惠普 Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (jseb) | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (jseb) |
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 230 cd/m²
Contrast: 1095:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.18 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.59% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
HP Omen 15-ax213ng AU Optronics AUO41ED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax007ng LGD0519, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS LP156WF6-SPK3, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX502VM-AS73 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 29% | 1% | -6% | -1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 38.59 | 59.9 55% 40.34 5% | 38.88 1% | 36.42 -6% | 38.28 -1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 58 | 85.9 48% 60.3 4% | 58.2 0% | 54.9 -5% | 56.9 -2% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.87 | 61.6 55% 41.73 5% | 40.2 1% | 37.62 -6% | 39.47 -1% | |
Response Times | -21% | 33% | -8% | -35% | 26% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 55 ? -31% | 22 ? 48% | 36 ? 14% | 58.8 ? -40% | 28.4 ? 32% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 31 ? -11% | 23 ? 18% | 36 ? -29% | 36 ? -29% | 22.4 ? 20% |
PWM Frequency | 21550 ? | |||||
Screen | -29% | -14% | -84% | -48% | -46% | |
Brightness middle | 230 | 214 -7% | 281 22% | 246 7% | 239 4% | 209.5 -9% |
Brightness | 228 | 203 -11% | 257 13% | 235 3% | 244 7% | 205 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 79 -10% | 85 -3% | 75 -15% | 88 0% | 92 5% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.28 -33% | 0.32 -52% | 0.55 -162% | 0.35 -67% | 0.69 -229% |
Contrast | 1095 | 764 -30% | 878 -20% | 447 -59% | 683 -38% | 304 -72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.01 | 6.04 -51% | 5.16 -29% | 10.97 -174% | 7.3 -82% | 4.7 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.26 | 12 -65% | 9.09 -25% | 24.7 -240% | 19.7 -171% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.18 | 5.91 -86% | 4.57 -44% | 14.25 -348% | 4.9 -54% | 1.8 43% |
Gamma | 2.52 87% | 2.44 90% | 2.59 85% | 1.83 120% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6814 95% | 7362 88% | 6931 94% | 11200 58% | 7332 89% | 6975 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38 3% | 37 0% | 35 -5% | 35 -5% | 36.2 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 60 3% | 58 0% | 55 -5% | 55 -5% | 56.6 -2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-9% | 7% /
-5% | -33% /
-56% | -42% /
-46% | -7% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4165 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5402 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3141 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4653 points | |
Help |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX502VM-AS73 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -65% | -97% | -60% | -6% | -67% | 10% | |
Read Seq | 1657 | 475.7 -71% | 101.5 -94% | 485.8 -71% | 2170 31% | 503 -70% | 2141 29% |
Write Seq | 1208 | 169.2 -86% | 100.6 -92% | 422.8 -65% | 1202 0% | 138.2 -89% | 1621 34% |
Read 512 | 806 | 327.6 -59% | 28.33 -96% | 338.9 -58% | 786 -2% | 343.5 -57% | 499.7 -38% |
Write 512 | 807 | 169.6 -79% | 28.31 -96% | 304 -62% | 822 2% | 137.8 -83% | 1531 90% |
Read 4k | 62.6 | 33.14 -47% | 0.327 -99% | 27.11 -57% | 58.9 -6% | 29.36 -53% | 54.2 -13% |
Write 4k | 176.9 | 81.4 -54% | 0.846 -100% | 85.4 -52% | 146.4 -17% | 70.9 -60% | 158.2 -11% |
Read 4k QD32 | 650 | 276.8 -57% | 0.718 -100% | 279.6 -57% | 457.7 -30% | 369.9 -43% | 632 -3% |
Write 4k QD32 | 557 | 168 -70% | 0.893 -100% | 255.1 -54% | 392.9 -29% | 99.7 -82% | 527 -5% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 9045 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85236 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22010 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6720 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3550 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2455 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 216 | 176.8 | 163.4 | 70.7 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 180.2 | 176.4 | 146 | 71.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 128.1 | 86.2 | 48.3 | 26.6 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 115.4 | 68.2 | 38.9 | 32.5 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32 / 34 / 36 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 11% | 6% | 13% | 6% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30.4 -1% | 30.3 -1% | 27.7 8% | 28.7 4% | 28.8 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 32 -0% | 31.4 2% | 30.9 3% | 30.5 5% | 30.6 4% | 33.1 -3% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 31.4 8% | 30.9 9% | 30.5 10% | 30.6 10% | 33.1 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 36 -0% | 31.4 13% | 31 14% | 30.6 15% | 31 14% | 34 6% |
Load Average * | 48 | 43 10% | 36.8 23% | 46.5 3% | 40 17% | 46.2 4% | 37.2 22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 40 18% | 46.1 6% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 51 | 49 4% | 41.3 19% | 46.8 8% | 42.6 16% | 52.3 -3% | 47.1 8% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | 9% | 21% | 4% | -3% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 52.4 | 48.5 7% | 47 10% | 43.4 17% | 46.8 11% | 53.2 -2% | |
Maximum Bottom * | 54.2 | 59 -9% | 47 13% | 37.7 30% | 55.8 -3% | 56.8 -5% | |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.5 | 28.7 6% | 28.4 7% | 24.3 20% | 27.6 10% | 28.8 6% | 28.4 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.2 | 25.7 9% | 27.1 4% | 23.6 16% | 28.4 -1% | 31.4 -11% | 29.6 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.4 °C / 113.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-16.6 °C / -29.9 F).
HP Omen 15-ax213ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 6 / 11 / 18 Watt |
Load |
81 / 146 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | 6% | 26% | 5% | -40% | -51% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 7 -17% | 7 -17% | 4.4 27% | 8.5 -42% | 14.9 -148% | 14.5 -142% |
Idle Average * | 11 | 11 -0% | 10.2 7% | 6.8 38% | 9.1 17% | 15.1 -37% | 17.3 -57% |
Idle Maximum * | 18 | 19 -6% | 14 22% | 8.3 54% | 9.7 46% | 15.2 16% | 17.4 3% |
Load Average * | 81 | 79 2% | 78 4% | 81 -0% | 79.9 1% | 105.8 -31% | 93 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 | 97.7 -9% | 128.8 -43% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 146 | 119 18% | 127 13% | 127 13% | 121.5 17% | 148.8 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 74 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | -34% | 54% | -43% | -41% | -40% | |
Reader / Idle | 765 | 467 -39% | 322 -58% | 1174 53% | 509 -33% | 363 -53% | 386 -50% |
H.264 | 196 | 244 24% | 455 132% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 272 -36% | 302 -29% | 622 45% | 240 -44% | 277 -35% | 232 -46% |
Load | 97 | 93 -4% | 81 -16% | 81 -16% | 46 -53% | 64 -34% | 75 -23% |
Pros
Cons
惠普 Omen 15t(2017)将不会太好受,特别是当竞争对手一直在为新的Pascal架构提供各种设备时。该15英寸的设备有很好的设计,虽说作为一个1500美元的设备,它的做工可以更好。我们也不明白为什么它会缺少最新的端口,如DisplayPort或USB 3.1 Gen2。它的连接性不适用于未来。
惠普 Omen 15t(2017)表现出了坚实性能。这一点,在我们的评级中发挥了重要作用。该设备配备了Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti和强大的Intel Core i7-7700HQ。这种由16 GB 运行内存支持的配件组合,可让您以高清晰度顺利播放时下的游戏。
如果您一直在期待着惠普 Omen 15t(2017),那么现在您将获得可靠的游戏表现。然而,制造商决定不更新其端口并坚持原貌。
此外,惠普也因为其屏幕不够亮而失分。色彩空间覆盖率同样令人失望。尽管如此,我们喜欢Omen HP15的系统性能,NVMe SSD也进一步增强了它。
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
-
07/03/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade