Notebookcheck2012年12月 - 智能手机和平板电脑版

Contenders:

Medion Lifetab S9714 84 %

Google Nexus 10 90 %

Asus Vivo Tab RT TF600 89 %

Archos 101 XS 82 %

Unitech TB100 85 %

Samsung ATIV Tab GT-P8510 87 %

In early December, a tablet reached us that was to arouse great interest with Medion's LifeTab S9714. The experience with prior models led to this conclusion. Aldi again wanted to lure buyers with a thorough configuration for a fair price. And the tablet really does not lack anything in terms of equipment. Moreover, Medion includes extensive accessories. Overall, a complete package with decent performance. We partly criticized the careless workmanship and the sometimes unreliable touchscreen. The final rating was good, but not outstanding.

In return, Google's Nexus 10 reaped in this verdict in a few sub-disciplines and achieved a rating of 90 percent. Consequently, it is currently third place in out Top 10 Tablets. The 10 inch tablet could particularly excel with its brilliant HD screen and the latest Android version 4.2, which Google reserves for company-own devices to-date. This was complemented with a meticulous workmanship, long battery runtimes and – even if not part of the rating – a very fair price. We deemed the omitted micro SD slot for memory expansion and the lack of an optionally available 3G module adverse.

We also had high expectations on Asus' Vivo Tab RT TF600, the first Asus tablet powered by Windows RT. The Android brother, Asus Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T, is currently second place in our Top 10 Tablets. However, the well-built 10 inch tablet just scratches the 90 percent rating necessary for this. Consequently, it "only" achieved fifth place. Neither the screen nor its handling gave reason for complaint. Its performance was also more than sufficient for everyday use. We were not happy that the USB port could only be used with an adapter cord. The author would also have appreciated a digitizer pen. Nevertheless, an altogether very good tablet.

The Archos 101 XS did not score quite as well. Despite the clever solution with the docking keyboard that is a protective cover at the same time, the 10 inch device "only" achieved a final rating of 82%. Regrettably, there were two quite major points of criticism. The casing could be warped easily and partly resulted in unwanted inputs. Also the flickering screen was too dark. Consequently, the tablet could not reach a better rating although it is very slim and the keyboard cover was well-implemented.

The so far only ruggedized tablet found its way to our test lab in form of Unitech TB100. And this device is really special. This was also why we had a hard time with the rating. The innards of the very robust and equally well-built tablet were based on Nvidia's outdated Tegra 2. Google's Android Honeycomb was also almost two years old. But, that was the point of this tablet: reliable technology that works for a long time without modification. In return, the components were carefully selected. In any case, the tablet survived innumerable drops, a shower and the freezer without taking damage and should thus be perfectly suitable for rough treatment, even remote from civilization. Its performance was only mediocre, the weight and dimensions for a 7 inch device rather high and big.

On time for New Year's Eve, Samsung's ATIV Tab GT-P8510 got the opportunity to ignite a real firework. However, the first Windows RT tablet from the Korean manufacturer did not fully exploit this chance. Its feel and build were high standard and we did not have any criticism on screen, battery life or everyday performance. The enthusiasm was slightly marred by the fact that only 14 GB net of the 32 GB gross memory were left after startup and that a 3G module was not available even for a surcharge, just like the detail that the tablet could only be recharged via a power supply unit. A higher screen resolution should also be possible for a price of EUR 750.

Tablet of December 2012: Google Nexus 10

Consequently, the December winner is Google's Nexus 10. The 10 inch Android tablet did not exhibit any major weaknesses and achieved the highest rating. Moreover, the fair price makes it even more attractive.

竞争者：

麦迪S9714 LifeTab 84％

谷歌Nexus 10〜90％

华硕RT体内标签TF600 89％

爱可视101％XS 82

联科TB100 85％

三星GT-P8510 Ativ的标签87％

在12月初，平板电脑达到了我们与麦迪的LifeTab S9714是要引起极大的兴趣。与以前的型号的经验导致了这样的结论。阿尔迪再次希望有透彻的配置更具竞争力的价格吸引买家。平板电脑真的不缺少什么设备。此外，的Medion公司包括广泛的配件。总体而言，一个完整的软件包不俗的表现。部分批评了粗心的做工和有时是不可靠的触摸屏。最终的评价还是不错的，但不突出。

谷歌的Nexus 10％的回报，在这几个子学科的判决，并取得了收获的评级第90因此，它是目前排在第三位出前片10日10英寸平板擅长特别是其辉煌的高清屏幕和最​​新的Andr​​oid版本4.2，迄今为止，谷歌公司自己的设备储备。这是辅以细致的做工，超长的电池运行时间 - 即使没有对评级的一部分 - 一个非常公平的价格。我们认为，省略的micro SD插槽，内存扩展和缺乏一个可选的3G模块不利。

我们也有很高的期望的华硕RT的TF600体内Tab的，第一片由Windows华硕RT供电。华硕Transformer垫TF700T无限，Android的兄弟，是目前在我们的十大平板电脑的第二位。然而，精心打造的10英寸平板电脑仅仅90％的评级为这个必要。因此，“只”取得了第五名。无论是画面，还是其处理了投诉的原因。因此，它的性能超过足够日常使用。我们不快乐的USB端口只能使用一个适配器电源线。因此，笔者将不胜感激一个数字笔。然而，完全很不错的平板电脑。

爱可视101 XS的得分并没有那么好。尽管聪明的解决方案，这是一个保护盖在Sametime对接键盘，10英寸的设备“只”取得了最后的82％。遗憾的是，有两个很主要的批评点。外壳可以很容易地扭曲和部分造成不必要的输入。因此，闪烁的屏幕太暗。因此，平板电脑无法达到更好的评价，虽然它很轻薄，键盘盖实现。

坚固耐用的平板电脑至今只找到了自己的方式向我们的测试实验室中联科TB100。这个装置是很特别的。所以这就是为什么我们的日子不好过与评级。非常强大的，同样精心打造的平板电脑的内部结构是基于Nvidia的Tegra过时的第二谷歌的Andr​​oid蜂窝，这是近两年来岁。但是，这是这款平板电脑的可靠的技术，很长一段时间没有修改。作为回报，组件都经过精心挑选。在任何情况下，平板电脑不受到伤害的情况下存活了无数的下降，淋浴和冷冻，的马尔萨斯应该是非常适合的粗暴对待，甚至远离文明。它的表现只是平平，重量和尺寸为7英寸的设备相当高，大。

在除夕的时间，三星GT-P8510 Ativ的标签得到了机会，一个真正的烟花点燃。然而，从韩国制造商的第一个Windows平板RT并没有充分利用这个机会。它的手感和建设高标准，我们在屏幕上，每天的电池寿命或性能没有任何批评。只能通过电源充电，平板的热情轻微毁损的事实，只有14 GB扣除32 GB大容量内存，启动后留下了一个3G模块，甚至附加费的细节，就像供电单元。更高的屏幕分辨率，因此，有可能以优惠的价格为750欧元

2012年12月：谷歌Nexus平板10

因此，赢家是谷歌的Nexus 12月10日10英寸的Andr​​oid平板电脑并没有表现出任何重大的弱点，并获得最高评分。此外，有竞争力的价格使得它更具吸引力。