惠普 Omen 15 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, Full-HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 304 cd/m²
Contrast: 1169:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.46 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -39% | -24% | 0% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.8 | 38.88 -41% | 48.21 -27% | 65.2 -1% | 66.4 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 90.9 | 58.2 -36% | 72.6 -20% | 92.5 2% | 88.9 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 40.2 -40% | 49.81 -25% | 66.5 0% | 65.1 -2% |
Response Times | 38% | 30% | -1% | 53% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 22 ? 49% | 28 ? 35% | 42.8 ? 1% | 24 ? 44% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 23 ? 26% | 23.6 ? 24% | 32 ? -3% | 12 ? 62% |
PWM Frequency | 1351 ? | 26000 ? | |||
Screen | -29% | -66% | -24% | -69% | |
Brightness middle | 304 | 281 -8% | 274.2 -10% | 320 5% | 357 17% |
Brightness | 289 | 257 -11% | 263 -9% | 316 9% | 365 26% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 85 -1% | 92 7% | 90 5% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.44 -69% | 0.36 -38% | 0.5 -92% |
Contrast | 1169 | 878 -25% | 623 -47% | 889 -24% | 714 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 5.16 -49% | 8 -131% | 4.62 -34% | 9.93 -187% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.72 | 9.09 -18% | 14.6 -89% | 9.75 -26% | 14.87 -93% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.46 | 4.57 -86% | 9.1 -270% | 6 -144% | 10.32 -320% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.59 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.46 89% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6915 94% | 6931 94% | 5020 129% | 6761 96% | 10096 64% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 37 -37% | 45.7 -23% | 60 2% | 58 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 58 -36% | 72.1 -21% | 92 1% | 89 -2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-22% | -20% /
-45% | -8% /
-16% | -6% /
-39% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4858 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5348 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4861 points | |
Help |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | SCHENKER XMG A517 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Gigabyte P56XT LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 20% | -11% | -3% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3431 | 3389 -1% | 2445 -29% | 3445 0% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1246 | 1706 37% | 790 -37% | 1848 48% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 586 | 627 7% | 588 0% | 547 -7% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 486 | 591 22% | 455.5 -6% | 463 -5% |
Read Seq | 1419 | 1856 31% | 1881 33% | 954 -33% |
Write Seq | 1266 | 1652 30% | 797 -37% | 1049 -17% |
Read 4K | 47.14 | 49 4% | 46.69 -1% | 45 -5% |
Write 4K | 156 | 196 26% | 142.5 -9% | 149 -4% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11902 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 138488 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25573 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8949 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3271 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Star Wars Battlefront - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Assassin's Creed Syndicate - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:4x MSAA + FX | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Rainbow Six Siege - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Far Cry Primal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
The Division - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
Asus G752VS | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Asus G752VS | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:T2X SM | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Dishonored 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Watch Dogs 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng |
Dirt 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GT62VR | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 |
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 119 | 63.2 | 34.6 | 22.9 | |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 129 | 81 | 54 | 26 | |
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 188 | 93 | 80.9 | 29.3 | |
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 82.6 | 65.8 | 29.4 | 22.2 | |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 224 | 126 | 102 | 37.3 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 124 | 65.6 | 51.1 | 23.5 | |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 81 | 71 | 53 | 22 | |
The Division (2016) | 127 | 61.9 | 48.8 | 22.1 | |
Doom (2016) | 127 | 91.1 | 86.2 | 28.4 | |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 130 | 66.4 | 59.6 | 20.5 | |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 93.8 | 50.2 | 26.7 | 15.8 | |
FIFA 17 (2016) | 330 | 250 | 248 | 95.2 | |
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 154 | 76 | 67.8 | 25.3 | |
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 144 | 79 | 67.3 | 24.8 | |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 124 | 91.6 | 81.7 | 34.6 | |
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 85.4 | 64.7 | 54.8 | 23.7 | |
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 101 | 56.8 | 39.4 | 18.9 | |
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 169 | 93 | 76.1 | 25.1 | |
For Honor (2017) | 92.3 | 87.8 | 63.9 | 25.7 | |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 65 | 58.7 | 33.2 | 19.4 | |
Prey (2017) | 126 | 101 | 84.7 | 27.7 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 194 | 134 | 56.5 | ||
Dirt 4 (2017) | 129 | 93.6 | 49.9 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30 / 33 / 37 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
Load |
| 41 / 50 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 1% | 0% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30.4 -1% | 28.8 4% | 31 -3% | 31 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 30 | 31.4 -5% | 33.1 -10% | 32 -7% | 33 -10% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 31.4 5% | 33.1 -0% | 33 -0% | 34 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 31.4 15% | 34 8% | 34 8% | 44 -19% |
Load Average * | 41 | 36.8 10% | 37.2 9% | 39 5% | 46 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 46.1 -10% | 43 -2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 50 | 41.3 17% | 47.1 6% | 50 -0% | 52 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 17% | 24% | 10% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 47 -0% | 56 -19% | 49.2 -5% | |
Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 47 13% | 61 -13% | 62 -15% | |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 28.4 21% | 28.4 21% | 25 31% | 32.4 10% |
Idle Bottom * | 40 | 27.1 32% | 29.6 26% | 24 40% | 33 17% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-ce002ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 18 / 23 / 30 Watt |
Load |
85 / 158 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 40% | 9% | 15% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18 | 7 61% | 14.5 19% | 12 33% | 14 22% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 10.2 56% | 17.3 25% | 15 35% | 18 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 30 | 14 53% | 17.4 42% | 20 33% | 24 20% |
Load Average * | 85 | 78 8% | 93 -9% | 82 4% | 87 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 96 | 128.8 -34% | 111 -16% | ||
Load Maximum * | 158 | 127 20% | 161 -2% | 201 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 70 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 52.5 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 94.24 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 60 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | 21% | 102% | -4% | |
Reader / Idle | 256 | 322 26% | 386 51% | 638 149% | |
H.264 | 224 | 464 107% | 213 -5% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 198 | 302 53% | 232 17% | 422 113% | 195 -2% |
Load | 80 | 81 1% | 75 -6% | 112 40% |
Pros
Cons
多年来,许多笔记本制造商都依赖于其“荣誉”,或者准确地说,它的外壳。以及,不断更新迭代的中央处理器和图形处理器。而新一代的Omen,惠普敢于重新设计。在我们看来,获得了许多方面的成功。
即便机身没有变得轻薄,但是它既有更高的稳定性,更好的输入配件,和更优雅的材料。惠普采用了比较奇特的外观设计,无论用户喜欢与否。撇开较慢的反应时间,其屏幕也是令人瞩目。
顶级配置的120赫兹显示屏,确保了视角的稳定性,高对比度,以及体面的色彩值。
同样,我们对扬声器也几乎没有任何抱怨。
对于显卡,我们有些犹豫。实际生活中, Max-Q 设计 的作用非常的有限,另一方面,损失了接近于10%的性能,而不是将这些地方省下来,降低价格。采用 GTX 1060,其他运营商达到了相同或者是较少的排放量(温度,噪声)。
尽管如此,惠普成功地迈出了决定性的一步,所以也在前10排行榜获得了好位置。(轻薄游戏本表)。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
- 07/20/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser