惠普 Omen 17 (GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Omen 17-w100ng
Brand: HP

均衡。售价近1300欧元（约9515人民币），Omen 17 w100ng是这个产品线中售价最低的一台设备。尽管性能相对较弱，但也可以满足在它的雾面全高清屏幕上流畅运行游戏所需。作为一台游戏笔记本电脑这台Omen提供了非常优秀的电池续航表现。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Nvidia DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 17-w100ng (Omen 15-ce Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-6300HQ 4 x 2.3 - 3.2 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1405 MHz, RAM: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), 192 bit 界面, ForceWare 376.33, no Optimus, iGPU deaktiviert

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2400, 双通道, 两个内存槽 (均已占用)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 全高清, G-Sync, 75 Hz, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB

, m.2固态硬盘+ HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm

Soundcard

Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机-输出接口，麦克风-输入接口, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 416 x 279

Battery

95.8 Wh, 0 mAh Lithium-Ion, 6 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 四个扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器: 230 瓦, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), 许多生产商工具软件, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.23 kg, Power Supply: 811 g

Price

1300 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	76 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng	73 MB/s
Asus GL702VM-GC102D	72.6 MB/s -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	87 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng	87 MB/s
Asus GL702VM-GC102D	84.6 MB/s -3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -68%

Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	676 MBit/s 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	674 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	529 MBit/s +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	524 MBit/s


326 cd/m²	364 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
320 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	334 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	312 cd/m²	315 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD046E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 364 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 331 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 342 cd/m²
Contrast: 1069:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 17-w100ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080	Asus GL702VM-GC102D LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080	MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Display		-3%	27%	1%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	67.2	65.1 -3%	90 34%	68 1%	66.6 -1%
sRGB Coverage	86.6	83.5 -4%	99.9 15%	87.5 1%	84.1 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.3	61.1 -3%	83.6 32%	64 1%	61.5 -3%
Response Times		-1%	41%	1%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	35 ?(14, 21)	38 ?(12, 26) -9%	28 ?(13.2, 14.8) 20%	33.6 ?(14, 19.6) 4%	37 ?(13, 24) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(4, 21)	23 ?(5, 18) 8%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 62%	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) -2%	24 ?(4, 20) 4%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-28%	15%	-10%	2%
Brightness middle	342	326 -5%	337.2 -1%	329.2 -4%	362 6%
Brightness	331	312 -6%	315 -5%	321 -3%	342 3%
Brightness Distribution	84	91 8%	86 2%	93 11%	87 4%
Black Level *	0.32	0.5 -56%	0.308 4%	0.267 17%	0.31 3%
Contrast	1069	652 -39%	1095 2%	1233 15%	1168 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.35	6.3 -45%	2.96 32%	5.93 -36%	4.5 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.24	11.69 -27%	5.45 41%	11.07 -20%	9.31 -1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.73	7.37 -98%	2.57 31%	6.72 -80%	3.48 7%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.37 ^93%	2.25 ^98%	2.12 ^104%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6801 ^96%	7116 ^91%	7114 ^91%	7611 ^85%	6144 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	55 -4%	74.3 30%	57 0%	55 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86	83 -3%	100 16%	87 1%	84 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -19%	28% / 21%	-3% / -6%	-0% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8258

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

16456

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4815

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

59.6 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

5.32 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.49 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102.9 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

464 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

132 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	136 Points +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	132 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 Intel Core i5-6300HQ	118 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points +46%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points +45%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	468 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	464 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 Intel Core i5-6300HQ	461 Points -1%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20283 Points +23%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20111 Points +22%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20090 Points +22%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	16609 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	16456 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 Intel Core i5-6300HQ	16161 Points -2%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5484 Points +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5126 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	5026 Points +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4926 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	4815 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 Intel Core i5-6300HQ	4759 Points -1%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	3301 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	3168 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2926 Points -8%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	11903 Points +28%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	9520 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	9307 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	3933 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3663 Points -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	11033 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	10421 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	269.2 Points +22%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	252 Points +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	232.4 Points +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	230.8 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	220.4 Points
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF Intel Core i5-6300HQ	196.1 Points -11%

PCMark 7 Score		5990 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4711 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6858 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5252 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4833 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	4711 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4670 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points -11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4012 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5394 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	5252 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4809 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4774 Points -9%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G

Sequential Read: 495 MB/s

Sequential Write: 180.2 MB/s

512K Read: 315.5 MB/s

512K Write: 172.4 MB/s

4K Read: 20.25 MB/s

4K Write: 76.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 141.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 170.8 MB/s

	HP Omen 17-w100ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	Asus GL702VM-GC102D HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-80%	13%	43%	122%
Read Seq	495	134.6 -73%	334.3 -32%	481.7 -3%	1156 134%
Write Seq	180.2	130.6 -28%	319 77%	315.4 75%	294.9 64%
Read 512	315.5	44.85 -86%	242.3 -23%	303.1 -4%	616 95%
Write 512	172.4	63.3 -63%	254.4 48%	314.4 82%	294.7 71%
Read 4k	20.25	0.602 -97%	20.3 0%	25.93 28%	42.7 111%
Write 4k	76.1	1.146 -98%	42.51 -44%	84.6 11%	153.3 101%
Read 4k QD32	141.6	1.106 -99%	251.6 78%	273.9 93%	600 324%
Write 4k QD32	170.8	1.186 -99%	167.1 -2%	274.9 61%	295.3 73%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		24318 points
3DMark 11 Performance		10805 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		111645 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		15394 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8654 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4806 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3339 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	86780 Points +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	79578 Points +6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	79107 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	74982 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	67791 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15806 Points +40%
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11506 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11326 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11311 Points 0%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23356 Points +60%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20656 Points +41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14904 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14642 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14317 Points -2%

BioShock Infinite | Battlefield 4 | Battlefield 1 | Anno 2205

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	123.8 fps +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	103.8 (19.8^min - 180.2^max) fps +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	100 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	99.1 fps
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	98.9 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	98.1 fps -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	94 fps -5%

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	101.5 fps
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	99.1 fps -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	94 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	92.9 fps -8%

Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	110.1 fps +40%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	79 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	78.5 fps

Anno 2205 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x
SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	81.1 fps +25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	79.2 fps +22%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	64.7 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	290.5	289.2	274.9	140
BioShock Infinite (2013)	197.8	176.2	164.8	99.1
Battlefield 4 (2013)	188.8	172.8	155.7	101.5
Anno 2205 (2015)	81.9	75	64.7	30.2
Just Cause 3 (2015)	94.6	83	76.7	70.4
Far Cry Primal (2016)	94	82	73	59
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	97.1	93	56.5	29.2
FIFA 17 (2016)	276.7	270.8	222.5	227.3
Battlefield 1 (2016)	136.4	117.5	86.6	78.5
Civilization VI (2016)	58.1	47.1	43	42.8
Titanfall 2 (2016)	143.5	143.5	89.7	80

Noise Level

Idle		35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
Load		44 / 54 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

	HP Omen 17-w100ng 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise		10%	6%	4%	4%
off / environment *	31	30.5 2%	28.4 8%	29.7 4%	30 3%
Idle Minimum *	35	31.4 10%	31.9 9%	33.2 5%	33 6%
Idle Average *	36	31.4 13%	32 11%	33.2 8%	34 6%
Idle Maximum *	37	31.5 15%	34 8%	33.2 10%	35 5%
Load Average *	44	40.9 7%	47 -7%	47.5 -8%	45 -2%
Load Maximum *	54	46.2 14%	49.4 9%	52.5 3%	52 4%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


41.5 °C	39.1 °C	39.3 °C
37.1 °C	37.4 °C	33.4 °C
32.5 °C	33.5 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 41.5 °C
Average: 36 °C


44.9 °C	42.4 °C	45.5 °C
30.2 °C	35.3 °C	37.7 °C
23.3 °C	27.7 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 45.5 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).

	HP Omen 17-w100ng 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat		-11%	-9%	-24%	-4%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.5	53.1 -28%	50.8 -22%	59 -42%	45 -8%
Maximum Bottom *	45.5	44.9 1%	60 -32%	66 -45%	54.3 -19%
Idle Upper Side *	31.8	32.9 -3%	27.4 14%	33.2 -4%	29.6 7%
Idle Bottom *	29.6	33.4 -13%	28.8 3%	30.6 -3%	28.6 3%

* ... smaller is better

HP Omen 17-w100ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	17 / 22 / 29 Watt
Load	72 / 141 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC940

	HP Omen 17-w100ng 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption		3%	-35%	-40%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	17	15.6 8%	22.6 -33%	18.4 -8%	19 -12%
Idle Average *	22	20.2 8%	32.7 -49%	22.8 -4%	25 -14%
Idle Maximum *	29	21.4 26%	32.8 -13%	24 17%	31 -7%
Load Average *	72	90 -25%	114.7 -59%	175.5 -144%	90 -25%
Load Maximum *	141	147 -4%	167.9 -19%	229.5 -63%	193 -37%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 03min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		6h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 25min

	HP Omen 17-w100ng 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 95.8 Wh	Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh
Battery Runtime		-31%	-43%	-32%	-25%
Reader / Idle	543	353 -35%	353 -35%	418 -23%	432 -20%
H.264	313	262 -16%			233 -26%
WiFi v1.3	363	250 -31%	213 -41%	201 -45%	247 -32%
Load	145	87 -40%	66 -54%	103 -29%	115 -21%

Pros

+ 优秀的性价比

+ M.2接口支持NVMe

+ G-Sync支持

+ 雾面IPS屏幕

+ 固态硬盘+机械硬盘

Cons

- 触控版表现较差

- 不支持USB-C 3.1第二代接口

In review: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Test model courtesy of Nvidia

Omen系列的这台入门机型并没有搭配酷睿i7处理器，而“仅”提供了一颗酷睿 i5-6300HQ处理器。因此，消费者“仅”需要支付1300欧元（约9515人民币）的账单。不过，它搭载的这颗处理器对于大部分常见用途都能够提供充足的动力。6300HQ和GeForce GTX 1060显卡的组合可以在全高清分辨率下流畅运行目前绝大部分游戏，而用户可以使用高设定，一部分情况下甚至可以设定全开。英伟达的G-Sync技术为在75赫兹刷新率屏幕上流畅显示画面提供了支持。

SATA III固态硬盘为流畅的系统响应奠定了基础。不过在这方面它还有提升的空间。它的固态硬盘可以升级为更快的PCIe/NVMe接口硬盘。而用户也可以更换它的预装1TB硬盘。雾面的IPS屏幕提供了高亮度、高对比度和稳定的可视角度范围。

Omen 17 w100ng是惠普最新推出的一台均衡全面的入门级游戏机型。

不过这台Omen也并不完美：比如，惠普还应该在噪音控制上多下一些功夫。这台笔记本电脑的噪音有些高得离谱。它的散热系统更像是为酷睿i7-6700和GeForce GTX 1070所设计的。一个BIOS更新应该可以改善这个问题。它也没有提供Thunderbolt 3或者USB 3.1第二代接口。对于一台2016/2017年的这个价位上的机型，我们认为这应该属于标配。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Omen 17-w100ng - 01/18/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

76 / 98 → 78%

Keyboard

77%

Pointing Device

72%

Connectivity

60 / 81 → 74%

Weight

55 / 10-66 → 80%