Notebookcheck Logo

华为 Nova 2 智能手机简短评测

自拍神器?华为发布了5英寸的中高档手机Nova 2,它配有2000万像素前置摄像头。快来看看它是否值得购买吧。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Huawei Nova 2 (Nova Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 659 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 443 PPI, capacitive, Full-HD, LTPS, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: headphones and microphone combo jack (3.5 mm), Card Reader: microSD cards up to 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: fingerprint sensor, proximity sensor, digital compass, gravity sensor, gyroscope, USB-OTG, BT aptX
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (800, 850, 900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 850, 900, 1.800, 2.100, 2.600 MHz), Downloads up to 300 MBit/s, Uploads up to 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 142.2 x 68.9
Battery
2950 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 18 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 18 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 400 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 400 h
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix F/1.8, LED flash, pixel size 1.25 µm
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual, modular power supply, USB cable, headset, protective sleeve, SIM tool, quick start guide, EMUI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
143 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

162.4 mm 79.9 mm 8 mm 170 g152.3 mm 75.3 mm 6.98 mm 162 g148.9 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 163 g147 mm 71 mm 7.5 mm 155 g146.5 mm 72.7 mm 7.8 mm 158 g142.2 mm 68.9 mm 6.9 mm 143 g141.2 mm 69.1 mm 7.1 mm 146 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s +245%
LG G6
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s +193%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s +97%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s +87%
Huawei Nova 2
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
75 MBit/s
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AX12
LG G6
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s +457%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s +385%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s +324%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s +315%
Huawei Nova 2
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 MBit/s -66%
Huawei Nova 2: Whole route
Huawei Nova 2: Whole route
Huawei Nova 2: Turning point
Huawei Nova 2: Turning point
Huawei Nova 2: Bridge
Huawei Nova 2: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
484
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LTPS tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 496 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 487.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 481 cd/m²
Contrast: 1002:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei Nova 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7"
Huawei Nova
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen
-24%
24%
12%
-9%
39%
13%
Brightness middle
481
458
-5%
550
14%
470
-2%
361
-25%
646
34%
493
2%
Brightness
487
473
-3%
535
10%
445
-9%
366
-25%
611
25%
485
0%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
92
-5%
88
-9%
87
-10%
89
-8%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.48
0.51
-6%
0.42
12%
0.22
54%
0.23
52%
0.44
8%
Contrast
1002
898
-10%
1310
31%
2136
113%
2809
180%
1120
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.2
7.1
-37%
3.3
37%
5.5
-6%
5.1
2%
4.5
13%
4.2
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.7
14.5
-67%
4.5
48%
11.9
-37%
10
-15%
8.3
5%
6.6
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
10.5
-54%
3.6
47%
7.6
-12%
5.5
19%
6
12%
3.8
44%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.38 92%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.39 92%
CCT
8149 80%
8951 73%
7226 90%
7454 87%
7388 88%
7996 81%
7438 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points +5%
Honor 9
150276 Points +137%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points +120%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points +55%
LG G6
151751 Points +140%
Huawei Nova
63206 Points 0%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points -6%
Honor 9
7034 Points +13%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points -17%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points +15%
LG G6
5703 Points -9%
Huawei Nova
4596 Points -26%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points +2%
Honor 9
6113 Points +27%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points +8%
LG G6
5152 Points +7%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points -8%
Honor 9
2779 Points +94%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points +41%
LG G6
2496 Points +74%
Huawei Nova
1264 Points -12%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points +18%
Honor 9
4154 Points +40%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points +33%
LG G6
3646 Points +23%
Huawei Nova
2280 Points -23%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points -48%
Honor 9
3258 Points +62%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points -21%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points +33%
LG G6
1930 Points -4%
Huawei Nova
1531 Points -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points +20%
Honor 9
4126 Points +389%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points +445%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points +79%
LG G6
5138 Points +509%
Huawei Nova
1006 Points +19%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points -5%
Honor 9
1069 Points +26%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points +24%
LG G6
1073 Points +27%
Huawei Nova
727 Points -14%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points +1%
Honor 9
1869 Points +104%
LG G6
1831 Points +99%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points +23%
Honor 9
6527 Points +84%
LG G6
4369 Points +23%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2997 Points
Honor 9
Points -100%
LG G6
7080 Points +136%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points +14%
Honor 9
28883 Points +137%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points +143%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points +63%
LG G6
29276 Points +140%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points +14%
Honor 9
38979 Points +233%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points +186%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points +87%
LG G6
32128 Points +175%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points +18%
Honor 9
15150 Points +5%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points +47%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points +6%
LG G6
22335 Points +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points +37%
Honor 9
2611 Points +321%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points +375%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points +92%
LG G6
3282 Points +429%
Huawei Nova
849 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points +38%
Honor 9
2990 Points +468%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points +624%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points +98%
LG G6
4121 Points +683%
Huawei Nova
737 Points +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points +28%
Honor 9
1809 Points +9%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points -1%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points +41%
LG G6
1961 Points +18%
Huawei Nova
1821 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points +15%
Honor 9
2666 Points +563%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points +453%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points +137%
LG G6
2669 Points +564%
Huawei Nova
473 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points +15%
Honor 9
2798 Points +748%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points +629%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points +145%
LG G6
2980 Points +803%
Huawei Nova
391 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points +28%
Honor 9
2287 Points +38%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points +6%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points +53%
LG G6
1955 Points +18%
Huawei Nova
1802 Points +8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps +10%
Honor 9
55 fps +175%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps +130%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps +115%
LG G6
46 fps +130%
Huawei Nova
22 fps +10%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps +21%
Honor 9
60 fps +216%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps +289%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps +116%
LG G6
75 fps +295%
Huawei Nova
23 fps +21%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps +8%
Honor 9
28 fps +215%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps +158%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps +113%
LG G6
27 fps +203%
Huawei Nova
10 fps +12%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps +24%
Honor 9
30 fps +280%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps +229%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps +128%
LG G6
38 fps +381%
Huawei Nova
9.8 fps +24%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps +21%
Honor 9
22 fps +323%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps +131%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps +112%
LG G6
16 fps +208%
Huawei Nova
6.6 fps +27%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps +33%
Honor 9
22 fps +358%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps +150%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps +108%
LG G6
29 fps +504%
Huawei Nova
6.2 fps +29%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps +13%
Honor 9
16 fps +416%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps +171%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps +119%
LG G6
11 fps +255%
Huawei Nova
3.6 fps +16%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps +21%
Honor 9
15 fps +417%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps +417%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps +114%
LG G6
20 fps +590%
Huawei Nova
3.4 fps +17%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps
LG G6
24.34 fps +391%
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points
LG G6
37621 Points +121%
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points
LG G6
35449 Points +305%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points
LG G6
647 Points +340%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps
LG G6
59 fps +25%

Legend

 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Nova Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
70 Points +153%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points +112%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.6 Points +104%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.08 Points +63%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.49 Points +10%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
27.69 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.84 Points -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
12058 Points +148%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points +110%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points +87%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points +13%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
4864 Points
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4717 Points -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
8863 ms *
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8742 ms * +1%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8235 ms * +7%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * +53%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * +64%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
2792 ms * +68%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464 ms * +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
130 Points +37%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points +28%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points +13%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
95 Points
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points -9%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
60 Points -37%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Nova 2BQ Aquaris X ProHonor 9HTC U UltraHuawei P9 PlusLG G6Huawei Nova
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
2%
18%
-2%
12%
0%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.4
270.5
-10%
293
-2%
423.9
41%
284.3
-5%
428.7
43%
248.3
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.8
139.6
-28%
204
6%
164.7
-15%
140.4
-27%
122.8
-36%
75
-61%
Random Read 4KB
69
37.97
-45%
55.7
-19%
84.2
22%
39.33
-43%
95.2
38%
38.19
-45%
Random Write 4KB
25.41
12.07
-52%
32.7
29%
13.7
-46%
51.2
101%
16.58
-35%
44.63
76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
68.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
14%
68 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
62.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
13%
79.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
36.22 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37%
34.64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
67.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
87%
24.95 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
53.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
47%
47.69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high56 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high28 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. Load
 37.2 °C33.8 °C36.4 °C 
 37.6 °C34.1 °C39.6 °C 
 36 °C35.6 °C37.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
33 °C33.1 °C35.8 °C
33.2 °C34.4 °C35.8 °C
33.1 °C34.1 °C35.6 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.631.22525.438.43125.330.14032.930.25033.631.96331.635.58028.424.51002726.912520.823.7160223920021.350.525020.849.531521.249.340019.458.250019.559.963017.763.680017.962.5100017.867125017.372.4160017.473.6200016.772.2250017.273.3315018.274.6400017.973.8500017.676.4630017.776.9800017.876.41000017.977.61250018.175.51600018.262.9SPL3085.7N1.361.9median 17.9median 67Delta1.411.637.536.427.134.832.437.534.827.726.630.831.334.832.233.629.529.731.732.238.33634.933.72638.350.547.147.347.739.450.531.633.329.131.936.231.628.231.532.626.728.628.230.625.227.624.525.430.632.626.428.523.621.332.642.523.539.922.123.342.549.423.446.621.222.549.45524.65022.722.45559.531.553.326.121.359.563.528.755.421.818.463.567.126.358.620.117.567.169.230.256.820.317.569.270.337.65722.217.270.370.141.756.928.516.870.174.852.660.840.617.374.878.459.862.945.817.478.478.761.364.942.316.678.78265.166.247.517.38279.563.963.348.817.679.577.668.26248.917.677.67273.356.654.217.77261.673.24653.917.461.653.371.136.752.917.753.347.473.926.954.817.947.439.973.122.654.218.139.926.859.618.741.118.126.888.480.373.361.629.888.464.534.827.811.81.364.5median 64.5median 52.6median 55.4median 40.6median 17.7median 64.513.620.312.313.81.713.631.642.925.433.825.327.832.933.233.641.731.631.928.431.8272620.824.72228.621.336.520.85021.25519.45719.556.517.757.317.963.817.870.517.372.317.474.816.77817.276.918.279.417.981.417.678.217.774.217.873.917.968.618.170.818.2683088.31.366.5median 17.9median 68.61.411.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova 2Huawei P9 PlusHuawei Nova
Huawei Nova 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Nova audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.59 / 1.71 Watt
Load midlight 4.61 / 5.84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova 2
2950 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-39%
-50%
4%
-14%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.67
-3%
1.13
-74%
1
-54%
0.87
-34%
0.62
5%
0.61
6%
Idle Average *
1.59
1.7
-7%
2.25
-42%
2.41
-52%
1.2
25%
1.43
10%
1.83
-15%
Idle Maximum *
1.71
1.78
-4%
2.3
-35%
2.46
-44%
1.27
26%
1.48
13%
1.86
-9%
Load Average *
4.61
4.42
4%
4.89
-6%
6.8
-48%
4.69
-2%
5.52
-20%
3.71
20%
Load Maximum *
5.84
6.3
-8%
7.99
-37%
8.9
-52%
5.63
4%
10.47
-79%
5.19
11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 32min
Huawei Nova 2
2950 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
-8%
-8%
-0%
12%
26%
Reader / Idle
1378
1840
34%
1399
2%
1568
14%
1446
5%
1789
30%
1870
36%
H.264
711
644
-9%
564
-21%
605
-15%
776
9%
779
10%
717
1%
WiFi v1.3
602
730
21%
516
-14%
546
-9%
530
-12%
692
15%
873
45%
Load
272
254
-7%
278
2%
214
-21%
263
-3%
252
-7%
328
21%

Pros

+ iPhone类似的时尚外观
+ 明亮的显示效果
+ 双SIM卡
+ USB Type-C
+ 蓝牙4.2 / aptX
+ 高存储容量
+ 高性能
+ 续航长
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 仅支持混合双SIM卡
- 仅支持USB 2.0
- 平庸的Wi-Fi性能
- 平均水准的摄像头
In review: Huawei Nova 2. Test model provided by Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Nova 2. Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

华为的这台Nova 2,是一款优秀的智能手机,属于中高端手机。该5英寸的安卓机具有质量很好,握感舒适。外观彰显高端气质。4 GB 的运行内存以及 ARM Mali-T830 MP2,配合 HiSilicon Kirin 659 八核处理芯片,提供了很高的系统性能,使得Nova 2成为一款非常全面的设备。除了能提供顺畅的上网体验,还能在全高清屏幕下,完美运行安卓游戏。 另外,它的续航时间长,充电速度快;即便是华为的EMUI 用户界面占用了大量的空间,它的存储空间还是相对较大的空间。

除了2千万像素的前置摄像头,Nova 2达不到华为宣传的“自拍神器”称号。该机提供了稳定但是不出众的摄像水平。

只有您不使用microSD卡时候,才能使用Nova 2的双SIM卡功能,因为这是个混合插槽。问题不大,因为内部存储空间不会很快被填满。同时,您也应该了解到USB Type-C端口仅支持2.0的事实。可惜的是,Wi-Fi互传功能,不是数据传输到智能手机时的好选择。相机也有点令人失望。它不差,只是无法达到预期的水平。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Huawei Nova 2 - 10/02/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
39 / 60 → 66%
Weight
93%
Battery
93%
Display
85%
Games Performance
22 / 63 → 35%
Application Performance
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
76%
Average
74%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 Nova 2 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-10-26 (Update: 2017-10-26)