Notebookcheck2013年1月 - 智能手机和平板电脑版

Contenders:

Braun B-Tab 711: 74 %

Pearl Touchlet X10.dual: 83 %

Acer Iconia B1-A71: 82 %

cmx Rapax 070-0508: 74 %

Blaupunkt Endeavour 800: 84 %

Tablets had a bit of a rough start going into the New Year at notebookcheck.com. A real budget device faced our test range in the Braun's B-Tab 711. Some hurdles were simply too high to take. While the casing reaped in praise for its aluminum back and the stable impression, we missed the one or other feature in connectivity like Bluetooth or GPS. Its 4 GB of internal memory was tight but it could fortunately be expanded. The criticism became more solid after that. The camera is virtually useless and photos come out blurry very easily. The screen proved to be dark and only provided weak viewing angle stability. We ultimately lowered its rating so not to leave it in an undeserved good light.

Pearl is also known for low prices. Its newest tablet generation, the Pearl Touchlet X10.dual, features a dual-core processor and a graphics card with just as many computing cores. 230 Euros (~$308) for a 10-inch device sounds good and the device does its job accordingly well. However, the tablet could not score in connectivity and camera quality. In return, we liked the smooth use of the latest Android system and its relatively good gaming suitability. The screen was also acceptable though it could be a bit brighter. Its resolution is also not really up-to-date, but the viewing angles are good. We couldn't complain much about the performance considering it is an affordable 10-inch tablet. Despite that, the Touchlet keeps a safe distance from high-end models. It scored 83% in the end. The small battery and the occasional crash prevented an even better rating.

We could hardly wait for the next "low-cost" tablet, Acer's Iconia B1. It is to provide good workmanship, decent performance and long battery runtimes for a mere 119 Euros (~$159). We asked ourselves whether it really represents an affordable tablet or whether it is just another cheap device for this price. The answer: The B1 naturally has its shortcomings, but the value for money ratio is very good. Only a few manufacturers, such as Prestigio, can compete with that. Asus has announced a similar upcoming price-breaker dubbed Memo Pad though. Back to Acer's B1: The choice of materials and workmanship made a rather low-end impression, the connectivity was appropriate. Unlike other manufacturers, Acer does not cross out any important features. Android Jelly Bean, Bluetooth 4.0 and GPS are installed. On the other hand, we would not have missed the camera and the TN screen presented shortcomings in brightness and viewing angle stability. Acer's B1 is a full-fledged tablet due to its smooth operation and appealing performance. Although it is a bit restrained in terms of graphics, it is quite satisfactory as a surf and mail device. An appealing battery life adds to that.

cmx – the newcomer from Austria now has a handful of tablets in its range. We ordered a device that is within the same price range as Acer's Iconia B1 called cmx Rapax 070-0508. However, the tablet by cmx is a real letdown in many areas and blows the same tune as Braun's B-Tab 711. The build is at most functional and the choice of materials is bottom of the barrel. In return, the connectivity is fairly good although it lacks GPS and Bluetooth. External devices, such as a UMTS dongle, can be connected owing to the OTG feature. Its handling was quite acceptable even if sporadic crashes and foreign language menu items were annoying. It fortunately does not sport any cameras. However, its real shortcoming is the poor screen. We have not yet seen anything worse in our test lab to date. Brightness rates that do not even achieve three digits and its extreme viewing angle dependency disqualify the Rapax for serious use. The good battery runtimes cannot save it either. Like Braun's B-Tab, we had to lower the final score for cmx's Rapax.

A familiar name, Blaupunkt, finishes off the tablet reviews in January. However, the car radio giant is still more an outsider in the tablet sector. The Endeavour range from which our test device comes also stands for affordable devices. The manufacturer demands 190 Euros (~$254) for the Blaupunkt Endeavour 800. The buyer gets a dual-core CPU alongside outdated graphics with only one core for that. A common thread ran through the entire test. The 8-inch tablet does not stand out positively or – more importantly – negatively from the crowd. We did not have much reason for complaint in terms of use and the performance is middling. What more can you demand from a tablet of this price range? Conclusively, the Blaupunkt supplies a solid performance.

Tablet of January 2013: Blaupunkt Endeavour 800

In view of the rather weak competition, a good performance is enough for a place in the limelight. Consequently, Blaupunkt's Endeavour 800 is January's Tablet of the Month. If we had a value for money award, Acer's Iconia B1 would be the leader.

竞争者：

布劳恩B-711标签：74％

珍珠Touchlet X10.dual：83％

宏碁Iconia B1-A71：82％

070-0508 CMX Rapax的：74％

蓝宝奋进800：84％

片中有位在艰难中起步，进入新年notebookcheck.com。布劳恩的B-711标签，设备面临着一个真正的预算在我们的测试范围。一些障碍，采取实在太高了。虽然外壳收获好评，为铝背部和稳定的印象，我们错过了一个或其他的功能，像蓝牙或GPS的连接。其4 GB的内存很紧张，但幸运的是，它可能被扩大。批评后变得更加坚实的。相机几乎是无用的，照片出来很容易模糊。屏幕被证明是黑暗的，只提供了微弱的视角稳定。我们最终下调其评级，所以没有把它留在不当良好的光。

低廉的价格也被称为珍珠。其最新的平板代，的珍珠Touchlet X10.dual，设有正如许多计算核心的双核心处理器和图形卡。听起来不错230欧元（约$ 308）一个10英寸的设备和设备以及其相应的工作。然而，平板电脑无法连接和摄像头质量得分。作为回报，我们喜欢的顺利使用了最新的Andr​​oid系统和其相对不错的游戏适宜。屏幕也是可以接受的，虽然它可能会有点变亮。其分辨率也没有真的到，但观看的角度都不错。我们不能抱怨太多考虑它是一种经济实惠的10英寸平板电脑的性能。尽管如此，Touchlet保持一个安全的距离从高端机型。它拿下了83％而告终。小电池和偶尔的崩溃，防止一个更美好的评级。

我们迫不及待的下一个“低成本”的平板电脑，宏基ICONIA B1的。它是提供良好的做工，不俗的性能和超长的电​​池运行时间仅为119欧元（约$ 159）。我们问自己，是否真的代表一个负担得起的平板电脑，还是它只是另一个这个价格便宜的设备。答案是：B1，自然有它的缺点，但货币比率的值非常好。只有很少的厂家，如PRESTIGIO，能与之抗衡的。华硕虽然已宣布了类似的即将到来的价格断路器配成便条。回到宏碁的B1：材料和工艺的选择比较低端的印象，连通性是适当的。与其他厂商不同的是，宏碁不划掉任何重要的功能。 Android的果冻豆，蓝牙4.0和GPS安装。另一方面，我们会不会错过了相机和提出的TN屏在亮度和可视角度稳定性的缺点。宏基的B1是一个全面的平板电脑，由于其流畅的操作和感染力的表现。虽然这是一个位在显卡方面制止，它是作为一个冲浪和邮件设备中规中矩。一个有吸引力的电池寿命增加。

CMX - 来自奥地利的新人现在拥有了一把药片在其范围内。我们订的是相同的价格范围内的设备，是，宏基ICONIA B1称为CMX Rapax的070-0508。然而，CMX平板电脑是一个真正的失望，在许多领域和打击布劳恩的B-711标签同调。构建是功能最全和材料的选择是桶底。作为回报，连通性是相当不错的，虽然它缺乏GPS和蓝牙。外部设备，如UMTS加密狗，可以连接由于的OTG特征。它的处理是完全可以接受的，即使零星的崩溃和外国语言菜单项是烦人。幸运的是，它不运动相机。但其真正的缺点是屏幕差。我们还没有见过更糟糕的东西在我们的测试实验室。亮度率甚至没有达到三位数，其极端的视角依赖性取消Rapax资格严重。良好的电池运行时间无法保存它。像布劳恩的B-Tab键，我们不得不，降低最终得分CMX Rapax的。

一个熟悉的名字，蓝宝，完成在一月关闭平板电脑的评论。然而，汽车收音机巨头在平板电脑行业仍是一个局外人。从我们的测试设备来也代表奋进范围价格适中的设备。制造商要求190蓝宝奋进800欧元（约$ 254）。买方得到过时的图形旁边的双核CPU，只有一个核心。一个常见的​​线程贯穿整个测试。 8英寸平板电脑不站出来正面或 - 更重要的是 - 从人群负。我们并没有太多的使用条款投诉的原因和表现中等。你还有什么可要求从这个价格范围内的片剂？确凿，蓝宝提供了坚实的性能。

平板电脑2013年1月：蓝宝奋进800

而竞争力弱，良好的性能是足够的地方了风头。因此，蓝宝的奋进800本月一月的平板。如果我们有一个价值的钱奖，宏碁ICONIA B1的将是领导者。

Contenders:

Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini GT-I8190: 87 %

HTC Windows Phone 8S: 85 %

Nokia Lumia 820: 86 %

Sony Xperia J: 86 %

HTC One SV: 87 %

Five devices from the smartphone category also faced our tests. All had one thing in common: They belong to the midrange devices of their manufacturer. Samsung's Galaxy S3 Mini GT-I8190 tries to fit into the big footprints of Samsung's Galaxy S3 flagship. Samsung likely wanted to use the same sounding name to boost sales. Does the small S3 bear the name rightfully? We believe it does because the phone is not really mini with a 4-inch screen and the S3 Mini convinced us in most parts of the test. We only reproached its imperfect reception, the mediocre performance and the rather short warranty period of 12 months. On the other hand, Samsung's S3 Mini reaped in more points on the pro side. It is fairly lightweight, features flawless workmanship and adequate connectivity and bids a relatively bright screen with crisp colors and absolute viewing angle stability. The rear-facing camera is even suitable for taking pictures and videos, which is not always the case in the smartphone sector. Its flawless handling and Android Jelly Bean complete the good total score.

HTC also supplies a midrange device with its Windows Phone 8S, which is to benefit from the splendor of HTC's 8X premium model. The latter managed to win our Best of November 2012 award. Like the name suggests, the manufacturer equips the 8S with Windows Phone 8. A good choice considering its use. The smartphone OS from Redmond has almost always received positive remarks from us until now. Unlike HTC's 8X, the "smaller" 8S comes with a microSD slot, which is also necessary in view of the tight internal memory. The user however has to accept drawbacks in resolution and the non-removable battery. There was barely any reason to reproach the screen's brightness, materials or the workmanship. Controls were mostly intuitive and smooth. However, the casing's spongy buttons marred the impression a bit. The four available colors provide a welcome change. Ultimately, a good result of 85% is recorded in the rating chart.

Nokia's Lumia 820 has almost the same starting position as HTC's 8S. The premium model Lumia 920 already exists and the Finnish manufacturer added the midrange early this year. Unlike Samsung's S3 Mini and HTC's 8S, the Lumia 820 achieved exactly the same rating as its bigger counterpart. This was particularly due to its flawless workmanship, very smooth controls and the above-average battery runtime. Even the screen convinced us to a large extent. Our records show sufficient brightness, vivid colors and a fantastic contrast. The midrange Windows phone also scored with an appealing performance that not always managed its way into the top ratings, but led to perfect and stutter-free control. And this is what counts in everyday use. However, its high weight and bulky shape might be a drawback.

Sony currently seems to believe ”more is better” in product development. This is virtually the only explanation why the Japanese manufacturer is throwing new Xperia models on the market on a weekly basis. One of the latest models is Sony's Xperia J, which is a conventional smartphone when looking at the key specs. An RRP of 240 Euros (~$321) is also a quite reasonable price. The slow clocked single-core processor, 512 MB of working memory and the low-performance graphics unit correspond to that. Nevertheless, the buyer gets a flawlessly manufactured phone including a 4-inch high-resolution screen in a midrange device. We did not have many points of complaint for the bright, high-contrast and stable viewing angle screen. But we did for camera quality and the device's performance. All pictures exhibited a visible bluish cast and the Xperia J's power was at most enough for the lower midfield. It is unusual for a modern phone not to be able to render HD videos. In return, the battery runtime proved to be first-rate.

The second HTC. With the One SV, HTC expands its successful Android smartphone family by a model featuring a fast LTE module, optimized hardware and a card reader. A look at the tech specs including a dual-core CPU and the price of 430 Euros (~$576) make it evident that HTC's One SV is still within the midrange, but with aspirations for the upper range. The 1 GB of memory and the decent graphics correspond to that. However, the SV's mediocre resolution positions it as a midrange device. Nevertheless, the positive aspects clearly outweigh the negative ones. They start with the decent build quality and the pleasant subjective feel, followed by the good speech quality and high-end screen and do not finish even with the removable battery and the appealing performance. Criticism? There is hardly anything to mention. Android Ice Cream Sandwich was not the newest, the included headset made a cheap impression and the speaker was at most middling. However, we found HTC's One SV compelling overall.

Smartphones of January 2013: Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini GT-I8190 and HTC One SV

Again, the room for the smartphones on the winner's podium is tight. All reviewed devices are only two percent points apart and all are consequently good. Nevertheless, Samsung's Galaxy S3 Mini GT-I8190 and HTC's One SV stand out by a hair's breadth and win our award.

竞争者：

三星Galaxy S3迷你GT-I8190：87％

HTC的Windows Phone 8S：85％

诺基亚Lumia 820：86％

索尼Xperia J：86％

宏达其中SV：87％

5智能手机类设备也面临着我们的测试。所有有一个共同点：它们属于中端设备的制造商。三星GT-I8190 Galaxy S3的迷你试图融入三星的Galaxy S3旗舰的大脚印。三星可能想使用相同的冠冕堂皇的名称，以促进销售。小S3是否承担的名称是理所当然的？我们相信它，因为手机是不是真的迷你一块4英寸的屏幕和S3迷你说服我们的测试大部分地区。我们只责备其不完美的接待处，平庸的性能和相当短的保修期为12个月。另一方面，三星的S3迷你收获多点亲侧。这是相当轻巧，拥有完美的做工和充足的连通，并与明快的色彩和绝对的视角稳定的出价相对明亮的画面。后置摄像头更适合拍照和录像，这是在智能手机领域并非总是如此。其完美的处理和Android果冻豆完成良好的总得分。

HTC还提供了中端设备的Windows Phone 8S，这是受益于HTC的8X溢价模型的辉煌。后者赢得我们2012年11月最佳奖项。喜欢这个名字所暗示的，制造商装备与Windows Phone 8的8S。这是一个很好的选择考虑使用它。雷德蒙的智能手机操作系统几乎总是从我们到现在为止收到的积极评价。不同于HTC的8X，“较小的”8S配有一个microSD插槽，这也是必要的，严密的内部存储器。然而，用户必须接受的分辨率和不可拆卸电池的缺点。几乎没有任何理由责备屏幕的亮度，材料或做工。控制大多是直观的和光滑的。然而，有点外壳海绵按钮的破坏了印象。四个可用的颜色提供了一个可喜的变化。最终，85％的一个很好的结果被记录在评分图表。

诺基亚的Lumia 820具有几乎相同的HTC 8S的起始位置。溢价模型的Lumia 920已经存在，并且芬兰制造商增加了中音今年年初。不同于三星S3 Mini和HTC 8S，实现完全的Lumia 820相同的评级作为其做大。这是特别是由于其完美的做工，很顺利控制和高于平均水平的电池运行时间。即使屏幕说服我们在很大程度上。我们的记录显示足够的亮度，鲜艳的色彩和奇妙的对比。中端的Windows手机还拿下了一个有吸引力的表现并不总是管理的方式进入最高收视率，但完美和流畅的控制。这是什么罪名，在日常使用。但是，其高的重量和体积庞大的形状可能会对一个缺点。

目前，索尼似乎相信“越多越好”，在产品开发的。这几乎是唯一可以解释为什么日本制造商抛出新的Xperia机型在市场上每周一次。最新的车型之一是索尼的Xperia J，这是一个传统的智能手机时，看着关键指标。一个建议零售价为240欧元（约$ 321）也是一个相当合理的价格。慢主频的单核处理器，512 MB的工作记忆和低性能的图形单元对应。尽管如此，买方得到一个完美的制造的手机中端设备包括一个4英寸的高分辨率屏幕。我们没有多点投诉，明​​亮，高对比度和视角屏稳定。但我们所做的相机质量和设备的性能。所有图片展出了明显偏蓝演员和较低的中场是最足够的Xperia J的权力。这是不寻常的一个现代化的手机不能够呈现高清视频。作为回报，电池的使用时间被证明是一流的。

HTC第二。有了一个SV，HTC扩展其成功的Andr​​oid智能手机家族的模型具有一个快速的LTE模块，优化的硬件和读卡器。双核CPU的价格430欧元（约$ 576）的技术规格，包括一看明显，HTC的SV是仍然在中音，但适用范围上的愿望。 1 GB的内存和体面的图形对应。然而，SV的平庸的分辨率将它定位为中端设备。然而，积极的方面显然大于消极因素。他们开始与体面构建质量和愉快的主观感觉，其次是良好的语音质量和高端的屏幕，不可拆卸电池和吸引人的性能甚至完成。批评？几乎没有什么提。 Android的冰淇淋三明治是不是最新的，附带的耳机便宜的印象，说话的是在大多数中等。然而，我们发现HTC的SV整体的吸引力。

2013年1月的智能手机：三星Galaxy S3迷你GT-I8190和HTC SV

同样，智能手机冠军的领奖台上的空间是紧的。所有审查设备相距只有百分之二点都是啥都好。不过，三星的Galaxy S3迷你GT-I8190和HTC的SV脱颖而出毫厘，赢得我们的大奖。