华为 Nova 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 493 cd/m²
Contrast: 1120:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.39
| Huawei Nova IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | -13% | -30% | 18% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 493 | 509 3% | 658 33% | 328 -33% | 378 -23% | 485 -2% |
| Brightness | 485 | 511 5% | 633 31% | 334 -31% | 380 -22% | 481 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 93 -1% | 88 -6% | 91 -3% | 90 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.66 -50% | 0.5 -14% | |||
| Contrast | 1120 | 997 -11% | 970 -13% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.2 48% | 4.9 -17% | 4.6 -10% | 1.95 54% | 4.2 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.6 | 5.8 12% | 9.1 -38% | 14.7 -123% | 3.09 53% | 7.9 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 2 47% | 5.8 -53% | 2.8 26% | 1.86 51% | 4.8 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 7438 87% | 6768 96% | 7840 83% | 6612 98% | 6376 102% | 7568 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 1 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 42.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Nova | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | ZTE Axon 7 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | Huawei Nova Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | 30% | 54% | -38% | -19% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 248.3 | 254.8 3% | 282 14% | 406.5 64% | 209.4 -16% | 241.6 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 75 | 73.1 -3% | 188 151% | 150.9 101% | 60.4 -19% | 82.1 9% |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.19 | 38.78 2% | 74 94% | 121.1 217% | 22.9 -40% | 35.64 -7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 44.63 | 45.58 2% | 7.4 -83% | 16.22 -64% | 11.2 -75% | 30.12 -33% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.5 | 74.6 -6% | 79.2 0% | 78.4 -1% | 41.64 -48% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 47.69 | 50.6 6% | 50.1 5% | 51.3 8% | 33.32 -30% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 53 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Nova audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
| Idle |  0.61 / 1.83 / 1.86 Watt |
| Load |
3.71 / 5.19 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Nova 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 39% | -12% | -12% | -3% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.51 16% | 0.83 -36% | 0.64 -5% | 0.96 -57% | 0.49 20% |
| Idle Average * | 1.83 | 0.87 52% | 2.11 -15% | 0.84 54% | 1.64 10% | 1.63 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.86 | 0.9 52% | 2.12 -14% | 0.87 53% | 1.71 8% | 1.76 5% |
| Load Average * | 3.71 | 1.69 54% | 3.41 8% | 6.02 -62% | 2.98 20% | 2.98 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.19 | 4 23% | 5.46 -5% | 10.45 -101% | 5.08 2% | 4.99 4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Nova 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 1% | -22% | 9% | 5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1870 | 2540 36% | 1502 -20% | 1735 -7% | 2323 24% | 2048 10% |
| H.264 | 717 | 1190 66% | 905 26% | 704 -2% | 672 -6% | 732 2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 873 | 824 -6% | 797 -9% | 411 -53% | 626 -28% | 820 -6% |
| Load | 328 | 652 99% | 352 7% | 245 -25% | 483 47% | 366 12% |
Pros
Cons
就像华为的Nova Plus手机一样，华为的Nova手机是一台几乎没有瑕疵的好手机。它的亮点包括一块明亮的全高清屏幕，高质量的坚硬外壳，USB Type-C接口，双SIM卡支持以及一个可靠的指纹传感器。尽管它的1200万像素主摄像头相比Nova Plus来说分辨率略低，也缺少光学防抖组件，但是它却能拍摄质量很好的视频以及照片，甚至可以做到其他中端手机很少办到的事情---拍摄UHD视频。尽管它的电池容量相对较小，但是华为的Nova手机在续航方面却是让人信服的。比起Nova Plus，我们更喜欢喜欢Nova上这个支持更多UMTS频段以及更小的比吸收率（SAR）的无线电通讯模块。
华为带来了一台整体上值得推荐的5英寸设备，Nova。它与贵了80欧元（85美元）的Nova Plus相比，除了更小的屏幕外，几乎没有区别。
我们几乎可以完全将华为Nova Plus的缺点列表放在这里用 。它只有一个让SIM卡和Micro-SD卡不得不共享的混合卡槽而没有两个独立的卡槽。因为缺少对于5GHz网络的支持，它的Wi-Fi性能表现实在很难评价。再者，应用无法被安装到SD卡中。对于那些可以接受这些缺点而想省下80欧元，相比起Nova Plus，的买家来说，华为Nova是一台值得推荐的手机。根据厂商的说法，它很快会像它的5.5寸型号一样获得Android 7的更新。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Huawei Nova
- 01/09/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
