Notebookcheck2012年12月 - 笔记本电脑

结局.智能敞篷车，令人惊讶的ultrabooks，经典，超薄的游戏笔记本电脑和一个残缺的电源的Radeon。我们已经完成了2012年有31个各种评论。

Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Sabine Kückemanns, Published 01/16/2013 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Ivy Bridge Gaming Ultrabook Business

Editor's Note (January 13, 2013): The following review has not yet been edited for grammatical errors. A final draft of the review will be released soon.

For the original German review, see here.

The reviewers were not inactive around Christmas. We reviewed 31 notebooks and numerous tablets and smartphones, which we elect separately: Best of December 2012 – Smartphones and Tablets. Looking back, which devices did we like most in December? We compare laptops of five categories and elect a winner in each.

Alike in November Windows convertibles are gaining ground. But, only Lenovo's IdeaPad Yoga 11 uses Windows RT. This is not surprising as it comes with a Tegra 3 SoC. Samsung's ATIV Smart PC and Acer's W510 are tablets which can turn into a clamshell notebook via Keyboard-Dock.

We again had a lot of subnotebooks under review in December. Lenovo's ThinkPad T430u is a special contender, because it comes with a GeForce GT 620M despite a low price (T series). With the Fujitsu Lifebook P702, the old laptop style returns for a moment: conventional input devices, a lot of interfaces, and a matte display. Unfortunately the wobbly case cannot keep up with today's stiff plastics chassis.

As Office notebooks are demanded just before Christmas, we reviewed as much as nine. HP' ProBook 6570b, 6470b, and 4540s show professional ambitions, while the IdeaPad S405 and U510 turn out inferior. Especially the S405 can not meet the needs of its target group.

General-purpose laptops with big diagonals and decent to very good gaming performance have always been popular. We do not talk about gaming notebooks, as the graphics cards are mid-range. In December none of the devices proved to be especially good. Acer, HP, and Samsung achieved a rating of 83 % each. Many of our test samples are about on par, but not all of them, as the beaten devices from Asus and MSI prove.

Finally, two dissimilar gaming bolides competed, Asus' G75VX and MSI's GX60. Because of the AMD quad core, the most powerful Radeon, the HD 7970M performs vastly inferior. What did the "gaming specialists" think when they chose this configuration?

The only workstation of this month did not have any competitors: The Bullman E-Klasse 4 i7 17FHD (84 %) is a mobile 17-inch CAD workstation equipped with powerful Nvidia Quadro K3000M graphics card and Core i7 3940XM, the fastest mobile processor in Q3 2012.

编者注（1月13日，2013年）：下面的审查尚未被编辑语法错误。最后草案的审查将很快被释放。

对于的德国原装审查，在这里看到。

在圣诞节前后的评论是不活动。我们回顾了31个笔记本电脑和大量的平板电脑和智能手机，这是我们选择分开：2012年12月最佳 - 智能手机和平板电脑。回过头来看，哪些设备，我们最喜欢在十二月？我们比较笔记本电脑五大类，并在每一个选举的赢家。

11月Windows的可转换债券都在抬头。但是，只有联想的IdeaPad瑜伽11使用Windows RT。这并不奇怪，因为它配备了一个的Tegra 3芯片。三星Ativ的智能电脑和宏碁的W510片，可以通过键盘基座变成一个翻盖式笔记本电脑。

我们再次有很多次笔记型电脑，经过审查，12月。联想的ThinkPad T430u是一个特殊的竞争者，因为它配备了GeForce GT 620M，尽管价格低（T系列）。随着富士通Lifebook P702，旧的笔记型电脑返回了一会儿：传统的输入设备，很多接口，以及一个雾面显示屏。不幸的是，摇摇晃晃的情况下，无法跟上今天的僵硬的塑料底盘。

随着Office笔记本电脑的要求就在圣诞节前，我们回顾了高达9。惠普惠普ProBook 6570b，6470b，4540s显示专业的野心，同时的IdeaPad S405和U510圈出劣势。特别是S405不能满足其目标群体的需求。

通用的笔记本电脑大对角线和体面的非常不错的游戏性能一直是受欢迎的。我们不谈论的游戏笔记本电脑，图形卡是中档。在12月的设备没有被证明是特别好。宏碁，惠普和三星的83％，实现了评级。我们的测试样本看齐，但不是所有的人，从华硕和微星的殴打设备证明。

最后，两个不同的的游戏火流星竞争，华硕的的G75VX和MSI的GX60。由于AMD四核心，最强大的Radeon HD 7970M执行远比不上。什么“游戏专家”认为，当他们选择了这个配置？

这个月的唯一工作站没有任何竞争对手：Bullman E-KLASSE 4是一个17英寸的移动CAD工作站配备了强大的Nvidia Quadro K3000M显卡和Core i7 3940XM，最快的移动处理器酷睿i7 17FHD（84％） Q3 2012年。

Convertibles

Contenders:

After the 13-inch Yoga 13 (November) we reviewed the 11.6-incher. In being equipped with Tegra 3 and a 64 GB SSD it could be a typical tablet, but why does it cost nearly 800 Euro? Because it comes with Windows RT and features a clever folding mechanism. Its hinges allow the display to be turned by 360 degrees and afterwards the keyboard (deactivated in this mode) is the underside. We like its build quality, materials, and runtime. But, the keyboard with poor feedback somewhat dampens our enthusiasm. And the connectivity is minimalistic for a Convertible. On the other side, a tablet with three fully-fledged USB-ports is a nice thing, but, as a tablet, the Yoga 11 is inherently bulkier and heavier then its super-slim Android competition. The later often feature higher resolutions. 1366 x 768 pixel do no longer appear to be opportune for a premium device. But, we cannot complain about colors and brightness. By the way, Lenovo just introduced the Intel model called Yoga 11s at the CES 2013 in Las Vegas.

Samsung's ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C combines an Intel Atom Z2760 (designed for tablets) with a fully-fledged Windows 8. Performance freaks won't appreciate this, while standard users will dislike the small 64 GB SSD, because only 32 GB are free on delivery. The keyboard dock does not belong to the best of its kind, but the mouse replacement and the keys are better than the Yoga's. The operating concept is appropriate, but docking and undocking could get annoying after a while.

Acer's Iconia Tablet W510 uses the same technology as the ATIV Smart PC, but is a little bit smaller (10-inch). HD resolution, IPS panel, Atom processor and 64 GB SSD are in a well built case. Unfortunately, the keyboard (tightly packed layout) and the touchpad (hangs, no multi-touch) perform poorly. The 13:35 h battery life could not be better and the brightness of nearly 300 cd/m² is also available on battery. The price of about 600 Euro is lower than the ATIV Smart PC's, which features a built-in 4G-modem.

Lenovo's ThinkPad Twist ultrabook is a conventional convertible. Size and weight are typical for a 12.5-inch ultrabook. The Twist does not try to be a light and slim Windows tablet. First of all it is a subnotebook with decent performance with optionally a classic tablet mode. The advantage of the Twist is its decent performance for Windows 8, the many interfaces typical for notebooks and the good keyboard (but, a poor touchpad). It is rather designed for business use, but the short battery life of 3:16 hours (WiFi test) is disappointing.

Convertible notebook of December 2012: Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11

While the operating concept of the SmartPC, which achieved the same rating as the Yoga 11, is appropriate, we did not like its weak netbook hardware. If being handy and mobile is a criterion, we would chose Windows RT and the Yoga 11. The folding wonder will find its fans as its possible fields of application in job, study, or private life are enormous. Furthermore, using docking keys is only limited joy (Smart PC, Iconia W510). In our opinion, single unit devices are smarter solutions.

竞争者：

联想IdeaPad瑜伽11 85％

三星Ativ的智能电脑XE500T1C 85％

宏碁Iconia W510 82％

联想ThinkPad扭S230u 80％

13英寸的瑜伽13（月）后，我们回顾了11.6英寸。在所配备的Tegra 3和64 GB SSD，它可以是一个典型的平板电脑，但为什么它花费近800欧元？因为它与Windows RT，并设有一个巧妙的折叠机制。它的铰链让显示器可以旋转360度后的键盘（在此模式下禁用）是底部。我们喜欢它的建设质量，材料，和运行时。但是，键盘与可怜的反馈有所削弱我们的热情。和连接可换股简约。在另一边，三个完全成熟的USB端口，一个平板电脑是一个很好的事情，但是，作为片剂，瑜伽本质上是体积较大和较重的超薄Android的竞争。后来往往具有更高的分辨率。 1366×768像素不再出现，是适当溢价设备。但是，我们不能抱怨的颜色和亮度。顺便说一下，联想刚刚推出了英特尔的模型，称为瑜伽11S在2013年，在拉斯维加斯的CES。

三星Ativ的的智能电脑XE500T1C结合的英特尔Atom Z2760（专为平板电脑设计），一个完全成熟的Windows 8。性能怪胎不会明白这一点，而标准使用者不喜欢小64 GB SSD，因为只有32 GB的免费交付。键盘底座不属于同类最佳的，但鼠标替代键比瑜伽的。的经营理念是合适的，但一段时间后可以得到恼人的对接和脱开。

宏碁的Iconia平板W510 Ativ的智能电脑使用相同的技术，但稍微小了一点（10英寸）。高清分辨率，IPS面板，Atom处理器和64 GB SSD是一个身材魁梧的情况下。不幸的是，键盘紧凑的布局和触摸板（挂起，没有多点触摸）表现不佳。 13时35 h的电池寿命好得不能再好，近300 cd /m²的亮度也可使用电池。约600欧元的价格低于Ativ的智能电脑，其特点是内置4G调制解调器。

联想的ThinkPad扭Ultrabook是一个传统的敞篷车。尺寸和重量是典型的12.5英寸Ultrabook。扭不尝试是一盏灯，超薄的Windows平板电脑。首先，它是一个亚笔记本不俗的表现，任选一个典型的平板电脑模式。 “扭曲的优势是其不俗的表现，为Windows 8中，许多典型的笔记本电脑和良好的键盘接口（但是，一个贫穷的触摸板）。它是设计用于商业用途，但电池寿命短的3:16小时（WiFi测试）是令人失望的。

2012年12月的可换股笔记本：联想IdeaPad瑜伽11

的经营理念，取得了同样的评价瑜伽11 SmartPC，是适当的，我们并没有像其薄弱的上网本硬件。如果方便，移动的标准，我们选择了Windows RT和瑜伽11。折叠难怪会发现它的拥趸，因为它可能在工作的应用领域，学习，生活还是私人生活是巨大的。此外，使用对接按键是有限的喜悦（智能电脑的Iconia W510）。在我们看来，单件设备更聪明的解决方案。

What we like

The concept of the 360 degree hinges and the good performance of the Nvidia SoC with Windows RT, along with the pleasant haptics of the case and the very good battery life.

What we'd like to see

The integrated UMTS module, a proper camera for taking pictures, and a backlit keyboard.

What surprises us

The combination of a subnotebook with a tablet with considerable success, although Lenovo unfortunately hasn't been entirely triumphant.

The competition

Tablets with Windows RT: Microsoft Surface RT, Asus Vivo Tab RT TF600, the Samsung ATIV Tab or the Samsung ATIV Smart PC. Tablets with other operating systems include the Google Nexus 10 or the Apple iPad 4. Furthermore subnotebooks and Ultrabooks include: Asus VivoBook S200E, Asus Zenbook Prime UX21A, Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass, Apple MacBook Air 11 Mid 2012 or needless to say the bigger Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13 with Windows 8.

我们喜欢

的概念，采用了Nvidia的SoC与Windows RT360度铰链和良好的性能，随着的情况下愉快的触觉和良好的电池寿命。

我们希望看到什么

集成的UMTS模块，一个适当的相机拍照，和背光键盘。

但令人惊讶的

相结合的亚笔记本与平板电脑相当大的成功，虽然联想遗憾的是一直没有完全胜利的。

本次大赛

平板电脑与Windows RT：微软Surface体内选项卡RT RT，华硕TF600，三星Ativ的Tab或三星Ativ的智能电脑。与其他操作系统的平板电脑，包括谷歌的Nexus10或苹果iPad4。此外亚笔记本电脑和的Ultrabooks包括：宏碁Aspire V5-17153314G50ass的，华硕ZENBOOK总理UX21A，华硕VivoBook S200E，苹果MacBook Air2012年11月中旬或不用说，更大的联想IdeaPad瑜伽13与Windows 8。

Subnotebooks

Contenders:

Lenovo's T series ThinkPads are known for their high standards and best everyday usability. The ThinkPad T430u is thinner than other ThinkPads (21 mm), but not more expensive (950 Euro). Performance freaks will appreciate its GeForce GT 620M and 128 GB SSD, even if the SSD cannot keep up with premium requirements. Battery Life (3:25 hours) and display (low contrast and brightness) are weak points.

Samsung's 13.3 inch 540U3C performs better with 5:40 hours battery life (WiFi test) and touch screen for a similar price (about 980 Euro). The build quality is decent and the input devices can keep up with the T430u's according to our rating. Unfortunately the display is equally poor and the SanDisk U100 SSD performs poorly when reading small blocks.

Long battery life, excellent build quality, high performance and a display with an at least acceptable contrast: Because of its just acceptable keyboard, weak TN display (glossy, narrow viewing angles) and few interfaces Dell's XPS 13 does not achieve a very good in our rating. Devices for more than 1,000 Euro entry-price should come with an excellent display.

Fujitsu's Lifebook P702 (just 1.000 Euro) demonstrates that old design is not necessarily better than new. We liked the 12-incher's connectivity, maintainability, ergonomics, and excellent keyboard (conventional, tapered keys). Undemanding users can live with its poor viewing angles. The wobbly base unit lowers the quality experience.

As an ultrabook Toshiba's Portégé Z930-105 is a small sham. Chassis and display are completely the same as the significantly cheaper Satellite Z930's with same i5 CPU and same 128 GB SSD (900 Euro). The manufacturer demands a surcharge of 380 Euro for the HDSPA modem incorporated in the Portégé. Nearly 1,300 Euro are too much for only acceptable input devices (poor feedback) and a display with weak contrast and narrow viewing angles. But, 900 Euro for the Satellite, an extremely light, delicate ultrabook suitable for everyday use, are adequate.

If HP's Envy TouchSmart 4-1102sg can deliver the desired high-quality display? Unfortunately, not! Although the 14-incher comes with a capacitive touchscreen, viewing angles and brightness are below average and too bad for outdoor use (glossy). Too bad, the aluminum case, the high system performance and the decent battery life (5:45 hours, WiFi test) would have made an excellent ultrabook.

An outsider and put back into the box with a rating of 74%? The same criteria as for Lenovo, Toshiba and HP also apply to the 14-incher of the German manufacturer Tarox. Unfortunately, the Modula Ultrabook disgruntles the reviewer everywhere: poor build quality, poor keyboard, rickety mouse replacement, poor-contrast, too dark, glossy display, high temperatures and system noise argue against a recommendation.

Subnotebook of December 2012: Samsung 540U3C-A01DE

Many ultrabooks come with inferior input devices, at least for prolific writers. Lenovo and Samsung demonstrate that typing can be comfortable on a slim elegant subnotebook. The T430u's battery life is simply too short for the ultrabook category. Both competitors should improve their displays. Convertibles have shown that contrast-rich IPS touch screens are possible. Why does especially Samsung use a poor screen in its touch ultrabook?

竞争者：

联想ThinkPad T430u 85％

三星540U3C A01DE 85％

戴尔XPS 13 84％

富士通Lifebook P702 84％

东芝PortégéZ930-105 83％

惠普Envy TOUCHSMART 4 1102sg 82％

Tarox和Modula Ultrabook的74％

联想的T系列ThinkPad笔记本电脑是众所周知的高标准，最好的日常实用性。而ThinkPad T430u厚度比其他ThinkPad笔记本电脑（21毫米），但是不是越贵（950欧元）。性能怪胎欣赏的GeForce GT 620M和128 GB SSD，即使SSD无法跟上溢价的要求。电池寿命（3:25小时）和显示器（低对比度和亮度）是弱了点。

三星的13.3英寸540U3C执行5分40小时的电池寿命“（WiFi测试）和触摸屏类似的价格（约980欧元）。建设质量是体面和输入设备能跟上的T430u根据我们的评级。不幸的是，显示的是同样贫穷和SanDisk的U100 SSD表现不佳时，读取小块。

长电池生活，出色的构建品质，高性能和一个至少可以接受的对比度的显示：由于其只是可以接受的键盘，弱TN显示有光泽，窄可视角度和几个接口戴尔XPS 13并没有达到一个非常良好的我们的评级。入门价格超过1000欧元的设备都应该有出色的显示效果。

富士通的LifeBook P702（1.000欧元）表明，旧的设计是不是一定比新。我们喜欢12英寸的连通性，可维护性，人体工程学设计，出色的键盘（传统的锥形键）。要求不高的用户可以忍受贫困的视角。颤抖的基本单元，降低质量的经验。

作为一个ultrabook的东芝的Portege Z930-105是一个小假。机箱和显示器是完全一样的显着更便宜的卫星Z930相同的酷睿i5的CPU和128 GB SSD（900欧元）。制造商要求380欧元的附加费，HDSPA调制解调器注册成立的Portege。近1300欧元太多，唯一可以接受的输入设备（可怜的反馈），显示弱的对比度和视角窄。但是，900欧元的卫星，极轻的，精致的Ultrabook适合日常使用，是足够的。

如果HP的Envy TouchSmart中，1102sg能提供所需的高品质的显示？不幸的是，没有！虽然14英寸的电容式触摸屏，可视角度和亮度都低于平均水平，太糟糕了户外使用（光面）。太糟糕了，会作出一个很好的ultrabook的铝合金外壳，高系统性能和体面的电池寿命（5时45小时，WiFi测试）。

一个局外人，然后放回包装盒的评级为74％？联想，东芝和惠普同样的标准也适用于14英寸的德国制造商Tarox。不幸的是，和Modula的Ultrabook disgruntles的评论随处可见：建设质量差，差的键盘，鼠标替代摇摇晃晃的，差的对比，太黑了，镜面显示屏，高温和系统噪声反对的建议。

亚笔记本电脑在2012年12月：三星540U3C-A01DE

许多的ultrabooks来与劣质输入设备，至少多产的作家。联想和三星的打字舒适优雅苗条的亚笔记本。 T430u的电池寿命太短的Ultrabook类别。这两个的竞争对手应该提高他们的显示器。可换股票据显示，对比丰富的IPS触摸屏是可能的。特别是三星为什么不使用在其触摸屏的ultrabook差吗？

What we like

The brushed aluminum surfaces and the attractive inner values like the bright touchscreen.

What we'd like to see

For a street price of a whole 1000 Euros (~$1320), more than one of the three USB ports should be of the USB 3.0 variety. The display could have better contrast and black values. Also, since we are dealing with a high-mobility device, a Kensington Lock would be desirable.

What surprises us

The good heating management considering the space requirements is surprising. It is unfortunately also surprising that the useful VGA adapter was cut.

The competition

The Samsung 540U3C has its own predecessor, the Samsung 530U3C, to compete with. But since the current price of the latter lies only about 70 Euros (~$91) beneath the new version, the pros of this review device prevail, for example the SSD and the touchscreen. Further competition in the 1000 Euros (~$1320) segment is coming in droves: Acer Aspire S5, Apple MacBook Air 13 Mid 2012, Asus Zenbook Prime UX31A, Fujitsu Lifebook U772 or the Sony Vaio SV-T1312V1ES.

我们喜欢

拉丝铝的表面和有吸引力的内在价值，如明亮的触摸屏。

我们希望看到什么

对于零售价为整个1000欧元（〜$1320），超过了三个USB端口是USB 3.0的品种。显示可能有更好的对比度和黑色值。此外，由于我们正在处理一个高流动性的设备，1个Kensington锁是可取的。

但令人惊讶的

考虑到空间的要求良好的供暖管理是惊人的。不幸的是，同样令人惊讶的是有用的VGA适配器被切断。

本次大赛

三星540U3C有其自己的前任，三星530U3C，与之相抗衡。但由于后者在于目前的价格只有大约70欧元（约$91）下的新版本，这篇评论装置的优点为准，例如SSD和触摸屏。在1000欧元（〜$1320）段，成群结队地：富士通LifeBook U772华硕ZENBOOK总理UX31A，宏碁Aspire S5，苹果MacBook Air 132012年年中，索尼的Vaio SV-T1312V1ES的进一步竞争。

Office

Contenders:

The 14-inch Lifebook S752 from Fujitsu looks a little bit bulky. However, neither beauty nor ultimate performance are important in this category. Instead, the Lifebook scores points with excellent ergonomics (waste heat, system noise), decent build quality, long battery life (6:27 Stunden) and a keyboard with strong feedback. Its plastics look and Core i3 are unremarkable. The hard drive is slow and only 2 GB RAM are unbalanced. This is too miserly for 700 Euro.

HP's ProBook 6570b achieved the same rating. Input devices and build quality are slightly better, but the matte display is striking in the office category: contrast of 1000:1 and brightness of 271 cd/m². As it is a TN panel the 1600 x 900 pixels screen has narrow viewing angles. The ergonomics is not that perfect as the Lifebook's, but it can score points in connectivity with a docking port and even a rare RS-232 (serial). Its biggest weakness is the short battery life of only 2:23 hours.

We continue with the ProBook 4540s, which is also a 15.6-incher. The 4xxx models are designed for ProBook novices, which have to live with lower resolution (HD), contrast (370:1) and without docking port. Our test sample with Core i3 and 7200 rpm hard drive costs 525 Euro and delivers a decent office performance. Furthermore, HP did not save in the important aspects, keyboard, touchpad, stability of the case and heat management, which are of best ProBook quality.

ProBooks keep coming. Finally, the 14-inch sister model of the 6570b mentioned above faced up to our critical review. The 6470b does not feature a dedicated graphics card and the display only has HD (1366 x 768) resolution. Unfortunately, the user can not appreciate the vibrant colors and the decent brightness of the 6570b. Strange enough: Now the battery life of 4:23 hours is balanced. Important aspects like input devices, build quality, temperature, and connectivity are largely on par with its 15.6 inch sister.

In regards of display the Asus P45VJ (14-inch) does not perform well (brightness: 196 c/m²). But, it costs significantly less then the 14-inch Probook despite coming with a relatively powerful GeForce GT 635M. High-end business features like docking port, ExpressCard or eSATA/serial are missing. The stable plastics chassis appears rather consumer-oriented. The same is true for the input devices, which do not feature the ProBook's strong feedback. The battery life (4:43 hours) is alright. To summarize, the Asus P45VJ is a compromise for consumers who like to play computer games and are looking for a laptop for work and entertainment.

If you do not want to spend 800 Euro for a mobile computer, you'll maybe come across Acer's TravelMate P243-M for 550 Euro. The 14-inch laptop features a stable carbon/Mg-AI case, a decent keyboard (touchpad is not that good) and a battery life above four hours. The low brightness of the TFT on battery (130 cd/m²) is disappointing. The TravelMate is only an alternative if interfaces typical for the consumer range (no docking port) are sufficient.

Lenovo's IdeaPad S405 also wants to be cheap. It features an AMD Radeon HD 7600G and an AMD A-Series A8-4555M for 550 Euro. The performance of the 14-inchers is very low and so is its energy consumption. This could have resulted in excellent battery runtimes, but due to its small 32 Wh battery only just three hours are possible. The plastic chassis twists, the keys spring, and the brightness of the display is low. Not even the price is a buying criterion as comparable and partly better Core i3 alternatives cost the same.

The IdeaPad U510 from the same manufacturer is a 15.6-incher cheekily categorized as ultrabook. It's up to the user's discretion whether weight (2.2 kg) and height (24 mm with feet) still conform to this claim. In mobility it achieves 5 hours with Core i5 and HD 4000. Because of the relatively dark, reflective display, the U510 is rather an elegant indoor device. The aluminum look reminds on the MacBook Pro series, but the flexibility of the base unit unmasks the imitator.

The Maxdata M-Book 4000 U G1 Select is a cheap ultrabook. The build quality is not disappointing and the matte, high-quality surfaces hardly show any weaknesses, but do also not achieve a top rank as an alu unibody would. We appreciate the long battery life of above six hours, but the matte, dark HD display cannot be used in the sun. For an interesting price Maxdata incorporates a genuine 128 GB SDD (no hybrid), which is unfortunately very slow. Unfortunately, it can not keep up with high-end devices in ergonomics and display. Under load the M-Book 4000 U gets louder and warmer than other 14-inch ultrabooks.

Office notebook of December 2012: HP ProBook 6570b

Despite its short battery life we elect the ProBook 6570b and not the Lifebook S752, because we want to honor the decent HD+ panel after countless pale office displays. Too often this important user interface is just an ordinary TFT.

竞争者：

富士通Lifebook S752 85％

惠普ProBook 6570b（B6P88EA）85％

惠普ProBook 4540s C4Z27EA 84％

惠普ProBook 6470b（B5W83AW）84％

华硕P45VJ VO002X 83％

宏基TravelMate P243-M 81％

联想IdeaPad S405 80％

联想IdeaPad U510 MBM62GE 80％

MAXDATA M-BOOK 4000 U G1选择78％

富士通14英寸的LifeBook S752看起来有点笨重。然而，这一类既不美也没有最终的表现是非常重要的。相反，富士通LifeBook具有优良的人体工程学的得分点（余热，系统噪声），体面的建设质量，电池寿命长（6:27 Stunden）具有较强的反馈和键盘。塑料的外观和酷睿i3是平淡无奇的。硬盘驱动器速度很慢，只有2 GB的RAM是不平衡的。这是太寒碜为700欧元。

HP惠普ProBook 6570b取得了同样的评价。输入设备和建造质量稍微好一点，但在办公室类别：对比度1000:1，亮度为271 cd /m²的雾面显示屏是惊人的。由于这是一个TN面板，1600×900像素的屏幕视角窄。人体工程学富士通LifeBook不是那么完美，但它可以得分，一个对接端口的连接，甚至难得一见的RS-232（串行）。其最大的缺点是电池寿命短，只有2:23小时。

我们继续，这也是一个15.6英寸的ProBook 4540s。的的4XXX模型设计为的惠普ProBook新手，有较低的解析度（HD），对比度（370:1），不停靠港口。我们的测试样机采用酷睿i3和7200转的硬盘驱动器成本525欧元，提供了一个不错的办公性能。此外，HP没有保存的重要方面，键盘，触摸板，稳定的情况下，热管理，这是最好的ProBook质量。

ProBooks滚滚而来。最后，14英寸的姊妹车型上面提到的6570b面对我们的严格审查。 6470b并没有配备独立显卡和显示HD（1366×768）分辨率的。不幸的是，用户不能欣赏鲜艳的色彩和亮度的6570b体面的。奇怪的是：现在4:23小时的电池寿命是平衡的。如输入设备的重要方面，建立质量，温度和连接看齐，在很大程度上，其15.6英寸的姐姐。

方面显示的：华硕P45VJ（14英寸）不执行（亮度：196 C /平方米）。但是，它的成本显着小于14英寸的ProBook尽管未来一个相对强大的GeForce GT 635M。高端商务对接接口，ExpressCard或eSATA /串口的功能，如丢失。稳定的塑料底盘出现，而以消费者为导向。同样是真实的输入设备，不配备的ProBook的强烈反响。（4:43小时）电池的寿命是没有问题的。总结一下，华硕P45VJ是一种妥协，为消费者谁喜欢玩电脑游戏，并正在寻找一台笔记本电脑工作和娱乐。

如果你不想花800欧元，为移动计算机，你或许会遇到宏碁的TravelMate P243-M 550欧元。 14英寸的笔记本电脑提供稳定的碳/ Mg-AI的情况下，一个体面的键盘（触摸板并不好），上述四个小时的电池寿命。低亮度的TFT电池（130坎德拉/平方米）是令人失望的。的TravelMate的选择，如果仅仅是一个典型的消费范围（不对接端口）接口是足够的。

联想的IdeaPad S405还希望要便宜。它采用了AMD Radeon HD 7600G和AMD A系列A8-4555M为550欧元。在14英寸轮圈的性能是非常低的，所以是它的能量消耗。这可能导致优秀的电池运行时间，但由于其小32 Wh电池只有短短三个小时是可能的。塑料机箱曲折，键弹簧，和显示画面的亮度低。甚至没有价格作为比较的标准是买入和部分更好的酷睿i3替代品的成本相同。

从同一制造商生产的IdeaPad U510是一款15.6英寸的厚脸皮归类为Ultrabook的。它的重量（2.2公斤）和高度（24毫米英尺）的用户的自由裁量权是否仍然符合这个要求。在流动性达到5小时，Core i5和HD 4000。由于相对黑暗的，反射型显示，U510是相当优雅的室内的移动设备。提醒的MacBook Pro系列的铝合金外观，但基本单元的灵活性不能控制的模仿者。

对MAXDATA M-BOOK 4000 U G1选择，是一种廉价的ultrabook的。建设质量是不会让人失望的，磨砂，高品质的表面几乎没有表现出任何弱点，但还没有达到的最高等级的铝合金一体成型机身。我们对此表示赞赏上述六个小时的电池寿命长，但，亚光，不能使用黑暗HD显示在阳光下。对于一个有趣价MAXDATA采用真正128 GB SDD（没有混合动力），不幸的是，非常缓慢。不幸的是，它不能跟上高端设备在人体工程学和显示。负载下的M-图书4000 U变大，比其他14英寸的ultrabooks温暖。

办公室2012年12月：惠普ProBook 6570b笔记本

尽管它的电池寿命短，我们选择的ProBook 6570b和富士通LifeBook S752，因为我们要兑现体面的HD +面板经过无数次苍白的办公室显示器。往往这个重要的用户界面只是一个普通的TFT。

What we liked

The flawless manufacturing and high quality materials, as well as the successful design impresses throughout.

What we'd like to see

At a retail price of 1159 Euros (~$1530) we would have hoped for more than two USB 3.0 ports. And, HP could have improved the battery life by allowing the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 chip to be used.

What surprises us

Despite the powerful components, the ProBook 6570b has very good temperature management. Considering the abundant features, a retail price of around 1000 Euros is very fair.

The competition

The HP ProBook 6570b-B6P88EA competes against the older ProBook 6560b. Among the other manufacturers: Acer TravelMate P653, Dell Latitude E5530, Vostro 3560, Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E530 and the Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E535.

我们喜欢

完美无瑕的制造和高品质的材料，以及成功的设计令人印象深刻各地。

我们希望看到什么

的零售价为1159欧元（〜$1530），我们也希望为两个以上的USB3.0端口。，HP可能提高电池的使用寿命，允许使用集成Intel HD Graphics4000芯片。

但令人惊讶的

尽管功能强大的组件，惠普ProBook6570b具有很好的温度管理。考虑到丰富的功能，零售价大约1000欧元是很公平的。

本次大赛

惠普ProBook6570b-B6P88EA对旧的惠普ProBook6560b竞争。在其他制造商：宏碁TravelMate P653，戴尔Latitude E5530，Vostro成就3560，联想ThinkPad Edge E530和联想ThinkPad Edge E535。

Multimedia

Contenders:

Acer's Aspire TimelineUltra M5-581TG can be described as gaming-capable ultrabook with sufficient display size. The GeForce GT 640M (Kepler, newest chip generation) and Core i5 provide gaming power on-the-go. This is the first ultrabook that achieves a gaming rating of 86 %. It even outperforms the HP Envy m6-1101sg (Radeon HD 7670M) with standard voltage Core i5. Despite a its relatively low price of 800 Euro it achieves a high level in build quality (89 %) and battery life (5 hours WiFi test).

It's much more difficult for the HP Envy m6-1101sg with similar price to attract gamers. The 15-incher comes with HD 7670M and Core i5 3210M does not score that well in keyboard and build quality, but performs better in ergonomics, while the battery runtime is about on par. Both competitors have a reflective TN display with narrow viewing angles. The Envy m6-1101sg somewhat excels with a contrast of 571:1.

Fast gaming and good looking? That's what Samsung thought when they updated their series 7 (model 700Z5C) with a powerful GeForce GT 640M. Together with a Core i7 it is slightly faster than the Aspire M5-581TG low voltage system. A lot of games can be stored on the 1,000 GB hard drive, but poor contrast (144:1) and narrow viewing angles are outperformed by the HP Envy m6. This is a pity as the matte display feature a comfortable 1,600 x 900 pixel resolution. Customers expect a better color representation for 1,400 Euro. The series 9 models demonstrate how this can be accomplished with a matte IPS panel.

Do you demand an excellent display? If only the 700Z5C could change displays with the Envy dv7-7202eg. The 17-incher features a matte FullHD display, which is not only bright, but also achieves a contrast of 868:1. The TN panel performs above average in viewing angels and sRGB is nearly covered. In contrast, high system noise and relatively few interfaces devalue the dv7. Gamer will spurn the GeForce GT 630M, which is significantly slower than the 640M. Games do sometimes not even run smoothly in HD resolution. Here the GT 640M would have been much appreciated.

If you do not want to spend 1,200 Euro for the Envy dv7, you might be interested in the HP Pavilion g6-2200sg. The 15.6-incher comes with a contrast-rich HD display and a gaming capable AMD Radeon HD 7670M for significantly less than 500 Euro. The good news from our test: Its Pentium processor does hardly limit gaming performance. Most of today's games run smoothly in native resolution. But, users have to live with a complicated GPU switch and a moderate build quality.

Same CPU, but less fun due to an AMD processor? This is our verdict on the 460 Euro cheap Asus K53TK. The AMD A-Series A4-3305M slows down the Radeon HD 7670M in games. Games even run faster on HP's Pavilion g6-2200sg with cheap Pentium. The display features decent contrast (595:1) and the battery keeps up with the Pavilion g6-2200s'.

The K series from Asus is also available in 17-inch. We reviewed the powerful model with GeForce GT 635M and Intel quad core (nearly 800 Euro). The gaming performance is slower than with GT 640M, but suffices high details in HD resolution. But, the native 1600 x 900 pixels screen is not much fun. Pale colors, low brightness and narrow viewing angles indicate that it is an ordinary display. The second 2.5 inch hard drive slot is a special feature.

If you want to save money, do it right. The MSI CX61 is available for barely 600 Euro in virtual shops. The 15.6-incher houses a GeForce GT 635M and a Core i5 3210M. Its gaming performance is solid and similar to the Asus K75VJ-TY102H's. Not everyone will like the moderate build quality (input devices too) and the unstable chassis is not well manufactured. In addition, the short battery life, the poor display and the loud system noise under load downgrade the laptop.

Multimedia notebook of December 2012: Acer Aspire M5-581TG

One laptop must win. The same rating forces us to balance pros and cons. We elect Acer's Aspire M5-581TG as it combines decent build quality and high performance. Users will gladly live with high waste heat and loud system noise under load as this is the ultrabook currently running games fastest. None of the notebooks with a rating of 83 % features a really decent display. If you appreciate such a thing, consider the HP Envy dv7-7202eg.

What we like

High performance in a slim chassis and very good battery life under load.

What we'd like to see

A maintenance hatch allowing easy access to the hard drive, RAM, and the mSATA SSD.

What surprises us

The thermal differences between this model and the Timeline Ultra M3-581TG.

The competition

HP Envy 6-1000sg, Asus S56CM, Acer Aspire TimelineU M3-581TG, Asus S500CA

14-inch alternatives: Samsung 530U4C, Acer Aspire TimelineU M5-481TG

Not Ultrabooks, but also slim designs: Acer Aspire V5-571G (23 millimeter / 0.91 inches), Dell XPS 15z (25 millimeter / 0.98 inches)

Gaming

Contenders:

Asus G75VX 87%
MSI GX60 81%

The G75VX is the gaming bolide from Asus. The flagship now comes with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX. So, it is based on the newest Nvidia-Kepler architecture. Together with the i7 3630QM the 17.3-incher can run all games without problems - but not all of them in native full HD resolution. Despite lacking Optimus, the battery life of three hours is remarkable. However, the 4.2 kg bolide needs a 74 Wh battery to accomplish this. We still have to criticize the suboptimal interface layout, but we like the high-quality case and the bright matte display with appropriate contrast (454:1). However, we expected an IPS panel for 1,600 Euro.

Rashly, MSI combined the most powerful AMD GPU with the weak AMD A-Series A10-4600M. This is the only way to keep the low price of 1,200 Euro. In terms of performance this mobile quad core is on par with a Core i3. Accordingly, the results of the gaming tests are sober. The A10 often slows down the Radeon HD 7970M that much, that games can only run on mid-range level. That said, the gentle reader can also buy a GT-640M system like the Acer Aspire M5-581TG above with better build quality (incl. input devices), weight on ultrabook level and low brightness for less than 900 Euro. The matte full HD display of the GX60 with good brightness, decent contrast and appropriate viewing angles is useful during games and work. The two mSATA-SSDs in RAID 0 are less impressive than expected. In reading small blocks the Raid-0 configuration performs poorly and worse than Solo SSDs (4K test: 8 MB/s).

Gaming notebook of December 2012: Asus G75VX-T4020H

According to the rating, the decision is easy. The G75VX profits from the MSI's fatal combination of strongest Radeon GPU with AMD quad core. The 17-incher from Asus keept its strength (ergonomics, input devices) and improved performance with the newest Kepler GPU. All things considered, there are no serious points of critique as even the matte FHD display can convince us completely.