三星 Odyssey NP800G5M (7700HQ, 全高清, GTX 1050) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Brand: Samsung

并非史诗巨作。 最新款的三星Odyssey本可以很出众。然而，它只是一个平均水准的入门级设备，不具备从众多游戏本脱颖而出的功能。除了，它那个惊人的风扇声。

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 05/02/2017 🇺🇸 🇵🇹 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US (Odyssey Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1354 MHz, RAM: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 375.63, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, PC4-19200 DDR4, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-35, 双通道, 2x SODIMM

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, IPS, ID: BOE0689, Name: NV156FHM-N46, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM175

Storage

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, 128 GB

, Secondary: 1 TB Seagate ST1000M035-1RK172 HDD

Soundcard

Conexant @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳麦合一, Card Reader: SD 读卡器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23.9 x 378 x 260.1

Battery

43 Wh, 3780 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 1.5 W 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Samsung Recovery, Samsung Settings, Samsung Update, WiFi Sharing, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.5 kg, Power Supply: 747 g

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Gigabyte P55W v7 Asus FX502VM-AS73 Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD reader, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)	120.5 MB/s +468%
Asus FX502VM-AS73	78.8 MB/s +272%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US	21.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)	252.6 MB/s +1311%
Asus FX502VM-AS73	86.9 MB/s +385%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US	17.9 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	524 MBit/s +54%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	513 MBit/s +50%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	341 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	659 MBit/s +92%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	541 MBit/s +58%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	343 MBit/s


245.6 cd/m²	251.5 cd/m²	234.9 cd/m²
246.8 cd/m²	255.9 cd/m²	241 cd/m²
245.9 cd/m²	261.4 cd/m²	257.8 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 261.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 249 cd/m² Minimum: 4.69 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 255.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 533:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus FX502VM-AS73 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV LGD04D4, , 15.6", 3840x2160	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080	Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple APPA030, IPS, 15.4", 2880x1800
Display		-19%	34%	44%	25%	77%
Display P3 Coverage	47.11	38.28 -19%	63 34%	68.9 46%	63.5 35%	99 110%
sRGB Coverage	70.4	56.9 -19%	94.4 34%	98.9 40%	82 16%	100 42%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	48.71	39.47 -19%	64.8 33%	70.9 46%	59.9 23%	87.3 79%
Response Times		30%	24%	-48%	16%	144%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38.8 ?(20.8, 18)	28.4 ?(11.2, 17.2) 27%	30.4 ?(12.4, 18) 22%	54 ?(33.2, 20) -39%	37 ?(15, 22) 5%	46 ?(18, 28) -19%
Response Time Black / White *	33.6 ?(18.8, 14.8)	22.4 ?(6, 16.4) 33%	24.8 ?(10, 14.8) 26%	52.4 ?(33.2, 19.2) -56%	25 ?(5, 20) 26%	56 ?(11, 45) -67%
PWM Frequency	19230 ?(99)					119000 ?(80) 519%
Screen		-8%	15%	46%	28%	61%
Brightness middle	255.9	209.5 -18%	259 1%	400 56%	287 12%	420 64%
Brightness	249	205 -18%	255 2%	392 57%	289 16%	401 61%
Brightness Distribution	90	92 2%	87 -3%	89 -1%	87 -3%	90 0%
Black Level *	0.48	0.69 -44%	0.51 -6%	0.26 46%	0.29 40%	0.3 37%
Contrast	533	304 -43%	508 -5%	1538 189%	990 86%	1400 163%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.9	4.7 20%	3.9 34%	4.9 17%	4.92 17%	3.33 44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.9	19.7 -4%	6.9 63%	11 42%	11 42%	5.11 73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.6	1.8 68%	4.5 20%	7.2 -29%	3.66 35%	2.73 51%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.43 ^91%	2.11 ^104%	2.32 ^95%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	7250 ^90%	6975 ^93%	7257 ^90%	6911 ^94%	6482 ^100%	6457 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	44.8	36.2 -19%	59.5 33%	64.2 43%	54 21%	78.09 74%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	70.1	56.6 -19%		98.9 41%	82 17%	99.97 43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / -5%	24% / 21%	14% / 33%	23% / 26%	94% / 80%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.8 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.8 ms rise
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

19230 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 19230 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 19230 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	190 Points +23%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	184 Points +19%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	162 Points +5%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	155 Points
MSI GT80 Titan SLI Intel Core i7-5700HQ	143 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points -14%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	131 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	899 Points +22%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	897 Points +22%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points +1%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	738 Points
MSI GT80 Titan SLI Intel Core i7-5700HQ	724 Points -2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points -8%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	566 Points -23%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	2.19 Points +20%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	2.08 Points +14%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.83 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.77 Points -3%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.67 Points -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -18%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.49 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.91 Points +21%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	9.78 Points +20%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.18 Points 0%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.17 Points
MSI GT80 Titan SLI Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.94 Points -3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points -9%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	6.02 Points -26%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	28189 Points +25%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22512 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22217 Points -1%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI Intel Core i7-5700HQ	21755 Points -3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20111 Points -11%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	7222 Points +21%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5954 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5747 Points -3%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5550 Points -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5126 Points -14%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	236 s * -12%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	211.3 s *
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	176.3 s * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6832

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

22512

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5954

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

67.5 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.17 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.83 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102.9 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

738 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

155 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4765 Points +19%
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	4013 Points 0%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	4001 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3770 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	3659 Points -9%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	5317 Points 0%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	5305 Points
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	4884 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4680 Points -12%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	2722 Points -49%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	7220 Points +35%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	5362 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4317 Points -19%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4001 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5362 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5305 points
Help

	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	Asus FX502VM-AS73 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-46%	19%	-93%	94%
Read Seq	1518	503 -67%	1115 -27%	93.5 -94%	1684 11%
Write Seq	798	138.2 -83%	311 -61%	89.6 -89%	1106 39%
Read 512	460.5	343.5 -25%	706 53%	39.06 -92%	977 112%
Write 512	195.8	137.8 -30%	472.3 141%	51.1 -74%	1119 472%
Read 4k	47.16	29.36 -38%	31.97 -32%	0.57 -99%	45.14 -4%
Write 4k	143.1	70.9 -50%	135.1 -6%	1.05 -99%	134.1 -6%
Read 4k QD32	521	369.9 -29%	288.3 -45%	1.06 -100%	509 -2%
Write 4k QD32	176.4	99.7 -43%	405.5 130%	1.04 -99%	398.1 126%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR

Sequential Read: 1518 MB/s

Sequential Write: 798 MB/s

512K Read: 460.5 MB/s

512K Write: 195.8 MB/s

4K Read: 47.16 MB/s

4K Write: 143.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 521 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 176.4 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	11261 Points +88%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7791 Points +30%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7321 Points +22%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K	6797 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6013 Points 0%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5990 Points
Gigabyte P55K v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	5323 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points -31%
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	3638 Points -39%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5348 Points +99%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	3517 Points +31%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K	3199 Points +19%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2714 Points +1%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2685 Points
Gigabyte P55K v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	2507 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	1988 Points -26%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	50205 Points +32%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	46362 Points +22%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K	40922 Points +8%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	38001 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	37840 Points 0%
Gigabyte P55K v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	33304 Points -12%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	32344 Points -15%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	25986 Points -32%
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	25900 Points -32%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	14450 Points +86%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9824 Points +27%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9768 Points +26%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K	8571 Points +10%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7760 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7457 Points -4%
Gigabyte P55K v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7128 Points -8%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points -38%
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	4384 Points -44%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8873 Points +19%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K	7998 Points +8%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7952 Points +7%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7440 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6999 Points -6%
Gigabyte P55K v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	6712 Points -10%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6361 Points -15%
MSI PX60 6QD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	4501 Points -40%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points -40%

3DMark 11 Performance		7872 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		84774 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20291 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5455 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2678 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)				63.6
Metro: Last Light (2013)			78	43.8
Thief (2014)			73	40.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)			43	20.8
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	91	79	47	25
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)				115
Fallout 4 (2015)			41.5	34.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		70.1	38.7	33.4
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	54.7	34.1	29.6
Doom (2016)			47.5	43.5
Overwatch (2016)			95.3	54.2

The Witcher 3 high

Noise Level

Idle		28.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB(A)
HDD		29.1 dB(A)
Load		49.2 / 49.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)

	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11	Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
Noise		-4%	-3%	-1%	-7%	3%
off / environment *	28.1	28.7 -2%	28.9 -3%	28.4 -1%	30 -7%	29 -3%
Idle Minimum *	28.1	30.6 -9%	32.3 -15%	29 -3%	33 -17%	30.3 -8%
Idle Average *	29.1	30.6 -5%	32.3 -11%	29 -0%	34 -17%	30.3 -4%
Idle Maximum *	29.1	31 -7%	32.3 -11%	32.2 -11%	35 -20%	30.3 -4%
Load Average *	49.2	46.2 6%	43.2 12%	47.1 4%	39 21%	35.1 29%
Load Maximum *	49.2	52.3 -6%	45.2 8%	47.1 4%	50 -2%	46 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *				52

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


58.4 °C	51.2 °C	45.2 °C
48.2 °C	47 °C	29.2 °C
26.8 °C	27 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 58.4 °C
Average: 39.9 °C


43.4 °C	40.6 °C	54.2 °C
24.2 °C	33.8 °C	35.2 °C
25.8 °C	25 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 34.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27.6 °C	27.2 °C	25.4 °C
26.6 °C	27.4 °C	24.6 °C
23.2 °C	23.6 °C	23.2 °C

Maximum: 27.6 °C
Average: 25.4 °C


26.2 °C	28.6 °C	29.2 °C
24.2 °C	27.6 °C	27.6 °C
24.4 °C	24.4 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 29.2 °C
Average: 26.3 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46.8 °C	43.6 °C	35.8 °C
40 °C	39.8 °C	26 °C
24.2 °C	24 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 33.8 °C


37.2 °C	38 °C	45.4 °C
24.8 °C	29 °C	31.6 °C
24 °C	24.2 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 30.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).

Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.28 / 0.78 Watt
Idle	6.7 / 8.9 / 10.8 Watt
Load	81.8 / 122.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US	Asus FX502VM-AS73	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71	Gigabyte P55W v7	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Power Consumption		-57%	0%	-12%	-28%	14%
Idle Minimum *	6.7	14.9 -122%	6.6 1%	7.7 -15%	8 -19%	3 55%
Idle Average *	8.9	15.1 -70%	9 -1%	11.7 -31%	13 -46%	9.9 -11%
Idle Maximum *	10.8	15.2 -41%	10.7 1%	12 -11%	18 -67%	12.5 -16%
Load Average *	81.8	105.8 -29%	77.5 5%	80.5 2%	76 7%	70.6 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	92.2
Load Maximum *	122.7	148.8 -21%	130 -6%	128.4 -5%	143 -17%	90.8 26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 12min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 16min

	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43 Wh	Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh	Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh	Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime		-17%	10%	-20%	30%	52%
Reader / Idle	612	363 -41%	565 -8%	440 -28%	789 29%
WiFi v1.3	263	277 5%	334 27%	276 5%	346 32%	619 135%
Load	76	64 -16%	84 11%	47 -38%	98 29%	52 -32%

Pros

+ 游戏负载下，核心温度相对较低

+ 强大的处理器和显卡性能；没有节流

+ NVMe M.2 固态硬盘 + 机械硬盘

+ 系统监视器实用程序

+ 易于维护

+ 良好的按键反馈

Cons

- 平均显示响应时间；无120 Hz / 5 ms或G-Sync显示选项

- 游戏时，风扇很响；无风扇控制软件

- 电池容量小；平均水平电池续航

- A面可以更坚固；外壳脆弱

- 游戏时，WASD键发热

- 无USB Type-C或DisplayPort

- 扬声器较弱；低音薄弱

- 非常慢的SD卡读卡器

- 键盘按键声大

Verdict

In review: Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US

我们队Odyssey这台笔记本电脑的第一印象是，它是一个混合体。一方面，该机作为一款游戏本：可以在处理器和显卡没有节流的情况下，可以保持可接受的温度运行游戏。另一方面，它所维持高涡轮加速时钟频率，是轻薄笔记本的弱项。所以，该机的表现还算不错。

在其可靠的表现之外，Odyssey也有特的问题。最值得注意的一点是，即便是作为游戏笔记本，它游戏时的风扇噪音也太大。对于近50分贝噪声，与之匹配应该是更强大的显卡才对，如GTX 1070或GTX 1080，而不是GTX 1050。为了让用户平衡噪音和核心温度，从而获得更愉快游戏体验，手动控制风扇还有很长的路要走。

对该笔记本电脑打量的时间越长，就会发越多偷工减料的地方。SD读卡器缓慢，能力只达到基础水平，显存减半，电池容量小，对比度和颜色都不如更贵的替代品。过热的WASD键也是一个奇怪的设计：就像汽车制造商将永远不会设计出不舒服的发热方向盘，游戏笔记本不应该有让人不舒服的发烫WASD按键。

具有相同处理器和显卡的惠普Pavilion 15t零售价在1100美元至1200美元之间，与我们配置的Odyssey一样。虽然三星在核心功能方面表现优异，但在其他方面，它只是平庸水准，并不足以超越其他GTX 1050笔记本电脑。