惠普Omen 16游戏笔记本电脑评测。少即是多
与目前的许多竞争对手一样,惠普Omen使用16英寸显示屏。因此,这款游戏笔记本具有合理的便携性,同时还能提供令人愉悦的大画面。可以选择全高清或QHD作为分辨率大小。至于处理器,这是以AMD Ryzen的形式出现的,其中的带宽从Ryzen 5到Ryzen 9不等。
除了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070(在我们对前身惠普Omen 16-b0085ng的测试中使用),还有AMD Radeon RX 6600M。这就是我们的测试设备与AMD Ryzen 7 5800H结合使用的东西。就性能而言,这款游戏笔记本大致相当于惠普Victus 16或微星Alpha 15,与惠普Omen 16一样,目前价格约为1300欧元(约1413美元)。
一个微妙的区别仍然存在。省电绝对不是它的长处之一。这对我们的测试结果有一些明显的影响。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | HP Omen 16-c0077ng R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M | 2.3 kg | 26 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M | 2.4 kg | 23.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.85 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--惠普兆头的小光景
除了铰链之外,笔记本的外观是由塑料制成的。因此,结构的稳定性受到影响。虽然略微弯曲的键盘框架几乎看不出来,但大型显示屏似乎有点过于弯曲。特别是,用一只手打开它,屏幕会不必要地弯曲。像许多商务笔记本那样的铝制盖子在这里会有帮助。
总的来说,它的构造给人留下了高质量的印象。所有的部件都能很好地结合在一起,而且缝隙均匀。扭曲的可能性是有限的。但惠普可以让显示屏的框架更坚硬一些。铰链似乎也有点太弱了,以至于屏幕摇摇晃晃,但它仍然可以同时用一只手打开。
大尺寸是由于16英寸显示屏的缘故。即使是纤细的显示屏边缘也只能在有限的范围内进行补偿,因此,标准的笔记本电脑包或笔记本背包可能会太紧。在外壳厚度方面,惠普Omen 16比其前代产品厚3毫米(约0.12英寸)。由于冷却系统特别大,它在底座的后部区域突出于机箱,因此它的性能值也超过了其他具有类似性能的游戏笔记本电脑。
所有塑料的优点是重量相对较低,只有2.25公斤(约5.0磅)。然而,230瓦的电源使总重量增加到3公斤(约6.6磅)。
硬件 - 适用于游戏笔记本
在三种不同的显示器输出之间的选择是值得称赞的。有了USB-C、miniDP和HDMI,几乎所有的外部显示器都能得到满足。由于有DP 1.4和HDMI 2.1,还可以连接4K以上分辨率的显示器。
机箱左右两边的USB接口,几乎可以毫无问题地连接桌面上的所有东西。然而,各个连接点之间的距离有时非常紧张。右边的两个USB端口只相隔4毫米(约0.16英寸)的宽度。
虽然端口的数量似乎非常实用,但特别是USB-A的速度是一个缺点。所有三个端口都只能达到5Gbit/s,因此只能达到USB 3.0标准。至少USB-C连接管理10 Gbit/s,但与这里不支持的Thunderbolt 4相比,这只是目前技术上可能做到的一小部分。
SD卡阅读器
用我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考存储卡测试,读卡器的速度可以明显提高。然而,那些不完全是雄心勃勃的爱好摄影的人几乎不会注意到这个缺点。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
除了局域网端口外,还提供了Wi-Fi 6。与惠普Victus 16一样,这里使用的是Realtek WLAN卡,在我们的测试中,这种硬件的性能大致是平均水平。但由于惠普Omen 16处于游戏笔记本的入门级领域,这应该足够了。然而,看看我们评测中所有游戏笔记本的平均值就会发现,吞吐率通常要高得多。
网络摄像头
惠普Omen 16网络摄像头的分辨率和色彩准确性最多只能满足最低要求,尽管这是该领域的普遍做法。
维护
没有隐藏的螺丝,没有牢固的塑料夹子。松开八颗螺丝后,需要一点技巧来拆卸底板。但是,一个扁平的撬动工具永远不会有坏处。
之后,所有的关键位置都很容易接触到,以便清洁通风或更换电池,电池被拧在六个点上。两个内存插槽可用于升级的可能性。另一个NVMe固态硬盘可以插入未配备的M.2插槽中。WLAN模块,安装在离热管有点太近的地方,对我们的口味来说,也可以被替换。
输入设备--游戏键盘会发出彩色的光芒
键盘
这款键盘似乎完全是为游戏而设。即使只有1毫米的下划线对要求高的用户来说似乎很浅,但防滑的表面和按键之间的适当距离确保了快速和准确的输入。右侧没有数字栏,而是有被赋予大量空间的方向键。不幸的是,它正上方的排列看起来有点混乱,这在最初是特别令人恼火的。删除 "和 "电源 "键并不完全在我们期望的位置。带有电源控制、颜色控制和其他实用的游戏额外功能的Omen游戏中心的快速通道被放在显眼的位置。
键盘照明非常好看。然而,在这里,有些东西被削减了。只有四个区域可供选择,它们可以发出18种不同的颜色的光芒。只有在安装了Omen Light Studio之后,才增加了一些额外的动作配置文件,这些配置文件一般都是面向声音播放或显示器的内容。由于颜色选择有限,而且一次只能显示四种颜色,所以效果显得很简陋。另一方面,带有独立 "WASD "键的静态显示看起来不错。
在我们的测试设备中,有一个工艺上的缺陷不应该不被提及。大写锁定 "键的位置是歪的。当背光开启时,这一点尤其明显,尽管该按钮的功能似乎没有受到影响。
触摸板
在所有的可能性中,人们很可能会用一个单独的鼠标来使用HP Omen 16。但触摸板是相当有说服力的。它反应迅速,磨砂而光滑的表面允许精确的控制,即使是用多个手指。当然,如果下面有几个按钮就更好了,但对于使用振荡式游戏鼠标的满腔热血的玩家来说,无论如何也是无趣的。
显示屏--惠普也考虑到了高要求的游戏玩家
除了这里使用的2,560×1,440像素的QHD显示屏外,惠普还为Omen 16提供了一个对角线屏幕尺寸为16.1英寸的全高清面板。由于它的尺寸,选择更高的分辨率似乎是合理的,因为屏幕看起来就像一个27英寸的桌面显示器,也站在27英寸之外。此外,全高清版本只提供144赫兹,而较大的变体则提供165赫兹。这种差异是否真的可以感觉到,完全是另一个问题。
与前辈或竞争对手Omen 16-b085ng或Victus 16相比,惠普已经将峰值亮度从400cd/m²降低到300cd/m²。当在办公桌上使用并远离光线明亮的工作站时,这种差异应该很难被注意到。另一方面,均匀的照明是一个积极的方面,由于亮度降低,屏幕出血现象也不那么明显了。在我们的测试机型中,只有右下角出现了极小的异常情况。
与其他惠普机型一样,我们无法确定PWM闪烁。在响应时间方面也没有什么可挑剔的。许多其他游戏笔记本也在10毫秒左右。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1350:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 6.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Omen 16-c0077ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 Panda LM156LF-2F03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | HP Omen 16-b0085ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -5% | -41% | 4% | 4% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.8 | 65.9 -4% | 64.5 -6% | 39.7 -42% | 72.6 6% | 72.3 5% | |
sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 91.6 -5% | 95.9 -1% | 59.7 -38% | 100 3% | 99.5 3% | 99 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 67 -6% | 65.8 -7% | 41.1 -42% | 73.5 3% | 73.8 4% | 73 3% |
Response Times | 44% | -16% | -208% | -9% | 7% | 41% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13 ? | 5.06 ? 61% | 15 -15% | 40.4 ? -211% | 9.6 ? 26% | 8 ? 38% | 9.2 ? 29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 7.44 ? 26% | 11.6 -16% | 30.4 ? -204% | 14.4 ? -44% | 12.4 ? -24% | 4.8 52% |
PWM Frequency | |||||||
Screen | -20% | -2% | -49% | 4% | -26% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 297 | 311 5% | 393 32% | 283 -5% | 361 22% | 405 36% | 551 86% |
Brightness | 283 | 325 15% | 353 25% | 266 -6% | 341 20% | 378 34% | 523 85% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 83 -9% | 85 -7% | 88 -3% | 87 -4% | 88 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.47 -114% | 0.2 9% | 0.3 -36% | 0.34 -55% | 0.54 -145% |
Contrast | 1350 | 1414 5% | 836 -38% | 1415 5% | 1203 -11% | 1191 -12% | 1020 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.25 | 5.06 -56% | 2.84 13% | 5.32 -64% | 2.44 25% | 3.7 -14% | 1.8 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.33 | 8.37 -32% | 7.15 -13% | 17.68 -179% | 6.37 -1% | 7.77 -23% | 2.53 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 2.62 -136% | 0.67 40% | 3.94 -255% | 1.26 -14% | 3.49 -214% | 1.66 -50% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.97 | 4.8 31% | 3.73 46% | 2.9 58% | 4.6 34% | 5.88 16% | 1.85 73% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.12 104% | 2.53 87% | 2.062 107% | 2.268 97% | 2.57 86% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6050 107% | 8002 81% | 7312 89% | 7167 91% | 6609 98% | 6342 102% | 6338 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73.76 | 72.81 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.47 | 99.41 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-7% | -8% /
-5% | -99% /
-70% | -0% /
2% | -5% /
-15% | 19% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器提供了良好的图片,具有良好的对比度和很低的黑值。不幸的是,出厂设置并不十分理想,因此可以观察到轻微的黄色色调。经过校准(表上面有相应的配置文件可供下载),肉眼应该不再能看到颜色偏差。
由于该显示器不是为专业用户设计的,它提供了足够的色彩再现,几乎百分之百地覆盖了sRGB色彩空间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在300cd/m²的情况下,Omen 16只应在紧急情况下在户外使用。尤其是游戏,因为颜色更不明显,所以不是很吸引人。但是,即使在阳光直射下,文本和简单的图形仍然清晰可见。哑光显示表面在此做出了贡献。相比之下,亮度在室内是绰绰有余的,特别是因为0.22cd/m²的极低黑值确保了高对比度。
IPS面板在通常的观察角度下是稳定的。即使在尖锐的角度也无法检测到颜色变化。然而,亮度从大约70°到80°明显下降,尽管这几乎不是一个实用的观看角度。
性能--惠普专注于动力
我们的惠普Omen 16中的AMD Ryzen 7 5800H和AMD Radeon RX 6600M,对于目前的游戏有足够的动力。16GB的内存几乎应该足够了,而且以后可以很容易地扩展。然而,当系统在QHD显示屏上以165帧的速度运行时,笔记本的极限得到了测试。另一方面,在许多游戏中,60帧似乎几乎可以毫不费力地实现。
为了尽可能拉伸这些极限,我们在Omen Gaming Hub中选择了 "性能 "选项,这使得处理器的供电量增加了近20%。
处理器
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H的耗电量几乎是无限的。在零点几秒的时间里,它可以消耗160W。在更长的时间里,134W是标准。例如,这两个数值都明显高于采用相同CPU的微星Alpha 15中的设置。
然而,无法确定更大的性能飞跃。至少,通常价格低廉的CPU可以与英特尔酷睿i7-11800或i7-12800H竞争,尽管是以牺牲效率为代价。在我们的基准测试中,增加功耗的效果并不明显。Omen 16在各种评级中大多处于中场,被竞争对手紧密包围。所有可以说的是,该处理器提供了它所能提供的一切。
真正引人注目的是Cinebench循环中的数值没有下降,这通常可以防止系统过热。惠普Omen 16只是将其通风量提升到最大,然后抵消了性能的任何下降。
Cinebench R15 multi sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 |
系统性能
与其前身类似,考虑到直接的竞争,系统性能是令人信服的。考虑到测量中可能出现的波动,Omen 16与其竞争对手基本持平,并始终接近顶端。创建和编辑图像和视频的成绩甚至高于平均水平。配备NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060的型号在这里不能完全跟上。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (6875 - 7150, n=2) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (9907 - 10479, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (8922 - 9231, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (9977 - 10257, n=2) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1302 - 1309, n=3) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1284 - 1285, n=3) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1384 - 1401, n=3) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1116 - 1136, n=3) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7150 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在播放4K视频时,只有三个跳帧是一个不错的结果。另一方面,测量的延迟显示,驱动程序的调整似乎并不理想。惠普Omen 16仅有不到2毫秒的延迟,在排名中处于领先地位,不幸的是这是最差的结果。但应该记住,其他可比的游戏笔记本在这一类别中也是没有说服力的。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
安装的NVMe固态硬盘三星PM981a,像许多其他笔记本一样,能够充分展示其能力。几乎所有的记录值都高于平均水平,这也解释了为什么在我们的硬盘和固态硬盘的表格中,这种固态硬盘被发现在我们表格的顶部。
通过PCIe 4.0,这款固态硬盘的速度会更快,但AMD处理器不支持这种方式。主板上的连接本身甚至会有这种能力。但这个功能在这个系统的性能中并没有发挥重要作用。
HP Omen 16-c0077ng Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drive Performance Rating | |||||||||
Percent | 79.6 | 57.1 -28% | 59.7 -25% | 56.2 -29% | 74.6 -6% | 15.2 -81% | 44.8 -44% | 70.6 -11% | 96.1 21% |
AS SSD | -31% | -24% | -36% | -6% | -163% | -151% | -14% | 18% | |
Score Total | 5866 | 3300 -44% | 3394 -42% | 3329 -43% | 5503 -6% | 910 -84% | 3636 -38% | 4826 ? -18% | 6737 ? 15% |
Score Read | 2363 | 1157 -51% | 1612 -32% | 1574 -33% | 2017 -15% | 389 -84% | 1493 -37% | 1786 ? -24% | 2441 ? 3% |
Score Write | 2325 | 1546 -34% | 1007 -57% | 1000 -57% | 2452 5% | 338 -85% | 1397 -40% | 2144 ? -8% | 3113 ? 34% |
Seq Read | 3148 | 2016 -36% | 2589 -18% | 2844 -10% | 2383 -24% | 925 -71% | 2695 -14% | 2553 ? -19% | 4944 ? 57% |
Seq Write | 2565 | 1830 -29% | 1435 -44% | 1779 -31% | 2466 -4% | 496 -81% | 2384 -7% | 2084 ? -19% | 3720 ? 45% |
4K Read | 52.1 | 55.2 6% | 53.6 3% | 42.9 -18% | 44.14 -15% | 19.99 -62% | 29.75 -43% | 53.1 ? 2% | 65.1 ? 25% |
4K Write | 136.8 | 127.7 -7% | 154.2 13% | 130.7 -4% | 117.5 -14% | 17.96 -87% | 52 -62% | 131.2 ? -4% | 211 ? 54% |
4K-64 Read | 1996 | 901 -55% | 1299 -35% | 1246 -38% | 1734 -13% | 276.2 -86% | 1193 -40% | 1477 ? -26% | 1876 ? -6% |
4K-64 Write | 1931 | 1235 -36% | 710 -63% | 692 -64% | 2088 8% | 270.2 -86% | 1107 -43% | 1805 ? -7% | 2533 ? 31% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.087 -32% | 0.056 15% | 0.089 -35% | 0.049 26% | 0.23 -248% | 0.136 -106% | 0.04983 ? 24% | 0.05509 ? 17% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.032 -19% | 0.027 -0% | 0.043 -59% | 0.032 -19% | 0.249 -822% | 0.36 -1233% | 0.04222 ? -56% | 0.04843 ? -79% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-30% | -25% /
-24% | -33% /
-35% | -6% /
-6% | -122% /
-156% | -98% /
-142% | -13% /
-14% | 20% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
AMD Radeon RX 6600M是入门级显卡之一,与NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060大致相当。AMD卡提供更大的视频内存,因此它应该能够在某种程度上更好地处理要求更高的标题。
然而,与处理器不同的是,Omen 16没有为GPU提供额外的电源,而只是提供最大115W的电源。在一些游戏笔记本电脑中,如Schenker XMG Apex 15,该卡由Nvidia提供最大130W的电源。
在电池模式下,惠普甚至将功耗限制在25W。如果没有永久性的电源,游戏只能在有限的范围内进行。
3DMark 11 Performance | 25021 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 51430 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21360 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8353 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
关于可能的游戏的选择,几乎没有任何限制。目前的游戏即使在QHD分辨率下也能达到可观的帧率。特别是那些专门为广大观众编程的游戏,通常对系统性能要求较低。这里的图形性能对于从运动模拟到战斗游戏的三A级游戏来说,应该可以满足一段时间的需求。
在全高清情况下,即使选择了最高级别的细节,三位数的帧速率几乎总是可以实现的,以供应显示器的165赫兹的内容。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (75.4 - 88.2, n=6) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Elex 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (30.1 - 118.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (59 - 66.1, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
2560x1440 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (59.9 - 116.7, n=4, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M () |
GRID Legends | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (109.8 - 199, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (105 - 131.7, n=5) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 190, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (87 - 102.8, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
Back 4 Blood | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (72.3 - 309, n=7, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M () | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (94.7 - 327, n=4, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M () |
GTA V | |
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 160.6, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (49.3 - 63.8, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (65.9 - 88.7, n=6) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
与Cinebench循环类似,Omen并没有被其硬件长时间的强烈加热所吓倒。与其说是节流从而导致波动,不如说是增加了通风量,使多余的热量能够被充分地排除。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 146 | 71 | 49.3 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 135 | 84 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115.7 | 105.6 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 77.8 | 54.8 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.3 | ||||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 103 | 96 | 81 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 172 | 155 | 101 | ||
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 189 | 172 | 124 | ||
GRID Legends (2022) | 138 | 110 | 87 | ||
Elex 2 (2022) | 66 | 59 | 58 |
排放--有副作用的游戏
噪声排放
沉默是一种罕见的现象。当惠普Omen 16使用电池供电运行,并将性能模式设置为 "平衡 "时,风扇只是不时地启动。在使用办公程序或冲浪时,几乎没有噪音。然而,一旦与电源建立连接,就会出现永久性的背景噪音。造成这种情况的原因是处理器的功耗增加了一倍以上。
只要显卡一发挥作用,游戏笔记本就能清楚地听到。如此清晰,以至于即使在隔壁房间或之后的房间,你也能知道游戏何时启动。只有隔绝良好的门和一副入耳式耳机才能在这里有所帮助。
尽管Omen在这方面并不孤单,但类似的惠普Victus 16和联想Legion 5 Pro尤其表明它可以做得更好。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 31.2 / 33.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 55.4 / 56 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 16% | 0% | 9% | 13% | 17% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 25.49 -2% | 23 8% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 23 8% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 29.57 -18% | 23 8% | 27 -8% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 25 -0% |
Idle Average * | 31.2 | 29.57 5% | 23 26% | 29 7% | 25 20% | 23 26% | 25 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.8 | 29.57 13% | 26.4 22% | 31 8% | 34 -1% | 34.81 -3% | 25 26% |
Load Average * | 55.4 | 48.61 12% | 34.25 38% | 57 -3% | 44 21% | 35.02 37% | 35.5 36% |
Load Maximum * | 56 | 57.66 -3% | 58.42 -4% | 58 -4% | 52 7% | 56 -0% | 50.35 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 59 | 58.4 | 56 | 50 | 52 | 46.67 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
一个强大的通风系统确保了相对舒适的表面温度。我们在机箱上测得的温度刚刚超过40°C(104°F),这从未引起任何不适。
同时,应该非常小心地确保大的通风口在任何时候都不被遮挡。除非在一个坚硬的表面上,后方和右侧有足够的空间,否则不建议将笔记本的性能推到极限。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-e0179ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | 4% | 8% | -33% | -21% | -22% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.6 | 44.4 -9% | 36 11% | 37 9% | 51 -26% | 48 -18% | 50 -23% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36 | 48.6 -35% | 38 -6% | 40 -11% | 52 -44% | 55 -53% | 55 -53% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.3 | 31.2 -0% | 31 1% | 27 14% | 46 -47% | 33 -5% | 34 -9% |
Idle Bottom * | 36 | 32.2 11% | 33 8% | 29 19% | 41 -14% | 39 -8% | 37 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
Omen不会因为连续的操作而被甩出同步。强大的风扇,达到近6000转/分钟,可以在任何时候散去足够的热量。最大功耗在任何时候都不会受到限制。硬件温度保持在相对可容忍的水平。
然而,当显卡也处于负载状态时,CPU的时钟会慢一些,这仅仅是由于巨大的电力消耗造成的。一个 "只有 "230W的电源根本无法为CPU提供134W,为GPU提供另外115W。此外,其他组件,如屏幕,也需要一些电力。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | 1,6 | 0 | 34 | 33 |
Prime95压力 | 4,1 | 0 | 66 | 39 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 3,3 | 1.800 | 92 | 73 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 3,6 | 2.330 | 78 | 74 |
发言人
Bang & Olufsen "的标签是部分合理的。特别是,电影、系列片和其他媒体的声音在内置的扬声器下应该是这样的。
然而,在音乐方面,这款笔记本电脑就不那么令人信服了。虽然小型扬声器的低音听起来相当不错,高音听起来也很干净和细致,但中间的音域缺乏力量。吉他味重的音乐在这里尤其受影响。
总的正面印象对于游戏来说用处不大。高音量不足以淹没通风,以创造正确的气氛。耳机连接在这里可以有所帮助。
HP Omen 16-c0077ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能量管理--"预兆 "有耐力
消耗功率
即使在没有任何负载的情况下,Omen 16的功耗也在12W的上限范围内。但在视频播放过程中只多消耗了0.8W,这说明对于游戏笔记本来说,电池寿命出奇地好。
特别引人注目的是,一旦连接了230瓦的电源适配器,游戏和其他高要求任务的平均功耗。190瓦比我们在惠普的Omen 16-b0085ng或Schenker的XMG Apex 15中测得的数值几乎高出100%。提供最大的性能是以牺牲可闻的通风和糟糕的效率为代价的。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.02 Watt |
Idle | 12 / 12.8 / 18.5 Watt |
Load |
190 / 200 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | 10% | 17% | 3% | 10% | -1% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12 | 9.1 24% | 10.5 12% | 8 33% | 12 -0% | 10.45 13% | 13.7 ? -14% | 13.5 ? -13% |
Idle Average * | 12.8 | 14.61 -14% | 15 -17% | 11 14% | 18 -41% | 14.92 -17% | 16.6 ? -30% | 18.9 ? -48% |
Idle Maximum * | 18.5 | 15.05 19% | 17 8% | 16 14% | 21 -14% | 16.02 13% | 19.1 ? -3% | 26.7 ? -44% |
Load Average * | 190 | 77.8 59% | 109 43% | 109 43% | 94 51% | 119.65 37% | 114.4 ? 40% | 106.6 ? 44% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 194 | 131 32% | 186 4% | 183 6% | 147 24% | 174.9 10% | ||
Load Maximum * | 200 | 114.42 43% | 186 7% | 211 -6% | 199 -0% | 187.26 6% | 197.8 ? 1% | 249 ? -25% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Energy consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
尽管电池容量相当低,只有70Wh,但视频播放时的运行时间特别令人信服。惠普的Omen 16-b0085ng的电池较大,在这里处于劣势。原因是AMD处理器的集成图形效率更高。虽然它的性能值比英特尔的同类产品差,但它对简单任务的要求要低得多。
另一方面,在负载情况下,没有任何节能规格是有帮助的。由于显卡仍被允许使用25W,处理器使用40W,这使得它在使用前只有一个多小时的时间。
在旅途中,应完全关闭键盘照明,降低显示屏亮度。这将大大增加电池寿命。
HP Omen 16-c0077ng R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, 70 Wh | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 41% | -14% | 11% | -2% | 2% | -2% | |
H.264 | 419 | 587 40% | 277 -34% | 325 -22% | 408 ? -3% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 363 | 524 44% | 389 7% | 404 11% | 354 -2% | 457 26% | 376 ? 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 83 | 115 39% | 78.3 ? -6% |
Pros
Cons
结论:HP Omen 16设定了优先事项
如果性能是唯一的关注点,那么Ryzen 7和AMD的RX 6600M的组合就没有什么可批评的。目前的游戏可以在高或最大细节水平上进行。即使是QHD分辨率也不会对惠普Omen 16-c0077ng的硬件造成过度压力。
由于慷慨的冷却和肆无忌惮的电源,Omen在不到1300欧元(约1413美元)的情况下具有出色的性能价值。硬件充其量是坚实的,可以将其推到极限,以获得最大的收益。但这是以高噪音水平和过高的耗电量为代价的。
此外,惠普为了诱人的定价,在其他方面也有所削减。没有使用RGB键盘,而只使用了种类有限的四个区域。所有的USB-A端口都只能达到5Gbit/s,这一点没有跟上时代的步伐。
扎实的游戏性能、良好的电池寿命和远低于1,500欧元(约1630美元)的QHD显示屏使Omen成为一款值得推荐的产品。然而,好的耳机是必须的。
着眼于未来和对图形性能日益增长的需求,配备全高清面板的版本可能是更持久的选择。更强大的RTX 3070在更高的QHD分辨率下表现得更好一点。但我们的测试装置显示,RX 6600M也可以处理这个屏幕。
价格和可用性
这里评论的惠普Omen 16-c0077ng目前可以在数码港找到,价格为1300欧元(约1413美元)。配备全高清显示屏的惠普Omen 16-c0075ng,价格略低。惠普Omen 16-c0085ng配备更强大的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070,目前售价为1800欧元(约1957美元)。
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
- 04/07/2022 v7 (old)
Mario Petzold