OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Nokia 2.1 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 649 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Oukitel U25 Pro IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Wiko Harry 2 1440x720, 5.5" | Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 6A IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 21% | 5% | 16% | 38% | |
Brightness middle | 649 | 479 -26% | 338 -48% | 404 -38% | 599 -8% |
Brightness | 623 | 491 -21% | 327 -48% | 400 -36% | 593 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 82 -9% | 82 -9% | 96 7% |
Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.2 64% | 0.27 52% | 0.26 54% | |
Contrast | 1159 | 2395 107% | 1252 8% | 1554 34% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 6.17 13% | 5.36 25% | 4.28 40% | 1.4 80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.6 | 11.46 9% | 9.77 22% | 9.97 21% | 3.2 75% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.4 | 7.1 24% | 6.2 34% | 3.5 63% | 2 79% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.066 106% | 2.345 94% | 2.213 99% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 8629 75% | 8441 77% | 8460 77% | 6899 94% | 6496 100% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (4012 - 5154, n=2) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (3042 - 3850, n=2) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (6.7 - 7.5, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (7.1 - 7.1, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (4.5 - 5, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T () | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro | |
Wiko Harry 2 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (51621 - 54871, n=2) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72) | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (15.7 - 18.7, n=2) | |
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72) | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (3082 - 3303, n=2) | |
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71) | |
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71) | |
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72) | |
Average Mediatek MT6750T (13903 - 14543, n=3) | |
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Oukitel U25 Pro | Wiko Harry 2 | Nokia 2.1 | Xiaomi Redmi 6A | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -22% | -13% | 29% | 75% | 17% | 831% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 284.3 | 227.3 -20% | 288.3 1% | 277.5 -2% | 675 137% | 274 ? -4% | 1834 ? 545% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 195.1 | 59.1 -70% | 51.2 -74% | 131.7 -32% | 206.8 6% | 176.2 ? -10% | 1426 ? 631% |
Random Read 4KB | 56 | 35.47 -37% | 50.5 -10% | 33.94 -39% | 133.2 138% | 59.4 ? 6% | 278 ? 396% |
Random Write 4KB | 16.76 | 11.6 -31% | 13.45 -20% | 52.2 211% | 19.54 17% | 32 ? 91% | 310 ? 1750% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 71.9 ? | 80.3 ? 12% | 79.4 ? 10% | 82.8 ? 15% | 77.4 ? 8% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 54.2 ? | 63.4 ? 17% | 61.9 ? 14% | 65.7 ? 21% | 58.3 ? 8% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Oukitel U25 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 44.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Wiko Harry 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.72 Watt |
Idle | 1.47 / 2.88 / 2.96 Watt |
Load |
4.74 / 5.99 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Oukitel U25 Pro 3200 mAh | Wiko Harry 2 2900 mAh | Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750T | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 16% | 40% | 41% | 37% | 11% | 8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.47 | 1.2 18% | 0.7 52% | 0.7 52% | 0.49 67% | 1.305 ? 11% | 0.895 ? 39% |
Idle Average * | 2.88 | 2 31% | 1.2 58% | 1.2 58% | 0.67 77% | 2.44 ? 15% | 1.447 ? 50% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.96 | 2.7 9% | 1.9 36% | 2 32% | 0.87 71% | 2.5 ? 16% | 1.608 ? 46% |
Load Average * | 4.74 | 4.2 11% | 3.2 32% | 3.4 28% | 3.64 23% | 4.23 ? 11% | 6.41 ? -35% |
Load Maximum * | 5.99 | 5.2 13% | 4.8 20% | 4 33% | 9.04 -51% | 5.98 ? -0% | 9.61 ? -60% |
* ... smaller is better
Oukitel U25 Pro 3200 mAh | Wiko Harry 2 2900 mAh | Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 491 | 613 25% | 809 65% | 761 55% | 719 46% |
Pros
Cons
OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款坚固耐用的廉价智能手机,体现了目前智能手机市场的矛盾所在。虽然制造商在不增加许多新功能的情况下为其旗舰智能手机收取更多费用,但廉价机型开始弥合性能和质量差距,同时保持合理的低价。 U25 Pro有它的缺点,例如它的电池寿命不佳以及毫无意义的第二个后置摄像头,但总的来说,它做得很好。
1080p显示屏非常明亮,具有良好的视角,这对于低于100欧元(800元)的智能手机来说是罕见的,其指纹识别器也是如此。此外,U25 Pro的外观和感觉都很好,同时它在我们的基准测试中提供了不错的性能。
OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款功能强大且价格合理的智能手机,如果您的预算有限,它值得考虑。
然而,扬声器令人失望,删除了耳机插孔似乎与包括辅助后置摄像头的花哨一样没有意义。然而,很少有智能手机能够以低于100欧元(约800元)的价格提供U25 Pro的水平。
Oukitel U25 Pro
-
02/16/2019 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich