惠普Omen 17 (2022)游戏笔记本电脑在审查。时尚的外壳和硬件有很大的潜力
几年来,惠普一直在成功地推销Omen系列,将其作为具有吸引力的设计和出色的制造质量的强大游戏笔记本电脑。然而,该制造商也收取相当高的价格。目前,购买者必须为目前的Omen 17掏出超过2000欧元(约2000美元)。
惠普Omen 17中选择了强大的硬件组件,确保在处理器基准测试中具有非常强的性能。2022年版本的游戏笔记本电脑现在使用的是英特尔酷睿i7-12700H最新一代处理器,同时配备16GB DDR5内存和西数的1TB NVMe SSD。该 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti在我们的第二个审查样本中也表现良好。由于显卡的缺陷,我们的第一个审查样本不得不被惠普更换。总的来说,17英寸的Omen经常超过强大的 HP Omen 16相同的硬件。
其他可比较的游戏机有:微星Vector GP76 12UGS ,华硕TUF Gaming F17 和便宜得多的宏碁Nitro 5 ,配备AMD处理器。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 31 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 25.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
84.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
81.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 设计上没有改变
惠普Omen的外壳采用了黑色塑料和一些黑漆的金属。显示屏盖上的Omen标志是唯一醒目的颜色点。其他方面,笔记本电脑的设计一直保持简单。笔直的线条和少量的装饰构成了这款游戏笔记本的外观。自去年以来,该设计没有任何变化。即使是典型的风扇大开口在这里也不显眼。由于采用了瑞士边缘和其他光学技巧,惠普设法使笔记本看起来比实际尺寸小得多。反过来说,它几乎就像悬浮在表面之上。
打开后,一个体面的键盘露出来了,上面有可切换的RGB灯光。上面是一个有趣的三角形图案,似乎根本没有任何功能。除此之外,一个大的O17字样吸引了我们的注意。笔记本电脑稳稳地站在底部的大橡胶脚上。
显示屏盖和底座底面由塑料制成。带有键盘和触摸板的笔记本的上侧是由金属制成的。这里的一个积极方面是,即使在重载的情况下,掌托仍然保持冷却。尽管它的尺寸很大,但屏幕可以用一只手打开到150°。惠普在铰链方面做得很好,因为屏幕位置保持稳定,即使笔记本受到摇晃。
惠普笔记本的尺寸和重量是典型的游戏笔记本。笔记本和电源适配器加起来的重量超过4公斤。充其量,它看起来比许多竞争对手要苗条一些。
设备 - 所有的连接都在侧面
惠普的游戏笔记本的连接性对于游戏玩家来说是比较正常的,尽管一个具有良好速度的SD读卡器在这里让我们吃惊。所有的端口都位于笔记本的两侧。然而,如果你在右侧连接有线鼠标或其他硬件,你应该注意不要挡住通风槽。
SD卡阅读器
AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡在许多笔记本电脑上达到了明显的高传输速度。但尽管如此,还是有可能在读取速度超过100MB/s的情况下工作。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 (AV Pro V60) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE |
沟通
惠普Omen 17使用联发科MT7921进行无线通信。该模块支持WLAN 6和蓝牙5.2。与Netgear Nighthawk AX12结合使用时,数据传输的速率不幸没有其他笔记本电脑那么高。不过,在接收和发送方向上超过880MBit/s的速率也不差。从长远来看,WLAN模块的位置可能会成为问题,因为它位于冷却器和图形芯片之间的热管之下。它甚至用一个胶垫固定在那里,所以在使用过程中可能会变得相当热。从长远来看,这也可能导致连接问题。
网络摄像头
尽管在良好的环境光线下,内置摄像头的图像质量清晰,对比度丰富,但该网络摄像头几乎不适合流媒体使用。在较暗的房间里,它几乎没有机会提供合理的良好图像质量。
安全问题
除了英特尔酷睿i7的安全功能,如TPM 2.0和SecureBoot,用户不会在这款游戏笔记本中找到更多的东西。
辅料
交付范围只包括通常的文件和大型的350W电源适配器。
维护
惠普Omen 17比较容易打开,里面有很多模块化组件。这里有一个免费的NVMe SSD插槽。一个相应的散热器和一个散热垫已经被预装。然而,更换WLAN模块可能会有问题。如前所述,它位于热管下方,由一个胶垫固定。
担保
惠普在欧洲为HP Omen 17提供24个月的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以你应该在购买前向你的供应商查询。
输入设备 - RGB键盘
键盘
虽然17英寸的笔记本电脑有全键盘的空间,但惠普在这里省略了Numpad,以便为方向键和一些宏键(P1至P6)腾出更多的空间,并给键块以良好的间距。由于超过一毫米的清晰键程和清晰的反馈,这块RGB发光的键盘在触觉上非常令人愉悦。对于习惯了ISO布局的欧洲人来说,这款键盘的ANSI布局可能很不寻常。另一方面,主要使用机械键盘的玩家在这里应该很快就会有家的感觉。
WASD键,除其他外,可以通过RGB照明的四个可控区域在视觉上突出。玩家们可能会对此感到高兴。键盘的照明和巨集键的分配可以通过Omen中心控制。照明有静态和动态模式。另一个有趣的方面是,键盘照明的颜色和亮度可以根据屏幕内容进行调整。这导致了一种有点让人联想到Ambilight系统的效果。这个功能只在Light Studio中可用。
触摸板
点击板对每一个输入都有丰富的点击声做出反应。它很精确,反应迅速。点击板的大小和位置也很令人满意。
显示器 - 144赫兹,但反应不是特别快
惠普Omen 17的IPS级显示屏,分辨率为全高清,亮度仅为302cd/m²,更多属于中等水平。由于采用了哑光表面,至少不会出现干扰游戏体验的反射。我们确定对比度只有892:1。黑值相对较高,为0.36cd/m²。
肉眼看不出显示屏上的亮度差异。只有相机可以检测到屏幕上清晰的光晕,尽管只是在长时间曝光后。
屏幕的响应时间与我们对游戏笔记本的期望不太相符。特别是有要求的游戏者很可能在快速的图像变化中注意到清晰的条纹。
然而,竞争对手的游戏笔记本在这里的表现并没有好到哪里去。这两款华硕TUF游戏机和 Acer Nitro 5在其17英寸的变体中使用的屏幕,大多有明显的恶化率。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 313 cd/m²
Contrast: 783:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.24 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.46% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.03% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus 17X XES Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 AUO B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 BOE NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 17% | 16% | -32% | -38% | 18% | 17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 59.03 | 70.1 19% | 70.09 19% | 40.2 -32% | 36.7 -38% | 71.7 21% | 71 20% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.46 | 99.9 14% | 98.98 13% | 59.7 -32% | 55.3 -37% | 98.8 13% | 97.9 12% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.04 | 71.9 18% | 70.91 16% | 41.5 -32% | 37.9 -38% | 73.6 21% | 73.3 20% |
Response Times | 59% | 46% | -188% | -35% | 41% | 1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 3.4 ? 76% | 4 ? 71% | 39.2 ? -180% | 18 ? -29% | 4.2 ? 70% | 14.5 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 5.8 ? 42% | 8 ? 20% | 29.6 ? -196% | 14 ? -40% | 8.8 ? 12% | 9.4 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 100 ? | ||||||
Screen | -74% | -22% | -64% | -93% | -89% | -70% | |
Brightness middle | 321 | 278 -13% | 274 -15% | 287 -11% | 282 -12% | 323.3 1% | 335 4% |
Brightness | 302 | 273 -10% | 264 -13% | 268 -11% | 255 -16% | 315 4% | 319 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 79 -6% | 87 4% | 89 6% | 85 1% | 91 8% | 90 7% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.26 37% | 0.25 39% | 0.17 59% | 0.24 41% | 0.33 20% | 0.28 32% |
Contrast | 783 | 1069 37% | 1096 40% | 1688 116% | 1175 50% | 980 25% | 1196 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.62 | 3.96 -144% | 2.53 -56% | 5.1 -215% | 5.91 -265% | 4.59 -183% | 4.38 -170% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.08 | 10.78 -164% | 6.76 -66% | 8.72 -114% | 10.98 -169% | 10.82 -165% | 9.48 -132% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.93 | 1.07 45% | 0.98 49% | 5.1 -164% | 1.4 27% | 1.33 31% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.24 | 6.8 -448% | 3.49 -181% | 4.24 -242% | 5.85 -372% | 7.9 -537% | 7 -465% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.224 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.44 90% | 2.32 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.103 105% |
CCT | 6261 104% | 7651 85% | 6714 97% | 6008 108% | 7372 88% | 5941 109% | 6244 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | ||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55 | ||||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-36% | 13% /
-4% | -95% /
-75% | -55% /
-71% | -10% /
-47% | -17% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
惠普Omen 17的可显示色彩空间并不高,只有87.46%的sRGB。这对于游戏和办公应用来说可能是足够的,但艺术家可能想要更多。
经过校准,HP Omen 17的屏幕显示出相当小的色彩偏差。如果你有相同的配置,你可以使用信息框中的颜色配置文件大大减少颜色偏差。颜色偏差从deltaE 6.41下降到1.93,低于可感知的数值。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 100 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
显示器的背光在阳光直射下有些弱。但在明亮的阳光下,只要有合适的视角,仍然可以用笔记本电脑工作。
这款游戏笔记本的屏幕在可视角度方面不是特别稳定。虽然在较陡峭的视角下没有明显的色彩偏差,但在可感知的亮度方面有强烈的变化。
性能 - 惠普笔记本电脑的图形性能略高于平均水平
惠普Omen 17的硬件显然是为PC游戏设计的。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti和英特尔Core i7 12700H确保了这里的强大性能。该处理器由16GB的DDR5工作内存支持。来自西部数据的NVMe SSD也足够大,可以容纳1TB的几个游戏。
测试条件
惠普Omen 17的电源控制一直保持相对朴素,但也可以进行强烈的定制。在系统性能、CPU性能、DPC延迟和SSD性能等领域的基准测试中,选择了平衡的 配置文件。对GPU性能和游戏的测试是在性能 模式下进行的。不同的性能模式也被用于测试体积和能量测量。
在平衡和性能 模式下,CPU的提升功率为100瓦,GPU的提升功率为135瓦。在平衡 模式下,处理器以大约45瓦的功率持续工作,而在性能 模式下的功率大约为75瓦。
处理器
的 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H属于当前Alder Lake一代的高端芯片,由六个性能核心和八个效率核心组成,共有20个线程。在性能 模式下,PL1为75瓦,远高于45瓦的通常值。在测试中,通过对Cinebench R15基准的25次运行,日志分析显示各种性能配置和电池模式的结果明显不同。i7在Boost功率下连续运行了四次(只要性能 模式被激活),然后迅速下降到75瓦的连续输出。平衡 模式允许45瓦的持续输出,这意味着性能 模式实现了490分以上。在电池模式下,PL1和PL2受到了严重的限制。在这里,处理器分别只有35瓦和25瓦的功率可以支配。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -2! | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
系统性能
由于强大的硬件,这款游戏笔记本电脑也证明了其在系统性能基准方面的优势。在PCMark10和CrossMark的所有子领域都可以看到强劲的得分。虽然惠普的Omen 17不能把自己放在比较设备的顶端,但所有设备都有非常高的性能值。这使得在日常使用中,笔记本电脑的响应速度始终如一。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (6941 - 7947, n=11) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9892 - 10935, n=11) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9024 - 10638, n=11) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10165 - 12546, n=11) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (974 - 2000, n=12) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (907 - 1962, n=12) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1027 - 2057, n=12) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1029 - 2142, n=12) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
PCMark 10 Score | 7357 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在目前的配置中,HP Omen 17显示出DPC延迟的严重问题。9988微秒是这里的结果。在第一次测试运行中,笔记本电脑完全崩溃,显示蓝屏。驱动程序的更新可能能够补救这个问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
WDC PC SN810 1TB是一款非常快的NVMe SSD。然而,在内存基准测试中,它的性能明显落后于我们的SSD和HDD基准表中的顶级型号。SSDs和HDDs的基准表中的顶级型号。比较设备的SSD在这里也表现得更好。另一方面,惠普Omen 17中的NVMe固态硬盘的访问时间和传输率都非常好。不幸的是,在长期负载下,NVMe SSD的数据传输率在一定时间内不断下降(SSD的传感器没有显示过热)。我们也观察到了同样的行为,在 惠普Omen 16.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
该 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti是最强大的显卡之一。幸运的是,它的性能几乎不取决于惠普笔记本电脑中选择的性能配置文件。因此,在3DMark的基准测试中,平衡模式和性能模式都能获得优异的成绩。这里的差异不到600分。即使手动将风扇设置到最高水平也很难提高性能。在查看日志时,我们注意到,在Time Spy 基准的短期负载中,平衡模式只限制了显卡的性能,大约为10瓦特。尽管如此,惠普Omen 17中的Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Ti的温度在这里上升了一些。
然而,由于Nvidia GPU的缺陷,我们不得不更换我们的第一个评测设备。由于无法解释的原因,RTX 3070 Ti的热点温度在第一台惠普Omen 17中飙升得很高,它只能在40瓦左右的功率下运行而不会过热。与此同时,dGPU的平均温度只有75℃。
在电池供电的情况下,这款游戏笔记本仍然表现良好。在大量的游戏中,超过30FPS的全高清游戏应该是可能的。
3DMark 11 Performance | 32071 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 61904 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24663 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10705 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years) | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years) | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
惠普Omen 17在大多数游戏基准测试中都能达到100 FPS以上。只有少数笔记本电脑的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti在这里提供更多的FPS。因此,在所有测试的游戏中,即使在最高的图形设置下,全高清游戏也是没有问题的。
即使启用了光线追踪,这款游戏笔记本在《鬼影东京》和《地铁出埃及记》等作品中仍能达到60FPS以上的成绩。
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (139.7 - 226, n=27) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (76.8 - 124.1, n=39) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=145, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (80 - 181.9, n=28) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 123.9, n=36) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 3840x2160 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (64.3 - 145.5, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (91.3 - 102, n=3) |
Metro Exodus | |
1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (74.3 - 146.5, n=8, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (71 - 77.2, n=2) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Quality DXR AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (63.2 - 118.8, n=8, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (61.3 - 65.1, n=2) |
F1 2021 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (67.3 - 134.2, n=13) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (74.3 - 204, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (47.5 - 99.2, n=11) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
Ghostwire Tokyo | |
1920x1080 High Settings | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (68.6 - 234, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (123.9 - 152, n=4) | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings | |
Average of class Gaming (65.9 - 231, n=7, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (115.4 - 145.1, n=4) | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing | |
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 127, n=7, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (48.9 - 59.9, n=3) |
Witcher 3 基准中的帧率比平时更不稳定,但总体上保持稳定。平均而言,在1920p分辨率和最高图形设置下,可以达到105FPS。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 186.1 | 181.7 | 177.3 | 117.5 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 417.5 | 317.5 | 204.8 | 103.7 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 166.6 | 153.7 | 148.4 | 140.8 | 127.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 209 | 137.8 | 102.8 | 76 | 46.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 143.8 | 128 | 101.6 | 102 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 155 | 146 | 137 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 441 | 267 | 214 | 186.4 | ||
Metro Exodus (2019) | 140.27 | 120.28 | 97.22 | 77.24 | ||
F1 2021 (2021) | 333 | 169.5 | 139.2 | 67.3 | 47.5 | |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 181.2 | 156.2 | 152 | 143 |
排放--带耳机更好
噪声
当设置为平衡模式时,惠普Omen有时几乎是无声的。但是一旦要求超过基本负荷,笔记本电脑的音量就会从明显可闻的范围增加到令人讨厌的范围。在大多数情况下,像许多游戏笔记本电脑一样,该笔记本电脑的声音相对较大。惠普以这样的方式设置了风扇曲线,较高的数值很早就开始发挥作用了。在52.2 dB(A)时,笔记本电脑的音量达到了令人讨厌的水平。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 28 / 31.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 52.2 / 52.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Aorus 17X XES GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | -0% | 14% | -1% | 9% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 26 -2% | 25.6 -1% | 24 6% | 26 -2% | 24.2 5% | 26 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28 -0% | 27 4% | 24 14% | 26 7% | 24.7 12% | 30 -7% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 32 -14% | 27 4% | 24 14% | 33.1 -18% | 24.7 12% | 31 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.2 | 38 -22% | 30.1 4% | 24 23% | 31.3 -0% | 24.7 21% | 33 -6% |
Load Average * | 52.2 | 53 -2% | 54.4 -4% | 42.6 18% | 49.8 5% | 44.3 15% | 49 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.2 | 54 -3% | 46.84 10% | 56.3 -8% | 53 -2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 52.2 | 55 -5% | 56.2 -8% | 46.84 10% | 49.6 5% | 47.7 9% | 57 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
底座上侧的键盘和触摸板的温度几乎总是很低。因此,笔记本电脑使用起来总是感觉很舒服。掌托总是保持令人愉快的凉爽,即使是在笔记本电脑不得不长时间以最大负荷运行的情况下。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -29% | -12% | -12% | -10% | -9% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 31.3 | 54 -73% | 46.3 -48% | 52 -66% | 44 -41% | 41 -31% | 41 -31% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.3 | 58 -34% | 45 -4% | 47 -9% | 52.7 -22% | 47.2 -9% | 62 -43% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.3 | 37 -18% | 34.2 -9% | 31 1% | 32.6 -4% | 33.2 -6% | 25 20% |
Idle Bottom * | 43.3 | 39 10% | 38.3 12% | 31 28% | 32.1 26% | 39 10% | 26 40% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在一小时的压力测试中,笔记本的性能和温度率保持相对稳定。由于审查时正值夏季,惠普Omen 17出现小幅波动是可以原谅的。没有观察到明显的性能下降,也没有被日志分析发现。
发言人
曾几何时,Bang & Olufsen代表了声音和设计的最高水平。然而,惠普的笔记本电脑却不是这样的。惠普Omen 17的声音轮廓是尖锐的,高音部分过度驱动,低音部分无力。如果巨大的风扇没有促使你戴上耳机,你可能会因为扬声器而这样做。幸运的是,这款笔记本电脑有足够的连接选项,可以通过蓝牙、3.5毫米插孔和USB-C进行外部声音输出。
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--HP Omen,电池运行时间可接受
消耗功率
由于采用了混合模式,英特尔酷睿i7的iGPU承担了大部分的工作,这款游戏笔记本电脑被证明是经济的。空闲时的耗电量相当低。在负载情况下,惠普Omen 17显示出较高的耗电量。然而,笔记本电脑的电源适配器并没有被完全利用。
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 1.2 Watt |
Idle | 12.2 / 18 / 19.4 Watt |
Load |
128 / 266 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -12% | 30% | -6% | -33% | 26% | -11% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12.2 | 18 -48% | 13.5 -11% | 6.6 46% | 18.7 -53% | 20.9 -71% | 4 67% | 14.2 ? -16% | 13.6 ? -11% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 28 -56% | 15.6 13% | 8.3 54% | 22 -22% | 25.1 -39% | 10 44% | 19.9 ? -11% | 19 ? -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 19.4 | 36 -86% | 20.6 -6% | 11.8 39% | 25.2 -30% | 45 -132% | 19 2% | 26.2 ? -35% | 26.8 ? -38% |
Load Average * | 128 | 153 -20% | 198 -55% | 119 7% | 134.7 -5% | 102 20% | 114 11% | 125.8 ? 2% | 106.3 ? 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 209 | 221 -6% | 199 5% | 169 19% | 135 35% | 189 10% | 183.2 12% | ||
Load Maximum * | 266 | 290 -9% | 319 -20% | 222 17% | 157 41% | 234.8 12% | 221 17% | 248 ? 7% | 249 ? 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
电池寿命通常不是游戏笔记本的核心竞争力。但惠普Omen 17在这里给出了体面的价格。在Wi-Fi网上冲浪测试中,五到六个小时证明了它适合游戏之外的日常使用。然而,在满负荷的情况下,运行时间明显减少。由于笔记本在电池模式下仍然为CPU和dGPU提供了相当多的电力,所以游戏时间只可能超过一小时。
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | -19% | 23% | -10% | -24% | -3% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 532 | 440 -17% | 608 14% | 404 -24% | 603 13% | 565 ? 6% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 371 | 266 -28% | 307 -17% | 519 40% | 334 -10% | 314 -15% | 336 -9% | 375 ? 1% |
Gaming | 62 | |||||||
Load | 131 | 86 -34% | 99 -24% | 138 5% | 86 -34% | 88 -33% | 114 -13% | 85.6 ? -35% |
H.264 | 226 | 462 | 420 | 409 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 一个大部分是普通的游戏笔记本电脑,价格很高
惠普Omen 17是一款相当不显眼的游戏笔记本电脑。塑料和金属的材料组合使机箱具有较高的稳定性和优质的表面感觉。不显眼的设计让人赏心悦目,几乎不能说明这款笔记本电脑的高性能潜力。尤其是英特尔酷睿i7-12700H能够再次表现出色。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti在游戏笔记本中也很强大。要求很高的游戏在全高清分辨率下顺利运行。
惠普Omen 17是一款不错的游戏笔记本,可以提供部分优秀的性能。但即使在这个性能水平上,也有更便宜的替代品。
惠普Omen 17与Thunderbolt 4的现代连接和连接外部显示器的许多选项也令人高兴。所有的端口都位于侧面,比许多其他游戏笔记本电脑更容易到达。
事实证明,这款游戏笔记本的屏幕有点弱。色彩空间覆盖率和响应时间在这里并没有显示出特别好的数值。人们可以接受笔记本电脑的音量:在性能模式下音量相当高,但平衡的性能曲线也为许多游戏提供了足够的动力。
那些寻找高质量游戏笔记本的人将在惠普Omen 17中找到它。出色的做工与高贵的设计在这里相遇。然而,惠普Omen 17也是相对昂贵的。更加便宜的对手,如 Acer Nitro 5,有几乎相同的性能值。惠普 惠普Omen 16也更便宜一些,而且更小。
价格和可用性
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
- 10/01/2022 v7 (old)
Marc Herter