)
213 fps +161%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
81.5 (70min, 70.58P1 - 89max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (54.9 - 86, n=12)
77.3 fps -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
69.7 (56min - 80max) fps -14%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
64.3 fps -21%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
51.6 fps -37%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years)
144.6 fps +191%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
49.7 (43min, 43P1 - 56max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (35.2 - 51.9, n=13)
45.2 fps -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
42.4 (34min - 49max) fps -15%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
36 fps -28%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
35.2 fps -29%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
33.5 fps -33%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +254%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
28.5 (24min, 24P1 - 32max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (20.6 - 29.9, n=13)
26.3 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
22.8 (15min - 26max) fps -20%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
21 fps -26%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
20.6 fps -28%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
16.5 fps -42%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps +260%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (10.1 - 17.5, n=12)
15.4 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
15 (11min, 11.65P1 - 18max) fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
13 fps -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
10.7 fps -29%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
10.1 (6min, 8P1 - 28max) fps -33%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Multimedia
  (32.9 - 196.4, n=83, last 2 years)
95.8 fps +95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (49.1 - 90.8, n=14)
68.1 fps +39%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
62.5 fps +27%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
58.9 fps +20%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
49.1 fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
47.7 fps -3%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
35.1 fps -29%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.3 fps -59%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.6 - 177.4, n=80, last 2 years)
81.6 fps +88%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
59.3 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (35.5 - 72.3, n=14)
55.9 fps +29%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
51 fps +17%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
43.5 fps
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
42.8 fps -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
28.1 fps -35%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
13.4 fps -69%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.8 fps +82%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
51.4 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (30.2 - 63.7, n=14)
48 fps +31%
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
41.3 fps +13%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
39.3 fps +7%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
36.7 fps
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
24.9 fps -32%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
12.8 fps -65%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 225, n=68, last 2 years)
101.3 fps +134%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (36.5 - 49.2, n=5)
44.8 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
43.3 fps
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.75 - 162.4, n=78, last 2 years)
66.5 fps +187%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
23.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (20.4 - 23.9, n=5)
22.4 fps -3%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +242%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
14.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (10.7 - 15.1, n=5)
13.8 fps -7%
Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average of class Multimedia
  (39.7 - 460, n=72, last 2 years)
231 fps +154%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (90.9 - 94.4, n=3)
92.7 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
90.9 (55.1min, 62.7P1 - 252max) fps
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.2 - 300, n=74, last 2 years)
117.5 fps +271%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (31.7 - 35, n=3)
33 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
31.7 (24.1min, 28P1 - 43.1max) fps
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 244, n=78, last 2 years)
100.7 fps +309%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (24.6 - 27.2, n=3)
25.6 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
24.6 (19min, 20.3P1 - 34.3max) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
87.4 fps +362%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350
  (18.8 - 20.1, n=3)
19.3 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
18.9 (13.6min, 14.6P1 - 26.8max) fps

Witcher 3 FPS图表

我们的测试样本能够在保持稳定的帧率方面做得相当不错,在TheWitcher 3,在1080p Ultra的压力测试中没有太多节流。我们确实注意到一些帧数下降,但它们只是间歇性地发生。

请看我们专门的 NvidiaGeForce MX350网页,了解更多性能基准和比较。

15161718Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition i7-10510U, GeForce MX350: Ø16.2 (15-19)
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 218.2 135 111.4 43.36
The Witcher 3 (2015) 81.5 49.7 28.5 15
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 112.8 97.3 78.7 66.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 43.3 23.2 14.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 49.1 43.5 36.7
Strange Brigade (2018) 90.9 31.7 24.6 18.9

Emissions: Single heatpipe-fan combo leads to higher emissions

系统噪音

Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition - 风扇噪音简介
Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition - 风扇噪音简介

只要没有额外的压力,Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon是一个安静的操作者。然而,与竞争对手相比,我们确实注意到在各种负载下的噪音水平更高。

最大的噪音水平是在用《Witcher 3》在1080p Ultra的压力下记录的。在测试期间,我们没有观察到任何恼人的噪音,如线圈啸叫、咔嚓声或哔哔声。

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Noise
2%
8%
-7%
7%
0%
off / environment *
27.24
29.3
-8%
27
1%
30.7
-13%
25.4
7%
31.2
-15%
Idle Minimum *
27.24
29.3
-8%
27
1%
31
-14%
25.4
7%
31.2
-15%
Idle Average *
27.24
29.3
-8%
27
1%
31
-14%
25.4
7%
31.2
-15%
Idle Maximum *
27.24
30.8
-13%
27
1%
31.3
-15%
25.4
7%
31.2
-15%
Load Average *
42.76
35.7
17%
35
18%
43.4
-1%
40.6
5%
33.8
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.9
35.7
19%
42.8
3%
36.3
17%
Load Maximum *
43.65
37.9
13%
32.8
25%
41.5
5%
39.1
10%
33.5
23%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
27.24 / 27.24 / 27.24 dB(A)
Load
42.76 / 43.65 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 27.24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.320.92521.823.43129.319.14021.3205024.321.96332.825.28026.8251002726.212525.125.916020.324.120024.927.425023.82731520.428.540018.727.850017.929.563017.429.280013.129.4100012.931.412501331.5160013.732.3200012.732.8250013.432.7315015.633.5400013.933.3500013.834630013.730.4800013.325.41000014.321.71250014.719.41600016.218.9SPL27.243.7N14.5median 14.7median 29.2Delta3.43.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseXiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition

温度

冷却系统由一个风扇和热管组成,贯穿CPU和GPU。
冷却系统由一个风扇和热管组成,贯穿CPU和GPU。

在常规使用中,表面温度是相当可控的。然而,单风扇和单热管系统在紧张的条件下似乎有点不够用。

在包括Prime95和FurMark的最大负荷下,我们看到右上角和左下角的区域变得相当热。在《Witcher 3》的压力下,也出现了类似的热量曲线。这意味着该设备在受压时不能在膝上使用。然而,掌托和触摸板区域继续保持相对凉爽。

请注意,这些都是极端条件,现实生活中的应用不可能对设备造成如此大的压力。

Max. Load
 41.2 °C49 °C50.8 °C 
 39 °C45.8 °C46.4 °C 
 33.4 °C33.6 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 50.8 °C
Average: 41.73 °C
53.2 °C49.2 °C37.4 °C
40.6 °C39.2 °C34.2 °C
36.8 °C35.8 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 53.2 °C
Average: 39.95 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.73 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.48 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.6 °C / -13.7 F).
系统空闲 - 顶部
系统空闲 - 顶部
系统空闲 - 底部
系统空闲 - 底部
Prime95 + FurMark负载 - 顶部
Prime95 + FurMark负载 - 顶部
Prime95 + FurMark负载 - 底部
Prime95 + FurMark负载 - 底部
TheWitcher 3 - 顶部
TheWitcher 3 - 顶部
TheWitcher 3 - 底部
TheWitcher 3 - 底部

压力测试

尽管酷睿i7-10510U实际上提供了32 W/51 W的PL1/PL2,但我们发现在压力测试中,该处理器只允许12 W/40 W。当单独用Prime95对CPU进行压力测试时,我们看到CPU的时钟达到了1.6GHz的最大值。将FurMark加入到测试中,CPU时钟下降到0.9GHz,而MX350 GPU达到1,493 MHz,这比额定的1,468 MHz的提升频率略高。

《Witcher 3》的压力下,我们看到GPU时钟保持稳定的1,493 MHz,没有任何节流现象。虽然CPU时钟达到3.5GHz,但它们波动很大,经常下降到2.8GHz的水平。这可能解释了为什么我们在这个压力测试中看到间歇性的帧数波动,尽管GPU的运行相当稳定。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95 + FurMark压力
Prime95 + FurMark压力
TheWitcher 3 stress
TheWitcher 3 stress
在Prime95+FurMark压力下的CPU和GPU时钟和温度
在Prime95+FurMark压力下的CPU和GPU时钟和温度
在《Witcher 3 》的压力下,CPU和GPU的时钟和温度。
在《Witcher 3 》的压力下,CPU和GPU的时钟和温度。
压力测试 CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)。
系统空闲 0.8 139 49 39.4
Prime95 1.59 139 69 50.5
Prime95 + FurMark 0.9 1493 72 72.5
Witcher 3 2.79 1493 70 71.4

发言人

小米NoteBook 14地平线版--粉色噪音图解
小米NoteBook 14地平线版--粉色噪音图解

小米NoteBook 14 Horizon配备了一对底部发射的扬声器,其质量与预算定价相符。对于偶尔的视频通话和休闲聆听来说,音频是可用的。然而,低音是不存在的,中音似乎有点太尖锐,尽管高频会好一点。小米包括DTS音频处理应用程序,允许调整一些预设。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.327.335.32527.921.827.93133.729.333.74030.721.330.75028.524.328.56331.832.831.88031.926.831.910027.72727.712535.125.135.116025.720.325.720034.724.934.725042.823.842.831547.220.447.240051.218.751.250054.517.954.563056.417.456.480066.313.166.3100064.112.964.1125058.21358.2160050.813.750.8200048.812.748.8250045.413.445.431504915.649400052.413.952.4500056.513.856.5630057.113.757.1800051.513.351.51000051.714.351.71250054.114.754.11600053.916.253.9SPL69.727.269.7N23.4123.4median 51.5median 14.7median 51.5Delta6.23.46.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon EditionApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (19.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management: Economical on AC power

消耗功率

与竞争对手相比,在整体功耗方面,Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition是一个有点经济的设备。所提供的65瓦交流适配器似乎足以满足该设备的需求,即使是在最大负荷下。

在3DMark 06返回Proxycon测试期间的耗电量
在3DMark 06返回Proxycon测试期间的耗电量
Prime95在10s的时候开始。消耗量最初达到~65W,然后平均为~50W
Prime95在10s的时候开始。消耗量最初达到~65W,然后平均为~50W
Prime95和FurMark在10秒的时候一起开始。消耗量在接近~65W时达到峰值,然后平均接近~55W
Prime95和FurMark在10秒的时候一起开始。消耗量在接近~65W时达到峰值,然后平均接近~55W
Witcher 3 ,在10s的时候开始。功率消耗基本上在50W左右,偶尔会有接近55W的峰值
Witcher 3 ,在10s的时候开始。功率消耗基本上在50W左右,偶尔会有接近55W的峰值
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.91 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.22 / 4.64 / 5.86 Watt
Load midlight 51.97 / 56.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14"
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14"
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption
-44%
-17%
-10%
6%
5%
Idle Minimum *
2.22
3
-35%
3.6
-62%
2.4
-8%
2
10%
2.8
-26%
Idle Average *
4.64
9
-94%
5.8
-25%
4.2
9%
4
14%
4.8
-3%
Idle Maximum *
5.86
11
-88%
9.5
-62%
7.8
-33%
6.5
-11%
6.7
-14%
Load Average *
51.97
60.8
-17%
42
19%
57
-10%
44
15%
28
46%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.2
56
-14%
52
-6%
57
-16%
Load Maximum *
56.2
65.6
-17%
31
45%
64
-14%
55.6
1%
31
45%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø49.2 (6.77-62.7)
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø56.1 (6.95-63.1)

电池寿命

所提供的46Wh电池落后于那些提供更大电池的竞争对手。也就是说,当屏幕设置为150尼特的亮度时,有可能获得略高于11.5小时的运行时间,以及约16小时的视频播放。在游戏或压力下,电池运行时间会受到极大的影响。

附带的46Wh电池只适合于视频、网络浏览和其他亮度较低的轻度任务。
附带的46Wh电池只适合于视频、网络浏览和其他亮度较低的轻度任务。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 00min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 06min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 37min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 56min
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 46 Wh
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 56 Wh
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 51 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh
Battery Runtime
60%
37%
-26%
30%
27%
Reader / Idle
1920
1549
-19%
941
-51%
1392
-27%
WiFi v1.3
697
768
10%
676
-3%
514
-26%
630
-10%
715
3%
Witcher 3 ultra
66
Load
56
117
109%
131
134%
141
152%
114
104%

Pros

+ 简约的设计和良好的整体结构
+ 合适的端口选择
+ 与竞争对手相比,CPU和GPU性能良好
+ 负载下的经济耗电

Cons

- 没有内置网络摄像头、SD读卡器、生物识别技术和Kensington锁插槽
- Wi-Fi吞吐量缓慢
- 输入设备需要改进
- 在较低的亮度水平上有60赫兹的PWM
- 电池上的CPU和GPU性能明显下降

裁定。2021年的相关性值得怀疑

小米NoteBook 14 Horizon版。评测单位由小米印度公司提供。
小米NoteBook 14 Horizon版。评测单位由小米印度公司提供。

小米NoteBook 14地平线版是小米最近为降低中端多媒体笔记本电脑的入门点所做的尝试之一。该设备采用了良好的金属合金结构,铰链牢固,干扰最小。虽然端口选择不错,但缺乏专用读卡器,甚至没有肯辛顿锁插槽,可能会让很多人感到不舒服。

虽然小米在包装中提供了一个外部网络摄像头,但其质量并不比大多数集成网络摄像头好。缓慢的Wi-Fi速度也是一个令人担忧的原因。狭窄的触摸板,无背光键盘,以及缺乏生物识别技术,是买家不得不面对的其他问题。

小米NoteBook 14地平线版尽力做好基本工作,但似乎比需要的时候走了更多弯路。由于第11代笔记本电脑已经广泛使用,它作为2021年新的购买选择的相关性不是没有问题。

小米NoteBook 14 Horizon在性能方面弥补了失地,CPU和GPU的整体得分不错。Nvidia MX350 GPU不会在2021年打破任何记录,但应该比iGPU提供更好的硬件加速。然而,CPU和GPU得分在电池上都会下降,顺便说一下,这是小米妥协的另一个领域。

小米NoteBook 14地平线版本身不是一款糟糕的多媒体笔记本电脑,但竞争对手显然提供了更好的设备。尽管诸如华为MateBook 14 2020惠普Envy 13 等笔记本电脑在原始性能上落后于小米NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition,但它们确实提供了一个更好的整体包装。然而,小米显然有价格优势,这是你应该考虑的因素。

随着包括小米在内的大多数原始设备制造商已经在Tiger Lake ,选择具有几个明显缺陷的彗星湖设备可能不是2021年作为新的日常驱动笔记本电脑的最佳选择。

价格和可用性

小米NoteBook 14地平线版目前可以从Mi.com印度亚马逊售价为56,999英镑(768美元)。

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition - 09/29/2021 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
62%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
42 / 80 → 53%
Weight
71 / 20-72 → 98%
Battery
89 / 95 → 94%
Display
79%
Games Performance
68 / 90 → 75%
Application Performance
90 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
81%
Noise
84 / 95 → 89%
Audio
51%
Camera
21 / 85 → 24%
Average
69%
78%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米NoteBook 14地平线版笔记本电脑评测。削减成本的做法不妥当
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2021-10- 1 (Update: 2021-10- 1)