ODYS Vario Pro 12 (Z8350, 高清) 变形本简短评测

Name: ODYS Vario Pro 12
Brand: ODYS

手写输入。 来自Odys的这台变形本支持主动式手写笔，可以方便地使用Windows Ink功能。同时它运行安静，电池续航优秀，搭配了一块IPS屏幕。260欧元（约1900人民币）的售价也十分优惠。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/08/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Vario Pro 12

Processor

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4 x 1.4 - 1.9 GHz, Cherry Trail

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Core: 500 MHz, 单通道, 20.19.15.4474

Memory

2048 MB

, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 板载内存

Display

11.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, 电容式，10点触控，支持主动式手写笔, MS_9003, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 17 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: 加速感应器，霍尔感应器, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 284 x 202

Battery

9000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 32 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 主动式手写笔, Microsoft Office Home and Student 2016 (试用版), 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

1.2 kg, Power Supply: 132 g

Price

300 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP x360 310 G1 Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 ODYS Vario Pro 12 Medion Akoya E2215T DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity

Right side: combo audio, micro HDMI, card reader (microSD), power, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A)

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Realtek RTL8723BS	46 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Realtek RTL8723BS	52 MBit/s


267 cd/m²	271 cd/m²	242 cd/m²
263 cd/m²	282 cd/m²	233 cd/m²
233 cd/m²	246 cd/m²	209 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

MS_9003 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 282 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 249.6 cd/m² Minimum: 55 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 74 %
Center on Battery: 282 cd/m²
Contrast: 762:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.04 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
45.16% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	ODYS Vario Pro 12 MS_9003, , 1366x768, 11.6"	Medion Akoya E2215T AU Optronics B116HAN03.1, , 1920x1080, 11.6"	HP x360 310 G1 Samsung SEC3953, , 1366x768, 11.6"	Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Chi Mei N116HSE-DA2, , 1920x1080, 11.6"
Display		7%	-17%	32%
Display P3 Coverage	45.16	48.12 7%	37.47 -17%	63 40%
sRGB Coverage	67.5	71.7 6%	56.4 -16%	83.9 24%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	46.71	49.78 7%	38.71 -17%	61.3 31%
Response Times		38%	30%	41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	60 ?(31, 29)	31 ?(13, 18) 48%	43 ?(20, 23) 28%	37 ?(16, 21) 38%
Response Time Black / White *	36 ?(22, 14)	26 ?(6, 20) 28%	25 ?(7, 18) 31%	20 ?(6, 14) 44%
PWM Frequency		50 ?(20)	396 ?(90)
Screen		16%	-62%	1%
Brightness middle	282	338 20%	199 -29%	257 -9%
Brightness	250	309 24%	186 -26%	235 -6%
Brightness Distribution	74	76 3%	76 3%	80 8%
Black Level *	0.37	0.39 -5%	0.8 -116%	0.25 32%
Contrast	762	867 14%	249 -67%	1028 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.63	3.94 30%	11.92 -112%	7.98 -42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.28	9.96 12%	20.52 -82%	12.25 -9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.04	2.54 50%	12.92 -156%	7.87 -56%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.38 ^92%	2.04 ^108%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	7254 ^90%	6902 ^94%	13589 ^48%	8815 ^74%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	43	46 7%	36 -16%	55 28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	67	71 6%	56 -16%	84 25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		20% / 17%	-16% / -41%	25% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 31 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

921

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

3076

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

1988

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	3076 Points
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2966 Points -4%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2897 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2575 Points -16%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	951 Points +3%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	938 Points +2%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	921 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	884 Points -4%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	760 Points
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	743 Points -2%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	726 Points -4%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2289 Points
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2175 Points -5%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2130 Points -7%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	44.1 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	42.55 Points -4%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	41.59 Points -6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	6122 ms * -9%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	5758 ms * -2%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	5630 ms *
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	5509 ms * +2%

Octane V2 - Total Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	7265 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	7142 Points -2%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	6382 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	6343 Points -13%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1437 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP x360 310 G1 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1445 Points +1%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1437 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1419 Points -1%
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1282 Points -11%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1246 Points -13%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

32 GB eMMC Flash

Sequential Read: 168.3 MB/s

Sequential Write: 43.13 MB/s

512K Read: 155 MB/s

512K Write: 33.71 MB/s

4K Read: 15.91 MB/s

4K Write: 11.64 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 32.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 13.65 MB/s

	ODYS Vario Pro 12 32 GB eMMC Flash	Medion Akoya E2215T 64 GB eMMC Flash	HP x360 310 G1 Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 32 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-19%	-43%	-47%
Read Seq	168.3	169.6 1%	99.5 -41%	142.8 -15%
Write Seq	43.13	39.77 -8%	102.9 139%	44.24 3%
Read 512	155	155.3 0%	34.45 -78%	125.4 -19%
Write 512	33.71	27.45 -19%	42.7 27%	16.9 -50%
Read 4k	15.91	13.09 -18%	0.439 -97%	7.82 -51%
Write 4k	11.64	7.915 -32%	0.013 -100%	1.423 -88%
Read 4k QD32	32.2	15.11 -53%	0.851 -97%	11.04 -66%
Write 4k QD32	13.65	10.05 -26%	0.033 -100%	1.435 -89%

3DMark 11 Performance		339 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	298 Points 0%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	297 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	297 Points 0%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	293 Points -1%
HP x360 310 G1 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Pentium N3540	221 Points -26%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)	105		24.7

Max. Load

Idle


24.5 °C	27 °C	36.5 °C
24.1 °C	27.1 °C	34.9 °C
23.9 °C	24.7 °C	30.3 °C

Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 28.1 °C


34.5 °C	25 °C	24.2 °C
36.5 °C	25.9 °C	24.5 °C
30.3 °C	25.6 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 27.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).

ODYS Vario Pro 12 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	1.1 / 1.3 Watt
Idle	4.8 / 7.8 / 8.2 Watt
Load	14.8 / 14.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		7h 33min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP x360 310 G1 N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 30 Wh	684 min +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 33 Wh	643 min +42%
Medion Akoya E2215T Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 38 Wh	474 min +5%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Wh	453 min
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 8.2 Wh	294 min -35%

Pros

+ IPS屏幕

+ 运行安静

+ 电池续航优秀

+ 主动式手写笔

Cons

- 屏幕较暗

- 不支持USB-C

- 无线网络模组速度较慢

In review: Odys Vario Pro 12. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Cherry Trail架构的凌动处理器位Vario Pro提供了足够简单办公应用和上网浏览的性能。显卡中集成的视频解码器也可以帮助处理器缓解视频播放带来的压力。因此，这款设备可以搭配电视作为多媒体终端。

Odys的Vario Pro 12是一台十分全面的11.6寸设备，由于搭配了手写笔它可以很好地从同类设备中脱颖而出。

它的键盘总体上十分不错。同时它还有优秀的电池续航和两年质保。IPS屏幕提供了稳定的可视角度范围和优秀的对比度。不过它的亮度还有待提高。主动式手写笔结合Windows Ink功能十分便于使用。

和许多同类设备相似，这台Odys变形本仅搭配2GB内存和32GB闪存，略显局促。我们认为一台Windows系统设备需要至少4GB内存和64GB硬盘空间。缺少USB-C接口也让人感觉有些遗憾，在2017年推出的新设备应该将这个接口作为标配。我们也不太满意它较慢的无线网络模组。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

ODYS Vario Pro 12 - 04/03/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

77 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

74%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

35 / 80 → 44%

Weight

73 / 35-78 → 87%

Battery

90%

Display

78%

Games Performance

31 / 68 → 45%

Application Performance

44 / 87 → 51%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

48 / 91 → 52%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

67%

79%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > ODYS Vario Pro 12 (Z8350, 高清) 变形本简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2017-04- 8)

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

ODYS Vario Pro 12 audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison