Notebookcheck2012年7月

Contenders:

Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2012-06 MD231LL/A 89%

Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2012-06 MD223D/A 88%

Sony Vaio SV-S13A1Z9E/S 87%

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Mid 2012 86%

Lenovo IdeaPad U410-MAH6MGE 85%

Lenovo IdeaPad U310 83%

Toshiba Satellite Z930-119 83%

Sony Vaio SVE-1111M1E/P 79%

There is always a lot of expectation surrounding the very successful MacBook Air 13 and we had the updated model in for review. The design, build quality, fit & finish, and overall feel of the unibody system are simply outstanding continuing in the same vein as the 2010 and 2011 models. Overall performance is up because of the upgraded SSD and improvement in battery life of the low-voltage Ivy Bridge processor (Core i5 3427U).

We also tested the MacBook Air 11 inch 2012-06 edition. The sibling of the MacBook Air 13  managed to score a "very good" in our review. Heat generation and lack of connectivity options are concerns here. The keyboard and the unibody chassis remain unchanged, while battery life has increased to about six hours. Apple fans sure will appreciate the attention to detail.

The competition never sleeps. On the Windows side, there is the Sony Vaio SV-S13A1Z9E/S. The system is small (13.3-inch form factor), yet very powerful. It features SSD-RAID, integrated UMTS/LTE, a carbon fiber chassis, and speedy input devices. The weak TN panel, however, offsets the premium features and causes the system to miss out on an excellent score.

When Apple updates one product, more are to follow. The MacBook Pro 13 Mid 2012 edition with the entry-level configuration (Core i5 3210M, HD Graphics 4000) is definitely more expensive than Windows laptops with comparable hardware, but it also features the famed unibody aluminum construction and a contrast-rich 1280x800 display panel. The above mentioned Vaio SV-S13A1Z9E certainly would benefit from a quality display like that the one in the Apple device. Because of the meager port selection and the high temperatures, the MacBook Pro 13 scored a "good" in our test. 

Lenovo's answer to expensive Ultrabooks turns out as expected: affordable Ultrabooks! The 13.3-inch IdeaPad U310 is available for about 600 Euro (~$750) and the 14-inch IdeaPad U410 for 800 Euro (~$1000). Both feature a premium aluminum case and score well ergonomically (heat, noise level, input devices). Unfortunately, the displays are reflective and offer low contrast and poor viewing angles. The combination drive, consisting of a small caching SSD and large standard HDD, isn't perfect, but a usable compromise between speed and storage space.

Of course, systems under the headline "Ultrabook" also need to include the Toshiba Satellite Z930-119 (1200 Euro or $1500). The system's light weight is almost without equal in the 13.3-inch category. The fast SSD and the Ivy Bridge low voltage processor help overall performance. Unfortunately, weak input devices and an inferior TN display take away some of the joy.

Those who think that the various Apple, Vaio, and Lenovo subnotebooks are too expensive might be happier with the 11.6-inch AMD-Fusion APU offerings. The Lenovo ThinkPad X121e can be had for less than 500 Euro (~$630), but we just can't recommend the extremely gutless configuration with the AMD E-300. The low-cost ThinkPad has weak input devices and a case that's not very sturdy.

The build quality of the Sony Vaio SVE-1111M1E/P with AMD E-Series E2-1800 is not much better. The 11.6-inch system features a glossy display and an APU performance that's hardly improved. We think that 480 Euro (~$600) price is too expensive considering the competition. Those set on a Brazos APU should not spend above 400 Euro (~$500).

Subnotebook for the month of July 2012: Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2012-06 MD231LL/A

No, it's not the perfect subnotebook. The processor performance gets throttled under load, and the reflective TN panel does not is not a premium feature. We don't need to say anything else about the fairly limited port selection, but for 1250 Euro (~$1600) a 3G module should have been included.

竞争者：

苹果MacBook Air 13英寸2012-06 MD231LL / A 89％

苹果MacBook Air 11英寸2012-06 MD223D / A 88％

索尼Vaio的SV-S13A1Z9E / S 87％

苹果MacBook Pro 13 2012年年中的86％

联想IdeaPad U410-MAH6MGE 85％

联想IdeaPad U310 83％

东芝Satellite Z930-119 83％

索尼Vaio的小量豁免-1111M1E / P 79％

总有一种期望周围很多非常成功的MacBook Air 13，我们有更新的模型审查。设计，建造质量，适合完成，总体感觉的一体式机身，简单地继续在2010年和2011年的机型同样优秀。整体性能，因为升级SSD和改善电池寿命的低电压Ivy Bridge处理器（酷睿i5 3427U）。

我们还测试了MacBook Air 11英寸的2012-06版。的MacBook Air 13的兄弟姐妹设法赢得一个“非常好”在我们的检讨。所产生的热量和缺乏的连接选项，在这里关注。键盘和整体式底盘保持不变，而电池的寿命已提高到约6个小时。苹果的粉丝们一定会喜欢对细节的关注。

本次大赛不夜城。在Windows方，有索尼的Vaio SV-S13A1Z9E / S。该系统体积小（13.3英寸外形），但非常强大的。它采用SSD-RAID，集成的UMTS / LTE，碳纤维底盘，快速的输入设备。弱的TN面板，但是，抵消了高级功能，使系统​​错过了一个很好的得分。

当苹果更新一个产品，更多的是遵循。 MacBook Pro的13中2012年版的入门级配置（酷睿i5 3210M，HD图形4000）是比Windows的笔记本电脑相媲美的硬件肯定更贵，但它也采用了著名的精密铝合金Unibody建设和对比度丰富的1280x800屏幕面板。上面提到的VAIO SV-S13A1Z9E肯定会受益于优质的显示，例如一个苹果的设备。由于微薄的端口选择和高温，MacBook Pro的13拿下了一个“好”在我们的测试中。

联想的回答昂贵的Ultrabooks原来的预期：负担得起的Ultrabooks！ 13.3吋的IdeaPad U310是约600欧元（约750美元）和14吋的IdeaPad U410为800欧元（约1000美元）。这两种功能以及符合人体工程学的一个高档铝合金外壳和得分（热噪声电平，输入设备）。不幸的是，显示器的反射和低对比度和可视角度不佳。组成的一个小缓存的SSD和大标准硬盘驱动器的组合，是不完美的，但可用的速度和存储空间之间的妥协。

当然，系统​​“的Ultrabook”的标题下，还需要包括东芝Satellite Z930-119（1200欧元或1500元）。该系统的重量轻，几乎是无可匹敌的13.3英寸的类别。快速的SSD的Ivy Bridge低电压处理器的整体性能。不幸的是，薄弱的输入设备和较差的TN显示器带走的喜悦。

那些谁认为，各种苹果，VAIO，和联想的次笔记型电脑，经过太贵了11.6英寸AMD的Fusion APU产品可能会更快乐。联想ThinkPad X121e可以有不到500欧元（约$ 630），但就是不建议非常缺乏勇气的配置采用了AMD E-300。低成本的ThinkPad有弱的输入设备和情况不是很坚固。

AMD E-E2-1800系列是索尼的Vaio SVE-1111M1E / P的建设质量也好不了多少。系统的特点是11.6英寸镜面显示屏和APU性能几乎没有改善。我们认为，480欧元（约600元）的价格太贵了，考虑到竞争。的Brazos APU在所订的时间不应该超过400欧元（约500美元）。

亚笔记本电脑月份2012年7月：苹果MacBook Air 13英寸2012-06 MD231LL / A

不，这是不完美的亚笔记本。处理器的性能得到负载下节流，和TN面板的反射不是不是一个高级功能。我们不说别的，约相当有限的端口选择，但为1250欧元（〜$ 1600），应该已包含了3G模块。

Contenders:

Lenovo Thinkpad L530 2479-3BG 86%

Samsung 900X4C-A04DE 86%

Lenovo ThinkPad T530 2429-5XG 85%

Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk 84%

Fujitsu Lifebook E782 84%

Lenovo ThinkPad T430 84%

Dell Vostro 3560 82%

Lenovo G585-M8325GE 81%

Acer Aspire V5-531 78%

Acer Aspire 5250-E304G50Mnkk 76%

Acer Aspire 7739Z-P624650MNKK 73%

Lenovo’s Thinkpad L530 2479-3BG and Samsung’s 900X4C-A04DE go head to head, even though they are not exactly comparable. The no-frills and rather bulky 15.6-inch ThinkPad appeals to the business user not interested in appearances, but in functionality. The 900X4C, equipped with the Ivy Bridge low voltage processor, lures the mobile user with its design and slim chassis (and a weight of only 1.6 kilogram / 3.53 pounds). The prices are vastly different: about 2000 Euro (~$2500) for the 900X4C and less than 1000 Euro (~$1250) for the L530.

The upscale ThinkPad T530 2429-5XG business laptop is in familiar territory as far as build quality and rugged looks are concerned. The new chiclet keyboard with backlight does its job well. Slightly high heat emissions and the weight prevent a higher score. Even though the laptop features a good display panel and a high-performance Core i7 CPU, it missed a "very good" rating due to the aforementioned issues and a battery that doesn't fit snugly.

If the Thinkpad L530 or the T530 are too expensive, consider the Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk. For about 900 Euro (~$1150), this system offers enough ports (including one for a docking station), a gaming-capable GPU (GeForce GT 640M), well-functioning input devices, and a rigid chassis. The P643 is an attractive option and trails the T530 by only one percentage point. However, those wanting many configuration options need to look elsewhere.

The Fujitsu Lifebook E782 holds its ground among the competition. The 15.6-inch system is not exactly cheap at 1100 Euro (~$1400), but has good display (decent viewing angles), low noise levels, convincing input devices, and many ports (including a docking port).

Lenovo's ThinkPad T430 appeals to the ThinkPad fans, as not too many things have changed. The build quality is convincing, the design practical, the battery life quite impressive, port selection ample, while noise levels are low. The TN panel suffers from low contrast but has a high resolution of 1600x900 pixels.

The Dell Vostro 3560 with the Radeon HD 7670M and Intel Core i5-3210M only costs about 770 Euro (~$1000). Instead of a stable NVIDIA NVS 5400M, this system features a consumer-oriented Radeon card. For those looking to play the occasional game, this should be of little concern.

The Lenovo G585-M8325GE (340 Euro/$425) is the low-cost leader among the eleven business laptops. Considering the price, the potential buyer shouldn't complain too much about the reflective TN panel or the low performance. The AMD-APU E-Series E2-1800 is probably better suited for subnotebooks. The low performance does have positive side effects: five hour battery life, low power consumption, low noise levels, and a chassis that stays cool.

Almost as inexpensive, but a lot thinner, is the Acer Aspire V5-531 for 400 Euro (~$500). The 15.6-inch system offers barely enough performance (Intel Pentium 967) and features a cheap-looking plastic case. Input devices are usable but not perfect. At least the port selection features USB 3.0. 

Acer must have been a bit confused when they designed the Aspire 5250-E304G50Mnkk. Instead of an improved successor, we see cutbacks - no HDMI and the AMD E-Series E-300 APU is slower than the E450. 

It's probably better to spend a little more for the Aspire 7739Z-P624650MNKK instead. At least it allows for quick surfing and speedy typing. Gaming is more or less out of the question (Intel Pentium P6200 - Arrandale), and battery life is way too short (1 hour 32 minutes).   

Business notebook for the month of July 2012: Lenovo ThinkPad L530 2479-3BG

The Thinkpad L530 is neither as slim nor good looking as the Samsung Series 9, but for the money it offers better all-round business functionality. Docking port, Multi-Bay drive, and even a DisplayPort are some of the features a serious business user would want and available on the laptop.

竞争者：

联想ThinkPad L530 2479-3BG 86％

三星900X4C A04DE 86％

联想ThinkPad T530 2429-5XG 85％

宏基TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk 84％

富士通Lifebook E782 84％

联想ThinkPad T430 84％

戴尔Vostro 3560的82％

联想G585-M8325GE 81％

宏碁Aspire V5-531 78％

宏碁Aspire 5250-E304G50Mnkk 76％

宏碁Aspire 7739Z-P624650MNKK 73％

联想的ThinkPad L530 2479-3BG和三星的900X4C A04DE去头去头，即使他们是不完全可比。没有多余的装饰，而笨重的15.6英寸的ThinkPad呼吁企业用户不感兴趣出场，但在功能上。配备的Ivy Bridge低电压处理器，900X4C，引诱其设计和超薄机箱（和重量只有1.6公斤/3.53磅的），移动用户。价格有很大的不同：约2000欧元（〜$ 2500）的900X4C低于1000欧元（〜$ 1250）的L530。

高档的ThinkPad T530 2429-5XG的商务笔记本电脑是在自己熟悉的领域，尽可能建立和坚固耐用的外观。新的巧克力键盘，带背光，它的工作。稍微高热量的排放和重量，防止更高的分数。即使笔记本电脑拥有不错的显示面板和高性能的酷睿i7 CPU，它错过了一个“非常好”的评价，由于上述问题的电池，不紧贴。

如果是Thinkpad L530 T530太贵了，考虑：宏基TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk。约900欧元（〜$ 1150），该系统提供足够的端口（其中一个用于对接站），一个具有游戏功能的GPU（GeForce GT 640M的），运作良好的输入设备，和一个坚固的底盘。 P643是一个有吸引力的选择和落后的T530只有一个百分点。然而，那些想了许多配置选项需要到别处寻找。

富士通LifeBook E782持有其地面之间的竞争。 15.6英寸系统是不便宜1100欧元（〜$ 1400），但具有不错的显示效果（体面的视角），低噪音，有说服力的输入设备，以及许多港口（包括一个对接端口）。

联想的ThinkPad T430提出上诉到的ThinkPad球迷，没有太多的事情发生了变化。建设质量是有说服力的，设计实用，令人印象深刻，端口选择充足的电池寿命，而噪音水平低。患有低对比度的TN面板，但具有较高的分辨率为1600×900像素。

戴尔Vostro成就3560与Radeon HD 7670M和英特尔酷睿i5-3210M只有约770欧元（约1000美元）的费用。而不是一个稳定的NVIDIA NVS 5400M的是，该系统采用了以消费者为导向的Radeon显卡。对于那些偶尔玩游戏，这应该是很少关注。

联想G585-M8325GE（340欧元/ 425美元）之间的11个商用笔记本电脑的领导者是低成本的。考虑到价格，潜在的买家不应该抱怨太多的反射TN面板或低性能。 AMD的APU E系列E2-1800可能是更适合于亚笔记本电脑。的低性能确实有积极的副作用：5个小时的电池寿命，低功耗，低噪音，保持冷静和机箱。

几乎是价格便宜，但瘦了很多，是宏碁Aspire V5-531为400欧元（约500美元）。 15.6英寸系统几乎没有提供足够的性能（英特尔奔腾967），并设有一个廉价的塑料外壳。输入设备是可用的，但并不完美。至少有选择的端口提供USB 3.0。

宏碁已经有点困惑时，他们设计的Aspire 5250-E304G50Mnkk。而不是一种改进的继任者，我们看到削减 - 没有HDMI接口的AMD E-300 APU E系列是比E450慢。

多花一点点的Aspire 7739Z-P624650MNKK，而不是它可能会更好。至少，它允许快速上网和快速打字。游戏是多还是少的问题（英特尔奔腾P6200 - 阿伦代尔），和电池寿命的方式过短（1小时32分钟）。

2012年七月份的商务笔记本：联想ThinkPad L530 2479-3BG

的ThinkPad L530既不是作为三星9系列超薄也不好，但为了钱，它提供了更好的全面的业务功能。坞式端口，多湾的车程，甚至一个DisplayPort是一个严重的企业用户希望的功能，可以在笔记本电脑上。

Contenders:

Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2012-06 88%

Asus N76VZ-V2G-T1011V  85%

Dell XPS 15 (L521X) 85% 

Sony Vaio SV-E14A1M6EW 84%

Samsung 550P5C-T02DE 83%

Acer Aspire TimeLine Ultra M5-481TG-73514G25Mass 82%

Dell Inspiron 15R SE 82%

Gigabyte P2542G 82%

Medion Erazer X6821 MD98054 82%

Samsung Serie 7 700Z3C-S01 82%

Gigabyte U2442N 81%

Medion Akoya P7815-MD98063 81%

Acer Aspire V5-571G-53314G50Makk 80%

Asus K55VM-SX064V 80%

Toshiba Satellite P855-107 80%

Toshiba Satellite U840W no score

The Apple MacBook Pro 15 Retina scored the most points. We tried not to get bedazzled by the resolution of 2880x1800 pixels, but rather subjected the Pro to thorough tests running both Mac OS and Windows. For further details please check our report here.

The Asus N76VZ-V2G-T1011V offers great sound quality, which is made possible by an external subwoofer. The Full-HD 17-inch laptop not only features a very good display, but also top notch build quality and low emissions. Aside from a jumpy touchpad and occasional GPU throttling, the N76VZ doesn't suffer from any major shortcomings. The GT 650M doesn't always manage Full-HD gaming with the current game selection, but is still a potent graphics card.

According to the editor, the Dell XPS 15 (L521X) offers "class-leading" build quality. In that regard, this system is one of the few that is able to keep up with Apple's unibody chassis. The input devices are also perfect, and the performance is on a very high level due to the Core i7-3612QM and the SSD/HDD hybrid drive. The GeForce GT 640M is probably not the first choice for those interested in playing games since throttling is an issue (games with high CPU load).

Sony's newest member of its ‘bread and butter’ series is the 14-inch Vaio-SV-E14A1M6EW (730 Euro/$915). The Radeon HD 7670M is an attractive option for casual gamers. The input devices appeal to the business user and six hours of battery life won't leave those working on the go stranded. Unfortunately, the TN panel is pretty weak and features washed-out colors. 

The Samsung Series 5 550P5C-T02 is a system in the same league as the Vaio SV-E14A1M6EW and vies for the attention of the buyer with a GeForce GT 630M and a Core i5 processor. The JBL sound system emits surprisingly strong bass and the display panel is both matte and bright. Low contrast and reduced viewing angles don't work well for a multimedia machine, however.

The Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M5-481TG features a low voltage CPU and a GeForce GT 640M LE. The 14-inch notebook is not an Ultrabook, even though the slim chassis, low weight, and the long battery life of six hours would lead you to believe so. Negative aspects are the low contrast display and the limited port selection.

The special edition of the 15-inch Dell Inspiron 15R (SE) features a good display (contrast, viewing angles) and decent input devices. The resilient surfaces can't hide the fact that the build quality leaves room for improvement. Mobility is also not the Inspiron's forte, since the battery life is fairly short at about three hours.

We don't come across Gigabyte laptops that often. The 15.6-inch Gamer P2542G has a lot going for it. The antiglare coated Full-HD panel offers high contrast and an outstanding display brightness of 355 cd/m². That coupled with the fast LiteOn SSD and the GeForce GTX 660M make for a nice gaming system. Under load, the system does suffer from excessive heat, however.

The fairly high price of the Gigabyte system (1530 Euro/$1920) might have some people look at cheaper systems like the Medion Erazer X6821. For 1150 Euro (~$1450), the system features a slightly better GeForce GTX 670M, but is hampered by a weaker HD panel. No SSD is available, but the laptop hides two 500 GB HDDs in the bulky chassis.

Because Samsung updated the CPU and installed a better graphics card (GeForce GT 630M) in the Series 7 700Z3C-S01, we subjected the laptop to another round of testing. The TN panel still suffers from low contrast, but the battery life and overall performance increased compared to the Sandy Bridge version. The high build quality of the aluminum chassis and a very good keyboard are the other plus points of this all-around system.

The U2442N is our second notebook from Gigabyte. It appears to be a member of the Ultrabook family, but does not come equipped with a low voltage processor with just an integrated graphics card. Instead, it features a Core i5-3210M and a GeForce GT 640M. Gaming enthusiasts would sure appreciate the machine, if it wasn't for the low contrast TN panel (non-glare), which also suffers from poor viewing angles.

Medion's 17-inch Akoya P7815-MD98063 is a multi-purpose all-round laptop with a GeForce GT 640M and a Core i7-3612QM CPU. The case appears to be of poor quality, the touchpad and keyboard offer mediocre feedback. It is too bad because the bright, matte contrast-rich panel would surely appeal to many potential buyers (900 Euro/$1150).

With the Aspire V5-571G, Acer created an extremely thin 15-inch laptop (not an Ultrabook), which costs only 600 Euro (~$750) and comes equipped with a ULV processor and a GeForce GT 620M. Gaming is possible without any issues, although high resolutions on external monitors are out of the question. Disadvantages are the bad panel (low contrast), and the lack of build quality. 

The multi-purpose Asus K55VM-SX064V has a few things going for it (performance, emissions, battery life), but is not a stand-out in any area. "Average to good" describes the input devices, battery life, and gaming performance (GeForce GT 630M). We think the price (850 Euro/$1075) is too steep for a system with a low-quality TN panel and no Blu-ray drive.

The Toshiba Satellite P855-107 has better technical specs and comes with a GeForce GT 640M, This multi-purpose system offers a unique highlight: 3D without glasses (Nvidia’s 3D-Vision) and a superb speaker system. Unfortunately, outdoor use is limited because of strong reflections despite the high brightness. The slow conventional hard drive constrains performance and should be replaced with an SSD.

Since the Toshiba Satellite U840W we received was a pre-production sample, we did not enter it into the results. The first Ultrabook featuring a movie-like 21:9 aspect ratio is surely an interesting concept for the movie aficionados.

Multimedia notebook of the month of July 2012: Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2012-06

Notwithstanding discussions about the price (2100 Euro/$2650), we think that the new panel is simply outstanding. Color space, viewing angles, brightness, and contrast are perfect.

竞争者：

苹果MacBook Pro视网膜病变15寸2012-06 88％

华硕N76VZ-V2G T1011V 85％

戴尔XPS 15（L521X）85％

索尼Vaio SV-E14A1M6EW 84％

三星550P5C T02DE 83％

宏碁Aspire Timeline超M5-481TG 73514G25Mass 82％

戴尔Inspiron灵越15R SE 82％

技嘉P2542G 82％

麦迪Erazer X6821 MD98054 82％

三星意甲7 700Z3C-S01 82％

技嘉U2442N 81％

MEDION AKOYA P7815-MD98063 81％

宏碁Aspire V5-571G-53314G50Makk 80％

华硕K55VM SX064V 80％

东芝Satellite P855-107 80％

东芝Satellite U840W没有评分

苹果MacBook Pro 15视网膜拿下了最高分。我们试图不要被眼花缭乱的分辨率为2880x1800像素，而是临彻底的测试，同时运行Mac OS和Windows。有关详细信息，请在这里检查我们的报告。

华硕N76VZ-V2G T1011V提供卓越的音质，这是通过一个外置低音炮。全高清17英寸的笔记本电脑不仅采用了非常不错的显示效果，但也是一流的建设质量和低排放。除了一个跳动的触摸板和不定期的GPU节流，N76VZ不会受到任何重大的缺点。 GT 650M不管理全高清的游戏，目前的游戏选择，但仍然是一个强有力的图形卡。

根据编辑，戴尔XPS 15（L521X）提供了同级车中领先的“打造精品。在这方面，这个系统是少数几个能跟上苹果的一体式机身底盘之一。输入设备也很完善，性能是一个非常高的水平，由于酷睿i7-3612QM和SSD / HDD混合动力驱动。的GeForce GT 640M是为那些有兴趣在玩游戏的限制是一个问题，因为CPU负载高的游戏，可能不是第一选择。

索尼的“面包和奶油”系列的最新成员是14英寸的VAIO-SV-E14A1M6EW（730欧元/ $ 915）。而Radeon HD 7670M是休闲玩家有吸引力的选择。输入设备吸引企业用户和6小时的电池寿命，不会留下工作人员的滞留。不幸的是，TN面板是相当薄弱的，并设有洗出的颜色。

三星5 550P5C-T02系列是一个系统在同一个联盟的Vaio SV-E14A1M6EW的GeForce GT 630M和酷睿i5处理器的买家的关注和争夺。 JBL音响系统发出令人惊讶的强劲的低音和显示面板是雾面和亮。低对比度和降低可视角度不工作的多媒体机，但是。

宏碁Aspire时间轴超M5-481TG采用了低电压CPU和GeForce GT 640M LE。 14英寸的笔记本电脑是不是一个的Ultrabook的超薄机箱，重量轻，电池寿命长六小时，即使这样会导致你相信。消极方面是低对比度显示和有限的端口选择。

15英寸的戴尔Inspiron灵越15R（SE）的特别版拥有不错的显示效果（对比度，可视角度）和体面的输入设备。弹性的表面不能掩盖一个事实，即建设质量还有改进的余地。流动性也没有了Inspiron的强项，因为在三小时左右，电池的寿命是相当短的。

我们没有技嘉笔记本电脑经常遇到。的15.6英寸的玩家的P2542G有一个很多为它去。防眩光涂层的全高清面板，提供高对比度和出色的显示亮度为355 cd /m²的。这再加上快速建兴SSD和GeForce®（精视™）GTX 660M的一个不错的游戏系统。负载下，系统不会遭受过多的热量，但是。

技嘉的系统（1530欧元，/1920美元）相当高的价格可能有一些人看起来像的Medion公司Erazer的X6821便宜的系统。为1150欧元（〜$ 1450），该系统提供一个稍微好一点的GeForce®（精视™）GTX 670M，但阻碍了较弱的HD面板。没有SSD是可用的，但两个500 GB的硬盘驱动器的笔记本电脑隐藏笨重的机箱中。

由于三星最新的CPU和7 700Z3C-S01系列中安装了一个更好的显卡（GeForce GT 630M的），我们的笔记本电脑受到另一轮测试。 TN面板仍然存在着对比度低，但相比增加电池的使用寿命和整体性能的Sandy Bridge版。高品质的全铝底盘和一个很好的键盘加点这所有的系统。

在的U2442N是我们的第二个来自技嘉的笔记本电脑。这似乎是了Ultrabook家族的一员，但不只是一个集成的图形卡具有低电压处理器与配备。相反，它采用了酷睿i5-3210M和GeForce GT 640M。游戏爱好者肯定会欣赏的机器，如果它不是为低对比度的TN面板（无眩光），这也遭受贫困的视角。

麦迪的17英寸Akoya养P7815-MD98063是一个多用途的全面的GeForce GT 640M和酷睿i7-3612QM CPU的笔记本电脑。出现质量较差的情况下，触摸板和键盘提供平庸的反馈。实在是太糟糕了，因为明亮，对比丰富的磨砂面板一定会吸引许多潜在的买家（900欧元/1150美元的）。

宏碁的Aspire V5-571G，创造了一个非常薄的15英寸笔记本电脑（而不是Ultrabook的），它的价格仅为600欧元（约750美元），并配用ULV处理器和GeForce GT 620M。游戏是没有任何问题的，，虽然高分辨率外部显示器出了问题。缺点是不好的面板（低对比度），而缺乏的建设质量。

多用途华硕K55VM的SX064V有几件事情（性能，排放，电池寿命），但不是一个独立的任何区域。 “一般向好”的输入设备，电池寿命，和游戏性能（GeForce®（精视™）GT 630M）。我们认为，价格（850欧元，/1075美元）是太陡，低质量的TN面板，并没有蓝光驱动器的系统。

东芝Satellite P855-107具有更好的技术规格的GeForce GT 640M，这种多用途的系统提供了一个独特的亮点：3D不戴眼镜（Nvidia的3D视觉）和出色的扬声器系统。不幸的是，户外使用是有限的，因为尽管高亮度的强反射。缓慢的传统硬盘驱动器限制性能，因此用SSD取代。

由于，东芝Satellite的U840W我们是一个预生产样品，我们没有进入到的结果。一个电影般的21:9纵横比的首款Ultrabook的电影爱好者无疑是一个有趣的概念。

2012年7月一个月的多媒体笔记本：苹果MacBook Pro视网膜病变15寸2012-06

尽管价格（2100欧元/2650美元的）的讨论，我们认为，新的面板是简单地突出。色彩空间，可视角度，亮度和对比度是完美的。

Contenders:

One K73-2O 84%

Samsung Serie 7 Gamer 700G7C 84%

Deviltech Devil 6700 83%

MSI CX70-i789BW7H 78%

An inexpensive no-name product goes head to head with one from a top-tier manufacturer? This is what the comparison of the One K73-2O and the Samsung Series 7 Gamer 700G7C (1800 Euro/$2300) appears to be at first glance. The identical scores in the category DTR (desktop replacement)/gaming show the qualities of the much cheaper (1240 Euro/$1600 with SSD) notebook. While Samsung's gaming notebook pulls ahead in areas like 3D performance (GeForce GTX 675M), input devices, and fit and finish, the One K73-2O (GTX 660M) is better as far as battery life, heat emissions, and SSD speed is concerned.

Build to Order machines (BTO) can also get quite expensive. Case in point is the high-end configuration of the Devil 6700 from Deviltech. The 15.6-inch notebook features a GeForce GTX 680M, (at the time of writing this article) the most powerful single mobile GPU from Nvidia. Although the 1800 Euro price tag is not exactly a bargain, Devil includes an Intel SSD (520 series) and a very good Full-HD display for this price. Disadvantages are the very high noise level and the inferior input devices. We consider the latter a big no-no in this price bracket.

The MSI CX70-i789BW7H is a large all-round system with a GeForce GT 640M and Core i7-3610QM. The performance is quite good, but the conventional HDD slows the notebook down significantly. More reason for concern are the high temperatures (throttling up to system shutdown!), and the mediocre input devices. All in all, we just can't recommend this system.

Gaming notebook for the month of July 2012: Samsung Series 7 Gamer 700G7C

Our final decision is for the expensive Samsung and not the less expensive One K73-2O. Why? It is because on the K73-20, Turbo Boost does not function when the Nvidia GPU is active and the CPU gets throttled under load. Both are things the avid gamer would want to avoid.

竞争者：

K73-2O84％

三星意甲联赛7玩家700G7C84％

Deviltech魔鬼670083％

MSI CX70 i789BW7H78％

没有名字的一种价格低廉的产品去头对头的顶级制造商之一吗？这是比较K73-20和三星7系列：玩家700G7C（1800欧元/$ 2300）乍一看似乎是什么。相同类别中的DTR（台式机替代品）/游戏得分的质量更便宜的（1240欧元/1600美元SSD）的笔记本。虽然三星的游戏笔记本拉领先的3D性能（的GeForce GTX6.75亿），输入设备，以及适应和完成等领域，在一个K73-2O（GTX660M）是更好的电池生活，热量的排放，和SSD速度方面， 。

建立订购机（BTO）也可以得到相当昂贵的。典型的例子是高端配置的魔鬼6700 Deviltech。 15.6英寸的笔记本电脑采用的GeForce GTX680M，（在写这篇文章的时候）最强大的单来自Nvidia移动GPU。虽然1800欧元的价码是不完全的讨价还价，魔鬼包括英特尔SSD（520系列）和一个很好的全高清显示屏，这样的价格。缺点是非常高的噪声水平和下的输入设备。我们认为后者一大禁忌，在这个价位支架。

MSI CX70-i789BW7H是一个全面系统的GeForce GT640M和酷睿i7-3610QM。的表现也相当不错，但传统的HDD显著减缓了笔记本电脑。更值得关注的理由是节流系统关机的高温（！），和平庸输入的设备。所有的一切，我们只是不建议这个系统。

2012年7月的一个月的游戏笔记本：三星7系列玩家700G7C

我们的最终决定是昂贵的三星，而不是更便宜的K73-2O。为什么呢？这是因为在K73-20，没有涡轮增压功能时，Nvidia的GPU处于活动状态，CPU负载下被扼杀。两者都是狂热的游戏玩家希望避免的事情。

Contenders:

Asus Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T 90%

Acer Iconia Tab A510 84%

Low-priced budget product meets the expensive. We pit two 10-inch tablets which have not much in common besides Android 4.0 and Tegra 3 against each other. The Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T is a high end tablet which features a solid build quality and usability up to iPad 3 standards. Highlights are the great performance, outstanding IPS display (brilliant viewing angles, Full-HD), and the optional docking keyboard (with additional battery).

Acer's philosophy is different. The manufacturer seems to think that nobody would want to spend 700 Euro (~$900) for a tablet, no matter how sophisticated. The result is a tablet with Tegra 3, a good IPS panel (high contrast), and decent battery life for around 400 Euro (~$500). The disadvantages are apparent: bad speakers, high temperatures (even during idle), charging only via power adapter, and a warranty period of only 12 months.

Tablet / MID for the month of July 2012: Asus Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T

The price is up in iPad 3 territory, but the well-rounded system leaves nothing to be desired. Unless 3D shooting games are your forte, the tablet won't disappoint.

竞争者：

华硕Transformer垫无限TF700T90％

宏碁Iconia Tab A51084％

低价位的经济型产品符合贵。我们坑了两个10英寸的平板电脑并没有太大的Android 4.0和Tegra3除了常见的互相。变压器垫无限TF700T是一个高端的平板电脑，iPad 3的标准提供了坚实的建设质量和可用性。亮点是伟大的性能，出色的的IPS显示（辉煌的视角，全高清），以及可选的对接键盘（使用附加的电池）。

宏碁的理念是不同的。制造商似乎认为，没有人会要花费700欧元（约900美元）的平板电脑，无论多么复杂。其结果是平板电脑采用Tegra3，良好的IPS面板（高对比度），和体面的电池寿命大约为400欧元（约500美元）。它的缺点是显而易见的：坏的扬声器，较高的温度下（甚至在空闲时），只能通过电源适配器充电，只有12个月的保修期。

平板电脑/ MID月，2012年7月：华硕Transformer垫无限TF700T

价格是iPad 3的领土，但没有什么可全面的系统。除非是你的长处的3D射击游戏，平板