Notebookcheck Logo

OCZ Vector 256 GB (VTR1-25SAT3-256G)测评

Barefoot 3. OCZ Vector中的最新产品,挑战三星840 Pro的市场上表现最好的SSD的标题。这项检讨会抛出一些轻的Indilinx的赤脚3控制器,固件,OCZ已经在开发上阔步前进,公司希望上。
Storage
In Review: OCZ Vector with 256 GB
In Review: The 256 GB OCZ Vector

For the original German review, see here.

Indilinx was bought by OCZ in March 2011 to better control the quality of the SSDs that it was manufacturing. OCZ used to source the controller of its older Vertex SSDs (excluding the Vertex 4) from Sandforce. OCZ had very limited control over the quality of the firmware. Barefoot 2 was the first controller iteration that was introduced in the Vertex 4s. But the firmware was used on a Marvell chip and the SSDs did not find much traction with the consumer. ‘Barefoot 3’ has a lot of improvements that were needed to make the OCZ SSDs competitive.

Historically, OCZ has been selling a large number of SSDs by undercutting the prices of the competition. Now, they aim at the premium SSD market which requires the SSDs to offer excellent performance, quality and reliability. The Samsung SSD 840 Pro is currently one of the best performing SSDs and contains the tried and tested 25 nm MLC NAND flash chips. OCZ tries to follow suit by including similar innards but with its own controller, the ‘Barefoot 3’.

The Vector's design is simple. It comes in a heavy but stable metal case, with a label that has been well designed but haphazardly stuck on. On the scales, there is a pretty big weight disparity (116 g vs. 53 g, 4 oz vs. 1.9 oz), which is important above all for possible use in lightweight notebooks. The Samsung SSD is definitely the better looking and the much lighter device.

The OCZ Vector came with a 3.5-inch adapter with the necessary screws, a small information booklet and a sticker. The product also included the license for a copy of Acronis True Image Cloning software that is useful when trying to transfer data from the old HDD/SSD to the SSD.

对于的德国原装审查,在这里看到。

 

Indilinx的是2011年3月购买了OCZ的固态硬盘更好地控制质量,它是制造。 OCZ源使用其顶点的固态硬盘(不包括顶点4)从SandForce的控制器。 OCZ质量的固件非常有限的控制权。赤脚2是第一个控制器中引入的顶点4S的迭代。但在固件上使用Marvell的芯片和固态硬盘并没有太大的牵引与消费者。 “赤脚3'有很大的改进,需要OCZ固态硬盘竞争力的。

 

从历史上看,OCZ已经销售了大量的固态硬盘,削弱了价格竞争。现在,他们的目标是在高档的SSD市场需要提供优良的性能,质量和可靠性的固态硬盘。三星SSD840 Pro是目前表现最好的固态硬盘,并包含久经考验的25纳米MLC NAND闪存芯片。 OCZ尝试类似的内脏,但其自己的控制器,“赤脚3',跟风者。

 

Vector的设计很简单。它有一个沉重的,但稳定的金属外壳,得到了很好的设计,但随意停留在一个标签。放在秤上,是一个相当大的体重差距(116克为53克,4盎司 - 1.9盎司的),重要的是以上所有可能使用重量轻的笔记本电脑。三星SSD显然是更好的前瞻性和轻得多的设备。

 

OCZ矢量是必要的螺丝,一个小的信息小册子及贴纸,一块3.5英寸的适配器。该产品还包括许可证副本的Acronis True Image克隆软件是有用的,当试图将数据从旧的HDD / SSD的固态硬盘。

The new SATA 3.0 6 Gbit/s Indilinx 'Barefoot 3' Controller IDX50M00-BC is able to interact with the flash memory through 8 parallel data channels. Two 256 MB DDR3 DRAM chips by Micron act as cache for the controller. There is an open slot available on the PCB for a third chip. The Vector does not support automatic hardware encryption (AES). The 25 nm synchronous MLC NAND flash memory chips used in the SSD come from Intel Micron IMFT, but are cut and packed by OCZ themselves (hence the OCZ label).

新的SATA 3.0 Gbit / s的Indilinx的“赤脚”控制器IDX50M00-BC是通过8位并行数据通道,可以进行互动与快闪记忆体。两个256 MB DDR3 DRAM芯片,美光科技公司的行为作为控制器的高速缓存。有三分之一芯片是一个开放的PCB上的可用时隙。向量不支持自动硬件加密(AES)。同步的25纳米MLC NAND闪存芯片的SSD中使用来自英特尔,美光IMFT,但被切断,包装,OCZ本身(因此OCZ标签)。

front side of the PCB
The top of the PCB
back side of the PCB
The bottom of the PCB
exposed controller behind the thermal relief pad
The exposed controller behind the heat sink
free space for another cache chip
Free space for another cache chip

Test System

 

 

Our test bed for the SSD was a desktop PC with an Intel Core i7-2600K (without overclocking), an Intel DP67BG mainboard, 8 GB DDR3 memory and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 graphics card. The SSD was placed in the SATA 3.0 6G Port 0 and was used with the Intel Rapid Storage driver 11.2.0.1006 under Windows 7 (64 bit).

我们的测试床的SSD是一个台式电脑,英特尔酷睿i7-2600K(不超频),英特尔DP67BG主板,8 GB DDR3内存和Nvidia的GeForce®(精视™)GTX 470显卡。固态硬盘被放置在SATA 3.06G端口0和使用英特尔快速存储驱动11.2.0.1006在Windows7(64位)。

Synthetic Benchmarks

Sequential transfer rates

When it comes to sequential data transfer rates, the new Vector is one of the fastest SSDs out there. In the AS SSD benchmark (uses compressed data only) it is just faster than the Samsung 840 Pro. In the Crystal Disk Mark test, the ‘reads’ of the Vector fall behind that of the Samsung but the ‘writes’ are similar. Only in the HD Tune test does the Vector fall conspicuously behind the competition. It has to be noted that the Vertex 4 with the ‘Barefoot 2’ controller had similar problems in the same test.

Overall, the Vector is one of the fastest performing SSDs in the benchmarks and barely trails the Samsung 840 Pro.

当涉及到连续的数据传输速率,新的载体是有最快的固态硬盘之一。在AS SSD Benchmark的(仅使用压缩数据),它只是比三星的840临快。在水晶盘Mark测试中,'读'的矢量落后的三星,但“写”是类似的。只有在HD Tune的测试矢量下降明显落后于竞争对手。它的要注意的是顶点4与“赤脚2'控制器也有类似的问题,在同样的测试。

 

总体而言,Vector是在基准测试的执行速度最快的固态硬盘之一,仅仅落后于三星840 Pro的。

AS SSD
Seq Read (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
516 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
513 MB/s -1%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
513 MB/s -1%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
499 MB/s -3%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
496.1 MB/s -4%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
503 MB/s -3%
Seq Write (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
500 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
498 MB/s 0%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
254 MB/s -49%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
395 MB/s -21%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
288.4 MB/s -42%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
459 MB/s -8%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Read Seq (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
513 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
531 MB/s +4%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
531 MB/s +4%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
514 MB/s 0%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
497.7 MB/s -3%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
486 MB/s -5%
Read 512 (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
438 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
471 MB/s +8%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
458 MB/s +5%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
350 MB/s -20%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
441.2 MB/s +1%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
308 MB/s -30%
Write Seq (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
514 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
513 MB/s 0%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
259 MB/s -50%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
413 MB/s -20%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
307.8 MB/s -40%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
470 MB/s -9%
Write 512 (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
506 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
501 MB/s -1%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
258 MB/s -49%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
409 MB/s -19%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
299.5 MB/s -41%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
470 MB/s -7%

Legend

 
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vector 256 GB
 
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
 
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV
 
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
 
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
 
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G

 

When you compare SSDs running the Sandforce SF-2xxx controllers with the Vector and the 840 Pro, the results are dependent on the type of data (compressed or uncompressed) that has been used in the tests. The results of the Intel SSD 520 clearly show how dependent the Sandforce controller is on compressible data in order to obtain maximum write speeds (dependency on type of data for read speeds is lower).

 当你运行的SandForce SF-2系列控制器的矢量和840 Pro的比较固态硬盘,其结果是依赖于(压缩或非压缩)已在测试中使用的数据类型。的英特尔SSD520的结果清楚地表明如何依赖的SandForce控制器是可压缩的数据,以获得最大写入速度(依赖于类型的数据读取速度较低)。

OCZ Vector (Barefoot 3)
OCZ Vector (Barefoot 3)
Samsung SSD 840 Pro (MDX)
Samsung SSD 840 Pro (MDX)
Samsung SSD 830 (MCX)
Samsung SSD 830 (MCX)
Intel SSD 520 (Sandforce SF-2281)
Intel SSD 520 (Sandforce SF-2281)

ATTO data rates

In the ATTO test, you can easily see the maximum transfer speeds for different block sizes. In the ’Read’ test, the Vector achieves the same outstanding results as the Samsung 840 Pro. There is a minor variance in the test results for the 32 KB block size.

In the ‘Write’ test, the Vector matches the performance of the Samsung 840 Pro and does overtake at certain points after the 4 KB run. Other than the hiccup in the test for read speeds, the Vector results are spectacular.

在ATTO测试中,你可以很容易地看到不同的块大小的最大传输速度。在“读取”测试,矢量达到三星的840 PRO同样出色的结果。有一个小的块大小为32 KB的测试结果差异。

 

在“写入”测试中,矢量,三星840 PRO的性能相匹配的,不超过4 KB运行在某些点后。除在测试读取速度的打嗝,矢量结果壮观。

4K data rates

As far as the 4K data rates go, the Samsung SSD 840 Pro has about a 6% lead over the OCZ Vector. The Vertex 4 comes in behind the Vector with a similar gap in performance between them. The Samsung 840 Basic, Intel 520 and Samsung 830 make up the list in that order.

至于4K的数据传输速率,三星SSD840 Pro拥有约6%的铅在OCZ载体。顶点4在后面的载体,它们之间具有相似的性能差距。三星,英特尔520和三星830840基本弥补的列表中的顺序。

AS SSD
4K Read (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
24.38 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
32.3 MB/s +32%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
26 MB/s +7%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
21 MB/s -14%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
24.41 MB/s 0%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
26.3 MB/s +8%
4K Write (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
79.3 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
73.5 MB/s -7%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
70 MB/s -12%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
69 MB/s -13%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
72 MB/s -9%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
76.7 MB/s -3%
4K-64 Read (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
362 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
381 MB/s +5%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
354 MB/s -2%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
285 MB/s -21%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
236.2 MB/s -35%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
332 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Write (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
302 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
329 MB/s +9%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
207 MB/s -31%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
104 MB/s -66%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
231.8 MB/s -23%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
306 MB/s +1%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Read 4k (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
27.8 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
35.7 MB/s +28%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
29.7 MB/s +7%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
24.1 MB/s -13%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
29.74 MB/s +7%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
29.6 MB/s +6%
Write 4k (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
103 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
88.9 MB/s -14%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
86.1 MB/s -16%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
85.4 MB/s -17%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
91.2 MB/s -11%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
85 MB/s -17%
Read 4k QD32 (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
383 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
402 MB/s +5%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
372 MB/s -3%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
307 MB/s -20%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
239.9 MB/s -37%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
349 MB/s -9%
Write 4k QD32 (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
372 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
370 MB/s -1%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
259 MB/s -30%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
152 MB/s -59%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
266.3 MB/s -28%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
342 MB/s -8%

Legend

 
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vector 256 GB
 
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
 
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV
 
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
 
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
 
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G

Access times

The new OCZ Vector achieves extraordinary results for access time in the AS SSD benchmark. The Vector shows slower access times for writes than the Vertex 4 only. The Vertex 4, however, had clear weaknesses when it came to read access times. Once again, the Vector is one of the top performers in this test overall.

新的OCZ矢量取得了不平凡的业绩,在AS SSD Benchmark的访问时间。矢量显示只比顶点4的写访问速度较慢的时间。顶点4,然而,有明确的弱点,当它来读取时间。再次,Vector是在这个测试中整体表现最好的之一。

AS SSD
Access Time Read (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
0.049 ms *
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
0.056 ms * -14%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
0.063 ms * -29%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
0.069 ms * -41%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
0.126 ms * -157%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
0.13 ms * -165%
Access Time Write (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
0.04 ms *
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
0.046 ms * -15%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
0.054 ms * -35%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
0.052 ms * -30%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
0.212 ms * -430%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
0.03 ms * +25%

Legend

 
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vector 256 GB
 
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
 
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV
 
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
 
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
 
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G

* ... smaller is better

PCMark System Performance

We measure the SSD application performance with help of PCMark Vantage and the newer PCMark 7 benchmarks.

In the newer PCMark 7, the Vector has the highest result of all the SSDs tested in the system. The Samsung 840 Pro is behind by only 2%. The 840 Pro clambers over the Vector in the System Storage subtest by 3%. The fastest tested storage unit is incidentally found in the Asus UX51VZ with two ADATA XM11 SSDs (in RAID). But the three percent lead isn't terribly large.

In the older PCMark Vantage benchmark, the Vector falls behind the older Samsung SSD 830 and the Intel 520 SSD in terms of overall scores. The difference in scores between the Vector and the Samsung 840 Pro are miniscule at best. The ’premium’ SSDs all huddle together in a 7 percent variance window with hardly any noticeable differences. In the HDD sub-score, the Vector is positioned right behind the 840 Pro once again, which is faster by 9%.

我们衡量SSD的应用性能,PCMark Vantage的帮助下和新的PCMark 7基准。

 

Vector中在较新的PCMark 7,具有最高的系统中的测试结果,所有的固态硬盘。三星840 Pro是落后,只有2%。 840 PRO,它又爬上在系统存储载体的分测验3%。在华硕UX51VZ两个ADATA XM11固态硬盘(RAID),测试速度最快的存储单元时偶然发现。但3%的铅是不是非常大。

 

在PCMark Vantage的基准,矢量落后于旧的三星SSD830和Intel520 SSD的整体成绩。在最好的载体和三星840的分数之间的差异是微乎其微。 '高级'的固态硬盘全部挤在了7%,方差窗口几乎没有任何明显的差异。在HDD子分数,矢量定位背后的840 PRO再次,这是快了9%。

PCMark Vantage
1024x768 HDD Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
50320 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
54763 Points +9%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
41912 Points -17%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
45077 Points -10%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
45907 Points -9%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
36056 Points -28%
1024x768 Productivity Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
28295 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
27046 Points -4%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
23240 Points -18%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
25451 Points -10%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
25406 Points -10%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
23055 Points -19%
1024x768 Communications Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
18284 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
16400 Points -10%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
14764 Points -19%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
17669 Points -3%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
19022 Points +4%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
16316 Points -11%
1024x768 Music Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
20564 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
21711 Points +6%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
18073 Points -12%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
20102 Points -2%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
21465 Points +4%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
18004 Points -12%
1024x768 Gaming Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
22689 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
23183 Points +2%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
18342 Points -19%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
20852 Points -8%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
22422 Points -1%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
20746 Points -9%
1024x768 TV and Movies Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
7377 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
7544 Points +2%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
7427 Points +1%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
7371 Points 0%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
7038 Points -5%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
7294 Points -1%
1024x768 Memories Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
13754 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
13721 Points 0%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
13270 Points -4%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
13279 Points -3%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
13283 Points -3%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
11982 Points -13%
1024x768 Result (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
19638 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
19147 Points -3%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
17648 Points -10%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
19999 Points +2%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
20391 Points +4%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
18602 Points -5%
PCMark 7
System Storage (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
5371 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
5519 Points +3%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
5269 Points -2%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
5248 Points -2%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
5216 Points -3%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
5085 Points -5%
Computation (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
4658 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
4589 Points -1%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
4572 Points -2%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
4573 Points -2%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
4962 Points +7%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
4573 Points -2%
Creativity (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
5401 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
5405 Points 0%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
5214 Points -3%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
5280 Points -2%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
5310 Points -2%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
5176 Points -4%
Entertainment (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
4823 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
4700 Points -3%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
4689 Points -3%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
4662 Points -3%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
4739 Points -2%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
4662 Points -3%
Productivity (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
4782 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
4905 Points +3%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
4780 Points 0%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
4728 Points -1%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
4808 Points +1%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
4611 Points -4%
Lightweight (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
5172 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
5236 Points +1%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
5018 Points -3%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
5039 Points -3%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
5068 Points -2%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
4900 Points -5%
Score (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
5028 Points
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
4945 Points -2%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
4862 Points -3%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
4866 Points -3%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
4941 Points -2%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
4835 Points -4%

Legend

 
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vector 256 GB
 
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
 
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV
 
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
 
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
 
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G

Application Profiles with IOMeter

You can also test the practical performance of an SSD with the "IOMix" - c`t Application profile and "Workstation" for the IOMeter software. Both are access profiles that try and simulate realistic usage of the SSD by regular users (IOMix) and/or a workstation. In both tests, the Vector comes away with another win in this test. Even the fast Intel SSD 520 and the Vertex 4 are clearly trumped by the Vector.

您还可以测试SSD与“IOMix” - C`T应用的配置文件和“工作站”的IOMeter测试软件的实际性能。两者都尝试和模拟普通用户实际使用的SSD(IOMix)和/或工作站的访问配置文件。在这两项测试中,向量在本次测试的另一次胜利。即使是快速的英特尔SSD520和Vertex4清楚地战胜了由Vector。

IOMeter
Workstation, 3min, 10GB Partition (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
269 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
135.8 MB/s -50%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
61.8 MB/s -77%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
115.8 MB/s -57%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
165.7 MB/s -38%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
225.2 MB/s -16%
IOMix, 5min, 10GB Partition (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
275 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
177.5 MB/s -35%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
89.6 MB/s -67%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
217 MB/s -21%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
230.2 MB/s -16%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
211.9 MB/s -23%

Legend

 
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vector 256 GB
 
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
 
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV
 
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
 
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
 
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G

Resistance to Performance Drops

OCZ advertises the Vector as being especially resistant to drops in performance (lags/latency) when heavily loaded. In order to test this, we put SSDs through a stress test with the IOMix profile. In this test, data is written to the SSD and read repeatedly for 60 minutes. At 68 MB/s, the Vector's results are distinctly ahead of those of the Samsung SSDs (830, 840 Pro and 840). But thanks to over-provisioning, the Intel 520 Series with a Sandforce controller and larger memory reserves is clearly ahead with a result 200 MB/s taking the top spot.

Over-provisioning is a method employed by SSD manufacturers to extend the life of the SSD flash modules. It is not represented in the total available space for use. It helps in the distribution of writes and erases throughout the NAND chips and also provides a buffer for the controller to manage the writes and erase cycles. During garbage collection, over-provisioning reduces write amplification when the controller writes to the memory. The Samsung 840 Basic also has more free memory space available, which explains its minor lead over the 840 Pro.

OCZ发布的载体,特别是耐滴性能(延迟/延迟)时重仓。为了测试这一点,我们把固态硬盘的通过压力测试的IOMix配置文件。在该试验中,数据被写入到SSD,60分钟,重复读取。在68 MB/秒,Vector的结果有明显提前的三星固态硬盘(830,840 Pro和840)。但是,由于过度配置,英特尔520系列与SandForce控制器和更大的内存储量明显领先与200 MB/ s的第一把交椅。

 

以上配置是采用SSD制造商的方法,以延长寿命的SSD闪存模块。中未表示的总的可用空间的使用。它有助于分配的写入和擦除整个NAND芯片还提供了一个缓冲的控制器管理的写入和擦除周期。垃圾收集过程中,过度供应,降低写入放大时,控制器写入内存。三星840基本也有更多的可用内存,可用空间超过840 Pro的,这说明它含有少量的铅。

OCZ VOCZ Vector 256 GB
OCZ Vector 256 GB
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB
Intel SSD 520 240 GB
Intel SSD 520 240 GB

Practical Tests

For our practical tests, we use the good ol' stopwatch to examine the performance of the SSD as a system disk. Looking at the booting of Windows 7, you can hardly tell the difference between all the SSDs. The boot times for the Samsung 830, Intel 520 and the Vector are all between 33 and 34 seconds. According to our tests, the older Samsung 470 needed one second longer to boot to the desktop.

In the copying of gaming files from the folder containing Supreme Commander - Forged Alliance, the Vector doesn't really do well when you compare it to other SSDs. The folder is 7.29 GB in size and contains 2101 files. In duplicating data on the SSD, the Vector "only" achieves the results of the Intel 520 and OCZ Vertex 4 (though the Vertex gave us varying results). Still the undisputed winner is the older Samsung 830 with an average of 42 seconds (followed by the 840 Pro in about 43-45 seconds). Older SATA 2 SSDs like the Samsung 470 need one to two minutes to complete this test.

In the AS SSD copying benchmark, the Vector, like the Samsung 840 Pro, doesn't give a consistent result. At its best, the Vector does slightly better than the Samsung 840 Pro in all the subtests, but its weakest results lie distinctly lower than the weakest results of the 840 Pro.

In starting the single-player mode of Battlefield 3, all the modern SSDs need about 19-20 seconds. Even the old Samsung 470 needs a maximum of one second longer. In comparison, a traditional Toshiba MK6461GSYN 640 GB 7200rpm notebook hard drive needs 72 seconds for the same task.

对于我们的实际测试中,我们使用好醇'秒表检查SSD作为系统盘的性能。在Windows 7的启动,你很难告诉所有的固态硬盘之间的区别。三星830,英特尔520和Vector的启动时间是33秒和34秒之间。根据我们的测试,三星470需要,一秒启动到桌面。

 

在复制的游戏文件的文件夹中最高指挥官 - 锻造联盟,矢量并没有真正做的很好,当你把它比作其它固态硬盘。该文件夹的大小是7.29 GB,包含2101文件。在复制的SSD上的数据,矢量“只”实现的Intel520和OCZ的顶点(顶点虽然给了我们不同的结果)的结果。仍然是无可争议的赢家是三星830,平均42秒(840 Pro在约43-45秒)。较旧的SATA固态硬盘,如三星470需要一到两分钟来完成这个测试。

 

在AS SSD复制基准,矢量,如三星840 Pro的,不给予一致的结果。在其最好的,矢量,略好于三星840 Pro在所有的子测试,但其最薄弱的结果躺在明显低于最弱的结果的840 PRO。

 

在开始的“战地3”的单人游戏模式中,所有的现代固态硬盘需要约19-20秒。即使是老三星470需要一秒钟的时间最多。相比较而言,传统的东芝MK6461GSYN640 GB7200转笔记本电脑硬盘驱动器需要7

AS SSD copying benchmark OCZ Vector
AS SSD copying benchmark OCZ Vector
AS SSD copying benchmark OCZ Vector
AS SSD copying benchmark OCZ Vector
AS SSD
Copy Game MB/s (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
274 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
269 MB/s -2%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
158 MB/s -42%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
258 MB/s -6%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
214 MB/s -22%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
229 MB/s -16%
Copy Program MB/s (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
247 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
222 MB/s -10%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
124 MB/s -50%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
192 MB/s -22%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
143.9 MB/s -42%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
196 MB/s -21%
Copy ISO MB/s (sort by value)
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
448 MB/s
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
429 MB/s -4%
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop
211 MB/s -53%
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop
415 MB/s -7%
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
368 MB/s -18%
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
347 MB/s -23%

Legend

 
OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vector 256 GB
 
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
 
Samsung SSD 840 250 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV
 
Samsung SSD 830 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
 
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
 
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop Intel Core i7-2600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G

Power Consumption

We test the SSD power consumption with two multi-meters on the same desktop used to conduct our benchmark tests. Unfortunately the system doesn't offer any DMPI support, though all notebooks do, which means the power consumption in idle mode doesn't fall like it can in mobile systems (so far we only know of the Samsung SSD 840 Series that takes full advantage of this and drops to 0.04 Watts).

On average, taking all measured values into account, the OCZ Vector does extraordinarily well - coming in in second place, right behind the Samsung SSD 840 Pro. Unfortunately for notebook users, there's a slight drawback. Without load, the power consumption level is considerably higher than that of the competition. Since this load state is the most common in mobile use, this is clearly reflected in the results.

在同一桌面上进行我们的基准测试,我们测试的SSD功耗两个多米。不幸的是,系统不提供任何DMPI的支持,虽然所有的笔记本电脑在空闲模式下的功耗,这意味着如不属于它可以在移动通信系统(到目前为止,我们只知道的三星SSD840系列,以充分利用这一点,下降到0.04瓦)。

 

平均而言,考虑到所有的测量值,OCZ矢量确实非常好 - 在第二位,仅次于三星的SSD840 Pro的未来。不幸的是,对于笔记本用户来说,有一个轻微的缺点。无负载时,功率消耗电平比的竞争是相当高的。由于这种负载在移动使用中的状态是最常见的,这清楚地反映在结果中。

Power consumption idle and with CrystalDiskMark load
Power consumption idle and with CrystalDiskMark load

Verdict

The OCZ Vector is OCZ's first ’premium’ SSD with its own controller (software and hardware). The performance measurements in our test system speak for themselves and are, on average, at the same level as the Samsung SSD 840 Pro. The Vector makes an excellent impression, especially when using the application profiles IOMix and Workstation in the IOMeter and the PCMark 7 test. The relatively small performance drop in the stress test is also a clear plus factor.

The relatively high weight and the high idle power consumption unfortunately disqualify the Vector for use in lightweight subnotebooks.

Price-wise, the Vector currently sells at around the same price as the Samsung 840 Pro, making it cheaper than the Intel 520.

As is always the case, when new controllers are introduced, reliability is unknown. The Vector has to prove its reliability. But with a 5-year warranty, OCZ strongly expresses their confidence in the Vector.

In conclusion, the Vector is a very good product from OCZ that sets bar high in many areas and is especially suited for use in desktop machines.

OCZ Vector是OCZ的第一个'高级'的SSD其自己的控制器(软件和硬件)。在我们的测试系统的性能测量为自己说话,是,平均而言,在同级别的三星SSD840 Pro的。向量极好的印象,尤其是在使用应用程序时的配置文件IOMix和工作站的IOMeter测试的PCMark7测试。在压力测试是比较小的性能下降也有明显的有利因素。

 

不幸的是,权重比较高的高的闲置功耗载体的使用重量轻的次笔记型电脑,经过资格。

 

的矢量从价格上看,目前的售价大约在同一价格,三星840 PRO,它比Intel便宜的520。

 

的情况下,当引入新的控制器,可靠性是未知的。载体,以证明其可靠性。但是,随着5年的保修期,OCZ中的矢量强烈地表达了他们的信心。

 

总之,Vector是一个非常好的产品,OCZ设置酒吧在许多领域,特别适合于使用在台式机。

OCZ Vector 256 GB

Appendix

In the following table, we present all the test values in comparison to the Samsung SSD 840 Pro, the Intel SSD 520 and the Vertex 4. On average, the 840 Pro just barely supersedes the Vector 256 GB. You can clearly see the improvement in performance in comparison to the old OCZ Vertex 4.

 

OCZ Vector 256 GB Desktop
GeForce GTX 470, 2600K, OCZ Vector 256 GB
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256 GB Desktop
GeForce GTX 470, 2600K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB Desktop
GeForce GTX 470, 2600K, Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB Desktop
GeForce GTX 470, 2600K, OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB VTX4-25SAT3-256G
PCMark 7
0%
-0%
-4%
System Storage
5371
5519
3%
5216
-3%
5085
-5%
Computation
4658
4589
-1%
4962
7%
4573
-2%
Creativity
5401
5405
0%
5310
-2%
5176
-4%
Entertainment
4823
4700
-3%
4739
-2%
4662
-3%
Productivity
4782
4905
3%
4808
1%
4611
-4%
Lightweight
5172
5236
1%
5068
-2%
4900
-5%
Score
5028
4945
-2%
4941
-2%
4835
-4%
IOMeter
-43%
-27%
-20%
Workstation, 3min, 10GB Partition
269
135.8
-50%
165.7
-38%
225.2
-16%
IOMix, 5min, 10GB Partition
275
177.5
-35%
230.2
-16%
211.9
-23%
ATTO Disk Benchmark
17%
-1%
-26%
8192KB write
535680
468882
-12%
527637
-2%
470939
-12%
4096KB write
535532
474058
-11%
523776
-2%
473014
-12%
2048KB write
535532
468882
-12%
527637
-1%
470939
-12%
1024KB write
535532
470939
-12%
527637
-1%
470939
-12%
512KB write
534199
467424
-13%
527637
-1%
470939
-12%
256KB write
532634
468532
-12%
528689
-1%
471628
-11%
128KB write
532634
528689
-1%
524802
-1%
471859
-11%
64KB write
524802
518914
-1%
512507
-2%
471986
-10%
32KB write
510722
493887
-3%
489443
-4%
419037
-18%
16KB write
455901
419037
-8%
421028
-8%
431325
-5%
8KB write
433373
389865
-10%
389865
-10%
319635
-26%
4KB write
306323
275937
-10%
276959
-10%
199753
-35%
2KB write
150601
170655
13%
92477
-39%
100388
-33%
1KB write
78884
90690
15%
46986
-40%
50944
-35%
0.5KB write
40832
45454
11%
23757
-42%
25216
-38%
8192KB read
559240
560538
0%
556663
0%
546588
-2%
4096KB read
559240
560538
0%
556663
0%
546588
-2%
2048KB read
559240
560538
0%
556663
0%
546588
-2%
1024KB read
559240
560538
0%
554109
-1%
512525
-8%
512KB read
559240
556663
0%
545354
-2%
481498
-14%
256KB read
557784
557784
0%
529998
-5%
514709
-8%
128KB read
557104
553047
-1%
492676
-12%
500029
-10%
64KB read
547777
545078
0%
486146
-11%
397109
-28%
32KB read
356554
527106
48%
434335
22%
271203
-24%
16KB read
454764
467021
3%
373701
-18%
181554
-60%
8KB read
420035
446592
6%
337950
-20%
133549
-68%
4KB read
274916
326803
19%
223854
-19%
64191
-77%
2KB read
52213
178761
242%
120356
131%
28682
-45%
1KB read
43264
105508
144%
62208
44%
11883
-73%
0.5KB read
27136
56448
108%
30976
14%
5476
-80%
AS SSD
1%
-61%
-16%
Copy Game MB/s
274
269
-2%
214
-22%
229
-16%
Copy Program MB/s
247
222
-10%
143.9
-42%
196
-21%
Copy ISO MB/s
448
429
-4%
368
-18%
347
-23%
Score Total
1100
1165
6%
802
-27%
1052
-4%
Score Write
432
453
5%
339
-22%
429
-1%
Score Read
438
465
6%
309
-29%
408
-7%
Access Time Write *
0.04
0.046
-15%
0.212
-430%
0.03
25%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.056
-14%
0.126
-157%
0.13
-165%
4K-64 Write
302
329
9%
231.8
-23%
306
1%
4K-64 Read
362
381
5%
236.2
-35%
332
-8%
4K Write
79.3
73.5
-7%
72
-9%
76.7
-3%
4K Read
24.38
32.3
32%
24.41
0%
26.3
8%
Seq Write
500
498
0%
288.4
-42%
459
-8%
Seq Read
516
513
-1%
496.1
-4%
503
-3%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
4%
-19%
-10%
Write 4k QD32
372
370
-1%
266.3
-28%
342
-8%
Read 4k QD32
383
402
5%
239.9
-37%
349
-9%
Write 4k
103
88.9
-14%
91.2
-11%
85
-17%
Read 4k
27.8
35.7
28%
29.74
7%
29.6
6%
Write 512
506
501
-1%
299.5
-41%
470
-7%
Read 512
438
471
8%
441.2
1%
308
-30%
Write Seq
514
513
0%
307.8
-40%
470
-9%
Read Seq
513
531
4%
497.7
-3%
486
-5%
HD Tune Transfer Rate Minimum
Transfer Rate Minimum
288
400
39%
356.8
24%
238
-17%
HD Tune Transfer Rate Maximum
Transfer Rate Maximum
305
417
37%
405.8
33%
283
-7%
HD Tune Transfer Rate Average
Transfer Rate Average
295
414
40%
376.2
28%
271
-8%
HD Tune Access Time
Access Time *
0.1
0.14
HD Tune Burst Rate
Burst Rate
345
199
-42%
300.6
-13%
123.6
-64%
PCMark Vantage
0%
-2%
-12%
1024x768 HDD Score
50320
54763
9%
45907
-9%
36056
-28%
1024x768 Productivity Score
28295
27046
-4%
25406
-10%
23055
-19%
1024x768 Communications Score
18284
16400
-10%
19022
4%
16316
-11%
1024x768 Music Score
20564
21711
6%
21465
4%
18004
-12%
1024x768 Gaming Score
22689
23183
2%
22422
-1%
20746
-9%
1024x768 TV and Movies Score
7377
7544
2%
7038
-5%
7294
-1%
1024x768 Memories Score
13754
13721
0%
13283
-3%
11982
-13%
1024x768 Result
19638
19147
-3%
20391
4%
18602
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 7%
-4% / -14%
-18% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OCZ Vector 256 GB (VTR1-25SAT3-256G)测评
Klaus Hinum, 2013-01-16 (Update: 2014-06-13)