三星 Notebook 9 NP900X3N (i5-7200U, 全高清)笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Brand: Samsung

最薄最亮的13英寸超极本。该机是Notebook 9系列中的一款让人印象深刻的超轻量级产品，它的价格为1000美元。与其他13英寸的机型相比，该笔记本省略了一些主要功能。但是，对于用户的日常使用而言，大部分影响是可以忽略的。

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 10/04/2017 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Notebook 9 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 300 MHz, RAM: 1067 MHz, DDR4, 21.20.16.4541

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, 1066.7 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, 256 GB

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14 x 309 x 208

Battery

30 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 1.5 W stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Quick Start guide, Samsung Software Suite, Samsung PC Cleaner, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

817 g, Power Supply: 114 g

Price

1000 USD

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, USB Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s +60%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US	68.7 MB/s +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US	67.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s +184%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US	88.1 MB/s
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US	86.5 MB/s -2%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	663 MBit/s +28%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	575 MBit/s +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	517 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	668 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	525 MBit/s -21%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	485 MBit/s -27%


472 cd/m²	507.9 cd/m²	488.3 cd/m²
469.7 cd/m²	510.7 cd/m²	463.4 cd/m²
457.3 cd/m²	498.4 cd/m²	458.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2

Maximum: 510.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 480.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 510.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 774:1 (Black: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080	HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, 13.9", 3840x2160
Display		1%	-20%	35%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	63.4	64.6 2%	48.94 -23%	99.2 56%	62.2 -2%
sRGB Coverage	88.6	88.8 0%	73.3 -17%	99.9 13%	90.1 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	64.8 1%	50.5 -21%	87.1 36%	63.5 -1%
Response Times		-4%	12%	6%	9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41.6 ?(22.8, 18.8)	46 ?(26, 20) -11%	32.8 ?(16, 16.8) 21%	42.8 ?(22.4, 20.4) -3%	46 ?(14, 32) -11%
Response Time Black / White *	34 ?(20, 14)	33 ?(21, 12) 3%	33.2 ?(10.8, 22.4) 2%	28.8 ?(14.8, 14) 15%	24 ?(6, 18) 29%
PWM Frequency	210.1 ?(99)
Screen		-26%	-30%	29%	-49%
Brightness middle	510.7	404 -21%	351.2 -31%	588 15%	348 -32%
Brightness	481	382 -21%	325 -32%	561 17%	310 -36%
Brightness Distribution	90	91 1%	89 -1%	92 2%	80 -11%
Black Level *	0.66	0.35 47%	0.195 70%	0.45 32%	0.25 62%
Contrast	774	1154 49%	1801 133%	1307 69%	1392 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.4	5.37 -124%	7.4 -208%	1.7 29%	7.86 -228%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.3	9.46 -30%	9.08 -24%	3.5 52%	13.43 -84%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	6.44 -168%	6.71 -180%	1.9 21%	8.25 -244%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.52 ^87%	2.74 ^80%	2.33 ^94%	2.05 ^107%
CCT	6747 ^96%	6738 ^96%	7222 ^90%	6738 ^96%	6834 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	58 2%	50.48 -11%	77.92 37%	58 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88.1	89 1%	73.31 -17%	99.94 13%	90 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-10% / -18%	-13% / -23%	23% / 27%	-13% / -31%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

210.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 210.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 210.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	141 Points +15%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	139 Points +13%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	133 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Intel Core i5-6267U	131 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	125 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	123 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	113 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70 Intel Core i5-4200U	98 Points -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	91 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	503 Points +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	383 (377^min - 385^max) Points +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	343 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Intel Core i5-6267U	339 Points +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U	327 Points 0%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	314 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	284 Points -13%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70 Intel Core i5-4200U	230 Points -30%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	1.64 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	1.54 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	1.51 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U	1.48 Points +2%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	1.45 Points 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	1.45 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.28 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70 Intel Core i5-4200U	1.12 Points -23%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	1.03 Points -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5.81 Points +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	4.09 Points +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	3.83 Points +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	3.67 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	3.63 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.16 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U	3.15 Points -14%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	2.83 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70 Intel Core i5-4200U	2.5 Points -32%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	17618 Points +55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	11676 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	11403 Points 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	11373 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	10906 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U	10897 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	9723 Points -15%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	6550 Points -42%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	5630 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	5010 Points +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	4975 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	4943 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	4920 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U	4904 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	4368 Points -12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	4168 Points -16%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel Core i5-5200U	568 s * -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	492 s * -1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	489.4 s *
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	477.5 s * +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	456.8 s * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8772

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11373

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4975

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.67 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

36.64 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.45 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

123 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

46.26 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

328 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3852 Points +3%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3789 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	3728 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3535 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	5053 Points +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4928 Points +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	4786 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4568 Points -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4769 Points +4%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4655 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	4577 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4211 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3728 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4577 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4786 points
PCMark 10 Score		3449 points
Help

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
AS SSD		155%	33%	71%	-12%
Copy Game MB/s	186.8	397.9 113%	390 109%		189.4 1%
Copy Program MB/s	213	426 100%	188 -12%		204.3 -4%
Copy ISO MB/s	335.9	720 114%	283.3 -16%		293.5 -13%
Score Total	1057	3617 242%	1607 52%	1865 76%	1056 0%
Score Write	350	1115 219%	327 -7%	611 75%	374 7%
Score Read	463	1654 257%	870 88%	850 84%	448 -3%
Access Time Write *	0.053	0.026 51%	0.035 34%	0.028 47%	0.11 -108%
Access Time Read *	0.066	0.042 36%	0.055 17%	0.034 48%	0.076 -15%
4K-64 Write	223.8	862 285%	197.7 -12%	422.2 89%	271.4 21%
4K-64 Read	379.4	1465 286%	723 91%	671 77%	370.3 -2%
4K Write	79.2	134.4 70%	92 16%	132.9 68%	56.8 -28%
4K Read	31.24	56.4 81%	29.52 -6%	39.92 28%	25.89 -17%
Seq Write	466	1190 155%	372.8 -20%	560 20%	463.4 -1%
Seq Read	520	1325 155%	1179 127%	1389 167%	514 -1%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 551 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 512 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 273.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 99.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 489.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 458.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 34.45 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.4 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U	2379 (2355^min - 2425^max) Points +55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2230 Points +45%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	1623 Points +6%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	1562 Points +2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1545 Points +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1536 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1343 Points -13%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	1082 Points -30%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U	703 Points -54%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U	2193 (2057^min - 2200^max) Points +48%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	1770 Points +20%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	1609 Points +9%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1483 Points 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1478 Points
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	1413 Points -4%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1401 Points -5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	979 Points -34%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U	616 Points -58%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U	11495 (10969^min - 11750^max) Points +38%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	9060 Points +9%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	8385 Points +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	8301 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	8177 Points -1%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	8104 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	6924 Points -17%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	5415 Points -35%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U	4620 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	1593 Points +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U	1541 (1484^min - 1547^max) Points +59%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	1045 Points +8%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	967 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	963 Points 0%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	948 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	786 Points -19%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	657 Points -32%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U	544 Points -44%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	49119 Points +5%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U	47546 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	46817 Points
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	42314 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	37343 Points -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	31550 Points -33%

3DMark 11 Performance		1695 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		64405 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6418 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		892 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		411 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.6	26	24.7	7.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	20

Noise Level

Idle		28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Load		33.2 / 35.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Noise		-10%	1%	-11%	-6%	-10%
off / environment *	28.4	30.4 -7%		31.7 -12%	30.2 -6%	30.7 -8%
Idle Minimum *	28.4	30.4 -7%	28.9 -2%	31.7 -12%	30.2 -6%	30.7 -8%
Idle Average *	28.4	30.4 -7%	28.9 -2%	31.7 -12%	30.2 -6%	30.7 -8%
Idle Maximum *	28.4	30.4 -7%	28.9 -2%	31.7 -12%	30.2 -6%	30.9 -9%
Load Average *	33.2	40 -20%	30.9 7%	38.4 -16%	32.9 1%	38.7 -17%
Load Maximum *	35.2	40 -14%	33.5 5%	34.7 1%	39.3 -12%	38.9 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


36.8 °C	39.8 °C	28.6 °C
33.8 °C	36.2 °C	25.8 °C
25 °C	25.2 °C	24.4 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 30.6 °C


32.6 °C	38.8 °C	36.2 °C
29.4 °C	33.8 °C	33 °C
28.2 °C	29.8 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 32.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+3.1 °C / 5.5 F).

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.21 / 0.55 Watt
Idle	3.8 / 11 / 11.3 Watt
Load	35.6 / 37.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9"	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Power Consumption		16%	34%	16%	7%	23%
Idle Minimum *	3.8	3.6 5%	4.1 -8%	4.3 -13%	3.7 3%	3.3 13%
Idle Average *	11	6.4 42%	4.2 62%	6.3 43%	5.2 53%	6.2 44%
Idle Maximum *	11.3	9.2 19%	5.1 55%	9 20%	7.6 33%	10.4 8%
Load Average *	35.6	34 4%	22.1 38%	32.7 8%	41.6 -17%	28 21%
Load Maximum *	37.2	34.4 8%	29.4 21%	28.8 23%	50.5 -36%	25.7 31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 35min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 39min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 00min

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh	HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Battery Runtime		24%	130%	125%	87%	46%
Reader / Idle	695	718 3%	1295 86%	1069 54%		844 21%
WiFi v1.3	279	394 41%	677 143%	644 131%	681 144%	397 42%
Load	60	77 28%	157 162%	174 190%	78 30%	105 75%

Pros

+ 在负载下，相对较低的表面温度

+ 该尺寸下，屏幕最亮的超极本

+ 可拆卸；可升级固态硬盘

+ 键盘清脆和触控板有反馈

+ 该尺寸下，最轻的超极本

+ 全尺寸USB和HDMI端口

+ 可以通过USB Type-C充电

+ 指纹识别器

+ 安静的风扇

Cons

- 无QHD，4K UHD，触摸屏，NVMe或SIM卡选项

- 电池容量小; 低于平均的电池续航时间

- 在负载下，中央处理器和图形处理器降频

- 几乎在所有的亮度级别下，都存在屏幕闪烁

- 负载时，核心温度高

- 底座和盖子可以更硬

- 没有全尺寸SD读卡器和雷电3

- 扬声器弱

- 缺乏设计的外壳

- 没有哑光面板的选项

In review: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US

13英寸的Notebook 9为了一个目标而生——成为该尺寸下最小和最亮的超极本。在这方面，三星已经获得了成功，因为NP900X3N比第二名的机子明亮，重量轻很多。结合上安静的风扇，全尺寸的USB端口和优秀的键盘，可以说该机是最好的供旅行或者户外使用的13英寸超极本。

三星创造最轻的超极本的激烈方法，导致了一些性能牺牲。为了尽可能降低重量，该机缺少触摸屏和大猩猩玻璃选项，其冷却解决方案不佳和电池容量都相当小。特别是后者，导致笔记本电脑的平均电池续航时间低于其他户外使用的机型。底面强度虽然不错，但与XPS 13或MacBook Pro 13不在一个层次。

我们希望将来的升级版会添加雷电3，兼容SIM卡并有哑光面板选项，使得Notebook 9成为更好的旅行伴侣。在此之前，那些喜欢比XPS 13更轻更亮，而不牺牲全尺寸USB或HDMI端口（如Zenbook 3，Matebook X，Yoga 910或Spectre 13）机器的人，应该不会对三星感到失望。