中兴 Nubia Music 评测--拥有流行艺术外观和双耳机插孔的 DJ 手机
大声点,再大声点
中兴通讯希望通过 Nubia Music 以小搏大。这款手机售价不到 150 欧元,配备了超大音量扬声器、播放音乐时的灯光效果、图形均衡器和两个耳机插孔。但这一切真的能让这款智能手机成为音乐之王吗?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
谁能想到呢?中兴 Nubia Music 以不到 150 欧元的价格为音乐爱好者提供了非凡的功能:首先是超酷的设计、用于音效设置和大音量的 DTS 综合软件以及双音频接口。此外,还配备了无线电接收器,即使没有网络也能享受音乐。
扬声器的音量很大,但高音效果也很重。不过,通过均衡器,您实际上可以用稍低的音量获得相当饱满的音效。蓝牙音频编解码器的数量本可以再多一些,但最常见的选项和高保真音频播放选项都已提供。
当然,为了保持如此低的价格,中兴也不得不节省一些开支:这款手机没有 5G,只支持 WiFi 4,也没有亮度传感器。处理器的运行速度也相当慢,电池充电也需要时间。至少它配备了合适的充电器,这在现在即使是非常昂贵的手机中也是不多见的。
如果你想把中兴 Nubia Music 作为日常智能手机使用,你将不得不忍受一些限制。不过,如果你喜欢听音乐,希望有全面的音效设置,喜欢它的设计,喜欢通过两个耳机一起听音乐,那么努比亚音乐是专用音乐播放器的不错替代品,同时也具备智能手机的优势。
我们希望未来能看到更高品质的姊妹机型,用更好的元件完善努比亚音乐的真正好方法,摆脱成本压力。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
实际上,中兴 Nubia Music 的制造商定价略低于 150 欧元,但在线零售商提供的价格要低得多:
在测试时,这款智能手机在galaxus.de 等网站的售价已经达到 110 欧元。在亚马逊(amazon.de)则要多付几欧元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTE Nubia Music UNISOC SC9863A ⎘ PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $6.88 Damolong Screen Protector Co... 2. $5.72 [1-Pack] for ZTE Nubia Music... 3. $8.72 [3 Pack] Compatible for ZTE ... List Price: 149€ | 199 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" 1612x720 267 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $109.97 List Price: 150€ | 211 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.88" 1640x720 260 PPI IPS | |
Motorola Moto G24 Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $124.50 List Price: 150€ | 181 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.56" 1612x720 269 PPI IPS | |
HMD Pulse Pro Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $5.99 Anoowkoa [2 Pack] Designed f... 2. $36.99 Ygpmoiki for HMD Pulse Pro T... 3. $5.99 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... List Price: 179€ | 196 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.65" 1612x720 265 PPI IPS |
规格
手机壳与功能 - 多彩智能手机
中兴 Nubia Music 脱颖而出:背面要么是黄色,要么是别致的波普艺术设计,但总是色彩斑斓。因此,这款手机并不适合摆在每张会议桌上,但仅凭它的设计,就能让你在轻松的氛围中获得好心情。
手机背面由塑料制成,摄像头模块由一块透明板略微凸起,透明板上还有一个巨大的扬声器,扬声器采用黑胶唱片设计。中间是一个 DTS-X 标识,会随着音乐节奏亮起。
手机的设计和稳定性都非常好,只有非常强的压力才能通过屏幕。
可使用 NFC 进行无线支付。手机配备 128 GB 大容量存储空间和 4 GB 内存。
内存可通过 microSD 卡扩展,但两个 SIM 卡插槽中的一个会被占用。在使用我们的参考 microSD 卡 Angelbird V60 进行的测试中,读卡器的运行速度一般。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HMD Pulse Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G24 (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 14C (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=82, last 2 years) | |
ZTE Nubia Music (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 可惜只有 WiFi 4
如果您使用中兴 Nubia Music 连接互联网,您不应该期待过高的速度:WiFi 4 是该设备提供的最快的 WiFi 标准。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,我们只测出了非常慢的传输速率:在发送数据时,传输速率不到 60 MBit/s,而在接收数据时,中兴 Nubia Music 的传输速率也赶不上同类昂贵的智能手机。
一般来说,数据传输速率足以满足音乐串流的要求,即使是串流高保真音频时也是如此。不过,数据传输速率偶尔会下降,但由于有缓冲,在播放音乐时并不明显。在测试过程中,我们只遇到过一次播放过程中短暂中断的情况。
您也无法通过移动网络使用当前最快的标准:4G 是这里的最大值。此外,可用的频率也很少,这意味着在国外旅行时往往无法使用移动互联网。在我们的测试中,接收信号也很不稳定,尤其是在困难的情况下,比如在间距很近的房屋之间。
触摸屏很容易使用,但极慢的 SoC 经常会造成卡顿和延迟。指纹传感器集成在右侧的待机键上,一旦按下就能可靠地识别指纹。解锁过程略有延迟。用户还可以使用面部解锁,但这是通过前置摄像头以 2D 方式完成的,因此操作起来相对容易。
软件和可持续性 - 更新情况不确定
这款智能手机最初交付时使用的是Android 13,但在我们测试期间已更新到 14 版。不过,这仍然比计划晚了一年,因为许多手机已经收到了Android 15。
即使是高端产品,中兴通常也只更新一年。努比亚音乐没有保证的更新期限,但你不应该指望软件能用太久。毕竟,目前Android 手机仍然通过 Google Play 更新提供基本的安全更新,即使制造商什么也不做。
制造商只提供了设备可持续发展的一般信息,例如,有一个到 2050 年中性气候生产的战略。没有关于产品所用材料或生产过程中二氧化碳排放量的信息。包装仍然使用塑料薄膜,因此也几乎没有任何承诺的证据。
照相机 - 部分存在图像错误
智能手机背面有一个 5000 万像素的摄像头。虽然可以看到第二个镜头,但它只是用来改善拍照时的虚化效果。主摄像头在室外拍摄的照片效果尚可,但在反差较大的暗处和亮处会丢失一些细节。
晨光的意境拍摄得相当不错,但画面细节随之显得模糊。在暗光和高对比度下,主体本身很容易辨认,但有趣的是,在处理图像时出现了一个奇怪的错误:背景的放大结构被附加到了图像的左边。
在实验室中,主相机可以提供对比度更高的图像,但清晰度还不错。在照度为 1 lux 的情况下,照片中没有任何可辨认的东西。
视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps。自动对焦的工作速度相对较慢,但总体成像质量在同价位产品中尚可。
前置自拍摄像头的分辨率为 500 万像素。用它拍摄的照片颗粒感很强,很模糊,在明亮的地方甚至会出现图像错误。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light显示屏 - 可识别的蓝色铸模
中兴 Nubia Musik 的屏幕分辨率为 1,612 x 720 像素,这在同类产品中是标准的,而且亮度也足够高,在我们的测试中高达 524 cd/m²。这意味着这款智能手机也可以在户外使用,但在非常明亮的日子里,最好还是在阴凉处使用。
在我们使用 CalMAN 软件和分光光度计进行的测试中,可以看到明显的偏蓝现象,这也使色彩表现失真。
IPS 屏幕的帧频高达 90 Hz,因此可以显示流畅的滚动效果。我们没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 514 cd/m²
Contrast: 1389:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212
ZTE Nubia Music IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 14C IPS, 1640x720, 6.9" | Motorola Moto G24 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | HMD Pulse Pro IPS, 1612x720, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 11% | 1% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 514 | 422 -18% | 521 1% | 501 -3% |
Brightness | 508 | 401 -21% | 510 0% | 470 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 93 -1% | 89 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.3 19% | 0.39 -5% | 0.17 54% |
Contrast | 1389 | 1407 1% | 1336 -4% | 2947 112% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 3.21 38% | 4.83 7% | 5.21 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.64 | 6.29 27% | 7.71 11% | 8.79 -2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 2.9 45% | 5.3 -0% | 6.3 -19% |
Gamma | 2.212 99% | 2.382 92% | 2.111 104% | 2.297 96% |
CCT | 7903 82% | 6338 103% | 7021 93% | 8524 76% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.9 ms rise | |
↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 音质好,运行时间长
中兴通讯希望在其音乐智能手机上节省成本,并使用了 2021 年已经安装在入门级智能手机上的 SoC:Unisoc 9863A。 Unisoc 9863A.在日常使用中,该手机的性能较低,表现在系统经常迟缓,在基准测试中也是如此,尤其是与同价位的智能手机相比。
不过,该设备的外壳上几乎没有热量积聚,在 3DMark 压力测试中也没有发现 SoC 的节流现象。
对于一款音乐智能手机来说,扬声器当然非常重要。扬声器位于机身背面,看起来像一张黑胶唱片。实际上,在最大音量时,它能提供不错的音效,明显优于同价位的其他智能手机。如果再次按下音量增大按钮,就会激活增强功能,进一步提高音量。这时扬声器的音量会明显变大,但听起来也有点高音偏重。
好在智能手机上有 DTS 软件,您可以对音效进行大量设置,只要稍加尝试,您就能从这个价位的智能手机上获得意想不到的音效。
如果你仍然喜欢连接耳机或扬声器,可以使用两个 3.5 毫米插孔接口。这两个接口距离很近,但我们尝试过的大多数插头都可以同时插入。也可以通过蓝牙连接外部音响设备。最常见的蓝牙音频编解码器均可用于此目的,但对于一款明确的音乐手机来说,你本以为会有更多不同寻常的变体。
中兴 Nubia Music 的电池容量为 5,000 mAh,因此在我们的 WLAN 测试中可以达到 15:18 小时的续航时间。这足够用户在不充电的情况下使用一天,经济型用户可能会使用更长的时间。如果智能手机需要插电,充电过程可能需要 3 个小时。原因是最大充电功率为 10 瓦。尽管如此,该产品还是随附了一个充电器和一系列其他配件。
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G24 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
HMD Pulse Pro | |
ZTE Nubia Music | |
Average UNISOC SC9863A (4436 - 5187, n=2) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G24 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
HMD Pulse Pro | |
ZTE Nubia Music | |
Average UNISOC SC9863A (3111 - 6015, n=4) |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=16, last 2 years) | |
ZTE Nubia Music | |
Average UNISOC SC9863A () | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=16, last 2 years) | |
ZTE Nubia Music | |
Average UNISOC SC9863A () | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=16, last 2 years) | |
ZTE Nubia Music | |
Average UNISOC SC9863A () |
ZTE Nubia Music | Xiaomi Redmi 14C | Motorola Moto G24 | HMD Pulse Pro | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 32% | 41% | 295% | 16% | 522% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 269.6 | 300.9 12% | 291.9 8% | 966 258% | 283 ? 5% | 1886 ? 600% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 236.5 | 193.1 -18% | 252 7% | 824 248% | 195.1 ? -18% | 1474 ? 523% |
Random Read 4KB | 47.6 | 88.6 86% | 86.3 81% | 205 331% | 82.3 ? 73% | 278 ? 484% |
Random Write 4KB | 53.9 | 78.9 46% | 90.9 69% | 239 343% | 55.4 ? 3% | 312 ? 479% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
ZTE Nubia Music | |
Motorola Moto G24 | |
HMD Pulse Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Motorola Moto G24 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
ZTE Nubia Music |
Loudness without boost
ZTE Nubia Music audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HMD Pulse Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Loudness with maximum boost
ZTE Nubia Music audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HMD Pulse Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Nubia Music 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5160 mAh | Motorola Moto G24 5000 mAh | HMD Pulse Pro 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 918 | 976 6% | 969 6% | 899 -2% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
中兴 Nubia Music 是一款智能手机,它实际上只能出色地完成一件事:播放音乐。由于配备了丰富的均衡器软件、一个不错的扬声器、一个无线电接收器和两个音频接口,播放音乐的效果非常好。
但除此之外,这款手机的运行速度非常慢,而且不太可能提供更新。
ZTE Nubia Music
- 01/04/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.