惠普 Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 362 cd/m²
Contrast: 1168:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w010ng AUO119B, 3840x2160 | Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080 | MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080 | Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 38% | 2% | 30% | 3% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 88.5 33% | 67.4 1% | 90 35% | 68 2% | 66.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 84.1 | 100 19% | 85.8 2% | 99.9 19% | 87.5 4% | 85.2 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.5 | 100 63% | 62.8 2% | 83.6 36% | 64 4% | 62.3 1% |
Response Times | -25% | 4% | 42% | 1% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 49 ? -32% | 36 ? 3% | 28 ? 24% | 33.6 ? 9% | 38 ? -3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 23 ? 4% | 9.6 ? 60% | 25.6 ? -7% | 22 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
Screen | -3% | -1% | 13% | -12% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 362 | 316 -13% | 314 -13% | 337.2 -7% | 329.2 -9% | 328 -9% |
Brightness | 342 | 312 -9% | 308 -10% | 315 -8% | 321 -6% | 317 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 92 6% | 86 -1% | 93 7% | 88 1% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.29 6% | 0.28 10% | 0.308 1% | 0.267 14% | 0.3 3% |
Contrast | 1168 | 1090 -7% | 1121 -4% | 1095 -6% | 1233 6% | 1093 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5.69 -26% | 4.17 7% | 2.96 34% | 5.93 -32% | 3.74 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.31 | 7.94 15% | 8.94 4% | 5.45 41% | 11.07 -19% | 8.97 4% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.48 | 6.12 -76% | 3.84 -10% | 2.57 26% | 6.72 -93% | 2.67 23% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.56 86% | 2.41 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 6144 106% | 5875 111% | 6950 94% | 7114 91% | 7611 85% | 6861 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 87 58% | 56 2% | 74.3 35% | 57 4% | 56 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 100 19% | 86 2% | 100 19% | 87 4% | 85 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
2% | 2% /
0% | 28% /
21% | -3% /
-7% | 2% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Nexoc G734III |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Nexoc G734III |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Nexoc G734III |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Nexoc G734III |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
PCMark 7 Score | 5556 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4833 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7128 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5394 points | |
Help |
HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | HP Omen 17-w010ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 20% | 99% | -45% | -30% | 126% | |
Read Seq | 1156 | 1234 7% | 1917 66% | 334.3 -71% | 481.7 -58% | 1718 49% |
Write Seq | 294.9 | 583 98% | 1283 335% | 319 8% | 315.4 7% | 1305 343% |
Read 512 | 616 | 606 -2% | 871 41% | 242.3 -61% | 303.1 -51% | 1250 103% |
Write 512 | 294.7 | 428.3 45% | 1199 307% | 254.4 -14% | 314.4 7% | 1438 388% |
Read 4k | 42.7 | 41.42 -3% | 51 19% | 20.3 -52% | 25.93 -39% | 44.42 4% |
Write 4k | 153.3 | 137.2 -11% | 142.1 -7% | 42.51 -72% | 84.6 -45% | 154.4 1% |
Read 4k QD32 | 600 | 622 4% | 603 1% | 251.6 -58% | 273.9 -54% | 744 24% |
Write 4k QD32 | 295.3 | 348.3 18% | 382.4 29% | 167.1 -43% | 274.9 -7% | 578 96% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14116 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 107777 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22908 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 11779 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6894 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4729 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 197.1 | 171 | 161 | 103.8 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 196.3 | 150 | 94.8 | 50.8 | 34 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 173 | 151.7 | 105.6 | 89.7 | 36.1 |
XCOM 2 (2016) | 86.4 | 74.9 | 66.1 | 39.2 | 22.8 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 107 | 93 | 83 | 79 | 37 |
Doom (2016) | 147.5 | 140.1 | 125.7 | 116.6 | 49.8 |
No Man's Sky (2016) | 118.6 | 114.5 | 104 | 48.7 | 43.3 |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 72.3 | 70.2 | 43.2 | 19 | |
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 176.3 | 159.5 | 118.9 | 110.1 | 45.7 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33 / 34 / 35 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 2% | 3% | 0% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.4 5% | 29.7 1% | 30 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 32 3% | 31 6% | 31.9 3% | 33.2 -1% | 31 6% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 32 6% | 32 6% | 33.2 2% | 32 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 34 3% | 33 6% | 34 3% | 33.2 5% | 33 6% |
Load Average * | 45 | 41 9% | 49 -9% | 47 -4% | 47.5 -6% | 40 11% |
Load Maximum * | 52 | 51 2% | 50 4% | 49.4 5% | 52.5 -1% | 47 10% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -4% | -4% | -18% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 50.2 -12% | 50 -11% | 50.8 -13% | 59 -31% | 42.9 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 54.3 | 54.1 -0% | 60.5 -11% | 60 -10% | 66 -22% | 41.5 24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.6 | 28.9 2% | 29.1 2% | 27.4 7% | 33.2 -12% | 31.6 -7% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.6 | 24.3 15% | 26.9 6% | 28.8 -1% | 30.6 -7% | 29.5 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Idle | 19 / 25 / 31 Watt |
Load |
90 / 193 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | 11% | -14% | -16% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 19 | 10 47% | 13 32% | 22.6 -19% | 18.4 3% | 24 -26% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 19 24% | 20 20% | 32.7 -31% | 22.8 9% | 31 -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 25 19% | 27 13% | 32.8 -6% | 24 23% | 36 -16% |
Load Average * | 90 | 83 8% | 90 -0% | 114.7 -27% | 175.5 -95% | 94 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 193 | 118 39% | 210 -9% | 167.9 13% | 229.5 -19% | 204 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh | HP Omen 17-w010ng 62 Wh | Nexoc G734III 60 Wh | MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 75.81 Wh | Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | -16% | -25% | -11% | -23% | |
Reader / Idle | 432 | 435 1% | 400 -7% | 353 -18% | 418 -3% | 311 -28% |
H.264 | 233 | 214 -8% | 208 -11% | 186 -20% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 247 | 240 -3% | 177 -28% | 213 -14% | 201 -19% | 210 -15% |
Load | 115 | 76 -34% | 95 -17% | 66 -43% | 103 -10% | 84 -27% |
Pros
Cons
许多人听到惠普这个名字的时候都会想到办公笔记本电脑,不过来自惠普的Omen系列属于游戏设备。这台测试机Omen 17-w110ng可以满足我们对游戏本的期待。用户可以得到强劲的处理器和显卡组合,时尚的机身,不过它完全由塑料材质制成,也没有提供光驱。缺少光驱可能不会是个太大的问题,如果你用Steam这样的游戏平台的话,可以通过下载安装游戏。
比较让我们疑惑的是它的接口配备,它仅仅搭配了3个USB 3.0接口。我们更希望看到至少一个USB 3.1第二代C型接口。惠普也应该再改进一下输入设备。特别是它的触控版,给我们一种比较廉价的感受,不太符合这款设备的定位。它的尺寸不算小巧,6.5厘米的厚度显然不算薄。
考虑到各个方面,惠普Omen 17-w110ng是一台性价比不错的优秀设备。它的游戏性能让人无可挑剔。在运行中它也十分稳定,可以让用户毫无顾虑地享受几乎所有游戏。
这台设备的整体表现十分不错,不过也有我们以上提到的一些问题。它的性能非常优秀,完全可以达到游戏本的水平,这也通过测试成绩得到了证明。英特尔的Core i7-6700HQ处理器带来了对所有应用都充足的性能,由于搭配了强劲的英伟达 GeForce GTX 1070显卡,甚至是高要求的游戏也可以在全高清分辨率下运行(甚至4K)。它1800欧元(约13553人民币)的价位也十分诱人。类似的竞争设备价位都在2000-2500欧元(约15059-18824人民币)之间,因此惠普的Omen系列十分值得考虑。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Omen 17-w110ng
- 10/26/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade